Yu-Gi-Oh! » Deck Discussions

https://ygorganization.com/codeblackwin ... thebullet/ So the blackwings finally got their support and man I’m just really mixed on this.

https://ygorganization.com/codeblackwin ... thebullet/ So the blackwings finally got their support and man I’m just really mixed on this.

Why are they still trying to push the stupid dragon that does nothing

https://ygorganization.com/codeblackwin ... thebullet/ So the blackwings finally got their support and man I’m just really mixed on this.

Why are they still trying to push the stupid dragon that does nothing

respect to the anime archetypes

Why are they still trying to push the stupid dragon that does nothing

respect to the anime archetypes

I doubt even blackwing players respect that chicken

respect to the anime archetypes

I doubt even blackwing players respect that chicken

blackwings aren't chickens

I doubt even blackwing players respect that chicken

blackwings aren't chickens

Exactly, why is Black-Winged Dragon not a "Blackwing" card?

respect to the anime archetypes

I doubt even blackwing players respect that chicken

blackwings aren't chickens

I doubt even blackwing players respect that chicken

blackwings aren't chickens

Well you see, I used a common form of speech known as "sarcasm", which is defined by the Oxford Languages as, and I quote "the use of irony to mock or convey contempt" in order to convey a message with the intent on mocking the Synchro DARK dragon-type card that goes by the name of "Black-Winged Dragon". I am pretty much aware that Black-Winged Dragon, or any Blackwing monster, are not based on the image of a Gallus gallus domesticus, or a chicken, for short. Pretty much all of them convey what species of avian they are representing. I used the image of a chicken because when comparing it to the image of other avians, such as the mighty Eagle, chickens look punny, with their fat, little body, and their incapability to fly and lack of other remarkable characteristics that compensate this tragic fact. However, note-worthy addition, you mention the fact that Blackwing cards are not Chickens, however I never addressed a Blackwing card when redacting my original post. Black-winged Dragon is tragically not considered a Blackwing card, due to the miniscule detail in it's name, since the hyphen it has separating the words "Black" and "Wing" invalidates it as a blackwing card.

blackwings aren't chickens

Well you see, I used a common form of speech known as "sarcasm", which is defined by the Oxford Languages as, and I quote "the use of irony to mock or convey contempt" in order to convey a message with the intent on mocking the Synchro DARK dragon-type card that goes by the name of "Black-Winged Dragon". I am pretty much aware that Black-Winged Dragon, or any Blackwing monster, are not based on the image of a Gallus gallus domesticus, or a chicken, for short. Pretty much all of them convey what species of avian they are representing. I used the image of a chicken because when comparing it to the image of other avians, such as the mighty Eagle, chickens look punny, with their fat, little body, and their incapability to fly and lack of other remarkable characteristics that compensate this tragic fact. However, note-worthy addition, you mention the fact that Blackwing cards are not Chickens, however I never addressed a Blackwing card when redacting my original post. Black-winged Dragon is tragically not considered a Blackwing card, due to the miniscule detail in it's name, since the hyphen it has separating the words "Black" and "Wing" invalidates it as a blackwing card.

Black-Wing Dragon isn't a chicken either

Well you see, I used a common form of speech known as "sarcasm", which is defined by the Oxford Languages as, and I quote "the use of irony to mock or convey contempt" in order to convey a message with the intent on mocking the Synchro DARK dragon-type card that goes by the name of "Black-Winged Dragon". I am pretty much aware that Black-Winged Dragon, or any Blackwing monster, are not based on the image of a Gallus gallus domesticus, or a chicken, for short. Pretty much all of them convey what species of avian they are representing. I used the image of a chicken because when comparing it to the image of other avians, such as the mighty Eagle, chickens look punny, with their fat, little body, and their incapability to fly and lack of other remarkable characteristics that compensate this tragic fact. However, note-worthy addition, you mention the fact that Blackwing cards are not Chickens, however I never addressed a Blackwing card when redacting my original post. Black-winged Dragon is tragically not considered a Blackwing card, due to the miniscule detail in it's name, since the hyphen it has separating the words "Black" and "Wing" invalidates it as a blackwing card.

Black-Wing Dragon isn't a chicken either

Did you even read the first line?

Black-Wing Dragon isn't a chicken either

Did you even read the first line?

Sarcasm or not you shouldn't insult one of the Signer Dragons

Did you even read the first line?

Sarcasm or not you shouldn't insult one of the Signer Dragons

Sarcasm or not you shouldn't insult one of the Signer Dragons

Blackwings aren't chickens. They're turkeys.

Now Odd-Eyes Dragons, 100% robot chickens.

Sarcasm or not you shouldn't insult one of the Signer Dragons

Blackwings aren't chickens. They're turkeys.

Now Odd-Eyes Dragons, 100% robot chickens.

blackwings aren't chickens

Exactly, why is Black-Winged Dragon not a "Blackwing" card?

We could ask the same question about red dragon archfiend. Why is he called Red Dragon Archfiend if he doesn't fit with the Archfiend archetype?

Helshaddoll Hollow moment

Exactly, why is Black-Winged Dragon not a "Blackwing" card?

