Off Topic » Spam Paradise

Since there's no way to make your replays public on your profile, I have decide to create a thread that I will use for saving and sharing replays. Many people will save replays on their profile, but that will eventually clog and clutter up their profile and make them reach the character limit, so I figured here is a better place for saving and sharing my replays, and replays of others that I find funny or interesting.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=16584663

A random tag duel I stumbled across in customs, where one team accuses the other of making broken custom cards and then they start insulting each other.

Not once per turn, naturia beast on monsters... come on. The fact is not that "flitter_winda" made a monster like that by -mistake- but, who does even think on making such a card? is like I make a link 1 monster with a naturia beast effect but negating special summons, seriously dude? lmao.

And the other guy.. the amount of effects on his cards (monsters/traps), that Xyz thing is a Chaos MAX Dragon with steroids.

I find as a nice idea to make threads like this to "expose" (in guess we can call it in that way) broken/unfair custom cards/players.

Each of this guy's cards are a Naturia Beast.
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=479240-16606057

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=58994-16449397

A competitive match between me and a magical muskeet player. It was fun and intense.

someone's replay where a "garbage pendulum noob loses to lightsworn"
https://imgur.com/KeApHud
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=486894-16621982

Just a quick question, can other people post their replays on here too?

[quote="Darkraiclone":3b0cmbt6]Just a quick question, can other people post their replays on here too?[/quote:3b0cmbt6]

I guess. I think it's a good idea as opposed to having hundreds of people making their own threads with their replays, but at the same time, having 1 thread where hundreds of people share their replays could make it look messy.

So far, there aren't any rules specifically prohibiting others from sharing their replay on this thread. If you have a really good replay, I encourage you to share it.

Anyways, this is a replay of 2 people arguing for over an hour straight, about something.
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=11255398

[quote="Christen57":1gggbxxv][quote="Darkraiclone":1gggbxxv]Just a quick question, can other people post their replays on here too?[/quote:1gggbxxv]

I guess. I think it's a good idea as opposed to having hundreds of people making their own threads with their replays, but at the same time, having 1 thread where hundreds of people share their replays could make it look messy.

So far, there aren't any rules specifically prohibiting others from sharing their replay on this thread. If you have a really good replay, I encourage you to share it.

Anyways, this is a replay of 2 people arguing for over an hour straight, about something.
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=11255398[/quote:1gggbxxv]
That is pretty fair.

CrystalMusic Quits to unreasonable "Noob", He should get banned by now...
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=17104078

Another replay of CrystalMusic lashing out at someone for no good reason and insulting them: https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=17162913

And another replay of CrystalMusic getting mad at the opponent for playing a level 4 with 2000 ATK even though level 4's with 2000 ATK like Alexandrite Dragon already exist. https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=17162465

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=243903-17175460
First gen cards crystal doesn't like are no longer first gen

[quote="Debt":2fpz6qgs]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=243903-17175460
First gen cards crystal doesn't like are no longer first gen[/quote:2fpz6qgs]
Could've sworn CrystalMusic only played in customs...

Person get's mad at opponent for using Links when they could have just played in classic https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=17198112

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=17201950 totally fair and balanced

An Honorable Duel Against Jaden and Aster
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=90641-15016778

[quote="james123":2eeutq56]CrystalMusic Quits to unreasonable "Noob", He should get banned by now...
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=17104078[/quote:2eeutq56]
I'm honestly not sure if the guy was a noob or if he was just trolling Crystal.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=17296500
Probably the world's first duelingbook duel to have over 100 watchers.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=187240-17312245
Someone calls a judge over something that happened multiple turns ago.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=58994-17363550
Custom Dragonmaids vs custom Madolches

Me dueling my Good Ol' Friend while Rivers in the Deserts Plays over...
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=90641-11604854

Glad there's a forum where you can also post your own Replay here.
So, i need to vent out something, it's not a big deal, i just wanted to vent out some steam and stress.
Well, in short, i dueled CrystalMusic.
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=471916-17102957
I hope i get calmer.

Six judge calls in a row, along with insults/name-calling being thrown back and forth
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=17404346

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=17405650
Noob struggles to do first grade math, so judge has to come and teach it to them before giving beginner status.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=58994-17415325
pendulum magicians got a much needed buff thanks to master rule 5, now we see how they fare against shaddolls.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=17457876
[0:00] CrystalMusic: CrystalMusic hosted Single (with siding) in Custom Cards (Unrated) with duel note "LIGHT VS DARK. Im using LIGHT. No Pends."
[0:52] Paradox888: Activated "Toon Table of Contents" from hand (2/5)
[0:55] Paradox888: Viewed deck
[0:55] CrystalMusic: "bye"
[0:58] CrystalMusic: " isai ddark vs light"
[1:01] Paradox888: Stopped viewing Deck
[1:01] Paradox888: Shuffled deck
[1:01] CrystalMusic: "not toons vs light"
[1:06] Paradox888: "toons can be dark"
[1:19] CrystalMusic: "the ENTIRE deck has to be based purely on DARK mosnters"
[1:24] CrystalMusic: Left duel

Keep in mind that as CrystalMusic bashes his opponent for using monsters with different attributes, you can see in CrystalMusic's own hand that he himself also uses monsters with different attributes.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=17456821
Crystal breaks another one of his rules

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=17458797
Hittagamer from DN is officially active again and returns to his old tricks.

[quote="Christen57":1msf0iru]Six judge calls in a row, along with insults/name-calling being thrown back and forth
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=17404346

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=17405650
Noob struggles to do first grade math, so judge has to come and teach it to them before giving beginner status.[/quote:1msf0iru]
That first replay with the judge calls, they were both bad.....

Especially at the ending, the guy declared the effect of Dark Destroyer, so he has to destroy his own Dark Destroyer...

Then you have the other guy claiming the other cheated....when he didn't......then tries to lie to the judge for a free win....

[quote="Debt":144flgfq]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=17456821
Crystal breaks another one of his rules[/quote:144flgfq]
Makes you wonder why he needs to have all those rules that he has on his profile. He seems to be capable of winning real games just fine without them, and without having to resort to using broken customs either...

A Mirror Match Duel that went very well https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=90641-16018920

Some old replays of CrystalMusic, documented on youtube.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=13686598
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-HRI7mXG4K4

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=3096-3995251
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ye_8aV0m4c

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=17555930
Notice how CrystalMusic bashes his opponent for using "powerups" while he himself has a field spell in his hand that powers up his beast-warriors.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=17556230
So if CrystalMusic says that Egyptian Gods are meta, they're meta...

I couldn't find the replay cause this was a long time ago but

https://i.imgur.com/sJpTQjH.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/Ta0pCcU.png

This is either proof that Galaxy is terrible, or Injection Fairy Lily is busted.

[quote="Renji Asuka":1a9zyrzn]I couldn't find the replay cause this was a long time ago but

https://i.imgur.com/sJpTQjH.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/Ta0pCcU.png

This is either proof that Galaxy is terrible, or Injection Fairy Lily is busted.[/quote:1a9zyrzn]
You should be able to go to your Duel Records, and change the thing from "Current" to "All Time" and search for their username, to find the replay.

Unfortunately....https://imgur.com/V8aYtZV

Can't even link the replay lol

Hmm. This duel must have occurred before replays were introduced to duelingbook.

That's what I'm thinking.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=58994-17730503
You guys be the judge here. Is it true that it was too late for me to respond with my monster's effect like my opponent said, or was my opponent playing too fast without giving me the chance to respond? There was no objective clear-cut way for either of us to tell, although I will admit I got distracted by some noise behind me where I was sitting and didn't notice my opponent playing trap cards and going to their end phase, so when I turned back to my screen, I saw that my opponent had already gone to the end phase and I wanted to rewind the gamestate so I could respond with my monster's effect because I wasn't paying attention...

Honestly, I can't say, since we can't see the time stamps. However, you do always have the right to respond to a card.

[quote="Renji Asuka":3e2bj7lo]Honestly, I can't say, since we can't see the time stamps.[/quote:3e2bj7lo]
Sure you can.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=58994-17733739
What do you do when you're playing a terrible deck and you know you're gonna lose to pendulums? Simple. Just play really really fast without giving your opponent any opportunity to respond to your attack declarations or card effects, repeatedly call a judge and cancel it, over and over, to waste more and more time, and act like a rule-shark while you're at it! Then when the judge finally comes and rules against you, just argue and argue instead of complying with the judge so that you are issued a game loss. Finally, offer your opponent a rematch, wait for them to accept it, and then just go offline, giving them another free win. Harharharharharharharhar!!11!

I forgot those were buttons

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=204201-17823769
Don't know if this guy should be reported for asking inappropriate questions.

Whelp, can't play yugioh anyone 'till the next banlist comes out and the pole position combo is banned https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=58994-17830160

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=58994-17833884
Dark Ruler No More has become the new Wavering Eyes. Broken in the mirror match. Not so broken otherwise.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=17833957
We got one guy crying cheating, the other crying racism. Then Resource Judge 1245 arrives, and so does another judge because they then wanted to appeal this, and he wanted to appeal that, and it gets worse from there.

[quote="Christen57":bq90qu99]Whelp, can't play yugioh anyone 'till the next banlist comes out and the pole position combo is banned https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=58994-17830160[/quote:bq90qu99]
Double whelp, I just found out that the judge who came to this duel of mine recorded the whole thing and uploaded it to twitch. https://www.twitch.tv/videos/607184696?t=3h20m34s

[quote="Christen57":354smils]Whelp, can't play yugioh anyone 'till the next banlist comes out and the pole position combo is banned https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=58994-17830160[/quote:354smils]
This replay, turn 1...13 minutes 8 Seconds to end....and people wonder why I quit most games if I do play....I don't want to sit there watching the opponent play, I have no patience for that x)

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=58994-18924636
My first time trying out duelingbook's new "Declare" feature in rated on cards. Feels great that I finally don't have to keep typing "eff" in the chat everytime I want to do a combo. I'm finally getting to duel using just my right hand.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=58994-18973778

Guy gets mad at me for reminding him that his burning abyss monsters destroys itself since he controls a non-burning abyss monster...

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=58994-19008290

It's nice to know i'll be able to keep doing these epic combos for the next 2 months.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=19063219

HEROs are now a force to be reckoned with!

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=58994-19164642

F.A. Dawn Dragster + Borreload Savage Dragon + Herald of the Arc Light + Union Carrier + Dragon Buster Destruction Sword + Abyss Dweller = automatic victory

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=58994-19347967
My opponent calls a judge and forgets to cancel the call, and on my screen it looked like cancelled it, but apparently on their screen it shows they didn't, so it was an awkward moment.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=7005-4065626
Not my replay, but this person didn't seem to understand how chains work, and when the opponent explained it to him he accused that opponent of rule-sharking.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=7005-3114216
Another replay that isn't mine, but this time the opponent is saying that the other player is playing Ojamas which the opponent labels "a troll deck".

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=402473-9533325
This replay is over a year old, but looking at the logs of this replay, these players toss coins repeatedly nonstop, before they begin insulting each other and using the n-word.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=58994-19353979
Discovered this brand new combo on youtube that starts with Isolde and ends with Naturia Exterio + The Last Warrior From Another Planet

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=58994-19354155
After I summoned The Last Warrior From Another Plant + Naturia Exterio, my opponent tried to stall and deck me out, but my Sword of Deep-Seated made that impossible

[quote="Christen57":3k3e3iat]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=58994-19354155
After I summoned The Last Warrior From Another Plant + Naturia Exterio, my opponent tried to stall and deck me out, but my Sword of Deep-Seated made that impossible [/quote:3k3e3iat]
That right there, is spicy af

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=58994-19379745
My opponent says the reason I play Adamancipator is 'cause I have rocks for brains.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=58994-19417308
My first time surviving having my board wiped by Nibiru and still managing to scrap together a victory, but I still ended up losing game 3 because I made the mistake of siding in my 3 Lighting Storm instead of my 3 Dark Ruler No More.

https://www.twitch.tv/videos/660212317?t=1h43m32s
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/660212317?t=1h51m45s
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/660212317?t=2h36m46s

I have officially been dubbed "The Pikachu Guy" by DistantCoder and his gang, in the twitch chat xD

Looks like the twitch videos got deleted... oh well.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=58994-19461075
My opponent's own trap backfires against them.

I was hosting a Custom Rush Duel and someone quitted from good design
ttps://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=90641-19580182

[quote="james123":16k8i5ux]I was hosting a Custom Rush Duel and someone quitted from good design
ttps://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=90641-19580182[/quote:16k8i5ux]

Fixed it for you: https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=90641-19580182

Also, who plays cards that banish themselves at the start of the duel?

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=19997171
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=19997842

So let me get this straight: A Goblindbergh that prevents you from going into the battle phase the turn you use it's effect, and a Mystical Space Typhoon, are both too powerful, but a custom generic level 4 that is immune to pretty much everything and can special summon itself for free isn't?

What happens if you abuse the power of the creator of this thread's Cocoon deck
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=90641-19837850

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=20006063
MST is op but this one-sided CED is perfectly balanced

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=58994-20237930
It appears that asking someone to put proper psct on their cards and word it better makes me a "noob".

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=20246669
Instead of simply playing Nibiru to counter decks that "spam summon" CrystalMusic plays a custom that is essentially Nibiru, but on steroids.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=20246562
CrystalMusic has 2 cards in hand, and still gets angry at the opponent for flipping Morphing Jar even though CrystalMusic would get to go plus 3 in terms of card advantage.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=470417-20250064

A replay someone posted

[quote="james123":kznxq0jo]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=470417-20250064

A replay someone posted[/quote:kznxq0jo]

CrystalMusic broke most of his own rules :/
He uses monster removal, uses axe of despair, uses exodia, and normal summons a monster with over 2400 atk for 1 tribute, all of which he would rage at other people for.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=20250510
Not my replay, but I miss being able to check the opponent's hand for monsters after playing a card like Royal Tribute. Sure you can look at the replay afterwards to see if they lied/cheated, but you should also be able to see their main deck too for cards like Abyssal Designator.

Same as before...
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=370552-20051083
But this time... This is an Example of how you get frozen for Harassament

(I wouldn't explain how I didn't get frozen again by that stupid Comrade! )

[quote="Christen57":2acgy5qj][quote="james123":2acgy5qj]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=470417-20250064

A replay someone posted[/quote:2acgy5qj]

CrystalMusic broke most of his own rules :/
He uses monster removal, uses axe of despair, uses exodia, and normal summons a monster with over 2400 atk for 1 tribute, all of which he would rage at other people for.[/quote:2acgy5qj]

1: i dont mind exodia as long as ur not using "Draw" power to aquire him
2: i never said i hate cards with more than 2400 original atk for 1 tribute. its anything over the atk of summoned skull(2500 ATK) for 1 tribute that i think is to powerful
3: in the "1st gen only" duels: the only "Removal" i allow is battle or trap (excluding S/T removals like dust tornado or Jinzo as he basically makes the rule: No removal except by battle or trap" useless. Negations do not count as removal to me.
4: i only use axe of despair on cards with very high original ATK (3200 or more) like sorcerer of dark magic or Blue-eyes Ultimate Dragon. to make massive 4K + atk beatsticks

[quote="CrystalMusic":3o7lkrj4][quote="Christen57":3o7lkrj4][quote="james123":3o7lkrj4]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=470417-20250064

A replay someone posted[/quote:3o7lkrj4]

CrystalMusic broke most of his own rules :/
He uses monster removal, uses axe of despair, uses exodia, and normal summons a monster with over 2400 atk for 1 tribute, all of which he would rage at other people for.[/quote:3o7lkrj4]

1: i dont mind exodia as long as ur not using "Draw" power to aquire him
2: i never said i hate cards with more than 2400 original atk for 1 tribute. its anything over the atk of summoned skull(2500 ATK) for 1 tribute that i think is to powerful
3: in the "1st gen only" duels: the only "Removal" i allow is battle or trap (excluding S/T removals like dust tornado or Jinzo as he basically makes the rule: No removal except by battle or trap". Negations do not count as removal to me.
4: i only use axe of despair on cards with very high original ATK (3200 or more) like sorcerer of dark magic or Blue-eyes Ultimate Dragon. to make massive 4K + atk beatsticks[/quote:3o7lkrj4]
Interesting 3rd point, considering how you rage quit to Jinzo anyway: https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-20219109

[1:15] darkathem: Activated "Dark Magic Veil" from hand (4/6)
[1:18] darkathem: Lost 1000 LP
[1:21] darkathem: Special Summoned "Dark Magician" from hand (5/5) to M-3 (ATK)
[1:23] darkathem: Sent "Dark Magic Veil" from S-4 to GY
[1:25] darkathem: Sent "Dark Magician" from M-3 to GY
[1:27] darkathem: Normal Summoned "Jinzo" from hand (1/4) to M-3
[1:29] darkathem: Pointed at "Gravity Bind" in S-3
[1:30] CrystalMusic: "no"
[1:33] CrystalMusic: "that counts as removal"
[1:38] CrystalMusic: Pointed at "Jinzo" in M-3
[1:40] CrystalMusic: Left duel

[quote="NiwatoriFTW":16awzgei][quote="CrystalMusic":16awzgei][quote="Christen57":16awzgei]

CrystalMusic broke most of his own rules :/
He uses monster removal, uses axe of despair, uses exodia, and normal summons a monster with over 2400 atk for 1 tribute, all of which he would rage at other people for.[/quote:16awzgei]

1: i dont mind exodia as long as ur not using "Draw" power to aquire him
2: i never said i hate cards with more than 2400 original atk for 1 tribute. its anything over the atk of summoned skull(2500 ATK) for 1 tribute that i think is to powerful
3: in the "1st gen only" duels: the only "Removal" i allow is battle or trap (excluding S/T removals like dust tornado or Jinzo as he basically makes the rule: No removal except by battle or trap". Negations do not count as removal to me.
4: i only use axe of despair on cards with very high original ATK (3200 or more) like sorcerer of dark magic or Blue-eyes Ultimate Dragon. to make massive 4K + atk beatsticks[/quote:16awzgei]
Interesting 3rd point, considering how you rage quit to Jinzo anyway: https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-20219109

[1:15] darkathem: Activated "Dark Magic Veil" from hand (4/6)
[1:18] darkathem: Lost 1000 LP
[1:21] darkathem: Special Summoned "Dark Magician" from hand (5/5) to M-3 (ATK)
[1:23] darkathem: Sent "Dark Magic Veil" from S-4 to GY
[1:25] darkathem: Sent "Dark Magician" from M-3 to GY
[1:27] darkathem: Normal Summoned "Jinzo" from hand (1/4) to M-3
[1:29] darkathem: Pointed at "Gravity Bind" in S-3
[1:30] CrystalMusic: "no"
[1:33] CrystalMusic: "that counts as removal"
[1:38] CrystalMusic: Pointed at "Jinzo" in M-3
[1:40] CrystalMusic: Left duel

[/quote:16awzgei]

before i came along, next to no one used jinzo on here. so i dont like when ppl use my boi against me. get your own strategy!

