Yu-Gi-Oh! » Deck Discussions

Title explains it all reasons I may or may not mention in the original posts. Original posts may be updated over time.

SkyStrikers (too much spamming)
Altergeist ( way too much spamming)

They're ramp decks, they tend to have a slow turn 1 and they have a difficult time playing through established boards, if they go crazy with their resources is because you let them.

[quote="Fredblade":3dsjiv7f]They're ramp decks, they tend to have a slow turn 1 and they have a difficult time playing through established boards, if they go crazy with their resources is because you let them.[/quote:3dsjiv7f]
they seem to be fast paste from my experience besides unless I see an Odd-eyes deck take out altergeist and skystrikers with ease I stick to my claim as that they need a downgrade

Sky strikers are fine snd Altergeist isn't good. Rogue at best.

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":jtxk2srj]Title explains it all reasons I may or may not mention in the original posts. Original posts may be updated over time.

SkyStrikers (too much spamming)
Altergeist ( way too much spamming)[/quote:jtxk2srj]
Included you also Gimmick Puppet and Metalfoes

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":3udxdyvc]Title explains it all reasons I may or may not mention in the original posts. Original posts may be updated over time.

SkyStrikers (too much spamming)
Altergeist ( way too much spamming)[/quote:3udxdyvc]
And that's why they WERE downgraded through the banlist

[quote="greg503":3gsefdxa][quote="AnimeMasterDub":3gsefdxa]Title explains it all reasons I may or may not mention in the original posts. Original posts may be updated over time.

SkyStrikers (too much spamming)
Altergeist ( way too much spamming)[/quote:3gsefdxa]
And that's why they WERE downgraded through the banlist[/quote:3gsefdxa]
When was that?

[quote="Sound4":2j7knkbl]Sky strikers are fine snd Altergeist isn't good. Rogue at best.[/quote:2j7knkbl]
nope they both still need to be downgraded from my experience

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":1zloalqo][quote="greg503":1zloalqo][quote="AnimeMasterDub":1zloalqo]Title explains it all reasons I may or may not mention in the original posts. Original posts may be updated over time.

SkyStrikers (too much spamming)
Altergeist ( way too much spamming)[/quote:1zloalqo]
And that's why they WERE downgraded through the banlist[/quote:1zloalqo]
When was that?[/quote:1zloalqo]

Hornet Drones, Multirole, and Engage were put to 1 and are currently still at 1.

As for Altergeist, they seem to have been powercrept by better archetypes so Multifaker was taken off the list.

Adventurer should just lock you out of things that don't specifically mention "Adventurer Token" for the turn you use the Rite.

[quote="Christen57":3qrxqovs][quote="AnimeMasterDub":3qrxqovs][quote="greg503":3qrxqovs]
And that's why they WERE downgraded through the banlist[/quote:3qrxqovs]
When was that?[/quote:3qrxqovs]

Hornet Drones, Multirole, and Engage were put to 1 and are currently still at 1.

As for Altergeist, they seem to have been powercrept by better archetypes so Multifaker was taken off the list.[/quote:3qrxqovs]
is odd-eyes on that better archetypes list?

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":1uforedd][quote="Christen57":1uforedd][quote="AnimeMasterDub":1uforedd]
When was that?[/quote:1uforedd]

Hornet Drones, Multirole, and Engage were put to 1 and are currently still at 1.

As for Altergeist, they seem to have been powercrept by better archetypes so Multifaker was taken off the list.[/quote:1uforedd]
is odd-eyes on that better archetypes list?[/quote:1uforedd]
Me when electrumite

[quote="Lil Oldman":39g3sqxb][quote="AnimeMasterDub":39g3sqxb][quote="Christen57":39g3sqxb]

Hornet Drones, Multirole, and Engage were put to 1 and are currently still at 1.

As for Altergeist, they seem to have been powercrept by better archetypes so Multifaker was taken off the list.[/quote:39g3sqxb]
is odd-eyes on that better archetypes list?[/quote:39g3sqxb]
Me when electrumite[/quote:39g3sqxb]
what?