We could ask the same question about red dragon archfiend. Why is he called Red Dragon Archfiend if he doesn't fit with the Archfiend archetype?

Because Archfiend in the original language is literally "Demon" so its actual name should be "Red Dragon Demon". But because religious censorship they can't use words like "Hell" and "Demon" so they localized the archetype "Demon" as "Archfiend"

Also, the original Signer Dragons weren't supposed be archetypal cards, that's why none of them had mentions of the signer's archetypes because the dragons were independent of the deck the signer used. And that's why nowadays Konami has to make clunky support to shoe in these cards into their archetypes.

do I even have to say how insulting that is?

We could ask the same question about red dragon archfiend. Why is he called Red Dragon Archfiend if he doesn't fit with the Archfiend archetype?

Because Archfiend in the original language is literally "Demon" so its actual name should be "Red Dragon Demon". But because religious censorship they can't use words like "Hell" and "Demon" so they localized the archetype "Demon" as "Archfiend"

Also, the original Signer Dragons weren't supposed be archetypal cards, that's why none of them had mentions of the signer's archetypes because the dragons were independent of the deck the signer used. And that's why nowadays Konami has to make clunky support to shoe in these cards into their archetypes.

Well, that's why the "Red" archetype exists, and yes that does make all Red-Eyes cards part of it too, Speedroid moment

Exactly, why is Black-Winged Dragon not a "Blackwing" card?

We could ask the same question about red dragon archfiend. Why is he called Red Dragon Archfiend if he doesn't fit with the Archfiend archetype?

Because Archfiend in the original language is literally "Demon" so its actual name should be "Red Dragon Demon". But because religious censorship they can't use words like "Hell" and "Demon" so they localized the archetype "Demon" as "Archfiend"

Also, the original Signer Dragons weren't supposed be archetypal cards, that's why none of them had mentions of the signer's archetypes because the dragons were independent of the deck the signer used. And that's why nowadays Konami has to make clunky support to shoe in these cards into their archetypes.

We could ask the same question about red dragon archfiend. Why is he called Red Dragon Archfiend if he doesn't fit with the Archfiend archetype?

Because Archfiend in the original language is literally "Demon" so its actual name should be "Red Dragon Demon". But because religious censorship they can't use words like "Hell" and "Demon" so they localized the archetype "Demon" as "Archfiend"

Also, the original Signer Dragons weren't supposed be archetypal cards, that's why none of them had mentions of the signer's archetypes because the dragons were independent of the deck the signer used. And that's why nowadays Konami has to make clunky support to shoe in these cards into their archetypes.

If that is the case how come they didn't call it Red Devil Dragon instead?

We could ask the same question about red dragon archfiend. Why is he called Red Dragon Archfiend if he doesn't fit with the Archfiend archetype?

Because Archfiend in the original language is literally "Demon" so its actual name should be "Red Dragon Demon". But because religious censorship they can't use words like "Hell" and "Demon" so they localized the archetype "Demon" as "Archfiend"

Also, the original Signer Dragons weren't supposed be archetypal cards, that's why none of them had mentions of the signer's archetypes because the dragons were independent of the deck the signer used. And that's why nowadays Konami has to make clunky support to shoe in these cards into their archetypes.

If that is the case how come they didn't call it Red Devil Dragon instead?

Because Archfiend in the original language is literally "Demon" so its actual name should be "Red Dragon Demon". But because religious censorship they can't use words like "Hell" and "Demon" so they localized the archetype "Demon" as "Archfiend"

Also, the original Signer Dragons weren't supposed be archetypal cards, that's why none of them had mentions of the signer's archetypes because the dragons were independent of the deck the signer used. And that's why nowadays Konami has to make clunky support to shoe in these cards into their archetypes.

If that is the case how come they didn't call it Red Devil Dragon instead?

Devil is also one of their dreaded words

Because Archfiend in the original language is literally "Demon" so its actual name should be "Red Dragon Demon". But because religious censorship they can't use words like "Hell" and "Demon" so they localized the archetype "Demon" as "Archfiend"

Also, the original Signer Dragons weren't supposed be archetypal cards, that's why none of them had mentions of the signer's archetypes because the dragons were independent of the deck the signer used. And that's why nowadays Konami has to make clunky support to shoe in these cards into their archetypes.

If that is the case how come they didn't call it Red Devil Dragon instead?

Devil is also one of their dreaded words

If that is the case how come they didn't call it Red Devil Dragon instead?

Devil is also one of their dreaded words

not true there are at least 4 cards with devil in their name uncensored

Devil is also one of their dreaded words

not true there are at least 4 cards with devil in their name uncensored

There's only 1 card with the literal word Devil in its name and it's Tasmanian Devil and that's because it's not a literal Demon but a reference to the real world creature with the same name. The other 3 are actually Daredevil which is not the same as a literal Devil.

not true there are at least 4 cards with devil in their name uncensored

There's only 1 card with the literal word Devil in its name and it's Tasmanian Devil and that's because it's not a literal Demon but a reference to the real world creature with the same name. The other 3 are actually Daredevil which is not the same as a literal Devil.

Devil is still in the name