[quote="CrystalMusic":3vjvfrse]before i came along, next to no one used jinzo on here. so i dont like when ppl use my boi against me. get your own strategy![/quote:3vjvfrse]
That really doesn't solve the hypocrisy of your claims, though. Your back and forth with your rules can give logic some whiplash.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-20296153 ok how about this one guys? Isaak adds "Dark Magic Circle" with "Terraforming".

as for me admiting defeat? to quickly share this.

[quote="CrystalMusic":6zhkm3gc]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-20296153 ok how about this one guys? Isaak adds "Dark Magic Circle" with "Terraforming".

as for me admiting defeat? to quickly share this.[/quote:6zhkm3gc]
The hypocrisy issue still remains, despite you trying to change the subject. Also, I don't know, you could have tried a bit more to taught Isaak something instead of shaming him to no end.

[quote="NiwatoriFTW":iaj80gc0][quote="CrystalMusic":iaj80gc0]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-20296153 ok how about this one guys? Isaak adds "Dark Magic Circle" with "Terraforming".

as for me admiting defeat? to quickly share this.[/quote:iaj80gc0]
The hypocrisy issue still remains, despite you trying to change the subject. Also, I don't know, you could have tried a bit more to taught Isaak something instead of shaming him to no end.[/quote:iaj80gc0]

"Shaming"
Oh im sorry! isnt that what this whole tread is???

[quote="CrystalMusic":rgrjw2j2][quote="NiwatoriFTW":rgrjw2j2][quote="CrystalMusic":rgrjw2j2]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-20296153 ok how about this one guys? Isaak adds "Dark Magic Circle" with "Terraforming".

as for me admiting defeat? to quickly share this.[/quote:rgrjw2j2]
The hypocrisy issue still remains, despite you trying to change the subject. Also, I don't know, you could have tried a bit more to taught Isaak something instead of shaming him to no end.[/quote:rgrjw2j2]

"Shaming"
Oh im sorry! isnt that what this whole tread is???[/quote:rgrjw2j2]
No, this thread is designed for sharing replays of actual duels. Not shaming people like you do on a daily basis.

youre basically immortalizing the replays and some of those replays are of me, and when ppl show these replays of me, they are "shaming" so how is that any different?

Exposing your malicious behavior is not the same as you shitting on someone

[quote="CrystalMusic":1gk2ul6a]youre basically immortalizing the replays and some of those replays are of me, and when ppl show these replays of me, they are "shaming" so how is that any different?[/quote:1gk2ul6a]

Because you throw a temper tantrum like a spoiled child if:

- You don't win the duel.
- Someone doesn't follow your arbitrary, one-sided and ill-researched rules.
- Someone violates your banlist which is essentially 3/4 of the entire card game.
- Someone rightfully calls you out on harassment with evidence to support such claim.
- Someone calls you out on your pathological lies.
- Someone calls you out on a witch hunt forum post that YOU made.
- Someone tries to tell you that you're hindering yourself by not adapting to the game.
- Someone tells you all your cards are broken. (Which they are.)
- You are told the duel notes are not contracts.

[quote="LightCaster":1tkjxl4b][quote="CrystalMusic":1tkjxl4b]youre basically immortalizing the replays and some of those replays are of me, and when ppl show these replays of me, they are "shaming" so how is that any different?[/quote:1tkjxl4b]

Because you throw a temper tantrum like a spoiled child if:

- You don't win the duel.
- Someone doesn't follow your arbitrary, one-sided and ill-researched rules.
- Someone violates your banlist which is essentially 3/4 of the entire card game.
- Someone rightfully calls you out on harassment with evidence to support such claim.
- Someone calls you out on your pathological lies.
- Someone calls you out on a witch hunt forum post that YOU made.
- Someone tries to tell you that you're hindering yourself by not adapting to the game.
- Someone tells you all your cards are broken. (Which they are.)
- You are told the duel notes are not contracts.[/quote:1tkjxl4b]

ok:
1: why would u join someone, who has a ruleset for their duel, fully knowing you have no intent to obey that ruleset unless youre doing so to troll them or piss them off?
2: you want me to "adapt" to a format that is absolute garbage? HA! thats rich!
3: no one has ever said all my cards are broken. because believe it or not alot of ppl like my custom cards i made for the following:
"Crystal Beasts"
"Vampires"
not to mention the following custom decks:
"Zelda"
"Code Lyoko"
"US Armed Forces"
"Power Rangers"
"Star Wars"
"Transformers"
"Lord of The Rings"
"Destiny"

these decks actually have gotten alot of positive feedback TYVM!!!

[quote="CrystalMusic":bsakacfn][quote="LightCaster":bsakacfn][quote="CrystalMusic":bsakacfn]youre basically immortalizing the replays and some of those replays are of me, and when ppl show these replays of me, they are "shaming" so how is that any different?[/quote:bsakacfn]

Because you throw a temper tantrum like a spoiled child if:

- You don't win the duel.
- Someone doesn't follow your arbitrary, one-sided and ill-researched rules.
- Someone violates your banlist which is essentially 3/4 of the entire card game.
- Someone rightfully calls you out on harassment with evidence to support such claim.
- Someone calls you out on your pathological lies.
- Someone calls you out on a witch hunt forum post that YOU made.
- Someone tries to tell you that you're hindering yourself by not adapting to the game.
- Someone tells you all your cards are broken. (Which they are.)
- You are told the duel notes are not contracts.[/quote:bsakacfn]

ok:
1: why would u join someone, who has a ruleset for their duel, fully knowing you have no intent to obey that ruleset unless youre doing so to troll them or piss them off?
2: you want me to "adapt" to a format that is absolute garbage? HA! thats rich!
3: no one has ever said all my cards are broken. because believe it or not alot of ppl like my custom cards i made for the following:
"Crystal Beasts"
"Vampires"[/quote:bsakacfn]

"Knowing they have no intent to obey that ruleset." No idiot worth their fucking salt is going to read that giant fucking list of arbitrary, and in case you didn't know what "arbitrary" means: It means pointless/unneeded, rules that you have imposed ONLY for your opponent and not yourself because, honestly, you don't follow your own fucking rules.

It's not just me that wants you to adapt. It's every person that has posted on your forum posts as well, that's how you get BETTER at the game, ADAPTING TO THE GAME. If you can't do that then you just plainly suck and that's not any of our issue, that's yours.

Not a lot of people say it because not a lot of people have dueled you to know that you only make busted shit. I've seen your vampires, they're busted, those who say they are probably on your level of skill. Which is barely even casual and create custom cards for fun. You do it to feed your pathetically fragile ego.

[quote="LightCaster":a98vwshd][quote="CrystalMusic":a98vwshd][quote="LightCaster":a98vwshd]

Because you throw a temper tantrum like a spoiled child if:

- You don't win the duel.
- Someone doesn't follow your arbitrary, one-sided and ill-researched rules.
- Someone violates your banlist which is essentially 3/4 of the entire card game.
- Someone rightfully calls you out on harassment with evidence to support such claim.
- Someone calls you out on your pathological lies.
- Someone calls you out on a witch hunt forum post that YOU made.
- Someone tries to tell you that you're hindering yourself by not adapting to the game.
- Someone tells you all your cards are broken. (Which they are.)
- You are told the duel notes are not contracts.[/quote:a98vwshd]

ok:
1: why would u join someone, who has a ruleset for their duel, fully knowing you have no intent to obey that ruleset unless youre doing so to troll them or piss them off?
2: you want me to "adapt" to a format that is absolute garbage? HA! thats rich!
3: no one has ever said all my cards are broken. because believe it or not alot of ppl like my custom cards i made for the following:
"Crystal Beasts"
"Vampires"[/quote:a98vwshd]

"Knowing they have no intent to obey that ruleset." No idiot worth their fucking salt is going to read that giant fucking list of arbitrary, and in case you didn't know what "arbitrary" means: It means pointless/unneeded, rules that you have imposed ONLY for your opponent and not yourself because, honestly, you don't follow your own fucking rules.

It's not just me that wants you to adapt. It's every person that has posted on your forum posts as well, that's how you get BETTER at the game, ADAPTING TO THE GAME. If you can't do that then you just plainly suck and that's not any of our issue, that's yours.

Not a lot of people say it because not a lot of people have dueled you to know that you only make busted shit. I've seen your vampires, they're busted, those who say they are probably on your level of skill. Which is barely even casual and create custom cards for fun. You do it to feed your pathetically fragile ego.[/quote:a98vwshd]

i have a fragile ego? look whos talking!!!! all you ever do is berate, insult, swear, and reply negatively to everything i say, share, post or do. and for what? to make yourself feel better about your pathetic and miserable life? HA! now THAT is rich!

[quote="CrystalMusic":2j6sw2v2]
"Crystal Beasts"
"Vampires"
not to mention the following custom decks:
"Zelda"
"Code Lyoko"
"US Armed Forces"
"Power Rangers"
"Star Wars"
"Transformers"
"Lord of The Rings"
"Destiny"

these decks actually have gotten alot of positive feedback TYVM!!![/quote:2j6sw2v2]
Your transformers deck literally shuts down all decks that aren't light machines. Your zelda deck has extra deck traps. How do you justify saying hand traps are for noobs when you have the same thing but way better since comes from the extra deck so it's always available and almost permanent. Code lyoko has some wacky catch 22 that makes it unbeatable but I don't remember it immediately.

[quote="Debt":kjyhb2qr][quote="CrystalMusic":kjyhb2qr]
"Crystal Beasts"
"Vampires"
not to mention the following custom decks:
"Zelda"
"Code Lyoko"
"US Armed Forces"
"Power Rangers"
"Star Wars"
"Transformers"
"Lord of The Rings"
"Destiny"

these decks actually have gotten alot of positive feedback TYVM!!![/quote:kjyhb2qr]
Your transformers deck literally shuts down all decks that aren't light machines. Your zelda deck has extra deck traps. How do you justify saying hand traps are for noobs when you have the same thing but way better since comes from the extra deck so it's always available and almost permanent. Code lyoko has some wacky catch 22 that makes it unbeatable but I don't remember it immediately.[/quote:kjyhb2qr]

wtf is "catch 22?"

[quote="CrystalMusic":nz6daw8z][quote="Debt":nz6daw8z][quote="CrystalMusic":nz6daw8z]
"Crystal Beasts"
"Vampires"
not to mention the following custom decks:
"Zelda"
"Code Lyoko"
"US Armed Forces"
"Power Rangers"
"Star Wars"
"Transformers"
"Lord of The Rings"
"Destiny"

these decks actually have gotten alot of positive feedback TYVM!!![/quote:nz6daw8z]
Your transformers deck literally shuts down all decks that aren't light machines. Your zelda deck has extra deck traps. How do you justify saying hand traps are for noobs when you have the same thing but way better since comes from the extra deck so it's always available and almost permanent. Code lyoko has some wacky catch 22 that makes it unbeatable but I don't remember it immediately.[/quote:nz6daw8z]

wtf is "catch 22?"[/quote:nz6daw8z]

Catch-22 is a noun refering to a dilemma or difficult circumstance from which there is no escape because of mutually conflicting or dependent conditions.

[quote="CrystalMusic":2la14ppe]

wtf is "catch 22?"[/quote:2la14ppe]
An inescapable no win situation that arises due to mutually conflicting or contradictory rules or conditions.

[quote="Debt":23ks7bhv][quote="CrystalMusic":23ks7bhv]

wtf is "catch 22?"[/quote:23ks7bhv]
A situation where there's no escape due to mutually conflicting or contradictory rules or conditions.[/quote:23ks7bhv]

IN ENGLISH?

[quote="CrystalMusic":2uhpmjac]

IN ENGLISH?[/quote:2uhpmjac]
Apply some critical thinking skills and reevaluate what was said

[quote="CrystalMusic":3tbgvx5l][quote="Debt":3tbgvx5l][quote="CrystalMusic":3tbgvx5l]

wtf is "catch 22?"[/quote:3tbgvx5l]
A situation where there's no escape due to mutually conflicting or contradictory rules or conditions.[/quote:3tbgvx5l]

IN ENGLISH?[/quote:3tbgvx5l]

Use that thick head of yours and see if you can figure it out. You can drum up a lie faster than a bullet so apply that ability to thinking.

[quote="CrystalMusic":2d28otyv][quote="Debt":2d28otyv][quote="CrystalMusic":2d28otyv]

wtf is "catch 22?"[/quote:2d28otyv]
A situation where there's no escape due to mutually conflicting or contradictory rules or conditions.[/quote:2d28otyv]

IN ENGLISH?[/quote:2d28otyv]
That's English. He already described in English.
Well, here's another source if you're interested. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catch-22_(logic)

[quote="CrystalMusic":21ap6ixh]youre basically immortalizing the replays and some of those replays are of me, and when ppl show these replays of me, they are "shaming" so how is that any different?[/quote:21ap6ixh]
Nah, it isn't "shaming you". What you do is literally make call out threads like "Hey look at this noob! He is trash at the game and should quit Duelingbook!". Meanwhile Christen57 uses this to showcase the actual duel while giving a small summary.

Also, This thread is getting derailed now, so i to take it back on rail by posting one of my Replay i liked.

Ramirez! It's time to Duel!
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=471916-16958780

Jim/Fossil Adamancipator vs Furries: https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=90641-20164322
This is why my friend uses cards from other peeps, including myself

watching that replay james just posted makes me cringe cas someone doenst know lilo & stitch.

The duel that got me invited to a Discord Roleplay server: 2 people with Unique summoning method teaming up in a tag duel
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=471916-16832413

[quote="CrystalMusic":1nxhpqoh][quote="LightCaster":1nxhpqoh][quote="CrystalMusic":1nxhpqoh]

ok:
1: why would u join someone, who has a ruleset for their duel, fully knowing you have no intent to obey that ruleset unless youre doing so to troll them or piss them off?
2: you want me to "adapt" to a format that is absolute garbage? HA! thats rich!
3: no one has ever said all my cards are broken. because believe it or not alot of ppl like my custom cards i made for the following:
"Crystal Beasts"
"Vampires"[/quote:1nxhpqoh]

"Knowing they have no intent to obey that ruleset." No idiot worth their fucking salt is going to read that giant fucking list of arbitrary, and in case you didn't know what "arbitrary" means: It means pointless/unneeded, rules that you have imposed ONLY for your opponent and not yourself because, honestly, you don't follow your own fucking rules.

It's not just me that wants you to adapt. It's every person that has posted on your forum posts as well, that's how you get BETTER at the game, ADAPTING TO THE GAME. If you can't do that then you just plainly suck and that's not any of our issue, that's yours.

Not a lot of people say it because not a lot of people have dueled you to know that you only make busted shit. I've seen your vampires, they're busted, those who say they are probably on your level of skill. Which is barely even casual and create custom cards for fun. You do it to feed your pathetically fragile ego.[/quote:1nxhpqoh]

i have a fragile ego? look whos talking!!!! all you ever do is berate, insult, swear, and reply negatively to everything i say, share, post or do. and for what? to make yourself feel better about your pathetic and miserable life? HA! now THAT is rich![/quote:1nxhpqoh]

I am following what I was taught, if someone is behaving rudely, treat them with the same behavior. Unlike your parents who couldn't be assed to teach you humility. I comment negatively because what you produce is negativity. Your behavior is that of a spoiled, attention-seeking bully who's only lot in life is to take a card game they claim to love, bastardize it to meet their needs and make witch hunting forum posts berating them and creating a web of lies to make yourself feel better. I can be straight-forward with who I am at a coin flip and if I did, I guarentee you'd be the first person to make fun of me because you're lost in your sullied delusions so you have to call me pathetic in order to validate yourself.

Right now I'm choosing to be the biggest nuisance you'd ever face until you fully understand that your behavior is unacceptable in the vision of your peers.

[quote="james123":q9pram5f]What happens if you abuse the power of the creator of this thread's Cocoon deck
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=90641-19837850[/quote:q9pram5f]

You cheated. You were activating normal spells during your opponent's turn as if they were quick-plays.

[quote="KTeknis":39ylmynh]The duel that got me invited to a Discord Roleplay server: 2 people with Unique summoning method teaming up in a tag duel
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=471916-16832413[/quote:39ylmynh]

I'm not a fan of people making up their own attributes instead of just using one of the 7 attributes... but I'm glad you had a fun experience anyways.

we were having a Duel that was actually 2/3 Match and suddenly the duel bugged out when my opponent AKA friend offered a rematch, it's either me or him who noticed their internet Bugged out and I dc'd as a Result...
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=90641-20463367

[quote="CrystalMusic":3ezs5w69]watching that replay james just posted makes me cringe cas someone doenst know lilo & stitch.[/quote:3ezs5w69]
Um... I was the one who watched Lilo and Stitch at a Local Children's Dentist DUH!