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":260f0xvu][quote="greg503":260f0xvu][quote="AnimeMasterDub":260f0xvu]Title explains it all reasons I may or may not mention in the original posts. Original posts may be updated over time.

SkyStrikers (too much spamming)
Altergeist ( way too much spamming)[/quote:260f0xvu]
And that's why they WERE downgraded through the banlist[/quote:260f0xvu]
When was that?[/quote:260f0xvu]
Hornet Drones was limited in 2018, Multirole was limited in July 2019, Engage was banned Jan 2020, and has just now been brought back to 1.
As for Altergeist, it used to have cards on the banlist

[quote="greg503":1rqfltud][quote="AnimeMasterDub":1rqfltud][quote="greg503":1rqfltud]
And that's why they WERE downgraded through the banlist[/quote:1rqfltud]
When was that?[/quote:1rqfltud]
Hornet Drones was limited in 2018, Multirole was limited in July 2019, Engage was banned Jan 2020, and has just now been brought back to 1.
As for Altergeist, it used to have cards on the banlist[/quote:1rqfltud]
in other words I rest my case

I find it strange that your criticisms of two control decks is that they're 'too spammy.'

Both decks focus on disrupting your opponent's plays and denying them resources all the while establishing a minimalist offense.

I think the word you're looking for is 'Grinding,' which is a very different problem.

[quote="troglyte":355zeze1]I find it strange that your criticisms of two control decks is that they're 'too spammy.'

Both decks focus on disrupting your opponent's plays and denying them resources all the while establishing a minimalist offense.

I think the word you're looking for is 'Grinding,' which is a very different problem.[/quote:355zeze1]
whatever term you want to use my point still stands

I[quote="AnimeMasterDub":2eb0pz32][quote="Sound4":2eb0pz32]Sky strikers are fine snd Altergeist isn't good. Rogue at best.[/quote:2eb0pz32]
nope they both still need to be downgraded from my experience[/quote:2eb0pz32]
Then you don't know how to play against the decks properly.

[quote="Sound4":29s89gdo]:?: I[quote="AnimeMasterDub":29s89gdo][quote="Sound4":29s89gdo]Sky strikers are fine snd Altergeist isn't good. Rogue at best.[/quote:29s89gdo]
nope they both still need to be downgraded from my experience[/quote:29s89gdo]
Then you don't know how to play against the decks properly.[/quote:29s89gdo]
Are you implying that there is a way for Odd-Eyes to defeat sky strikers with ease that I don't know about?

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":114p0xtl][quote="Sound4":114p0xtl]:?: I[quote="AnimeMasterDub":114p0xtl]
nope they both still need to be downgraded from my experience[/quote:114p0xtl]
Then you don't know how to play against the decks properly.[/quote:114p0xtl]
Are you implying that there is a way for Odd-Eyes to defeat sky strikers with ease that I don't know about?[/quote:114p0xtl]
Lightning Storm, Feather Duster, Evenly Matched, and other backrow removal, even Ghost Ogre goes a long way

[quote="greg503":22ksup37][quote="AnimeMasterDub":22ksup37][quote="Sound4":22ksup37]:?: I
Then you don't know how to play against the decks properly.[/quote:22ksup37]
Are you implying that there is a way for Odd-Eyes to defeat sky strikers with ease that I don't know about?[/quote:22ksup37]
Lightning Storm, Feather Duster, Evenly Matched, and other backrow removal, even Ghost Ogre goes a long way[/quote:22ksup37]
I said for odd-eyes adding a non-supportive card to an odd-eyes deck would create a deck imbalance

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":19r75bbp][quote="greg503":19r75bbp][quote="AnimeMasterDub":19r75bbp]
Are you implying that there is a way for Odd-Eyes to defeat sky strikers with ease that I don't know about?[/quote:19r75bbp]
Lightning Storm, Feather Duster, Evenly Matched, and other backrow removal, even Ghost Ogre goes a long way[/quote:19r75bbp]
I said for odd-eyes adding a non-supportive card to an odd-eyes deck would create a deck imbalance[/quote:19r75bbp]
Sounds like a Skill Issue

