I will use this thread for saving and sharing replays with others
- parhelia_0000
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 3:03 am
- Reputation: 13
- Location: Canada
- Mood:
Re: I will use this thread for saving and sharing replays with others
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=37528-43503592
I swear to fucking god, tag partners who deliberately sabotage my plays are the reason why I really should consider making cards that lock my partner into specific archetypes/Types/Attributes. The way partners constantly sabotage the win conditions is starting to get out of hand.
"BuT I wAnT tO pLaY mY pAtHeTiC cArDs~" Bullshit. I gave you the win condition, YOU SHOULD BE THANKFUL AND USE THE WIN CONDITION WISELY!
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=37528-43504108
I knew slow play would become a problem in DB. This is why we need timers on DB, folks. You'll see this kind of shit stop the moment players realize that they will automatically lose the game if they don't abide by the timer.
I swear to fucking god, tag partners who deliberately sabotage my plays are the reason why I really should consider making cards that lock my partner into specific archetypes/Types/Attributes. The way partners constantly sabotage the win conditions is starting to get out of hand.
"BuT I wAnT tO pLaY mY pAtHeTiC cArDs~" Bullshit. I gave you the win condition, YOU SHOULD BE THANKFUL AND USE THE WIN CONDITION WISELY!
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=37528-43504108
I knew slow play would become a problem in DB. This is why we need timers on DB, folks. You'll see this kind of shit stop the moment players realize that they will automatically lose the game if they don't abide by the timer.
- Lil Oldman
- Posts: 1734
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2018 11:23 pm
- Reputation: 178
- Location: Toontown
- Mood:
"I swear to fucking god, tag partners who deliberately sabotage my plays are the reason why I really should consider making cards that lock my partner into specific archetypes/Types/Attributes. The way partners constantly sabotage the win conditions is starting to get out of hand.
"BuT I wAnT tO pLaY mY pAtHeTiC cArDs~" Bullshit. I gave you the win condition, YOU SHOULD BE THANKFUL AND USE THE WIN CONDITION WISELY!"
"BuT I wAnT tO pLaY mY pAtHeTiC cArDs~" Bullshit. I gave you the win condition, YOU SHOULD BE THANKFUL AND USE THE WIN CONDITION WISELY!"
"Complacency? How rude. I live the stifling life of a high school student in our problematic modern society."
Help I cannot remove this music from my head
https://youtu.be/ZuXI7qcNsHQ
Will try reviewing custom cards if they look interesting.
Help I cannot remove this music from my head
https://youtu.be/ZuXI7qcNsHQ
Will try reviewing custom cards if they look interesting.
parhelia_0000 wrote:https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=37528-43504108
I knew slow play would become a problem in DB. This is why we need timers on DB, folks. You'll see this kind of shit stop the moment players realize that they will automatically lose the game if they don't abide by the timer.
Oh look, someone complaining about slow play in unrated, where nothing matters
Buy Floowandereeze
- Christen57
- Posts: 2039
- Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 10:37 pm
- Reputation: 184
- Location: New York, United States of America
parhelia_0000 wrote:https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=37528-43503592
I swear to fucking god, tag partners who deliberately sabotage my plays are the reason why I really should consider making cards that lock my partner into specific archetypes/Types/Attributes. The way partners constantly sabotage the win conditions is starting to get out of hand.
"BuT I wAnT tO pLaY mY pAtHeTiC cArDs~" Bullshit. I gave you the win condition, YOU SHOULD BE THANKFUL AND USE THE WIN CONDITION WISELY!
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=37528-43504108
I knew slow play would become a problem in DB. This is why we need timers on DB, folks. You'll see this kind of shit stop the moment players realize that they will automatically lose the game if they don't abide by the timer.
A timer may work on an automatic simulator like EDOpro, but it wouldn't work as well here on duelingbook. There are simply too many issues that would arise with adding such a timer, like...
- How much time per turn should each player have?
- What if that amount of time is too short? What if it's too long? How do you determine what the most appropriate amount of time is?
- What happens if the duel gets put on hold due to a ruling dispute? Should the timer keep going or should it pause? If it should pause, how will the timer know when a ruling dispute is happening and when one isn't?
- What if a player is just playing a combo deck that focuses on combos that take multiple minutes long? Should that player automatically lose just because they were playing a combo deck that takes multiple steps to go through a combo? Why should a timer exist that will likely only put combo-oriented players at an unfair disadvantage, and non-combo players at an unfair advantage?