I was dueling a Famous person behind cool Customs straight from the Fanfics until i special Summoned your Ditto @Ignister and he Quit because it was too Controversial too play against it
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=90641-20498772

Also, Troll Decks are also afraid of decking out against decks with more than a lot of cards
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=90641-20504254

[quote="Christen57":rrt52cmr][quote="KTeknis":rrt52cmr]The duel that got me invited to a Discord Roleplay server: 2 people with Unique summoning method teaming up in a tag duel
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=471916-16832413[/quote:rrt52cmr]

I'm not a fan of people making up their own attributes instead of just using one of the 7 attributes... but I'm glad you had a fun experience anyways.[/quote:rrt52cmr]
To be fair of him, said new attribute and his Evolve Summon is based on the Discord Roleplay Server he joined, which i got invitation after.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=58994-20559392
Aromagirl doesn't know how continuous effects work.

Now that's the power of the upcoming Dragunities
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=90641-20092587
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=90641-20092033

[quote="james123":2io6q5v2]Now that's the power of the upcoming Dragunities
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=90641-20092587
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=90641-20092033[/quote:2io6q5v2]

The opponent had to leave mid-game in both replays though.

[quote="Christen57":yjhpy8st][quote="james123":yjhpy8st]Now that's the power of the upcoming Dragunities
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=90641-20092587
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=90641-20092033[/quote:yjhpy8st]

The opponent had to leave mid-game in both replays though.[/quote:yjhpy8st]
1. He had enough
2. He had to edit his deck quickly

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=58994-20835592

Guy uses banned cards, takes nearly 10 minutes to finish his turn, assembles a board with 5 negates, and still has the nerve to lash out out at me for dropping sphere mode on him.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=353979-20556225

Got otk but still had fun

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=20932818
A duel I stumbled across that lasts over 50 minutes and results in 2 judges being called and 1 guy getting frozen and a match loss.

For those of you who don't feel like watching the whole thing, what happened was that this person was playing dinosaurs and doing a combo, tried to use the second effect of oviraptor a second time even though it's a hard once per turn, the opponent called him out, but the dino player continued to play as if nothing was wrong, so a judge came to the duel, the dino player lied about trying to use the hard once per turn effect a second time that turn, the judge pointed out that this was incorrect and showed the log where they did in fact try to use that effect a second time that turn, the judge decided that the dino player must be frozen for cheating and lying, the dino player tried to appeal it, but the second judge came and also agreed to freeze the dino player. The end.

Also the dino player apparently barely speaks english and had to use "google traductor" (which is how you say "google translate" in spanish) to communicate with the judges and the opponent.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=21014248
I felt bad for the Creator during his Duel against a Guy with Random Star Wars cards even the ones with and without PSCT... plus he has The Grand Inquisitor (An Effect Veiler on Drugs) and even he ran one of the cards speedster made I added to the creator's Pikmin Deck for A Little more fire power in the Level12 Synchro Department... https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=6135691
(P.S. Christen57 does not Sponsor anyone else's cards except for certain times)

This Edited Quote from Grandma's Boy: "You've been spending our Rent Money, on Digimon" explains it all. (Try telling that to Toei... )
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=90641-21043392

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=58994-21061515

Somehow I got put into a tag duel vs myself...

[quote="Christen57":248aq4fi]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=58994-21061515

Somehow I got put into a tag duel vs myself...[/quote:248aq4fi]

I was able to join 2 hosters simultaneously, and they were able to join each other.

I was playing against the Guy in the Forums famous for his Mad Mew Mew card, and I wrecked him https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=90641-21203367

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=512763-21293772 and to think ppl say my custom cards are broken. mine are nothing compared to these 2 players and their custom cards

Your broken cards are made to uphold your ruleset and take advantage of it. You have repeated demonstrated toxic behavior in situations where you should have just moved on. You want to play a casual custom format? Then act like a casual custom player and make your cards fun and flavorful.

[quote="greg503":2ox51ch1]Your broken cards are made to uphold your ruleset and take advantage of it. You have repeated demonstrated toxic behavior in situations where you should have just moved on. You want to play a casual custom format? Then act like a casual custom player and make your cards fun and flavorful.[/quote:2ox51ch1]

ppl have been told if they dont like my rules then dont join but join anyways. so not my problem if u trigger a card from within the deck because of ignorance of the rules i set. and with that im not replying to replies anymore. good day

[quote="CrystalMusic":1whbna5e][quote="greg503":1whbna5e]Your broken cards are made to uphold your ruleset and take advantage of it. You have repeated demonstrated toxic behavior in situations where you should have just moved on. You want to play a casual custom format? Then act like a casual custom player and make your cards fun and flavorful.[/quote:1whbna5e]

ppl have been told if they dont like my rules then dont join but join anyways. so not my problem if u trigger a card from within the deck because of ignorance of the rules i set. and with that im not replying to replies anymore. good day[/quote:1whbna5e]
And no one has to abide by your "rules". But hey, even when people do follow your rules and beats you at your own game, you quit.

19 minutes ago: https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-21366860 - no need for an explanation just watch
result: https://imgur.com/p6exaET

[quote="CrystalMusic":3l63olzq]19 minutes ago: https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-21366860 - no need for an explanation just watch
result: https://imgur.com/p6exaET[/quote:3l63olzq]
You have been frozen before, haven't you? And from what I've seen, your behaviour hasn't improved much since then either.

[quote="DuskWill":o2b1t9fr][quote="CrystalMusic":o2b1t9fr]19 minutes ago: https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-21366860 - no need for an explanation just watch
result: https://imgur.com/p6exaET[/quote:o2b1t9fr]
You have been frozen before, haven't you? And from what I've seen, your behaviour hasn't improved much since then either.[/quote:o2b1t9fr]
iv never been frozen, if i have the judges changed their decision.

So: "Don't confuse my personality with my attitude. My personality is who I am. My attitude depends on who you are." - Frank Ocean

[quote="CrystalMusic":3jvxiy73][quote="DuskWill":3jvxiy73][quote="CrystalMusic":3jvxiy73]19 minutes ago: https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-21366860 - no need for an explanation just watch
result: https://imgur.com/p6exaET[/quote:3jvxiy73]
You have been frozen before, haven't you? And from what I've seen, your behaviour hasn't improved much since then either.[/quote:3jvxiy73]
iv never been frozen, if i have the judges changed their decision.

So: "Don't confuse my personality with my attitude. My personality is who I am. My attitude depends on who you are." - Frank Ocean[/quote:3jvxiy73]
Actually, I happen to have noticed an instance of you being frozen last year: https://imgur.com/RbIzKEz
Fri Dec 13 09:09:58 GMT-0300 2019

Also, that quote is quite meaningless in this context, considering how your arrogant and condescending attitude is the same for both your random opponents and the usual debaters here that you fail to sustain an argument against. That inevitably results in a common understanding of what your personality online (hopefully, just online) is. It's a shame that people have to mindlessly agree with your opinion and obey to your whims to see your good side.

All right! Back on Track just like what @KTeknis Said
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=90641-21376044
New Ice Barriers vs New Windwitches

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=38306-21443672

The casual me having fun with my meme deck while CM gets angry over bad Flip monsters and D. Board
Edit: He could have negated it with 7 tools if he was so scarred
I wasn't even going to use Desires and once he got BEWD I don't think my meme deck could win against it without D. Board's easily circumvented condition.

[quote="greg503":21fsu5en]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=38306-21443672

The casual me having fun with my meme deck while CM gets angry over bad Flip monsters and D. Board
Edit: He could have negated it with 7 tools if he was so scarred
I wasn't even going to use Desires and once he got BEWD I don't think my meme deck could win against it without D. Board's easily circumvented condition. [/quote:21fsu5en]

pathetic deck. only bad decks use an easy to aquire win condition
there is only 2 alt victories i use:
Exodia
Final Countdown

now considering i dont allow new support, its obvious that im running exodia as a backdoor. not purely to win.

[quote="CrystalMusic":213uk2dq][quote="greg503":213uk2dq]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=38306-21443672

The casual me having fun with my meme deck while CM gets angry over bad Flip monsters and D. Board
Edit: He could have negated it with 7 tools if he was so scarred
I wasn't even going to use Desires and once he got BEWD I don't think my meme deck could win against it without D. Board's easily circumvented condition. [/quote:213uk2dq]

pathetic deck. only bad decks use an easy to aquire win condition
there is only 2 alt victories i use:
Exodia
Final Countdown

now considering i dont allow new support, its obvious that im running exodia as a backdoor. not purely to win.[/quote:213uk2dq]
Destiny Board being an "easy to aquire win condition". Even though it's quite fragile, hinders your strategy, has literally useless spells and it's even worse if not using new support. No wonder championships all over the world, big or small, had players using it.

Again, Back on Topic
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=21446769
I was watching a Duel by someone else and it ended when I watched it!

[quote="CrystalMusic":3ijeu41l][quote="greg503":3ijeu41l]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=38306-21443672

The casual me having fun with my meme deck while CM gets angry over bad Flip monsters and D. Board
Edit: He could have negated it with 7 tools if he was so scarred
I wasn't even going to use Desires and once he got BEWD I don't think my meme deck could win against it without D. Board's easily circumvented condition. [/quote:3ijeu41l]

pathetic deck. only bad decks use an easy to aquire win condition
there is only 2 alt victories i use:
Exodia
Final Countdown

now considering i dont allow new support, its obvious that im running exodia as a backdoor. not purely to win.[/quote:3ijeu41l]
I wasn't playing to win though, if I wanted to win, I would have used a good deck. I made a MEME deck that uses funny cards. And I had fun, did you? Clearly not, you fail to see the humor in stats that aren't multiples of 50 and shuffling cards into the other player's deck.

[quote="CrystalMusic":2e7kehgh][quote="greg503":2e7kehgh]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=38306-21443672

The casual me having fun with my meme deck while CM gets angry over bad Flip monsters and D. Board
Edit: He could have negated it with 7 tools if he was so scarred
I wasn't even going to use Desires and once he got BEWD I don't think my meme deck could win against it without D. Board's easily circumvented condition. [/quote:2e7kehgh]

pathetic deck. only bad decks use an easy to aquire win condition
there is only 2 alt victories i use:
Exodia
Final Countdown

now considering i dont allow new support, its obvious that im running exodia as a backdoor. not purely to win.[/quote:2e7kehgh]

Destiny Board victory is harder than you though.
Tried doing a Destiny Board Deck in goat format with Hi-DEF/ Summon when destroyed monster. Either my defenses got breached before i even set D.Board, or the opponent destroys it anyway.
Also it make sense to diversify strategy by having other option such as Flip Monster. In case your opponent block your main win condition. Also you seems to hate Flip Deck in general for some reason.

[quote="james123":2e7kehgh]All right! Back on Track just like what @KTeknis Said
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=90641-21376044
New Nice Barriers vs New Windwitches[/quote:2e7kehgh]

I see you took my role of "Putting thing back in track" while i'm gone. Very nice indeed. My turn then

I tried porting my old Burn Deck from WCG 2005 game and modify it so it can stand up against current decks. I managed to pull a "Heart of the Card" draw by drawing 'Fire Cracker' and burning the last of his LP to victory.
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=471916-21109482

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=58994-21528966

Why can't people resolve their effects properly?

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=354464-21554722 This is just me doing a test hand to see if I can remember how to play this deck. And, yes, this deck is rather consistent at dropping The World.

[quote="CrystalMusic":ev033odf][quote="greg503":ev033odf]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=38306-21443672

The casual me having fun with my meme deck while CM gets angry over bad Flip monsters and D. Board
Edit: He could have negated it with 7 tools if he was so scarred
I wasn't even going to use Desires and once he got BEWD I don't think my meme deck could win against it without D. Board's easily circumvented condition. [/quote:ev033odf]

pathetic deck. only bad decks use an easy to aquire win condition
there is only 2 alt victories i use:
Exodia
Final Countdown

now considering i dont allow new support, its obvious that im running exodia as a backdoor. not purely to win.[/quote:ev033odf]

You play a Hoarkthy deck. So yours is just as pathetic

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=21562367

Guy makes an illegal play. Judge comes and tells him to undo it. He apparently don't know or speak much english as he is unable to understand the judge's orders, so judge ends up giving a loss for non-compliance.

People need to understand that duelingbook is for english-speakers only.

[quote="LightCaster":2ui2t7y2][quote="CrystalMusic":2ui2t7y2][quote="greg503":2ui2t7y2]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=38306-21443672

The casual me having fun with my meme deck while CM gets angry over bad Flip monsters and D. Board
Edit: He could have negated it with 7 tools if he was so scarred
I wasn't even going to use Desires and once he got BEWD I don't think my meme deck could win against it without D. Board's easily circumvented condition. [/quote:2ui2t7y2]

pathetic deck. only bad decks use an easy to aquire win condition
there is only 2 alt victories i use:
Exodia
Final Countdown

now considering i dont allow new support, its obvious that im running exodia as a backdoor. not purely to win.[/quote:2ui2t7y2]

You play a Hoarkthy deck. So yours is just as pathetic[/quote:2ui2t7y2]

ok i forgot about her. so make that 3. so i stand corrected!

[quote="CrystalMusic":87nc855c][quote="LightCaster":87nc855c][quote="CrystalMusic":87nc855c]

pathetic deck. only bad decks use an easy to aquire win condition
there is only 2 alt victories i use:
Exodia
Final Countdown

now considering i dont allow new support, its obvious that im running exodia as a backdoor. not purely to win.[/quote:87nc855c]

You play a Hoarkthy deck. So yours is just as pathetic[/quote:87nc855c]

ok i forgot about her. so make that 3. so i stand corrected![/quote:87nc855c]
Hoarkthy is a guy though....

[quote="Renji Asuka":1clcl2qx][quote="CrystalMusic":1clcl2qx][quote="LightCaster":1clcl2qx]

You play a Hoarkthy deck. So yours is just as pathetic[/quote:1clcl2qx]

ok i forgot about her. so make that 3. so i stand corrected![/quote:1clcl2qx]
Hoarkthy is a guy though....[/quote:1clcl2qx]

https://yugioh.fandom.com/wiki/Holactie ... (character)
Gender: Female

Back to the Replays! said @KTeknis
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=21598896
This is why CrystalMusic hates cards like these
@CrystalMusic, Next time how bout you turn off the Watcher or a password like "qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcbnm" like you promise!

[quote="james123":ygiyqcb1]Back to the Replays! said @KTeknis
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=21598896
This is why CrystalMusic hates cards like these
@CrystalMusic, Next time how bout you turn off the Watcher or a password like "qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcbnm" like you promise![/quote:ygiyqcb1]

looking at the replay its a 7 star, they didnt have enough monsters to tribute for it. they cheated!

[quote="CrystalMusic":vt7xb0vg][quote="Renji Asuka":vt7xb0vg][quote="CrystalMusic":vt7xb0vg]

ok i forgot about her. so make that 3. so i stand corrected![/quote:vt7xb0vg]
Hoarkthy is a guy though....[/quote:vt7xb0vg]

https://yugioh.fandom.com/wiki/Holactie ... (character)
Gender: Female[/quote:vt7xb0vg]
Still male, considering its Atem's father.

[quote="Renji Asuka":2be14oxd][quote="CrystalMusic":2be14oxd][quote="Renji Asuka":2be14oxd]
Hoarkthy is a guy though....[/quote:2be14oxd]

https://yugioh.fandom.com/wiki/Holactie ... (character)
Gender: Female[/quote:2be14oxd]
Still male, considering its Atem's father.[/quote:2be14oxd]
Plenty of deities have been portrayed as men and women before. This is irrelevant and petty. Relax.

[quote="greg503":3703am0x][quote="Renji Asuka":3703am0x][quote="CrystalMusic":3703am0x]

https://yugioh.fandom.com/wiki/Holactie ... (character)
Gender: Female[/quote:3703am0x]
Still male, considering its Atem's father.[/quote:3703am0x]
Plenty of deities have been portrayed as men and women before. This is irrelevant and petty. Relax.[/quote:3703am0x]
Its a lore thing.

[quote="CrystalMusic":1534753g][quote="LightCaster":1534753g][quote="CrystalMusic":1534753g]

pathetic deck. only bad decks use an easy to aquire win condition
there is only 2 alt victories i use:
Exodia
Final Countdown

now considering i dont allow new support, its obvious that im running exodia as a backdoor. not purely to win.[/quote:1534753g]

You play a Hoarkthy deck. So yours is just as pathetic[/quote:1534753g]

ok i forgot about her. so make that 3. so i stand corrected![/quote:1534753g]

I mean your rules say: "No alternate win conditions." So I'm not surprised in the least that you'd break your own rule.

I made my Opponent laugh and shut down his broken cards!
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=90641-21686757

[quote="LightCaster":3aqqu51m][quote="CrystalMusic":3aqqu51m][quote="LightCaster":3aqqu51m]

You play a Hoarkthy deck. So yours is just as pathetic[/quote:3aqqu51m]

ok i forgot about her. so make that 3. so i stand corrected![/quote:3aqqu51m]

I mean your rules say: "No alternate win conditions." So I'm not surprised in the least that you'd break your own rule.[/quote:3aqqu51m]

my rules dont say that. not the ones in my profile at least.
i have never minded exodia as long as its aquired 1 of 2 ways:
1: normally drawing it WITHOUT draw effects.
2: NOT using support that specifically lists "Forbidden One" in its effect

As for Horakhty? As long as ur not using any card that lists "The Winged Dragon of Ra" or "Obelisk The Tormentor" or "Slifer The Sky Dragon" in its effect, IDC

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-21738348 they tired using battle fusion from their hand during my turn. also, in order to use battle fusion, they must have been the one who declared the attack, not me. so they cant even activate it!

[quote="CrystalMusic":1dilzbho][quote="LightCaster":1dilzbho][quote="CrystalMusic":1dilzbho]

ok i forgot about her. so make that 3. so i stand corrected![/quote:1dilzbho]

I mean your rules say: "No alternate win conditions." So I'm not surprised in the least that you'd break your own rule.[/quote:1dilzbho]

my rules dont say that. not the ones in my profile at least.
i have never minded exodia as long as its aquired 1 of 2 ways:
1: normally drawing it WITHOUT draw effects.
2: NOT using support that specifically lists "Forbidden One" in its effect

As for Horakhty? As long as ur not using any card that lists "The Winged Dragon of Ra" or "Obelisk The Tormentor" or "Slifer The Sky Dragon" in its effect, IDC[/quote:1dilzbho]
Wait, there's only ONE card that lists Obelisk's or Slifer's name: Ra's Disciple, a terrible card for being both a Garnet (aside from the first copy you draw) and for locking you out of special summons. Dedicated Egyptian God decks and Horakthy actually get hindered by running that monster. On the other hand, "The Winged Dragon of Ra" does have more a bit more direct support, but the general goal there is making it a viable beatstick, since Ra is the worst of the trio.