[quote="Lil Oldman":3iv04ykp][quote="AnimeMasterDub":3iv04ykp][quote="greg503":3iv04ykp]
Lightning Storm, Feather Duster, Evenly Matched, and other backrow removal, even Ghost Ogre goes a long way[/quote:3iv04ykp]
I said for odd-eyes adding a non-supportive card to an odd-eyes deck would create a deck imbalance[/quote:3iv04ykp]
Sounds like a Skill Issue[/quote:3iv04ykp]
how so? besides the issue of keeping a deck balanced

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":2xshbxso][quote="Lil Oldman":2xshbxso][quote="AnimeMasterDub":2xshbxso]
I said for odd-eyes adding a non-supportive card to an odd-eyes deck would create a deck imbalance[/quote:2xshbxso]
Sounds like a Skill Issue[/quote:2xshbxso]
how so? besides the issue of keeping a deck balanced[/quote:2xshbxso]
Balanced or Pure? Playing strictly with in-archetype cards will only get you so far, theres a reason to why electrumite was a generic pendulum support link monster.

[quote="Lil Oldman":3laczdtw][quote="AnimeMasterDub":3laczdtw][quote="Lil Oldman":3laczdtw]
Sounds like a Skill Issue[/quote:3laczdtw]
how so? besides the issue of keeping a deck balanced[/quote:3laczdtw]
Balanced or Pure? Playing strictly with in-archetype cards will only get you so far, theres a reason to why electrumite was a generic pendulum support link monster.[/quote:3laczdtw]
but its banned now so the card can't be counted for

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":gkasq6s5][quote="Lil Oldman":gkasq6s5][quote="AnimeMasterDub":gkasq6s5]
how so? besides the issue of keeping a deck balanced[/quote:gkasq6s5]
Balanced or Pure? Playing strictly with in-archetype cards will only get you so far, theres a reason to why electrumite was a generic pendulum support link monster.[/quote:gkasq6s5]
but its banned now so the card can't be counted for[/quote:gkasq6s5]
Yes, and a good amount of Sky Striker cards are limited, so I don't see the point. Both decks are handicapped.

[quote="Lil Oldman":1yo93jvu][quote="AnimeMasterDub":1yo93jvu][quote="Lil Oldman":1yo93jvu]
Balanced or Pure? Playing strictly with in-archetype cards will only get you so far, theres a reason to why electrumite was a generic pendulum support link monster.[/quote:1yo93jvu]
but its banned now so the card can't be counted for[/quote:1yo93jvu]
Yes, and a good amount of Sky Striker cards are limited, so I don't see the point. Both decks are handicapped.[/quote:1yo93jvu]
the problem is the despite both having handicaps sky strikers still has the upper hand for some reason

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":36af7uw4][quote="Lil Oldman":36af7uw4][quote="AnimeMasterDub":36af7uw4]
but its banned now so the card can't be counted for[/quote:36af7uw4]
Yes, and a good amount of Sky Striker cards are limited, so I don't see the point. Both decks are handicapped.[/quote:36af7uw4]
the problem is the despite both having handicaps sky strikers still has the upper hand for some reason[/quote:36af7uw4]
Again, Skill Issue, Altergeist and Sky Striker ramp up their recourses, if you can stop the cards that do so (Kagari, Shizuhu, Hayate, Engage, Multirole) then the deck shouldn't suffer that much.

[quote="Lil Oldman":253y5iwv][quote="AnimeMasterDub":253y5iwv][quote="Lil Oldman":253y5iwv]
Yes, and a good amount of Sky Striker cards are limited, so I don't see the point. Both decks are handicapped.[/quote:253y5iwv]
the problem is the despite both having handicaps sky strikers still has the upper hand for some reason[/quote:253y5iwv]
Again, Skill Issue, Altergeist and Sky Striker ramp up their recourses, if you can stop the cards that do so (Kagari, Shizuhu, Hayate, Engage, Multirole) then the deck shouldn't suffer that much.[/quote:253y5iwv]
Is there an Odd-Eyes, performapal, or pendulum magician card that does that?