- What about lag? Should a player automatically lose for "slow play" even if it wasn't their fault if duelingbook just started lagging and forcing everyone's moves to become slow?
- Like Greg503 said, why are you complaining about slow play in the first place when it was in an unrated game?
parhelia_0000 wrote:https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=37528-43503592
I swear to fucking god, tag partners who deliberately sabotage my plays are the reason why I really should consider making cards that lock my partner into specific archetypes/Types/Attributes. The way partners constantly sabotage the win conditions is starting to get out of hand.
"BuT I wAnT tO pLaY mY pAtHeTiC cArDs~" Bullshit. I gave you the win condition, YOU SHOULD BE THANKFUL AND USE THE WIN CONDITION WISELY!
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=37528-43504108
I knew slow play would become a problem in DB. This is why we need timers on DB, folks. You'll see this kind of shit stop the moment players realize that they will automatically lose the game if they don't abide by the timer.
Just don't play tag duels in unrated
- Renji Asuka
- Posts: 2685
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2018 4:37 am
- Reputation: 243
Sound4 wrote:parhelia_0000 wrote:https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=37528-43503592
I swear to fucking god, tag partners who deliberately sabotage my plays are the reason why I really should consider making cards that lock my partner into specific archetypes/Types/Attributes. The way partners constantly sabotage the win conditions is starting to get out of hand.
"BuT I wAnT tO pLaY mY pAtHeTiC cArDs~" Bullshit. I gave you the win condition, YOU SHOULD BE THANKFUL AND USE THE WIN CONDITION WISELY!
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=37528-43504108
I knew slow play would become a problem in DB. This is why we need timers on DB, folks. You'll see this kind of shit stop the moment players realize that they will automatically lose the game if they don't abide by the timer.
Just don't play tag duels in unrated
More like don't play tag duels in at all lol
Showing people that I'm The King of Games since September 30, 1996.
- Christen57
- Posts: 2039
- Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 10:37 pm
- Reputation: 184
- Location: New York, United States of America
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=43763826
User gets frozen for insulting his opponent over 110 times and for cheating.
User gets frozen for insulting his opponent over 110 times and for cheating.
Is this person an Aromagirl alt?
His cards have the same patter and design philosophy, weeb art, a lot of petty protection effect, cannot be targeted, cannot be destroyed by battle, unaffected, cannot be tributed, cannot be used as material for anything but their own cards, cannot change type/attribute. Just say you don't like getting outed. As well as many searchers and specials from deck. Also a number monster? God forbid we respect the anime lore.
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=43802850
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=43803635
It doesn't matter how much pretty art and animated stuff you use for your cards to look good, you can never hide the bullshit and the pettiness.
His cards have the same patter and design philosophy, weeb art, a lot of petty protection effect, cannot be targeted, cannot be destroyed by battle, unaffected, cannot be tributed, cannot be used as material for anything but their own cards, cannot change type/attribute. Just say you don't like getting outed. As well as many searchers and specials from deck. Also a number monster? God forbid we respect the anime lore.
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=43802850
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=43803635
It doesn't matter how much pretty art and animated stuff you use for your cards to look good, you can never hide the bullshit and the pettiness.
vs Bakugan custom deck
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=106567-43857984
Just saying, how effects interact with cards is part of what makes Yugioh different from other games, this is not "whoever has the biggest vanilla wins" game, and it never was, even Yugi-Kaiba had ways of removal alternative to battle, also he says "we fight the old fashioned way" but his field spell cancels battle damage?, and then he gets upset when I play backrow removal on him (still can't out the field spell because it's unaffected by all effects). Just saying, if you make a card that completely changes the way yugioh is played at its core to try to imitate another game's mechanics, then you don't really want to play Yugioh, just play a different game, or get someone in private that wants to play the game your way.
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=106567-43857984
Just saying, how effects interact with cards is part of what makes Yugioh different from other games, this is not "whoever has the biggest vanilla wins" game, and it never was, even Yugi-Kaiba had ways of removal alternative to battle, also he says "we fight the old fashioned way" but his field spell cancels battle damage?, and then he gets upset when I play backrow removal on him (still can't out the field spell because it's unaffected by all effects). Just saying, if you make a card that completely changes the way yugioh is played at its core to try to imitate another game's mechanics, then you don't really want to play Yugioh, just play a different game, or get someone in private that wants to play the game your way.