But more importantly, doesn't that mean that you would care if the opponent used Horakthy, since it has all those three cards' names in its effect?
[quote="CrystalMusic":1dilzbho]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-21738348 they tired using battle fusion from their hand during my turn. also, in order to use battle fusion, they must have been the one who declared the attack, not me. so they cant even activate it![/quote:1dilzbho]
You could have stopped halfway there and the post would completely hold water. It turns out Battle Fusion can be activated whether you or the opponent attacked, it only matters if there was an attack declaration involving your Fusion Monster and the opponent's monster. Sure, they were in the wrong, but, had they known the rules a bit more, it would have been a nice comeback.

Also, you shouldn't shame people for not knowing how Quick-Play Spell Cards works: https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-20304389

[0:00] CrystalMusic: CrystalMusic hosted Single (with siding) in Goat Format (Unrated) with duel note "No Discard, Mill, Wave Cannon"
...
[2:09] Horus Dragon Tamer: Normal Summoned "D.D. Warrior Lady" from hand (6/6) to M-3
[2:10] Horus Dragon Tamer: Entered Battle Phase
[2:11] Horus Dragon Tamer: Attacked Set card in M-3 with "D.D. Warrior Lady" in M-3
[2:12] CrystalMusic: Activated Set "Bottomless Trap Hole" in S-3
[2:19] Horus Dragon Tamer: Activated "My Body as a Shield" from hand (5/5)
[2:21] Horus Dragon Tamer: Lost 1500 LP
[2:22] CrystalMusic: "u cant"
[2:32] CrystalMusic: "u can only use then im chain of they were set"
[2:38] CrystalMusic: "leanr how quick plays work noob"
[2:41] CrystalMusic: Left duel

How can situations like this not become a lesson in humility?

[quote="CrystalMusic":18y67i6a][quote="LightCaster":18y67i6a][quote="CrystalMusic":18y67i6a]

ok i forgot about her. so make that 3. so i stand corrected![/quote:18y67i6a]

I mean your rules say: "No alternate win conditions." So I'm not surprised in the least that you'd break your own rule.[/quote:18y67i6a]

my rules dont say that. not the ones in my profile at least.
i have never minded exodia as long as its aquired 1 of 2 ways:
1: normally drawing it WITHOUT draw effects.
2: NOT using support that specifically lists "Forbidden One" in its effect

As for Horakhty? As long as ur not using any card that lists "The Winged Dragon of Ra" or "Obelisk The Tormentor" or "Slifer The Sky Dragon" in its effect, IDC[/quote:18y67i6a]

So you can't have your rule be "No alternative win conditions" if you're okay with literally two of the ways of winning.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=21756783

This guy apparently thinks Masked HERO Dark Law negates whatever it banishes, so not 1 but 2 judges have to come and explain to him that this isn't true. He gets defensive and says that someone from his locals or something told him that it is. The judges tell him that this person, whoever they are, is wrong, and he refuses to believe them, even going as far as to get offended over being reminded of the rules. They give him a game loss for arguing and not cooperating.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=58994-21773263

This player tries to fusion summon a link monster, then gets salty when I tell him you can't do that.

[quote="Christen57":2kd2wzka]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=58994-21773263

This player tries to fusion summon a link monster, then gets salty when I tell him you can't do that.[/quote:2kd2wzka]
Not to mention he special summoned Indigo Eclipse twice using its once per turn summon effect.

[quote="Christen57":hdvv0ixh]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=21756783

This guy apparently thinks Masked HERO Dark Law negates whatever it banishes, so not 1 but 2 judges have to come and explain to him that this isn't true. He gets defensive and says that someone from his locals or something told him that it is. The judges tell him that this person, whoever they are, is wrong, and he refuses to believe them, even going as far as to get offended over being reminded of the rules. They give him a game loss for arguing and not cooperating.[/quote:hdvv0ixh]
Oh yeah He Also mocked the Great DistantCoder AKA the Holy God of Resource Judges
Also, Rez (The Dreamcast game) in Duel Form! AKA @Ignisters (Cyberspace) vs Melodious (Rhythm)
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=90641-21012313

Plus, did you know, that me and DJ professor K Duel'd 2 users with Very broken Decks (1 with a 9999 ATK Normal Gemini more broken than these 2 cards (https://www.duelingbook.com/card?id=1407381, https://www.duelingbook.com/card?id=705021) and 1 Hitman Deck with a Dirty Card that is Private at least (no pun intended) with no PSCT and more Broken Effects)
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=90641-21777443

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=21774883

Guy calls a judge over having his feelings hurt, then calls a judge a second time because the opponent acts like they know everything but said opponent gets a ruling wrong.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=21774918

Here a dinosaur player resolves Agnimazud's activated effect to destroy 2 fire monsters in his hand and special summon it, but then his opponent tries to use Solemn Judgment to negate it, even though that's an illegal play since you can't use Solemn Judgment to negate activated monster effects that special summon. The Agnimazud player apparently doesn't know this and thinks the illegal play was correct, thus overlooking it. Then said Agnimazud player tries to use Ash Blossom on the opponent's Shard of Greed, but the opponent says it's "too late". A judge comes and says it isn't, then gives him a game loss for not letting said Agnimazud player chain and resolve the Ash Blossom.

I guess someone didn't like Dora and/or watched "Dora gets Grounded"....
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=90641-21785987

[quote="Christen57":2037lpu9]Another replay of CrystalMusic lashing out at someone for no good reason and insulting them: https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=17162913

And another replay of CrystalMusic getting mad at the opponent for playing a level 4 with 2000 ATK even though level 4's with 2000 ATK like Alexandrite Dragon already exist. https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=17162465[/quote:2037lpu9]

Alexandrite Dragon: NORMAL MONSTER
Their card: EFFECT MONSTER
THAT CHANGES THE WHOLE ASPECT!!!!

[quote="Renji Asuka":xp4u6jx8][quote="CrystalMusic":xp4u6jx8][quote="Renji Asuka":xp4u6jx8]
Hoarkthy is a guy though....[/quote:xp4u6jx8]

https://yugioh.fandom.com/wiki/Holactie ... (character)
Gender: Female[/quote:xp4u6jx8]
Still male, considering its Atem's father.[/quote:xp4u6jx8]

Did you REALLY just say that? WOW! I cant even...
-_- who told you Horakthy was Atems Father? you got that so wrong!!! did u even watch the anime??? Atems father was/is King Aknamkanon!

[quote="CrystalMusic":nsq18l9f][quote="Christen57":nsq18l9f]Another replay of CrystalMusic lashing out at someone for no good reason and insulting them: https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=17162913

And another replay of CrystalMusic getting mad at the opponent for playing a level 4 with 2000 ATK even though level 4's with 2000 ATK like Alexandrite Dragon already exist. https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=17162465[/quote:nsq18l9f]

Alexandrite Dragon: NORMAL MONSTER
Their card: EFFECT MONSTER
THAT CHANGES THE WHOLE ASPECT!!!![/quote:nsq18l9f]

Itachi (Anbu)
Level 4 FIRE Warrior Gemini Effect Monster 2000/1800
This card is treated as a Normal Monster while face-up on the field or in the GY. While this card is a Normal Monster on the field, you can Normal Summon it to have it become an Effect Monster with this effect.
● This card's name becomes "Itachi" while on the field.

Wow, a Gemini monster. Such effect. Being treated as a different name after a second normal summon must be a complete game changer, indeed.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-21798246 rage quit to Shiba Warrior Taro. as for the name calling? only a pussy would quit ot Shiba Warrior Taro when using a HERO deck!

[quote="CrystalMusic":t569s1x0]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-21798246 rage quit to Shiba Warrior Taro. as for the name calling? only a pussy would quit ot Shiba Warrior Taro when using a HERO deck![/quote:t569s1x0]

Or he might know how predictable the gimmick is with that deck. Which violates your "no alternate victories" rule.

[quote="LightCaster":3nx7itvz][quote="CrystalMusic":3nx7itvz]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-21798246 rage quit to Shiba Warrior Taro. as for the name calling? only a pussy would quit ot Shiba Warrior Taro when using a HERO deck![/quote:3nx7itvz]

Or he might know how predictable the gimmick is with that deck. Which violates your "no alternate victories" rule.[/quote:3nx7itvz]

apparently u didnt read what the log said: Pure Beatdown Decks Only. Look at my hand i had armed protector dragon, a beatdown card as it gains atk for every equip spell equipped to it. shiba & marshamallon (along with other undestroyable by battle monsters) are purely for tributing for Armed Protector Dragon

the only time i use cards like shiba, marshmallon, arcana force 0 the fool, aroma jar, spirit reaper, gellenduo (and other cards that cannot be destroyed by battle) are for high level or critical summonings

[quote="CrystalMusic":18ynx1az][quote="LightCaster":18ynx1az][quote="CrystalMusic":18ynx1az]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-21798246 rage quit to Shiba Warrior Taro. as for the name calling? only a pussy would quit ot Shiba Warrior Taro when using a HERO deck![/quote:18ynx1az]

Or he might know how predictable the gimmick is with that deck. Which violates your "no alternate victories" rule.[/quote:18ynx1az]

apparently u didnt read what the log said: Pure Beatdown Decks Only. Look at my hand i had armed protector dragon, a beatdown card as it gains atk for every equip spell equipped to it[/quote:18ynx1az]

If I used a beatdown deck you would've thrown a fit either from how fast it happened or the cards I used because i'm sure there's a fuckton of other rules of yours that you yourself have broken.

[quote="CrystalMusic":3defyk6c][quote="LightCaster":3defyk6c][quote="CrystalMusic":3defyk6c]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-21798246 rage quit to Shiba Warrior Taro. as for the name calling? only a pussy would quit ot Shiba Warrior Taro when using a HERO deck![/quote:3defyk6c]

Or he might know how predictable the gimmick is with that deck. Which violates your "no alternate victories" rule.[/quote:3defyk6c]

apparently u didnt read what the log said: Pure Beatdown Decks Only. Look at my hand i had armed protector dragon, a beatdown card as it gains atk for every equip spell equipped to it. shiba & marshamallon (along with other undestroyable by battle monsters) are purely for tributing for Armed Protector Dragon[/quote:3defyk6c]
So, by definition, your deck isn't "Pure Beatdown" if you are using cards not meant to defeat the opponent's monsters, like Taro and Marshmallon.

[quote="LightCaster":1cd085lr][quote="CrystalMusic":1cd085lr][quote="LightCaster":1cd085lr]

Or he might know how predictable the gimmick is with that deck. Which violates your "no alternate victories" rule.[/quote:1cd085lr]

apparently u didnt read what the log said: Pure Beatdown Decks Only. Look at my hand i had armed protector dragon, a beatdown card as it gains atk for every equip spell equipped to it[/quote:1cd085lr]

If I used a beatdown deck you would've thrown a fit either from how fast it happened or the cards I used because i'm sure there's a fuckton of other rules of yours that you yourself have broken.[/quote:1cd085lr]

well due rto my rules a pure beatdown deck relies purely on summonig monsters with massive atk power. as beatdowns are based on atk power to deal mass damage. so a pure beatdown would rely purely on a massive beatstick, not cards like mst, raigeki, etc. the only 2 cards i dont allow in a beatdown duel as it makes it completely unfair is moon mirror shield and wicked avatar (hence why i run cursed seal of the forbidden spell purely to negate any possiblility of a moon mirror shield being used)

[quote="NiwatoriFTW":fa2mjvyk][quote="CrystalMusic":fa2mjvyk][quote="LightCaster":fa2mjvyk]

Or he might know how predictable the gimmick is with that deck. Which violates your "no alternate victories" rule.[/quote:fa2mjvyk]

apparently u didnt read what the log said: Pure Beatdown Decks Only. Look at my hand i had armed protector dragon, a beatdown card as it gains atk for every equip spell equipped to it. shiba & marshamallon (along with other undestroyable by battle monsters) are purely for tributing for Armed Protector Dragon[/quote:fa2mjvyk]
So, by definition, your deck isn't "Pure Beatdown" if you are using cards not meant to defeat the opponent's monsters, like Taro and Marshmallon.[/quote:fa2mjvyk]

they are purely used only for tributing for armed protector dragon so actually it is.

[quote="CrystalMusic":3kupshrn][quote="LightCaster":3kupshrn][quote="CrystalMusic":3kupshrn]

apparently u didnt read what the log said: Pure Beatdown Decks Only. Look at my hand i had armed protector dragon, a beatdown card as it gains atk for every equip spell equipped to it[/quote:3kupshrn]

If I used a beatdown deck you would've thrown a fit either from how fast it happened or the cards I used because i'm sure there's a fuckton of other rules of yours that you yourself have broken.[/quote:3kupshrn]

well due rto my rules a pure beatdown deck relies purely on atk power. as beatdowns are based on atk power to deal mass damage. so a pure beatdown would rely purely on a massive beatstick, not cards like mst, raigeki, etc. the only 2 cards i dont allow in a beatdown duel as it makes it completely unfair is moon mirror shield and wicked avatar (hence why i run cursed seal of the forbidden spell purely to negate any possiblility of a moon mirror shield being used)[/quote:3kupshrn]

So I have to beat you without any negation? Easy. I run a deck that rarely relies on negation anyway. I just have to play a card and watch you throw a tantrum over it.

[quote="LightCaster":15yrio49][quote="CrystalMusic":15yrio49][quote="LightCaster":15yrio49]

If I used a beatdown deck you would've thrown a fit either from how fast it happened or the cards I used because i'm sure there's a fuckton of other rules of yours that you yourself have broken.[/quote:15yrio49]

well due rto my rules a pure beatdown deck relies purely on atk power. as beatdowns are based on atk power to deal mass damage. so a pure beatdown would rely purely on a massive beatstick, not cards like mst, raigeki, etc. the only 2 cards i dont allow in a beatdown duel as it makes it completely unfair is moon mirror shield and wicked avatar (hence why i run cursed seal of the forbidden spell purely to negate any possiblility of a moon mirror shield being used)[/quote:15yrio49]

So I have to beat you without any negation? Easy. I run a deck that rarely relies on negation anyway. I just have to play a card and watch you throw a tantrum over it.[/quote:15yrio49]

explain how ur gonna duel me when i have u blocked?

[quote="CrystalMusic":sg46dcik][quote="LightCaster":sg46dcik][quote="CrystalMusic":sg46dcik]

well due rto my rules a pure beatdown deck relies purely on atk power. as beatdowns are based on atk power to deal mass damage. so a pure beatdown would rely purely on a massive beatstick, not cards like mst, raigeki, etc. the only 2 cards i dont allow in a beatdown duel as it makes it completely unfair is moon mirror shield and wicked avatar (hence why i run cursed seal of the forbidden spell purely to negate any possiblility of a moon mirror shield being used)[/quote:sg46dcik]

So I have to beat you without any negation? Easy. I run a deck that rarely relies on negation anyway. I just have to play a card and watch you throw a tantrum over it.[/quote:sg46dcik]

explain how ur gonna duel me when i have u blocked?[/quote:sg46dcik]

I can make another one you know... I've already gotten you to lose, what, 6 times over 3 accounts?

[quote="LightCaster":47pndhez][quote="CrystalMusic":47pndhez][quote="LightCaster":47pndhez]

So I have to beat you without any negation? Easy. I run a deck that rarely relies on negation anyway. I just have to play a card and watch you throw a tantrum over it.[/quote:47pndhez]

explain how ur gonna duel me when i have u blocked?[/quote:47pndhez]

I can make another one you know... I've already gotten you to lose, what, 6 times over 3 accounts?[/quote:47pndhez]

so u just admited to multi account block evading. good to know

[quote="CrystalMusic":325lnuo3][quote="NiwatoriFTW":325lnuo3][quote="CrystalMusic":325lnuo3]

apparently u didnt read what the log said: Pure Beatdown Decks Only. Look at my hand i had armed protector dragon, a beatdown card as it gains atk for every equip spell equipped to it. shiba & marshamallon (along with other undestroyable by battle monsters) are purely for tributing for Armed Protector Dragon[/quote:325lnuo3]
So, by definition, your deck isn't "Pure Beatdown" if you are using cards not meant to defeat the opponent's monsters, like Taro and Marshmallon.[/quote:325lnuo3]

they are purely used only for tributing for armed protector dragon so actually it is.[/quote:325lnuo3]
Oh, please. When you ask for "custom archetypes only" you rant if the opponent is not using a card with a freaking common name. https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-21607947

[0:00] CrystalMusic: CrystalMusic hosted Single (with siding) in Custom Cards (Unrated) with duel note "CUSTOM ARCHETYPE CARDS ONLY! NO PENDS!"
...
[3:45] PITA: Normal Summoned "Wile E. Coyote" from hand (4/5) to M-3
[3:51] PITA: Activated "Looney Leg Muscle Vitamins" from hand (1/4)
[3:54] PITA: Activated "Looney Rocket-Propelled Tennis Shoes" from hand (1/3)
[3:54] CrystalMusic: "nope"
[3:57] CrystalMusic: "nope"
[4:04] PITA: "huh?"
[4:07] CrystalMusic: "they dont share the name card name"
[4:12] CrystalMusic: "therefore not a n archetype"
[4:24] CrystalMusic: "see how mine are called "US Armed Forces"?"
[4:26] PITA: "It's a Toon archtype."
[4:28] CrystalMusic: "no"
[4:30] CrystalMusic: "the NAME of teh card"
[4:31] CrystalMusic: "not the type"
[4:32] PITA: "Based off of Looney."
[4:39] PITA: "Most of the spells are the same."
[4:41] PITA: "Except for one."
[4:43] CrystalMusic: "the name of the card determins ints arcetype"
[5:01] CrystalMusic: "like HERO, Cyber, Roid, Koala, The Forbidden One"
[5:06] PITA: "I know, but"
[5:12] CrystalMusic: "these are examples of an archetype"
[5:13] PITA: "can't spell/traps have archtypes?"
[5:23] CrystalMusic: "they have to share the name"
[5:34] PITA: "Only ONE single card doesn't have the same name"
[5:39] CrystalMusic: "wile e cyotoe doenst share the name of ur spells"
[5:39] PITA: "the monsters are all toons"
[5:43] CrystalMusic: "toon is a TYPE"
[5:45] PITA: "and all the spell and traps are the same."
[5:46] CrystalMusic: "not an archetype"
[5:47] PITA: "I know"
[5:49] PITA: "i don't care?"
[5:57] PITA: "Can't we just duel like normal people?"
[6:01] CrystalMusic: "then im blocking u cas u cant obey the rule u agreed to"
[6:12] CrystalMusic: "by clicking my nam u agreed to the rules i set"

And now you throw a double standard on how you define deck purity? For some reason, you claimed that EVERY card must be have the same naming in an archetype deck, how come a "Pure Beatdown" deck of yours can have exceptions? for Or is it the usual "My duel, my rules" being applied?