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":1coza1mq][quote="Lil Oldman":1coza1mq][quote="AnimeMasterDub":1coza1mq]
the problem is the despite both having handicaps sky strikers still has the upper hand for some reason[/quote:1coza1mq]
Again, Skill Issue, Altergeist and Sky Striker ramp up their recourses, if you can stop the cards that do so (Kagari, Shizuhu, Hayate, Engage, Multirole) then the deck shouldn't suffer that much.[/quote:1coza1mq]
Is there an Odd-Eyes, performapal, or pendulum magician card that does that?[/quote:1coza1mq]
If you can't deal with the amounts of backrow Sky Strikers do, then why not just run Backrow removal? Simply playing Lightning Storm / Feather Duster / Twin Twisters. If you are limiting yourself arbitrarly to in-archetype cards, in a game that half the fun is from toying around deck building, then you are out of luck.

With your restrictions in mind, Odd-Eyes Vortex is the only asset I can think off that can prevent a card from activating.

It just goes to show that Odd-Eyes. Performapal and Pendulum Magician are swarm archetypes, rather than control archetypes, they don't have an in-archetype Protocol or Infernity Barrier to use.

[quote="Lil Oldman":1xpaclgg][quote="AnimeMasterDub":1xpaclgg][quote="Lil Oldman":1xpaclgg]
Again, Skill Issue, Altergeist and Sky Striker ramp up their recourses, if you can stop the cards that do so (Kagari, Shizuhu, Hayate, Engage, Multirole) then the deck shouldn't suffer that much.[/quote:1xpaclgg]
Is there an Odd-Eyes, performapal, or pendulum magician card that does that?[/quote:1xpaclgg]
If you can't deal with the amounts of backrow Sky Strikers do, then why not just run Backrow removal? Simply playing Lightning Storm / Feather Duster / Twin Twisters. If you are limiting yourself arbitrarly to in-archetype cards, in a game that half the fun is from toying around deck building, then you are out of luck.

With your restrictions in mind, Odd-Eyes Vortex is the only asset I can think off that can prevent a card from activating.

It just goes to show that Odd-Eyes. Performapal and Pendulum Magician are swarm archetypes, rather than control archetypes, they don't have an in-archetype Protocol or Infernity Barrier to use.[/quote:1xpaclgg]
I am not restricting my decks to in-archetype I am restricting it to deck balance from my experience adding a random card into a deck causes a deck imbalance and an imbalanced deck is a losing deck

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":397smvzc][quote="Lil Oldman":397smvzc][quote="AnimeMasterDub":397smvzc]
Is there an Odd-Eyes, performapal, or pendulum magician card that does that?[/quote:397smvzc]
If you can't deal with the amounts of backrow Sky Strikers do, then why not just run Backrow removal? Simply playing Lightning Storm / Feather Duster / Twin Twisters. If you are limiting yourself arbitrarly to in-archetype cards, in a game that half the fun is from toying around deck building, then you are out of luck.

With your restrictions in mind, Odd-Eyes Vortex is the only asset I can think off that can prevent a card from activating.

It just goes to show that Odd-Eyes. Performapal and Pendulum Magician are swarm archetypes, rather than control archetypes, they don't have an in-archetype Protocol or Infernity Barrier to use.[/quote:397smvzc]
I am not restricting my decks to in-archetype I am restricting it to deck balance from my experience adding a random card into a deck causes a deck imbalance and an imbalanced deck is a losing deck[/quote:397smvzc]
What do you mean by "losing deck"? Do you mean bricky? Are you sure a generic staple is to blame or maybe you run other cards that are more situational than the staples?

[quote="Lil Oldman":1gl3bpku][quote="AnimeMasterDub":1gl3bpku][quote="Lil Oldman":1gl3bpku]
If you can't deal with the amounts of backrow Sky Strikers do, then why not just run Backrow removal? Simply playing Lightning Storm / Feather Duster / Twin Twisters. If you are limiting yourself arbitrarly to in-archetype cards, in a game that half the fun is from toying around deck building, then you are out of luck.