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=106567-43867117
https://imgur.com/hn9OHtr
Something that is lamer than making OP cards is taking already existing card and giving them better effects, I don't care if "they suck by today's standards", either make something original or try to adapt older decks by supporting them with newer cards, but just tuning up decks because you don't like how they aged is just lazy and cheap, without saying it's misleading to people that already know the actual cards and they're aware of what they're capable of. If you like an old deck, you should like it WITH THEIR FLAWS INCLUDED. As much as I love Gustos, I know they're slow and can't keep up, but not because of that I'm going to remake them with the 10 consistency boosting effects and specials from deck they need to be "competitive", that's just being a hypocrite.
https://imgur.com/hn9OHtr
Something that is lamer than making OP cards is taking already existing card and giving them better effects, I don't care if "they suck by today's standards", either make something original or try to adapt older decks by supporting them with newer cards, but just tuning up decks because you don't like how they aged is just lazy and cheap, without saying it's misleading to people that already know the actual cards and they're aware of what they're capable of. If you like an old deck, you should like it WITH THEIR FLAWS INCLUDED. As much as I love Gustos, I know they're slow and can't keep up, but not because of that I'm going to remake them with the 10 consistency boosting effects and specials from deck they need to be "competitive", that's just being a hypocrite.
- Renji Asuka
- Posts: 2685
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2018 4:37 am
- Reputation: 243
Fredblade wrote:https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=106567-43867117
https://imgur.com/hn9OHtr
Something that is lamer than making OP cards is taking already existing card and giving them better effects, I don't care if "they suck by today's standards", either make something original or try to adapt older decks by supporting them with newer cards, but just tuning up decks because you don't like how they aged is just lazy and cheap, without saying it's misleading to people that already know the actual cards and they're aware of what they're capable of. If you like an old deck, you should like it WITH THEIR FLAWS INCLUDED. As much as I love Gustos, I know they're slow and can't keep up, but not because of that I'm going to remake them with the 10 consistency boosting effects and specials from deck they need to be "competitive", that's just being a hypocrite.
Gate Guardian: How dare you!
Showing people that I'm The King of Games since September 30, 1996.
- parhelia_0000
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 3:03 am
- Reputation: 13
- Location: Canada
- Mood:
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=37528-43876983
That feeling with you clap a Synchro board with Potions Class fusion spell.
Ironbelly's ATK at the time of scoop phase is 368000.
That feeling with you clap a Synchro board with Potions Class fusion spell.
Ironbelly's ATK at the time of scoop phase is 368000.
- Lil Oldman
- Posts: 1734
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2018 11:23 pm
- Reputation: 178
- Location: Toontown
- Mood:
Me when the broken deck is broken
"Complacency? How rude. I live the stifling life of a high school student in our problematic modern society."
Help I cannot remove this music from my head
https://youtu.be/ZuXI7qcNsHQ
Will try reviewing custom cards if they look interesting.
Help I cannot remove this music from my head
https://youtu.be/ZuXI7qcNsHQ
Will try reviewing custom cards if they look interesting.
Customs
Jewelmancer vs Warrior of Zil
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=106567-43868198
Why is people's concept of control deck making "Lose 1 turn" a field spell? That floodgate is just annoying, but it served as testing for how my deck can do against those situations, also tributing opponent's monsters to summon yours without any need of other cards and you keep the monster, that's very balanced for sure.
Jewelmancer vs Warrior of Zil
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=106567-43868198
Why is people's concept of control deck making "Lose 1 turn" a field spell? That floodgate is just annoying, but it served as testing for how my deck can do against those situations, also tributing opponent's monsters to summon yours without any need of other cards and you keep the monster, that's very balanced for sure.
- Christen57
- Posts: 2039
- Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 10:37 pm
- Reputation: 184
- Location: New York, United States of America
- parhelia_0000
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 3:03 am
- Reputation: 13
- Location: Canada
- Mood:
- parhelia_0000
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 3:03 am
- Reputation: 13
- Location: Canada
- Mood:
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=37528-44025826
How to beat a deck that has Spell Speed 4 cards 101: Use your OWN Spell Speed 4 cards first, BEFORE your opponent gets a chance to use them!