[quote="CrystalMusic":2ddum9hj][quote="LightCaster":2ddum9hj][quote="CrystalMusic":2ddum9hj]

explain how ur gonna duel me when i have u blocked?[/quote:2ddum9hj]

I can make another one you know... I've already gotten you to lose, what, 6 times over 3 accounts?[/quote:2ddum9hj]

so u just admited to multi account block evading. good to know[/quote:2ddum9hj]

And you create rules to only hinder your opponent. Claimed to be a government official, intentionally stalled games, harrassed many people and told a few of them to get off the site, have used Youtube and the forums to shame people.and treat duel notes as contracts. If anything I'm a saint compared to you.

[quote="LightCaster":2rxqvkr8][quote="CrystalMusic":2rxqvkr8][quote="LightCaster":2rxqvkr8]

I can make another one you know... I've already gotten you to lose, what, 6 times over 3 accounts?[/quote:2rxqvkr8]

so u just admited to multi account block evading. good to know[/quote:2rxqvkr8]

And you create rules to only hinder your opponent. Claimed to be a government official, intentionally stalled games, harrassed many people and told a few of them to get off the site, have used Youtube and the forums to shame people.and treat duel notes as contracts. If anything I'm a saint compared to you.[/quote:2rxqvkr8]

create rules to only hinder my opponent? how many times have i repeated this? it is YOUR JOB to make a deck that can make my rules benefit you. if u dont make a deck that can make my rules benefit you, then thats YOUR FAULT.

[quote="CrystalMusic":3kan3hr4][quote="LightCaster":3kan3hr4][quote="CrystalMusic":3kan3hr4]

so u just admited to multi account block evading. good to know[/quote:3kan3hr4]

And you create rules to only hinder your opponent. Claimed to be a government official, intentionally stalled games, harrassed many people and told a few of them to get off the site, have used Youtube and the forums to shame people.and treat duel notes as contracts. If anything I'm a saint compared to you.[/quote:3kan3hr4]

create rules to only hinder my opponent? how many times have i repeated this? it is YOUR JOB to make a deck that can make my rules benefit you. if u dont make a deck that can make my rules benefit you, then thats YOUR FAULT.[/quote:3kan3hr4]

I watched you duel with your indian deck and broke these three rules:

No auto wins
No alternate wins
No TCG remakes

In the duel with your transformers you broke these rules:

No contact fusions.
No summoning more than twice without a cost.

These are rules YOU created and YOU broke them. I'd even be inclined to show you every replay i have and point out how you broke your own rules in every single one.

[quote="LightCaster":1k0sex7x][quote="CrystalMusic":1k0sex7x][quote="LightCaster":1k0sex7x]

And you create rules to only hinder your opponent. Claimed to be a government official, intentionally stalled games, harrassed many people and told a few of them to get off the site, have used Youtube and the forums to shame people.and treat duel notes as contracts. If anything I'm a saint compared to you.[/quote:1k0sex7x]

create rules to only hinder my opponent? how many times have i repeated this? it is YOUR JOB to make a deck that can make my rules benefit you. if u dont make a deck that can make my rules benefit you, then thats YOUR FAULT.[/quote:1k0sex7x]

I watched you duel with your indian deck and broke these three rules:

No auto wins
No alternate wins
No TCG remakes

In the duel with your transformers you broke these rules:

No contact fusions.
No summoning more than twice without a cost.

These are rules YOU created and YOU broke them.[/quote:1k0sex7x]

1: contact fusion RETURNS the cards to the deck. mine send to the GY so im not contact fusion summoining as my cards always send from the hand or field to the GY.

2: my NATIVE AMERICAN (NOT INDIAN!!! GET IT RIGHT!!!) only use eatos because shes my soul card as shes a native american warrior (im native american) and an angel (i beleive in angels) combined

3: its no INSTA wins. (aka cards tha make you win without any prerequisites)

4: the only deck i have that spam summons without a cost (with the acception on my "Safe Guards" is my paladins (i made this to give spam summoners a taste of their own medicine)

[quote="CrystalMusic":2sd04bwa][quote="LightCaster":2sd04bwa][quote="CrystalMusic":2sd04bwa]

so u just admited to multi account block evading. good to know[/quote:2sd04bwa]

And you create rules to only hinder your opponent. Claimed to be a government official, intentionally stalled games, harrassed many people and told a few of them to get off the site, have used Youtube and the forums to shame people.and treat duel notes as contracts. If anything I'm a saint compared to you.[/quote:2sd04bwa]

create rules to only hinder my opponent? how many times have i repeated this? it is YOUR JOB to make a deck that can make my rules benefit you. if u dont make a deck that can make my rules benefit you, then thats YOUR FAULT.[/quote:2sd04bwa]
And yet, when people actually do that, you rage quit over random minimal reasons:

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-21760129

[0:00] CrystalMusic: CrystalMusic hosted Single (with siding) in Advanced (Unrated) with duel note "1st gen & GX season 1."
..
[11:31] CrystalMusic: Entered Draw Phase
[11:31] CrystalMusic: Drew "Obnoxious Celtic Guard"
[11:33] CrystalMusic: Entered Standby Phase
[11:34] CrystalMusic: Entered Main Phase 1
[11:37] CrystalMusic: Entered Battle Phase
[11:39] CrystalMusic: Attacked "Dark Magician" in M-4 with "The Dragon Dwelling in the Cave" in M-4
[11:41] Swish3: Activated Set "Mirror Force" in S-2
[11:41] CrystalMusic: "ill take the lp"
[11:46] CrystalMusic: Declared effect of "Mirror Force Dragon" in M-3
[11:50] Swish3: "doesnt work"
[11:56] CrystalMusic: "u suck"
[11:56] Swish3: "theres no targeting"
[11:59] CrystalMusic: "using exodia"
[12:02] CrystalMusic: "i know u are"
[12:03] Swish3: Sent "Mirror Force" from S-2 to GY
[12:04] CrystalMusic: "get a REAL deck"
[12:05] Swish3: "not me"
[12:07] CrystalMusic: "not some BS like that"
[12:10] Swish3: "i swear lol"
[12:10] CrystalMusic: "POROVE IT"
[12:15] Swish3: Showed deck
[12:17] Swish3: "lolololol"
[12:18] CrystalMusic: Stopped viewing Opponent's Deck
[12:18] Swish3: Shuffled deck
[12:20] CrystalMusic: "show hand"
[12:22] CrystalMusic: Left duel

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-21761965

[0:00] CrystalMusic: CrystalMusic hosted Single (with siding) in Advanced (Unrated) with duel note "Severely Underused Cards Only. No Pends."
..
[1:12] programmer: Entered Draw Phase
[1:12] programmer: Drew "Spellbinding Circle"
[1:17] programmer: Entered End Phase
[1:20] programmer: Sent "Penumbral Soldier Lady" from hand (1/7) to GY
[1:23] programmer: Ended turn
..
[1:29] programmer: Entered Draw Phase
[1:29] programmer: Drew "Fairy's Hand Mirror"
[1:31] programmer: Entered Main Phase 1
[1:34] programmer: Set "Interdimensional Matter Transporter" from hand (2/7) to S-3
[1:35] programmer: Set "Call of the Haunted" from hand (4/6) to S-4
[1:37] programmer: Set "Fairy's Hand Mirror" from hand (5/5) to S-2
[1:39] programmer: Ended turn
--------------------------------------------
[1:40] CrystalMusic: Entered Draw Phase
[1:40] CrystalMusic: Drew "Magic Hole Golem"
[1:42] CrystalMusic: Entered Standby Phase
[1:42] CrystalMusic: Entered Main Phase 1
[1:44] programmer: Activated Set "Call of the Haunted" in S-4
[1:44] CrystalMusic: Set "Seven Tools of the Bandit" from hand (1/4) to S-3
[1:44] programmer: Viewed GY
[1:46] programmer: Special Summoned "Penumbral Soldier Lady" from GY to M-3 (ATK)
[1:46] CrystalMusic: Set "Cursed Seal of the Forbidden Spell" from hand (2/3) to S-4
[1:49] programmer: Stopped viewing GY
[1:52] CrystalMusic: "bye"
[1:56] CrystalMusic: "summon it the RIGHT way"
[1:57] CrystalMusic: "noob"
[1:58] CrystalMusic: Left duel

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-21762077

[0:00] CrystalMusic: CrystalMusic hosted Single (with siding) in Advanced (Unrated) with duel note "severely underused cards only. no pends."
..
[4:03] CrystalMusic: Entered Draw Phase
[4:03] CrystalMusic: Drew "Seven Tools of the Bandit"
[4:08] CrystalMusic: Flip Summoned Set "Aroma Jar" in M-4
[4:11] CrystalMusic: Entered End Phase
[4:14] CrystalMusic: Gained 1000 LP
[4:17] CrystalMusic: Sent "Alpha The Magnet Warrior" from hand (4/7) to GY
[4:19] CrystalMusic: Ended turn
--------------------------------------------
[4:20] Osqar1420|: Entered Draw Phase
[4:20] Osqar1420|: Drew "Gemini Elf"
[4:22] Osqar1420|: Entered Standby Phase
[4:22] Osqar1420|: Entered Main Phase 1
[4:25] Osqar1420|: Activated Set "Mystical Space Typhoon" in S-2
[4:28] Osqar1420|: Sent "Black Pendant" from S-3 to GY
[4:31] Osqar1420|: Sent "Mystical Space Typhoon" from S-2 to GY
[4:32] CrystalMusic: Lost 500 LP
[4:33] Osqar1420|: Removed a counter from "Alexandrite Dragon" in M-3 (now 0)
[4:40] Osqar1420|: Normal Summoned "Gemini Elf" from hand (7/7) to M-2
[4:48] Osqar1420|: Activated "United We Stand" from hand (1/6)
[4:50] Osqar1420|: Placed a counter on "United We Stand" in S-3 (now 1)
[4:51] Osqar1420|: Placed a counter on "Alexandrite Dragon" in M-3 (now 1)
[4:54] Osqar1420|: Activated "Mage Power" from hand (2/5)
[4:58] Osqar1420|: Placed a counter on "Mage Power" in S-2 (now 1)
[4:59] CrystalMusic: "noob"
[5:08] CrystalMusic: "use equips on the RIGHt monster"
[5:09] Osqar1420|: "?"
[5:10] CrystalMusic: "not a randomone"
[5:14] CrystalMusic: "use it on a mosnter MADe for equiops"
[5:15] CrystalMusic: "bye"
[5:19] CrystalMusic: Left duel

Also, "it is YOUR JOB"? Entitlement, much?

[quote="CrystalMusic":duh17bm6][quote="LightCaster":duh17bm6][quote="CrystalMusic":duh17bm6]

create rules to only hinder my opponent? how many times have i repeated this? it is YOUR JOB to make a deck that can make my rules benefit you. if u dont make a deck that can make my rules benefit you, then thats YOUR FAULT.[/quote:duh17bm6]

I watched you duel with your indian deck and broke these three rules:

No auto wins
No alternate wins
No TCG remakes

In the duel with your transformers you broke these rules:

No contact fusions.
No summoning more than twice without a cost.

These are rules YOU created and YOU broke them.[/quote:duh17bm6]

1: contact fusion RETURNS the cards to the deck. mine send to the GY so im not contact fusion summoining as my cards always send from the hand or field to the GY.

2: my NATIVE AMERICAN (NOT INDIAN!!! GET IT RIGHT!!!) only use eatos because shes my soul card as shes a native american warrior (im native american) and an angel (i beleive in angels) combined

3: its no INSTA wins. (aka cards tha make you win without any prerequisites)

4: the only deck i have that spam summons without a cost is my paladins (i made this to give spam summoners a taste of their own medicine)[/quote:duh17bm6]

Your INDIAN deck has an auto win. Your rules say no auto wins.

Your transformers deck, pony deck, pedo deck also spam summon with no cost.

You have a rule on no broken cards. All of them are broken.

Your transformers fusion is a remake of ABC-Dragon Buster, no TCG remakes

Your transformer fusion has the same contact fuse effect of ABC-Dragon Buster. No contact fusion.

[quote="LightCaster":1q7cey09][quote="CrystalMusic":1q7cey09][quote="LightCaster":1q7cey09]

I watched you duel with your indian deck and broke these three rules:

No auto wins
No alternate wins
No TCG remakes

In the duel with your transformers you broke these rules:

No contact fusions.
No summoning more than twice without a cost.

These are rules YOU created and YOU broke them.[/quote:1q7cey09]

1: contact fusion RETURNS the cards to the deck. mine send to the GY so im not contact fusion summoining as my cards always send from the hand or field to the GY.

2: my NATIVE AMERICAN (NOT INDIAN!!! GET IT RIGHT!!!) only use eatos because shes my soul card as shes a native american warrior (im native american) and an angel (i beleive in angels) combined

3: its no INSTA wins. (aka cards tha make you win without any prerequisites)

4: the only deck i have that spam summons without a cost is my paladins (i made this to give spam summoners a taste of their own medicine)[/quote:1q7cey09]

Your INDIAN deck has an auto win. Your rules say no auto wins.

Your transformers deck, pony deck, pedo deck also spam summon with no cost.

You have a rule on no broken cards. All of them are broken.

Your transformers fusion is a remake of ABC-Dragon Buster, no TCG remakes

Your transformer fusion has the same contact fuse effect of ABC-Dragon Buster. No contact fusion.[/quote:1q7cey09]

1: Transformers was out long before ABC Buster Dragon was. so its not a remake

[quote="CrystalMusic":3s77yd33][quote="LightCaster":3s77yd33][quote="CrystalMusic":3s77yd33]

1: contact fusion RETURNS the cards to the deck. mine send to the GY so im not contact fusion summoining as my cards always send from the hand or field to the GY.

2: my NATIVE AMERICAN (NOT INDIAN!!! GET IT RIGHT!!!) only use eatos because shes my soul card as shes a native american warrior (im native american) and an angel (i beleive in angels) combined

3: its no INSTA wins. (aka cards tha make you win without any prerequisites)

4: the only deck i have that spam summons without a cost is my paladins (i made this to give spam summoners a taste of their own medicine)[/quote:3s77yd33]

Your INDIAN deck has an auto win. Your rules say no auto wins.

Your transformers deck, pony deck, pedo deck also spam summon with no cost.

You have a rule on no broken cards. All of them are broken.

Your transformers fusion is a remake of ABC-Dragon Buster, no TCG remakes

Your transformer fusion has the same contact fuse effect of ABC-Dragon Buster. No contact fusion.[/quote:3s77yd33]

1: Transformers was out long before ABC Buster Dragon was. so its not a remake[/quote:3s77yd33]

Still shares the effect. Breaking that rule.

and if ur reffering to "Chief Joseph" its an ALTERNATE victory. not an inta win. he requires 3 other specifically named monsters on the field in order for me to claim victory. if it was an insta win, he would make me win the moment he hits the field, but he doesnt, he has a 3 monster pre-requisite + himself inorder to claim victory

[quote="CrystalMusic":28ok0kfj]and if ur reffering to "Chief Joseph" its an ALTERNATE victory. not an inta win. he requires 3 other specifically named monsters on the field in order for me to claim victory. if it was an insta win, he would make me win the moment he hits the field, but he doesnt, he has a 3 monster pre-requisite + himself inorder to claim victory[/quote:28ok0kfj]

Your rules also say no alt victories.

and all my customs are broken? u must have never dueled my Darksworns, they are litterally the same atk, def as the lightsworns, but instead of sending cards from my deck to my gy, they return cards from my gy to my deck. and retribution dragon is much harder to summon than judgement dragon, he requires 4 "darksworns" with differnet names in my GY to be summoned. and considering my "Darksworns" return cards from my GY to my deck, that is quite hard to pull off!!! so think how hard it would be to keep 4 or more "Darksworns" with different names in my GY when my darksworns are based on returning cards from my GY to my deck.

so "ALL" of my custom cards are broken?? yeah. no. dont think so. so TRY AGAIN!!!

[quote="LightCaster":3773ys8r][quote="CrystalMusic":3773ys8r]and if ur reffering to "Chief Joseph" its an ALTERNATE victory. not an inta win. he requires 3 other specifically named monsters on the field in order for me to claim victory. if it was an insta win, he would make me win the moment he hits the field, but he doesnt, he has a 3 monster pre-requisite + himself inorder to claim victory[/quote:3773ys8r]

Your rules also say no alt victories.[/quote:3773ys8r]
again NO INSTA WIN, what part of that dont u get thru that thickheaded skull of yours????

[quote="CrystalMusic":2fwtbivs][quote="LightCaster":2fwtbivs][quote="CrystalMusic":2fwtbivs]and if ur reffering to "Chief Joseph" its an ALTERNATE victory. not an inta win. he requires 3 other specifically named monsters on the field in order for me to claim victory. if it was an insta win, he would make me win the moment he hits the field, but he doesnt, he has a 3 monster pre-requisite + himself inorder to claim victory[/quote:2fwtbivs]

Your rules also say no alt victories.[/quote:2fwtbivs]
again NO INSTA WIN, what part of that dont u get thru that thickheaded skull of yours????[/quote:2fwtbivs]

Dunno. What part of "Your rules are one-sided" did you not get? Keep making these strawmen. I can keep taking them down.