With your restrictions in mind, Odd-Eyes Vortex is the only asset I can think off that can prevent a card from activating.

It just goes to show that Odd-Eyes. Performapal and Pendulum Magician are swarm archetypes, rather than control archetypes, they don't have an in-archetype Protocol or Infernity Barrier to use.[/quote:1gl3bpku]
I am not restricting my decks to in-archetype I am restricting it to deck balance from my experience adding a random card into a deck causes a deck imbalance and an imbalanced deck is a losing deck[/quote:1gl3bpku]
What do you mean by "losing deck"? Do you mean bricky? Are you sure a generic staple is to blame or maybe you run other cards that are more situational than the staples?[/quote:1gl3bpku]
a losing deck is a losing deck and adding a random card into a deck causes imbalance and an imbalanced deck is a losing deck whether it is a generic card or not

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":3uii24pg][quote="Lil Oldman":3uii24pg][quote="AnimeMasterDub":3uii24pg]
I am not restricting my decks to in-archetype I am restricting it to deck balance from my experience adding a random card into a deck causes a deck imbalance and an imbalanced deck is a losing deck[/quote:3uii24pg]
What do you mean by "losing deck"? Do you mean bricky? Are you sure a generic staple is to blame or maybe you run other cards that are more situational than the staples?[/quote:3uii24pg]
a losing deck is a losing deck and adding a random card into a deck causes imbalance and an imbalanced deck is a losing deck whether it is a generic card or not[/quote:3uii24pg]
... What? You aren't making sense.

[quote="Lil Oldman":19o9y4hw][quote="AnimeMasterDub":19o9y4hw][quote="Lil Oldman":19o9y4hw]
What do you mean by "losing deck"? Do you mean bricky? Are you sure a generic staple is to blame or maybe you run other cards that are more situational than the staples?[/quote:19o9y4hw]
a losing deck is a losing deck and adding a random card into a deck causes imbalance and an imbalanced deck is a losing deck whether it is a generic card or not[/quote:19o9y4hw]
... What? You aren't making sense.[/quote:19o9y4hw]
What I think he's trying to say here is that he's struggling to maintain the ratios of his deck while also trying to add answers to other strategies like SS or Altergeist.

This is why the side deck is important. What cards do you main deck that are terrible against these specific match-ups? That should give you a better idea on what cards to swap out.

[quote="troglyte":2a2ytcfx][quote="Lil Oldman":2a2ytcfx][quote="AnimeMasterDub":2a2ytcfx]
a losing deck is a losing deck and adding a random card into a deck causes imbalance and an imbalanced deck is a losing deck whether it is a generic card or not[/quote:2a2ytcfx]
... What? You aren't making sense.[/quote:2a2ytcfx]
What I think he's trying to say here is that he's struggling to maintain the ratios of his deck while also trying to add answers to other strategies like SS or Altergeist.

This is why the side deck is important. What cards do you main deck that are terrible against these specific match-ups? That should give you a better idea on what cards to swap out.[/quote:2a2ytcfx]
in a way you are correct but the problem is the side deck is out of the question since most duels are single duels

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":1u54mkqc][quote="troglyte":1u54mkqc][quote="Lil Oldman":1u54mkqc]
... What? You aren't making sense.[/quote:1u54mkqc]
What I think he's trying to say here is that he's struggling to maintain the ratios of his deck while also trying to add answers to other strategies like SS or Altergeist.

This is why the side deck is important. What cards do you main deck that are terrible against these specific match-ups? That should give you a better idea on what cards to swap out.[/quote:1u54mkqc]
in a way you are correct but the problem is the side deck is out of the question since most duels are single duels[/quote:1u54mkqc]

Official tournament duels and ranked are always best of 3 which are the ones that matter when it comes to the banlist.

[quote="Fredblade":3jqo7jtc][quote="AnimeMasterDub":3jqo7jtc][quote="troglyte":3jqo7jtc]
What I think he's trying to say here is that he's struggling to maintain the ratios of his deck while also trying to add answers to other strategies like SS or Altergeist.

