Renji Asuka wrote:Sound4 wrote:Christen57 wrote:
If "on eff" wasn't clear enough for you then you could have stopped and ask them to clarify what they meant — "What do you mean by 'on eff'? Are you saying you wish to respond?" You didn't have to ignore them and keep on playing.
I also don't think 10 seconds in this situation was "excessive time" or the opponent "taking too long" and the judges didn't think so either.
Communicating clearly in DB is key as if you are not it causes issues like this. 10seconds after an effect is a lot if you think about it. There is a good chance he already knew the nachster 2nd effect. What reason would he have to take so long? Which the judge or tge player could not answer.
Doesn't matter, you tried to get a free win and you tried to deny him a response in the N3sh duel.
Considering that is relevant, the only reason you're arguing that "Silence is consent" is literally YOU wanting to deny the window for your opponent to respond so you can play freely.
Man, to think you wouldn't get shittier.
I already said that I would have allowed the response if he responded quicker. I literally had advantage in the duel. Explain how I was at a "disadvantage" which I doubt you can. It is me being realistic there is no reason to take 10 seconds to respond especially when my opponent most likely already knew nachster 2nd effect as he didn't sat anything on him reading or not knowing the effect.