At least you get strawmen, the issues I point get completely avoided.

[quote="LightCaster":31km1h2o][quote="CrystalMusic":31km1h2o][quote="LightCaster":31km1h2o]

Your rules also say no alt victories.[/quote:31km1h2o]
again NO INSTA WIN, what part of that dont u get thru that thickheaded skull of yours????[/quote:31km1h2o]

Dunno. What part of "Your rules are one-sided" did you not get? Keep making these strawmen. I can keep taking them down.[/quote:31km1h2o]

when i make custom ALTERNATE Victory cards, i tend to make them work in a similar fashion to ones we already have in the game, to keep it fair. However i do add in a twist with some of them. Like my Age of Empires Wonder. I tend to keep cards based on certain things lore friendly.

In age of empires the Wonder is a building that makes you win so long as it stays standing for a set amount of time or in this case: a set amount of turns - 30 to be exact (this is similar to final countdown, except my card is a continuous trap and is able to be destroyed thus preventing its alternate victory and takes an extra +10 turns to claim victory with) However, in age of empires, the game where the wonder is based off of... villagers can repair damaged buildings and military units can defend key buildings and villagers, so keeping it lore friendly to the game, i added in some protection to my Wonder trap card so it cannot be targeted or destroyed whilst i have a villager. and villagers are usually protected by military units in the game so the villager cannot be attacked while i control a monster other than vilager. Im keeping the cards lore friendly to the game while putting it into a yugioh point of view!

[quote="CrystalMusic":3cjhs8ov][quote="LightCaster":3cjhs8ov][quote="CrystalMusic":3cjhs8ov]
again NO INSTA WIN, what part of that dont u get thru that thickheaded skull of yours????[/quote:3cjhs8ov]

Dunno. What part of "Your rules are one-sided" did you not get? Keep making these strawmen. I can keep taking them down.[/quote:3cjhs8ov]

when i make custom ALTERNATE Victory cards, i tend to make them work in a similar fashion to ones we already have in the game, to keep it fair. However i do add in a twist with some of them. Like my Age of Empires Wonder. I tend to keep cards based on certain things lore friendly.

In age of empires the Wonder is a building that makes you win so long as it stays standing for a set amount of time or in this case: a set amount of turns - 30 to be exact (this is similar to final countdown, except my card is a continuous trap and is able to be destroyed thus preventing its alternate victory and takes an extra +10 turns to claim victory with) However, in age of empires, the game where the wonder is based off of... villagers can repair damaged buildings and military units can defend key buildings and villagers, so keeping it lore friendly to the game, i added in some protection to my Wonder trap card so it cannot be targeted or destroyed whilst i have a villager. and villagers are usually protected by military units in the game so the villager cannot be attacked while i control a monster other than vilager. Im keeping the cards lore friendly to the game while putting it into a yugioh point of view![/quote:3cjhs8ov]

Your rules say no alternate victories. Only reducing your opponent's LP to 0. Also "lore reasons" isn't always a good reason to design a card. Flamvell Magician tried that and now look at it.

[quote="LightCaster":37bkhhpl][quote="CrystalMusic":37bkhhpl][quote="LightCaster":37bkhhpl]

Dunno. What part of "Your rules are one-sided" did you not get? Keep making these strawmen. I can keep taking them down.[/quote:37bkhhpl]

when i make custom ALTERNATE Victory cards, i tend to make them work in a similar fashion to ones we already have in the game, to keep it fair. However i do add in a twist with some of them. Like my Age of Empires Wonder. I tend to keep cards based on certain things lore friendly.

In age of empires the Wonder is a building that makes you win so long as it stays standing for a set amount of time or in this case: a set amount of turns - 30 to be exact (this is similar to final countdown, except my card is a continuous trap and is able to be destroyed thus preventing its alternate victory and takes an extra +10 turns to claim victory with) However, in age of empires, the game where the wonder is based off of... villagers can repair damaged buildings and military units can defend key buildings and villagers, so keeping it lore friendly to the game, i added in some protection to my Wonder trap card so it cannot be targeted or destroyed whilst i have a villager. and villagers are usually protected by military units in the game so the villager cannot be attacked while i control a monster other than vilager. Im keeping the cards lore friendly to the game while putting it into a yugioh point of view![/quote:37bkhhpl]

Your rules say no alternate victories. Only reducing your opponent's LP to 0. Also "lore reasons" isn't always a good reason to design a card. Flamvell Magician tried that and now look at it.[/quote:37bkhhpl]

1: youre trying to compare a TCG card to a Custom Card. your argument is invalid!
2: I dont see how Flamvell Magician has any "LORE" about it. i dont see how it relates to anything outside of yugioh, so more points to make your argument invalid!
3: again i have never said no alt victories! in previous posts i said i dont mind alt victories so long as you are not using new support with it. For example: "Obliderate" with exodia. that trap was not around during the inital release of exodia.

[quote="CrystalMusic":1gd7mubs][quote="LightCaster":1gd7mubs][quote="CrystalMusic":1gd7mubs]

when i make custom ALTERNATE Victory cards, i tend to make them work in a similar fashion to ones we already have in the game, to keep it fair. However i do add in a twist with some of them. Like my Age of Empires Wonder. I tend to keep cards based on certain things lore friendly.

In age of empires the Wonder is a building that makes you win so long as it stays standing for a set amount of time or in this case: a set amount of turns - 30 to be exact (this is similar to final countdown, except my card is a continuous trap and is able to be destroyed thus preventing its alternate victory and takes an extra +10 turns to claim victory with) However, in age of empires, the game where the wonder is based off of... villagers can repair damaged buildings and military units can defend key buildings and villagers, so keeping it lore friendly to the game, i added in some protection to my Wonder trap card so it cannot be targeted or destroyed whilst i have a villager. and villagers are usually protected by military units in the game so the villager cannot be attacked while i control a monster other than vilager. Im keeping the cards lore friendly to the game while putting it into a yugioh point of view![/quote:1gd7mubs]

Your rules say no alternate victories. Only reducing your opponent's LP to 0. Also "lore reasons" isn't always a good reason to design a card. Flamvell Magician tried that and now look at it.[/quote:1gd7mubs]

1: youre trying to compare a TCG card to a Custom Card. your argument is invalid!
2: I dont see how Flamvell Magician has any "LORE" about it. i dont see how it relates to anything outside of yugioh, so more points to make your argument invalid!
3: again i have never said no alt victories! in previous posts i said i dont mind alt victories so long as you are not using new support with it. For example: "Obliderate" with exodia. that trap was not around during the inital release of exodia.[/quote:1gd7mubs]

I'm using your logic because Flamvell Magician for some reason benefits Ally of Justice which is a thing in Duel Terminal lore that Flamvell was one of the groups that assisted Ally of Justice against the Worms. So Flamvell Magician gives Ally of Justice monsters 500 more atk despite being a Flamvell card.

Also you did say no alt victories so stop saying you didn't.

[quote="LightCaster":1hhycuej][quote="CrystalMusic":1hhycuej][quote="LightCaster":1hhycuej]

Your rules say no alternate victories. Only reducing your opponent's LP to 0. Also "lore reasons" isn't always a good reason to design a card. Flamvell Magician tried that and now look at it.[/quote:1hhycuej]

1: youre trying to compare a TCG card to a Custom Card. your argument is invalid!
2: I dont see how Flamvell Magician has any "LORE" about it. i dont see how it relates to anything outside of yugioh, so more points to make your argument invalid!
3: again i have never said no alt victories! in previous posts i said i dont mind alt victories so long as you are not using new support with it. For example: "Obliderate" with exodia. that trap was not around during the inital release of exodia.[/quote:1hhycuej]

I'm using your logic because Flamvell Magician for some reason benefits Ally of Justice which is a thing in Duel Terminal lore that Flamvell was one of the groups that assisted Ally of Justice against the Worms. So Flamvell Magician gives Ally of Justice monsters 500 more atk despite being a Flamvell card.

Also you did say no alt victories so stop saying you didn't.[/quote:1hhycuej]

oh FFS! Im done arguing with you. its clear that you just want to start sh!t because you clearly cant read! go start something with someone else im done.

[quote="CrystalMusic":1grahixw][quote="LightCaster":1grahixw][quote="CrystalMusic":1grahixw]

1: youre trying to compare a TCG card to a Custom Card. your argument is invalid!
2: I dont see how Flamvell Magician has any "LORE" about it. i dont see how it relates to anything outside of yugioh, so more points to make your argument invalid!
3: again i have never said no alt victories! in previous posts i said i dont mind alt victories so long as you are not using new support with it. For example: "Obliderate" with exodia. that trap was not around during the inital release of exodia.[/quote:1grahixw]

I'm using your logic because Flamvell Magician for some reason benefits Ally of Justice which is a thing in Duel Terminal lore that Flamvell was one of the groups that assisted Ally of Justice against the Worms. So Flamvell Magician gives Ally of Justice monsters 500 more atk despite being a Flamvell card.

Also you did say no alt victories so stop saying you didn't.[/quote:1grahixw]

oh FFS! Im done arguing with you. its clear that you just want to start sh!t because you clearly cant read! go start something with someone else im done.[/quote:1grahixw]
He's literally just pointing out your hypocritical bullshit. It seems you can't handle that.

Heck, he completely ignored the evidences of his hypocrisy I've pointed out. All it matters to him is to leave discussion on a moral high ground, even if just in his perception.

[quote="NiwatoriFTW":pj0267sl]Heck, he completely ignored the evidences of his hypocrisy I've pointed out. All it matters to him is to leave discussion on a moral high ground, even if just in his perception.[/quote:pj0267sl]

at least i have morals! even if they are, to you guys, a bit "questionable"

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-21806087

the duel log can be so useful
and if u try to say: i said no Alt Victories. id like you to prove where in my duel note it said that! It said no insta wins. not no alt victories!

the duel log doesnt lie: [0:00] CrystalMusic hosted Single (with siding) in Custom Cards (Unrated) with duel note "Custom Cards Only. No Pends or Insta Wins"

so try as you might, you cannot refute this evidence for this duels particular rules i set for it!

and not only that, i was fairly polite when reminding my opponent of the rules of my duel.

[quote="CrystalMusic":20pqzuog][quote="NiwatoriFTW":20pqzuog]Heck, he completely ignored the evidences of his hypocrisy I've pointed out. All it matters to him is to leave discussion on a moral high ground, even if just in his perception.[/quote:20pqzuog]

at least i have morals! even if they are, to you guys, a bit "questionable"[/quote:20pqzuog]
Talk about abusing the strawman fallacy. Also, they're not "a bit [quote]questionable[unquote]" when you abuse opportunities to not abide them, as seen from the replays I've shared, they're downright false.

[quote="CrystalMusic":3gy02vkz][quote="LightCaster":3gy02vkz][quote="CrystalMusic":3gy02vkz]

1: youre trying to compare a TCG card to a Custom Card. your argument is invalid!
2: I dont see how Flamvell Magician has any "LORE" about it. i dont see how it relates to anything outside of yugioh, so more points to make your argument invalid!
3: again i have never said no alt victories! in previous posts i said i dont mind alt victories so long as you are not using new support with it. For example: "Obliderate" with exodia. that trap was not around during the inital release of exodia.[/quote:3gy02vkz]

I'm using your logic because Flamvell Magician for some reason benefits Ally of Justice which is a thing in Duel Terminal lore that Flamvell was one of the groups that assisted Ally of Justice against the Worms. So Flamvell Magician gives Ally of Justice monsters 500 more atk despite being a Flamvell card.

Also you did say no alt victories so stop saying you didn't.[/quote:3gy02vkz]

oh FFS! Im done arguing with you. its clear that you just want to start sh!t because you clearly cant read! go start something with someone else im done.[/quote:3gy02vkz]

So I won this discussion like I won that rap battle with you? Is nice.

[quote="LightCaster":277d0vc6][quote="CrystalMusic":277d0vc6][quote="LightCaster":277d0vc6]

I'm using your logic because Flamvell Magician for some reason benefits Ally of Justice which is a thing in Duel Terminal lore that Flamvell was one of the groups that assisted Ally of Justice against the Worms. So Flamvell Magician gives Ally of Justice monsters 500 more atk despite being a Flamvell card.

Also you did say no alt victories so stop saying you didn't.[/quote:277d0vc6]

oh FFS! Im done arguing with you. its clear that you just want to start sh!t because you clearly cant read! go start something with someone else im done.[/quote:277d0vc6]

So I won this discussion like I won that rap battle with you? Is nice. [/quote:277d0vc6]

oh so u self-proclaimed yourself the winner of my rap battle? no one else said u won, and if they did they only did that because they hate me so that wouldnt count as its a biased vote!

[quote="CrystalMusic":1we3gxgv][quote="LightCaster":1we3gxgv][quote="CrystalMusic":1we3gxgv]

oh FFS! Im done arguing with you. its clear that you just want to start sh!t because you clearly cant read! go start something with someone else im done.[/quote:1we3gxgv]

So I won this discussion like I won that rap battle with you? Is nice. [/quote:1we3gxgv]

oh so u self-proclaimed yourself the winner of my rap battle? no one else said u won, and if they did they only did that because they hate me so that wouldnt count as its a biased vote![/quote:1we3gxgv]
Bulverism and Ad Hominem mixed with burden of proof? Considering your usage of fallacies, that's quite new.

[quote="CrystalMusic":1ogffmf1][quote="LightCaster":1ogffmf1][quote="CrystalMusic":1ogffmf1]

oh FFS! Im done arguing with you. its clear that you just want to start sh!t because you clearly cant read! go start something with someone else im done.[/quote:1ogffmf1]

So I won this discussion like I won that rap battle with you? Is nice. [/quote:1ogffmf1]

oh so u self-proclaimed yourself the winner of my rap battle? no one else said u won, and if they did they only did that because they hate me so that wouldnt count as its a biased vote![/quote:1ogffmf1]

Rap battle rules. If you can't come up with a response then I'm deemed the winner.

[quote="LightCaster":7j3036kj][quote="CrystalMusic":7j3036kj][quote="LightCaster":7j3036kj]

So I won this discussion like I won that rap battle with you? Is nice. [/quote:7j3036kj]

oh so u self-proclaimed yourself the winner of my rap battle? no one else said u won, and if they did they only did that because they hate me so that wouldnt count as its a biased vote![/quote:7j3036kj]

Rap battle rules. If you can't come up with a response then I'm deemed the winner.[/quote:7j3036kj]

not my rap battle. mine is based on: you say your entire rap, then people vote on who had the better rap in terms of its content, context, use of words, rhymes, and how many verses it had. thats how my rap battle was based. this aint ERB!

[quote="CrystalMusic":3tuafqxt][quote="LightCaster":3tuafqxt][quote="CrystalMusic":3tuafqxt]

oh so u self-proclaimed yourself the winner of my rap battle? no one else said u won, and if they did they only did that because they hate me so that wouldnt count as its a biased vote![/quote:3tuafqxt]

Rap battle rules. If you can't come up with a response then I'm deemed the winner.[/quote:3tuafqxt]

not my rap battle. mine is based on: you say your entire rap, then people vote on who had the better rap in terms of its content, context, use of words, rhymes, and how many verses it had. thats how my rap battle was based. this aint ERB![/quote:3tuafqxt]

You never specified that. So now you gotta commit.

Is 75% of this thread about CM?

[quote="LightCaster":3o2vfg58][quote="CrystalMusic":3o2vfg58][quote="LightCaster":3o2vfg58]

I'm using your logic because Flamvell Magician for some reason benefits Ally of Justice which is a thing in Duel Terminal lore that Flamvell was one of the groups that assisted Ally of Justice against the Worms. So Flamvell Magician gives Ally of Justice monsters 500 more atk despite being a Flamvell card.

Also you did say no alt victories so stop saying you didn't.[/quote:3o2vfg58]

oh FFS! Im done arguing with you. its clear that you just want to start sh!t because you clearly cant read! go start something with someone else im done.[/quote:3o2vfg58]

So I won this discussion like I won that rap battle with you? Is nice. [/quote:3o2vfg58]

What rap battle?

[quote="Christen57":31u07m1g][quote="LightCaster":31u07m1g][quote="CrystalMusic":31u07m1g]

oh FFS! Im done arguing with you. its clear that you just want to start sh!t because you clearly cant read! go start something with someone else im done.[/quote:31u07m1g]

So I won this discussion like I won that rap battle with you? Is nice. [/quote:31u07m1g]

What rap battle?[/quote:31u07m1g]

viewtopic.php?f=22&t=11306&p=45992&hilit=rap#p45992

[quote="CrystalMusic":212yxkb2][quote="LightCaster":212yxkb2][quote="CrystalMusic":212yxkb2]

oh FFS! Im done arguing with you. its clear that you just want to start sh!t because you clearly cant read! go start something with someone else im done.[/quote:212yxkb2]

So I won this discussion like I won that rap battle with you? Is nice. [/quote:212yxkb2]

oh so u self-proclaimed yourself the winner of my rap battle? no one else said u won, and if they did they only did that because they hate me so that wouldnt count as its a biased vote![/quote:212yxkb2]
You do realize it doesn't matter if a vote is "bias" right? Oh wait...voting in general has always had bias as a factor. So get out of here with your bullshit.

I also want to mention, Runzy hands down won the rap battle, while you spit a giant wall of text no one could be bothered to read, Runzy beat you with only 4 lines of text.

[quote="Renji Asuka":3pfdwytf]I also want to mention, Runzy hands down won the rap battle, while you spit a giant wall of text no one could be bothered to read, Runzy beat you with only 4 lines of text.[/quote:3pfdwytf]

you cant claim a victor unless you read the entire rap. thats just being biased and lazy.

Brevity is the soul of wit

I can't believe this thread got off rail for like 3 pages worth of post. Guys calm down already.