This is why the side deck is important. What cards do you main deck that are terrible against these specific match-ups? That should give you a better idea on what cards to swap out.[/quote:3jqo7jtc]
in a way you are correct but the problem is the side deck is out of the question since most duels are single duels[/quote:3jqo7jtc]

Official tournament duels and ranked are always best of 3 which are the ones that matter when it comes to the banlist.[/quote:3jqo7jtc]
not from my experience the majority of people on db don't have the time for a best 2 out of 3 plus even if that wasn't the case a side deck doesn't work for me because from my experience when I tried using a side deck it turns out the card I switched out I needed in addition to the card I switched in to put it simply the cards that I already have in the deck need to stay in the deck and the card that I need needs to be put into the deck

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":270zex9k][quote="Fredblade":270zex9k][quote="AnimeMasterDub":270zex9k]
in a way you are correct but the problem is the side deck is out of the question since most duels are single duels[/quote:270zex9k]

Official tournament duels and ranked are always best of 3 which are the ones that matter when it comes to the banlist.[/quote:270zex9k]
not from my experience the majority of people on db don't have the time for a best 2 out of 3 plus even if that wasn't the case a side deck doesn't work for me because from my experience when I tried using a side deck it turns out the card I switched out I needed in addition to the card I switched in to put it simply the cards that I already have in the deck need to stay in the deck and the card that I need needs to be put into the deck[/quote:270zex9k]
If your odd eyes deck is struggling against Altergeist then I recommend switching to a better Pendulum deck. Sky Strikers I some what understand but instead if saying that they need a downgrade read the cards and take advantage of certain weaknesses they have.

[quote="Lil Oldman":22o8fkju]Skill issue[/quote:22o8fkju]
no its a deck issue

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":7u1ugt7q][quote="Lil Oldman":7u1ugt7q]Skill issue[/quote:7u1ugt7q]
no its a deck issue[/quote:7u1ugt7q]
Yes, it's an issue of your deck building skill

[quote="greg503":2tblrhcy][quote="AnimeMasterDub":2tblrhcy][quote="Lil Oldman":2tblrhcy]Skill issue[/quote:2tblrhcy]
no its a deck issue[/quote:2tblrhcy]
Yes, it's an issue of your deck building skill[/quote:2tblrhcy]
I am good at using certain decks but not making them that I will admit to

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":2u9qw6p1][quote="greg503":2u9qw6p1][quote="AnimeMasterDub":2u9qw6p1]
no its a deck issue[/quote:2u9qw6p1]
Yes, it's an issue of your deck building skill[/quote:2u9qw6p1]
I am good at using certain decks but not making them that I will admit to[/quote:2u9qw6p1]
Yes, we know you struggle with that.

Especially when you asked for decks in the past.

Also, have you tried to hone your deck building skills at all?

[quote="Renji Asuka":3dnalj93][quote="AnimeMasterDub":3dnalj93][quote="greg503":3dnalj93]
Yes, it's an issue of your deck building skill[/quote:3dnalj93]
I am good at using certain decks but not making them that I will admit to[/quote:3dnalj93]
Yes, we know you struggle with that.

Especially when you asked for decks in the past.

Also, have you tried to hone your deck building skills at all?[/quote:3dnalj93]
tried and failed
the only times I am successful in building a deck is in duel links which isn't much of a milestone

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":2sbak6e1][quote="Renji Asuka":2sbak6e1][quote="AnimeMasterDub":2sbak6e1]
I am good at using certain decks but not making them that I will admit to[/quote:2sbak6e1]
Yes, we know you struggle with that.

Especially when you asked for decks in the past.

Also, have you tried to hone your deck building skills at all?[/quote:2sbak6e1]
tried and failed
the only times I am successful in building a deck is in duel links which isn't much of a milestone[/quote:2sbak6e1]
So keep trying.

No seriously, don't just give up, keep trying to better yourself.

[quote="Renji Asuka":19o52jf7][quote="AnimeMasterDub":19o52jf7][quote="Renji Asuka":19o52jf7]
Yes, we know you struggle with that.

Especially when you asked for decks in the past.