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=37528-44020099
Man still tried to burn me under Lavender's effect XDDD This is what happens when you do not read cards, bruvs.
How to beat a deck that has Spell Speed 4 cards 101: Use your OWN Spell Speed 4 cards first, BEFORE your opponent gets a chance to use them!
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=37528-44020099
Man still tried to burn me under Lavender's effect XDDD This is what happens when you do not read cards, bruvs.
parhelia_0000 wrote:https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=37528-44025826
How to beat a deck that has Spell Speed 4 cards 101: Use your OWN Spell Speed 4 cards first, BEFORE your opponent gets a chance to use them!
So you're just beating toxic cards by being toxic yourself. Congratulations, you're just part of the problem.
parhelia_0000 wrote:https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=37528-44020099
Man still tried to burn me under Lavender's effect XDDD This is what happens when you do not read cards, bruvs.
To be fair, I don't blame people for not being bothered about reading your cards, all of them are loaded with bullshit. Also remember people like Futuregamer already said, for many people, this is the first time they see your cards, so of course they won't know how to play against them, specially if they have to read an essay for each of them; you have to make them as pleasant to read as possible, and not loading them with tons of effects that do many different things is the first step.
- parhelia_0000
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 3:03 am
- Reputation: 13
- Location: Canada
- Mood:
Fredblade wrote:parhelia_0000 wrote:https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=37528-44025826
How to beat a deck that has Spell Speed 4 cards 101: Use your OWN Spell Speed 4 cards first, BEFORE your opponent gets a chance to use them!
So you're just beating toxic cards by being toxic yourself. Congratulations, you're just part of the problem.parhelia_0000 wrote:https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=37528-44020099
Man still tried to burn me under Lavender's effect XDDD This is what happens when you do not read cards, bruvs.
To be fair, I don't blame people for not being bothered about reading your cards, all of them are loaded with bullshit. Also remember people like Futuregamer already said, for many people, this is the first time they see your cards, so of course they won't know how to play against them, specially if they have to read an essay for each of them; you have to make them as pleasant to read as possible, and not loading them with tons of effects that do many different things is the first step.
I don't take advice from people who spew death threats towards others and ends up getting banned from this site. My policy is very clear - it doesn't matter how good the advice is, if they spew death threats towards ANYONE, resort to violence, and/or gets banned from this site, their advice are immediately nullified.
To quote the wise Glenn Fricker, if you have to resort to violence to get your point across, it's not a strong point that holds any value.
- DarwisBellium92
- Posts: 596
- Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2019 6:04 pm
- Reputation: 16
- Location: Italy
- Mood:
parhelia_0000 wrote:Fredblade wrote:parhelia_0000 wrote:https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=37528-44025826
How to beat a deck that has Spell Speed 4 cards 101: Use your OWN Spell Speed 4 cards first, BEFORE your opponent gets a chance to use them!
So you're just beating toxic cards by being toxic yourself. Congratulations, you're just part of the problem.parhelia_0000 wrote:https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=37528-44020099
Man still tried to burn me under Lavender's effect XDDD This is what happens when you do not read cards, bruvs.
To be fair, I don't blame people for not being bothered about reading your cards, all of them are loaded with bullshit. Also remember people like Futuregamer already said, for many people, this is the first time they see your cards, so of course they won't know how to play against them, specially if they have to read an essay for each of them; you have to make them as pleasant to read as possible, and not loading them with tons of effects that do many different things is the first step.
I don't take advice from people who spew death threats towards others and ends up getting banned from this site. My policy is very clear - it doesn't matter how good the advice is, if they spew death threats towards ANYONE, resort to violence, and/or gets banned from this site, their advice are immediately nullified.
To quote the wise Glenn Fricker, if you have to resort to violence to get your point across, it's not a strong point that holds any value.
You are very cringe on your part with these scenes that you make, now I understand that they put people on the sidelines.
Im cardmaker pioneer with 15 years experience, KONAMI member illustrator and 360 degrees artist
Albaz/Branded and Gem-Knight/Tearlaments/Shaddoll player
"Not crediting an artist for your crappy custom cards is a world crime."
Cit.
Albaz/Branded and Gem-Knight/Tearlaments/Shaddoll player
"Not crediting an artist for your crappy custom cards is a world crime."
Cit.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 169 guests