A random duel of a player defeating OP, poor PSCT Goku cards with more well designed cards, and rule lawyering (Although he also have some OP card on his own....)
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=15081070

[quote="CrystalMusic":2caxhuei][quote="Renji Asuka":2caxhuei]I also want to mention, Runzy hands down won the rap battle, while you spit a giant wall of text no one could be bothered to read, Runzy beat you with only 4 lines of text.[/quote:2caxhuei]

you cant claim a victor unless you read the entire rap. thats just being biased and lazy.[/quote:2caxhuei]
And yet I can still legally vote against you.

[quote="Renji Asuka":9pu017it][quote="CrystalMusic":9pu017it][quote="Renji Asuka":9pu017it]I also want to mention, Runzy hands down won the rap battle, while you spit a giant wall of text no one could be bothered to read, Runzy beat you with only 4 lines of text.[/quote:9pu017it]

you cant claim a victor unless you read the entire rap. thats just being biased and lazy.[/quote:9pu017it]
And yet I can still legally vote against you.[/quote:9pu017it]

actually cas ur one of the ppl who are biased against me, no u cannot. its just like AGT, if u know the person (rather personally or because of multiple videos, etc) then no you cannot.

[quote="CrystalMusic":t46q8fqc][quote="Renji Asuka":t46q8fqc][quote="CrystalMusic":t46q8fqc]

you cant claim a victor unless you read the entire rap. thats just being biased and lazy.[/quote:t46q8fqc]
And yet I can still legally vote against you.[/quote:t46q8fqc]

actually cas ur one of the ppl who are biased against me, no u cannot. its just like AGT, if u know the person (rather personally or because of multiple videos, etc) then no you cannot.[/quote:t46q8fqc]
Bias against you? I just point out what I see, I couldn't give 2 shits about you, but make an ass of yourself or be a shitty person, I'll call you out on it every time. Also, yes I can vote against you for any reason, from your name to when you were born or even the color of your skin, or OR hear me out, how you act.

[quote="Renji Asuka":3cj7mchc]Also, yes I can vote against you for any reason, from your name to when you were born or even the color of your skin, or OR hear me out, how you act.[/quote:3cj7mchc]

so youll vote against ppl because of their skin color, or their nationality? that sounds very prejudiced. wow, i cant believe you just said that in a public forum.

Bulverism and strawman fallacy at large here...

[quote="CrystalMusic":1i7tk3p8][quote="Renji Asuka":1i7tk3p8]Also, yes I can vote against you for any reason, from your name to when you were born or even the color of your skin, or OR hear me out, how you act.[/quote:1i7tk3p8]

so youll vote against ppl because of their skin color, or their nationality? that sounds very prejudiced. wow, i cant believe you just said that in a public forum.[/quote:1i7tk3p8]
What? You don't understand that people can vote for literally any reason even something you find nonsensical? But so glad you missed the point like you always do.

Imagine going to a thread expecting it to be on topic

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=58994-21848375

Red-Eyes/Dragunity/Rokket/Vylon player does a combo but I happen to use Nibiru at the right time so he isn't able to end on a board that's too strong or loop my hand with Smoke Grenade, but then he stops responding after game 1 so a judge has to come and award me the win by default.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=21897343

A match lasting over 3 hours, with judges being called to the game a grand total of 11 times, over various ruling, cheating, and slow play issues.

[quote="Christen57":3pso7vd0]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=21897343

A match lasting over 3 hours, with judges being called to the game a grand total of 11 times, over various ruling, cheating, and slow play issues.[/quote:3pso7vd0]
I... I'm just completely speechless, like, what was this duel?

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=239666-21930442

The match starts, and a player accidentally admits defeat, somehow, so he demands that his opponent also just forfeit game 2 so it can be fair and then both players play game 3 with a fair amount of wins/losses, but said opponent isn't having any of it, and they argue over this and call each other names until the defeat-admitting player gets sick of it and just quits.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=366349-21511342

Who the hell rage quits over Vampires?

[quote="LightCaster":2efjaj7x]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=366349-21511342

Who the hell rage quits over Vampires?[/quote:2efjaj7x]
That was just priceless.

Some dude loss to a Simple Spell/Trap
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=21939595

[quote="LightCaster":16zu1evv]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=366349-21511342

Who the hell rage quits over Vampires?[/quote:16zu1evv]
moonsamurai is a shitter

[quote="Christen57":3iiw2lwe]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=21897343

A match lasting over 3 hours, with judges being called to the game a grand total of 11 times, over various ruling, cheating, and slow play issues.[/quote:3iiw2lwe]

Hey. I saw that LIVE two days ago.

(Day 1 of login to this site)

[url:2ia3s0vh]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=529064-21962777[/url:2ia3s0vh] Extra deckless Dark Magician Vs. Monarchs

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=623896-21963006

Player rage quits because his opponent called him a name.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=58994-21964630

Had no idea Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon had a hard once per turn restriction placed on it until my opponent told me.

[quote="Christen57":lzdtjswp]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=58994-21964630

Had no idea Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon had a hard once per turn restriction placed on it until my opponent told me.[/quote:lzdtjswp]
Well I heard it got an Errata, so I guess it is now, unless I'm mistaken.

[quote="Christen57":1phczx3x]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=58994-21964630

Had no idea Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon had a hard once per turn restriction placed on it until my opponent told me.[/quote:1phczx3x]
Yeah that happened awhile back.

Well, Somebody thought it said "the same Type, Attribute, Level, ATK, AND DEF as a "Symphonic Warrior" monster you control;" rather than "the same Type, Attribute, Level, ATK, OR DEF as a "Symphonic Warrior" monster you control;"
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=90641-21980669

And oh yeah, I love using Stingmarine as a Replacement for O-lion
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=90641-21782377
Also, in the Deck Recipe There was another card that is a replacement for Jet Synchron in the Side Deck
It looks like this -> https://www.duelingbook.com/card?id=1636153
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=6345471

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=22030168

Guy gets himself frozen for swearing repeatedly after being asked politely to stop.

[quote="Christen57":32ufu1el]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=22030168

Guy gets himself frozen for swearing repeatedly after being asked politely to stop.[/quote:32ufu1el]
Wow, I can't tell if the guy was trolling or what, but I'm sure that he's not a very happy camper.

[url:3m818pj5]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=529064-22037817[/url:3m818pj5] Superheavy Samurai Vs. a Winged Dragon of Ra deck.

A Customs Duel made from Anime Characters until Crystal finds a Harpie
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=22059710

[quote="james123":43ms9lgg]A Customs Duel made from Anime Characters until Crystal finds a Harpie
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=22059710[/quote:43ms9lgg]

oh im sorry, harpies are to overused when ones not says no main characters. i dont like seeing my opponents use the same cards! for gods sake, no one ever uses weevil, rex, mako, rapheal, valon, alister, solomun, rebbeca, etc

[quote="james123":xyz5fidc]A Customs Duel made from Anime Characters until Crystal finds a Harpie
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=22059710[/quote:xyz5fidc]
Yep, there goes CrystalMusic, making the community look good again.

[quote="CrystalMusic":3244kqh5][quote="james123":3244kqh5]A Customs Duel made from Anime Characters until Crystal finds a Harpie
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=22059710[/quote:3244kqh5]

oh im sorry, harpies are to overused when ones not says no main characters. i dont like seeing my opponents use the same cards! for gods sake, no one ever uses weevil, rex, mako, rapheal, valon, alister, solomun, rebbeca, etc[/quote:3244kqh5]
Dude, even if someone does use those decks, you'll probably get butthurt over the fact they start beating you with them, and then you'll want people to not use them.

[quote="Darkraiclone":24y9wfho][quote="CrystalMusic":24y9wfho][quote="james123":24y9wfho]A Customs Duel made from Anime Characters until Crystal finds a Harpie
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=22059710[/quote:24y9wfho]

oh im sorry, harpies are to overused when ones not says no main characters. i dont like seeing my opponents use the same cards! for gods sake, no one ever uses weevil, rex, mako, rapheal, valon, alister, solomun, rebbeca, etc[/quote:24y9wfho]
Dude, even if someone does use those decks, you'll probably get butthurt over the fact they start beating you with them, and then you'll want people to not use them.[/quote:24y9wfho]

that depends on if they are running cards the character used or not.

example: someones running rex but throws in a bunch of new dinos that were never used by rex, then YEAH! im gonna leave! i make acceptions for some cards.

[quote="CrystalMusic":28zj7vci][quote="Darkraiclone":28zj7vci][quote="CrystalMusic":28zj7vci]

oh im sorry, harpies are to overused when ones not says no main characters. i dont like seeing my opponents use the same cards! for gods sake, no one ever uses weevil, rex, mako, rapheal, valon, alister, solomun, rebbeca, etc[/quote:28zj7vci]
Dude, even if someone does use those decks, you'll probably get butthurt over the fact they start beating you with them, and then you'll want people to not use them.[/quote:28zj7vci]

that depends on if they are running cards the character used or not.

example: someones running rex but throws in a bunch of new dinos that were never used by rex, then YEAH! im gonna leave! i make acceptions for some cards.[/quote:28zj7vci]
Same logic, same results.

[1:29] Normal Summoned "Harpie Lady 3" from hand (4/5) to M-4
[1:32] "bye"
[1:32] Activated "Cyber Shield" from hand (1/4)
[1:34] Entered Battle Phase
[1:35] "i hate harpies"
[1:40] "use somethign that isnt use all the time"

I don't know what you went through that made you think Harpie Lady 3 is something people still "use all the time" in today's meta, but I can assure you, you will never see a Harpie Lady 3 used in today's meta, not even in Harpie decks themselves.

It's because he's sick of playing against Mai decks in character duels

[quote="Christen57":2ut2ogda][1:29] Normal Summoned "Harpie Lady 3" from hand (4/5) to M-4
[1:32] "bye"
[1:32] Activated "Cyber Shield" from hand (1/4)
[1:34] Entered Battle Phase
[1:35] "i hate harpies"
[1:40] "use somethign that isnt use all the time"

I don't know what you went through that made you think Harpie Lady 3 is something people still "use all the time" in today's meta, but I can assure you, you will never see a Harpie Lady 3 used in today's meta, not even in Harpie decks themselves.[/quote:2ut2ogda]

1: i never said anything about meta (until now, since you brought it into this)
2: i never allow meta! (and im not just talking the current meta, im talking meta from 2012 onwards when i started to lose interest in the game) A: its unoriginal
B: this is not a tournament! its an online simulator! so theres no need to run a top (meta) deck!

[quote="CrystalMusic":ckttiqre][quote="Christen57":ckttiqre][1:29] Normal Summoned "Harpie Lady 3" from hand (4/5) to M-4
[1:32] "bye"
[1:32] Activated "Cyber Shield" from hand (1/4)
[1:34] Entered Battle Phase
[1:35] "i hate harpies"
[1:40] "use somethign that isnt use all the time"

I don't know what you went through that made you think Harpie Lady 3 is something people still "use all the time" in today's meta, but I can assure you, you will never see a Harpie Lady 3 used in today's meta, not even in Harpie decks themselves.[/quote:ckttiqre]

1: i never said anything about meta (until now, since you brought it into this)
2: i never allow meta! (and im not just talking the current meta, im talking meta from 2012 onwards when i started to lose interest in the game) A: its unoriginal
B: this is not a tournament! its an online simulator! so theres no need to run a top (meta) deck![/quote:ckttiqre]

Still, you aren't going to see people running Harpie Lady 3 that much due to it's low stats and mediocre effect. If anything, they will run far better Harpies.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=22089288

A D/D player makes an illegal play, and the opponent doesn't notice it until 2 turns later. The judge comes and questions the player who made said illegal play, and they're like "but I didn't do nuthin' wrong, I dunno wut yur talking about" so the judge freezes them for cheating and lying about it.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=22089727

Here a player misplays, demands that his opponent let him take back the misplay, opponent refuses, so the player calls a judge to try and force the opponent to let him take back the misplay, but becomes unresponsive and gets a match loss.

[quote="Christen57":1rb5om6u]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=22089288

A D/D player makes an illegal play, and the opponent doesn't notice it until 2 turns later. The judge comes and questions the player who made said illegal play, and they're like "but I didn't do nuthin' wrong, I dunno wut yur talking about" so the judge freezes them for cheating and lying about it.[/quote:1rb5om6u]
Wow, the judges here must have the patience of a saint to constantly deal with this BS and not snap. I honestly salute them.

[url:3f09zniv]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=529064-22093447[/url:3f09zniv] Apparently not everyone can stand up to steadfast Dueling.

[quote="CrystalMusic":14ad606a][quote="james123":14ad606a]A Customs Duel made from Anime Characters until Crystal finds a Harpie
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=22059710[/quote:14ad606a]

oh im sorry, harpies are to overused when ones not says no main characters. i dont like seeing my opponents use the same cards! for gods sake, no one ever uses weevil, rex, mako, rapheal, valon, alister, solomun, rebbeca, etc[/quote:14ad606a]

*Solomon
*Raphael

Also you'd throw a fit if someone used Raphael because Guardian Eatos is "your card".

[quote="LightCaster":2vcu16j7][quote="CrystalMusic":2vcu16j7][quote="james123":2vcu16j7]A Customs Duel made from Anime Characters until Crystal finds a Harpie
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=22059710[/quote:2vcu16j7]

oh im sorry, harpies are to overused when ones not says no main characters. i dont like seeing my opponents use the same cards! for gods sake, no one ever uses weevil, rex, mako, rapheal, valon, alister, solomun, rebbeca, etc[/quote:2vcu16j7]

*Solomon
*Raphael

Also you'd throw a fit if someone used Raphael because Guardian Eatos is "your card".[/quote:2vcu16j7]

its my "SOUL CARD" theres a difference!

[quote="CrystalMusic":2t42f04b][quote="LightCaster":2t42f04b][quote="CrystalMusic":2t42f04b]

oh im sorry, harpies are to overused when ones not says no main characters. i dont like seeing my opponents use the same cards! for gods sake, no one ever uses weevil, rex, mako, rapheal, valon, alister, solomun, rebbeca, etc[/quote:2t42f04b]

*Solomon
*Raphael

Also you'd throw a fit if someone used Raphael because Guardian Eatos is "your card".[/quote:2t42f04b]

its my "SOUL CARD" theres a difference![/quote:2t42f04b]

Whatever. So your "ban list" of characters should look like this:

Yugi Muto
Atem
Maximillian Pegasus
Raphael
Dartz
Marik Ishtar
Ishizu Ishtar
Seto Kaiba
Mokuba Kaiba
Joey Wheeler
Mai Valentine
Tristan Taylor
Tea Gardner
Aigami
Jaiden Yuki
Syrus Truesdale
Zane Truesdale
Chazz Princeton
Alexis Rhodes
Aster Phoenix
Zigfried von Schroeder
Leon von Schroeder
Duke Devlin
Odion
Sartorious Kumar
Tania
Camula
Bastion Misawa
Yubel
Dr. Vellian Crowler
Don Zaloog
Titan
Amnael
Kagemaru
Nightshroud
Abidos the Third
Ryo Bakura
Gozuburou Kaiba

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=22101078

Just some words of wisdom from a gray-named judge.

[quote="CrystalMusic":29hisul7][quote="LightCaster":29hisul7][quote="CrystalMusic":29hisul7]

oh im sorry, harpies are to overused when ones not says no main characters. i dont like seeing my opponents use the same cards! for gods sake, no one ever uses weevil, rex, mako, rapheal, valon, alister, solomun, rebbeca, etc[/quote:29hisul7]

*Solomon
*Raphael

Also you'd throw a fit if someone used Raphael because Guardian Eatos is "your card".[/quote:29hisul7]

its my "SOUL CARD" theres a difference![/quote:29hisul7]
Soul card or not anyone can use it there is no rule on it that no player can use it except for you it’s not like the anime.

whatever im not going to get into this. good day. imma be the mature one here and just ignore future replies to this thread unless its specifically about me

[quote="CrystalMusic":31ondyae]whatever im not going to get into this. good day. imma be the mature one here and just ignore future replies to this thread unless its specifically about me[/quote:31ondyae]
What a baby.

[quote="CrystalMusic":16zd58xu]whatever im not going to get into this. good day. imma be the mature one here and just ignore future replies to this thread unless its specifically about me[/quote:16zd58xu]
Thank God, this thread SHOULDN'T be about you, it should be about replays

[quote="greg503":3mvlc244][quote="CrystalMusic":3mvlc244]whatever im not going to get into this. good day. imma be the mature one here and just ignore future replies to this thread unless its specifically about me[/quote:3mvlc244]
Thank God, this thread SHOULDN'T be about you, it should be about replays[/quote:3mvlc244]
Agreed

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=15037-22121348
I beat crystal's blue-eyes with his rules and he throws a tantrum.

[quote="drquantumscale":2rpqk5rf]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=15037-22121348
I beat crystal's blue-eyes with his rules and he throws a tantrum.[/quote:2rpqk5rf]
oh im sorry u didint beat it, i still had all my LP so u didnt win

[quote="CrystalMusic":1ppyt33g][quote="drquantumscale":1ppyt33g]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=15037-22121348
I beat crystal's blue-eyes with his rules and he throws a tantrum.[/quote:1ppyt33g]
oh im sorry u didint beat it, i still had all my LP so u didnt win[/quote:1ppyt33g]
If this was the requirement to win, I'd just join tournaments with a burn deck, activate Ookazi or something and rage quit before the opponent could do something and claim victory, since I'd have more LPs than they would.

Sadly, this isn't how it works. If you quit, you lose.

[quote="CrystalMusic":1tz5vrra] oh im sorry u didint beat it, i still had all my LP so u didnt win[/quote:1tz5vrra]
well first I didn't claim I won, even though you forfeited.
second the state of the game it's pretty fair to argue that with gadjiltron in hand, and your best response being negate attack, it's pretty fair to argue the duel could've been won by me had you not forfeited.

Yet another thread derailment huh? Not even 24 hours

[quote="drquantumscale":utdvfucu]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=15037-22121348
I beat crystal's blue-eyes with his rules and he throws a tantrum.[/quote:utdvfucu]

[1:48] drquantumscale: Activated "Fissure" from hand (2/6)
[1:51] CrystalMusic: "bye"
[1:53] CrystalMusic: "learn to attack"
[1:54] drquantumscale: "?"
[1:55] CrystalMusic: "not use effects"
[2:00] drquantumscale: "that's part of the game though"
[2:03] CrystalMusic: "to bad"
[2:06] CrystalMusic: "i dont allow it"
[2:10] drquantumscale: "you never said that"
[2:12] CrystalMusic: "in MY duels u have to attack"
[2:18] CrystalMusic: "its called a PROFILE"
[2:20] CrystalMusic: "READ IT"

Keep in mind that CrystalMusic will sometimes play Marshmallon or some other monster that can't be killed in battle so... yeah.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-22121511 CrystalMusic summoning two massive beatsticks but never going for the kill. Then, he rants and calls his opponent a "noob" for using a character deck after summoning Buster Blader. If anything, we see here why we don't toy with our opponents if you value victory so much.

[0:00] CrystalMusic: CrystalMusic hosted Single (with siding) in Advanced (Unrated) with duel note "1st gen only. no alt victory or "Destroy" effects"
..
[4:03] CrystalMusic: Activated "Polymerization" from hand (4/7)
[4:06] CrystalMusic: Sent "The Dragon Dwelling in the Cave" from M-4 to GY
[4:07] CrystalMusic: Sent "Luster Dragon" from M-3 to GY
[4:08] CrystalMusic: Sent "Masked Dragon" from M-2 to GY
[4:10] CrystalMusic: Sent "Paladin of White Dragon" from hand (2/6) to GY
[4:12] CrystalMusic: Sent "The Dragon Dwelling in the Cave" from hand (5/5) to GY
[4:13] CrystalMusic: Viewed Extra Deck
[4:15] CrystalMusic: Special Summoned "Five-Headed Dragon" from Extra Deck to M-3 (ATK)
[7:51] CrystalMusic: Sent "Blue-Eyes Ultimate Dragon" from M-4 to GY
[7:53] CrystalMusic: Special Summoned "Blue-Eyes Shining Dragon" from hand (4/4) to M-4 (ATK)
..
[11:00] kapa123: Activated Field Spell "Fusion Gate" from hand (1/7)
[11:10] kapa123: Banished "Berfomet" from hand (6/6)
[11:14] kapa123: Banished Set "Gazelle the King of Mythical Beasts" from M-3
[11:14] CrystalMusic: "fusion gate is actuially gx"
[11:17] CrystalMusic: "used by jayden"
[11:22] kapa123: "and yugi"
[11:27] kapa123: Viewed Extra Deck
[11:28] CrystalMusic: "he never used it in 1st gen"
[11:30] kapa123: Special Summoned "Chimera the Flying Mythical Beast" from Extra Deck to M-3 (DEF)
[11:32] kapa123: Stopped viewing Extra Deck
[11:49] kapa123: "just let it go at this point"
[11:51] kapa123: "i have no game"
[11:52] kapa123: ":D"
[12:00] kapa123: Ended turn
..
[13:18] kapa123: Sent Set "Kuriboh" from M-4 to GY
[13:21] CrystalMusic: Viewed Opponent's Graveyard
[13:22] kapa123: Sent Set "Alpha The Magnet Warrior" from M-2 to GY
[13:23] CrystalMusic: Stopped viewing Opponent's Graveyard
[13:25] kapa123: Special Summoned "Buster Blader" from hand (5/6) to M-4 (ATK)
[13:34] kapa123: Viewed Opponent's Graveyard
[13:38] CrystalMusic: "-_-"
[13:42] CrystalMusic: "use a random build"
[13:44] CrystalMusic: "not a character deck"
[13:45] CrystalMusic: "NOOB"
[13:47] CrystalMusic: Left duel
[13:52] kapa123: "HAHA"
[13:56] kapa123: "he lost"
[13:58] kapa123: "HAHA"
[14:14] kapa123: Stopped viewing Opponent's Graveyard
[14:23] kapa123: "15*500 "
[16:00] kapa123: Entered Battle Phase
[16:02] kapa123: Attacked directly with "Buster Blader" in M-4
[16:05] kapa123: Left duel

Or perhaps the lesson here is to not discard Mirror Force to meet your max hand size in the End Phase while having open S/T Zone slots .

[quote="CrystalMusic":2vc82omr][quote="drquantumscale":2vc82omr]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=15037-22121348
I beat crystal's blue-eyes with his rules and he throws a tantrum.[/quote:2vc82omr]
oh im sorry u didint beat it, i still had all my LP so u didnt win[/quote:2vc82omr]
Proof that you're willing to change your own rules when they no longer benefit you, just so you can say your opponent broke them. Gee, doesn't that sound familiar?

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-22207595

Opponent:
- has a +1 Swords of Revealing Light (which as you can see, i didnt mind one but: all i said was: "ok swords with a +1" (Obviously i wasnt bothered by it! like i care that i cant attack for 4 turns?)
- has a "Mirror Force" that destroys all opponents monsters (including defense position ones)
- has an Archetype "Raigeki"
- has a level 4 that is unaffected by both spells and traps
and people tell me to think: "would i want to vs this?" before uploading a card. Tell that to this guy! (and any others who make Costless and restrictionless "I WIN" cards)

Me:
- my minotaur has a very simple effect: Each time this card destroys a monster in battle, place 1 counter on this card. This card gains 100 atk for each counter on it.
- my giant has a simple effect: If this card attacks and destroys a monster in battle, place 1 counter on this card. This card gains 200 ATK for each counter on it.
If this card attacks a defense position monster your opponent controls: you can inflict piercing battle damage to your opponent (basically this means: its Pierce damage is optional and only inflicted upon my request, meaning i can choose when it inflicts pierce damage)
- my porter has very low ATK & DEF: 100 each, and i only use its "Search" effect when i need a specific card. That and its only 1 od 2 searchers in my entire deck. Easily dispatched by a mere card effect or battle if its the only monster i control. the other is a level 5 with 2500 def and can be used on either players turn.
- my storm drake has limitations: it can only have 3 counters at a time
- as for the lightning cannon? its able to be destroyed, you just need the right type, and theres 4 types that can destroy it, 2 which are very popular with custom cards: Warrior, and Dragon. not to mention a simple type changing effect will do the trick!

mind you im going thru all my decks by playtesting them for ppl to give advice on balancing them.

Perhaps it was designed to be more modern, with more powerful versions of cards that aren't played in the 2020 meta like Mirror Force, Swords of Revealing Light, Compulsory Evac Device/D. Fissure. That archtype Raigeki is "Burst Stream of Destruction" a Blue-Eyes support card. And a Level 4 1800 beater that can be a 2k beater when a boss monster is on the field that is unaffected by Spells and Traps doesn't seem as strong in a meta dominated by monsters and their effects.

Cannot be destroyed by battle: Fine effect (in the game as is, not with your rules)
Cannot be destroyed by card effect: Fine effect, you can always use non-destruction forms of removal or battle to answer it.
Can only be destroyed by X: There's a reason why this design doesn't exist in card games. This is going into egregious territory. Non-destruction removal is still available, which is the only thing giving it reasonable counterplay.

[quote="CrystalMusic":smb2n5nd]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-22207595

Opponent:
- has a +1 Swords of Revealing Light (which as you can see, i didnt mind one but: all i said was: "ok swords with a +1" (Obviously i wasnt bothered by it! like i care that i cant attack for 4 turns?)
- has a "Mirror Force" that destroys all opponents monsters (including defense position ones)
- has an Archetype "Raigeki"
- has a level 4 that is unaffected by both spells and traps
and people tell me to think: "would i want to vs this?" before uploading a card. Tell that to this guy! (and any others who make Costless and restrictionless "I WIN" cards)

Me:
- my minotaur has a very simple effect: Each time this card destroys a monster in battle, place 1 counter on this card. This card gains 100 atk for each counter on it.
- my giant has a simple effect: If this card attacks and destroys a monster in battle, place 1 counter on this card. This card gains 200 ATK for each counter on it.
If this card attacks a defense position monster your opponent controls: you can inflict piercing battle damage to your opponent (basically this means: its Pierce damage is optional and only inflicted upon my request, meaning i can choose when it inflicts pierce damage)
- my porter has very low ATK & DEF: 100 each, and i only use its "Search" effect when i need a specific card. That and its only 1 od 2 searchers in my entire deck. Easily dispatched by a mere card effect or battle if its the only monster i control. the other is a level 5 with 2500 def and can be used on either players turn.
- my storm drake has limitations: it can only have 3 counters at a time
- as for the lightning cannon? its able to be destroyed, you just need the right type, and theres 4 types that can destroy it, 2 which are very popular with custom cards: Warrior, and Dragon. not to mention a simple type changing effect will do the trick!

mind you im going thru all my decks by playtesting them for ppl to give advice on balancing them.[/quote:smb2n5nd]
So to sum up the entire duel.
CrystalMusic: "Monster unaffected by spell and traps, I can't do anything against it with my 2100 DEF monster, that broken! REEEEEEEEEEE!"
CrystalMusic has rage quit.
Godzilla2000: "Lol what the fuck?"

[quote="Darkraiclone":3ep4gnmo][quote="CrystalMusic":3ep4gnmo]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-22207595

Opponent:
- has a +1 Swords of Revealing Light (which as you can see, i didnt mind one but: all i said was: "ok swords with a +1" (Obviously i wasnt bothered by it! like i care that i cant attack for 4 turns?)
- has a "Mirror Force" that destroys all opponents monsters (including defense position ones)
- has an Archetype "Raigeki"
- has a level 4 that is unaffected by both spells and traps
and people tell me to think: "would i want to vs this?" before uploading a card. Tell that to this guy! (and any others who make Costless and restrictionless "I WIN" cards)

Me:
- my minotaur has a very simple effect: Each time this card destroys a monster in battle, place 1 counter on this card. This card gains 100 atk for each counter on it.
- my giant has a simple effect: If this card attacks and destroys a monster in battle, place 1 counter on this card. This card gains 200 ATK for each counter on it.
If this card attacks a defense position monster your opponent controls: you can inflict piercing battle damage to your opponent (basically this means: its Pierce damage is optional and only inflicted upon my request, meaning i can choose when it inflicts pierce damage)
- my porter has very low ATK & DEF: 100 each, and i only use its "Search" effect when i need a specific card. That and its only 1 od 2 searchers in my entire deck. Easily dispatched by a mere card effect or battle if its the only monster i control. the other is a level 5 with 2500 def and can be used on either players turn.
- my storm drake has limitations: it can only have 3 counters at a time
- as for the lightning cannon? its able to be destroyed, you just need the right type, and theres 4 types that can destroy it, 2 which are very popular with custom cards: Warrior, and Dragon. not to mention a simple type changing effect will do the trick!

mind you im going thru all my decks by playtesting them for ppl to give advice on balancing them.[/quote:3ep4gnmo]
So to sum up the entire duel.
CrystalMusic: "Monster unaffected by spell and traps, I can't do anything against it with my 2100 DEF monster, that broken! REEEEEEEEEEE!"
CrystalMusic has rage quit.
Godzilla2000: "Lol what the fuck?"[/quote:3ep4gnmo]

to sum it up, YOU MISSED THE POINT!!!

[quote="CrystalMusic":nmgydop3][quote="Darkraiclone":nmgydop3][quote="CrystalMusic":nmgydop3]https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-22207595

Opponent:
- has a +1 Swords of Revealing Light (which as you can see, i didnt mind one but: all i said was: "ok swords with a +1" (Obviously i wasnt bothered by it! like i care that i cant attack for 4 turns?)
- has a "Mirror Force" that destroys all opponents monsters (including defense position ones)
- has an Archetype "Raigeki"
- has a level 4 that is unaffected by both spells and traps
and people tell me to think: "would i want to vs this?" before uploading a card. Tell that to this guy! (and any others who make Costless and restrictionless "I WIN" cards)

Me:
- my minotaur has a very simple effect: Each time this card destroys a monster in battle, place 1 counter on this card. This card gains 100 atk for each counter on it.
- my giant has a simple effect: If this card attacks and destroys a monster in battle, place 1 counter on this card. This card gains 200 ATK for each counter on it.
If this card attacks a defense position monster your opponent controls: you can inflict piercing battle damage to your opponent (basically this means: its Pierce damage is optional and only inflicted upon my request, meaning i can choose when it inflicts pierce damage)
- my porter has very low ATK & DEF: 100 each, and i only use its "Search" effect when i need a specific card. That and its only 1 od 2 searchers in my entire deck. Easily dispatched by a mere card effect or battle if its the only monster i control. the other is a level 5 with 2500 def and can be used on either players turn.
- my storm drake has limitations: it can only have 3 counters at a time
- as for the lightning cannon? its able to be destroyed, you just need the right type, and theres 4 types that can destroy it, 2 which are very popular with custom cards: Warrior, and Dragon. not to mention a simple type changing effect will do the trick!

mind you im going thru all my decks by playtesting them for ppl to give advice on balancing them.[/quote:nmgydop3]
So to sum up the entire duel.
CrystalMusic: "Monster unaffected by spell and traps, I can't do anything against it with my 2100 DEF monster, that broken! REEEEEEEEEEE!"
CrystalMusic has rage quit.
Godzilla2000: "Lol what the fuck?"[/quote:nmgydop3]

to sum it up, YOU MISSED THE POINT!!![/quote:nmgydop3]

No that's pretty accurate.

Could you guys just Please STFU and Try not to Derail this Thread for Pete's Sake?
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=90641-21878462 A Friend of mine Duel'd me "Gently" with his Not-so-Yugi Deck in Unlimited Format...

fun, friendly, funny and good sportsmanship: https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-22227406

[quote="CrystalMusic":us517fut]fun, friendly, funny and good sportsmanship: https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-22227406[/quote:us517fut]

I highly doubt that.

[quote="CrystalMusic":qegyw5ri]fun, friendly, funny and good sportsmanship: https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-22227406[/quote:qegyw5ri]
Wow, so you found someone who was nice enough to let you win, that's nice.

[quote="Darkraiclone":qal28qxl][quote="CrystalMusic":qal28qxl]fun, friendly, funny and good sportsmanship: https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-22227406[/quote:qal28qxl]
Wow, so you found someone who was nice enough to let you win, that's nice.[/quote:qal28qxl]

actually no, they didnt let me win. if you actually watched the replay you would see it was competitive, i just ended up with exodia. if they had used exchange that would have changed the outcome.

[quote="CrystalMusic":31nftjfx][quote="Darkraiclone":31nftjfx][quote="CrystalMusic":31nftjfx]fun, friendly, funny and good sportsmanship: https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-22227406[/quote:31nftjfx]
Wow, so you found someone who was nice enough to let you win, that's nice.[/quote:31nftjfx]

actually no, they didnt let me win. if you actually watched the replay you would see it was competitive, i just ended up with exodia. if they had used exchange that would have changed the outcome.[/quote:31nftjfx]
Even though the guy had plenty of outs to your "Combo" You still managed to pull out the win regardless even though you broke your, "All monsters must attack!" rule. No, he let you win.

[quote="Darkraiclone":1nbbe56r]
Even though the guy had plenty of outs to your "Combo" You still managed to pull out the win regardless even though you broke your, "All monsters must attack!" rule. No, he let you win.[/quote:1nbbe56r]
Besides not using Exchange to remove Exodia, and playing a weak, casual deck, how was that duel throwing?

[quote="Darkraiclone":318xdoj8][quote="CrystalMusic":318xdoj8][quote="Darkraiclone":318xdoj8]
Wow, so you found someone who was nice enough to let you win, that's nice.[/quote:318xdoj8]

actually no, they didnt let me win. if you actually watched the replay you would see it was competitive, i just ended up with exodia. if they had used exchange that would have changed the outcome.[/quote:318xdoj8]
Even though the guy had plenty of outs to your "Combo" You still managed to pull out the win regardless even though you broke your, "All monsters must attack!" rule. No, he let you win.[/quote:318xdoj8]

youre free to believe what you want, if thats what you want to believe so be it, but the replay doesnt lie, they didnt let me win, there were instances where they could have dealt damage to me, such as with princess of tsurugi, toll, cemetary bomb (if used at the right time) and due ot my barrier combo they couldnt damage my lp by battle, they stopped my ultimate ancient gear golem, which as you can see didnt bother me much, they could have used fire princess (if they had a zone free for her)

[quote="greg503":hqq3gjey][quote="Darkraiclone":hqq3gjey]
Even though the guy had plenty of outs to your "Combo" You still managed to pull out the win regardless even though you broke your, "All monsters must attack!" rule. No, he let you win.[/quote:hqq3gjey]
Besides not using Exchange to remove Exodia, and playing a weak, casual deck, how was that duel throwing?[/quote:hqq3gjey]
Mainly when he destroyed Spirit Barrier, he could have easily attacked over CrystalMusic's face down monster, his Fisherman, or even attack over the Unhappy Girl for a flat 2000, but yet he chose not to, and CrystalMusic didn't even have any face down spell or traps, so aside from Toll, why wouldn't he attack?

[quote="CrystalMusic":3d1he9w0][quote="Darkraiclone":3d1he9w0][quote="CrystalMusic":3d1he9w0]

actually no, they didnt let me win. if you actually watched the replay you would see it was competitive, i just ended up with exodia. if they had used exchange that would have changed the outcome.[/quote:3d1he9w0]
Even though the guy had plenty of outs to your "Combo" You still managed to pull out the win regardless even though you broke your, "All monsters must attack!" rule. No, he let you win.[/quote:3d1he9w0]

youre free to believe what you want, if thats what you want to believe so be it, but the replay doesnt lie, they didnt let me win, there were instances where they could have dealt damage to me, such as with princess of tsurugi, toll, cemetary bomb (if used at the right time) and due ot my barrier combo they couldnt damage my lp by battle, they stopped my ultimate ancient gear golem, which as you can see didnt bother me much, they could have used fire princess (if they had a zone free for her)[/quote:3d1he9w0]
Well it's either one of two things, they either let you win out of pity due to being familiar with your status and infamy, or your just preyed on a newbie who just started playing the game.