Also, have you tried to hone your deck building skills at all?[/quote:19o52jf7]
tried and failed
the only times I am successful in building a deck is in duel links which isn't much of a milestone[/quote:19o52jf7]
So keep trying.

No seriously, don't just give up, keep trying to better yourself.[/quote:19o52jf7]
waste of time and effort for more than one reason 1) even when they look good on paper figuratively speaking they fail in the field and 2) there are too many cards needed and there is no way to put in a contingency strategy

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":3psqnnsa][quote="Renji Asuka":3psqnnsa][quote="AnimeMasterDub":3psqnnsa]
tried and failed
the only times I am successful in building a deck is in duel links which isn't much of a milestone[/quote:3psqnnsa]
So keep trying.

No seriously, don't just give up, keep trying to better yourself.[/quote:3psqnnsa]
waste of time and effort for more than one reason 1) even when they look good on paper figuratively speaking they fail in the field and 2) there are too many cards needed and there is no way to put in a contingency strategy[/quote:3psqnnsa]
Its also a waste of time playing a deck if you arent willing to adapt against certain match-ups.

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":1b9s6wyf][quote="Renji Asuka":1b9s6wyf][quote="AnimeMasterDub":1b9s6wyf]
tried and failed
the only times I am successful in building a deck is in duel links which isn't much of a milestone[/quote:1b9s6wyf]
So keep trying.

No seriously, don't just give up, keep trying to better yourself.[/quote:1b9s6wyf]
waste of time and effort for more than one reason 1) even when they look good on paper figuratively speaking they fail in the field and 2) there are too many cards needed and there is no way to put in a contingency strategy[/quote:1b9s6wyf]
It isn't a waste of time, don't have the attitude of a defeatist.

[quote="Sound4":rg0p0il9][quote="AnimeMasterDub":rg0p0il9][quote="Fredblade":rg0p0il9]

Official tournament duels and ranked are always best of 3 which are the ones that matter when it comes to the banlist.[/quote:rg0p0il9]
not from my experience the majority of people on db don't have the time for a best 2 out of 3 plus even if that wasn't the case a side deck doesn't work for me because from my experience when I tried using a side deck it turns out the card I switched out I needed in addition to the card I switched in to put it simply the cards that I already have in the deck need to stay in the deck and the card that I need needs to be put into the deck[/quote:rg0p0il9]
If your odd eyes deck is struggling against Altergeist then I recommend switching to a better Pendulum deck. Sky Strikers I some what understand but instead if saying that they need a downgrade read the cards and take advantage of certain weaknesses they have.[/quote:rg0p0il9]
out of the question it has to be odd-eyes

I tried making a deck but it is probably terrible
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10497059

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":1ox4vqqr]I tried making a deck but it is probably terrible
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10497059[/quote:1ox4vqqr]
So, why do you run so many 1 offs? Is it spelled like that? Specifically Splashmammoth, Gongato, Light Phoenix and Unicorn.
Most cards that you dont play 3, are cards that don't contribute to mayor plays, so might as well replace those with more useful cards.
Regardless, your first, second, or third deck isn't going to be great. You should always look for what cards do the most for you and what cards do the least. How many scenarios does running Silver Claw help you in contrast with running Lightning Storm or a Gamma. Do you really need 2 Odd-eyes Fusion, 1 Dissolver and 1 Splashmammoth? These mental exercises are a way to get better at deck building.
Another big factor is too recognize your deck's weaknesses and look for ways to reduce them. Example, as a Krawler player, I suffer from backrow removal, and since TT, Lightning Storm and HFD are popular backrow removal options, so to counter these popular staples, I run Starlight Road. Any backrow protection works for me, but since Krawlers, from my experience, don't require a lot of their extra deck slots, I can run a single Stardust Dragon. Was it a good decision? Maybe, I'll have to look how much of a difference it makes running it. Maybe I can run a more versatile card like Solemn Judgement, Maybe I can run Waking the Dragon to make destruction more punishing, but I will just have to wait and see how the new additions perform. If you can't deal with handtraps, maybe run called or Gamma, if you can't deal with Backrow, maybe Lightning Storm can help you, you can't beat big monsters by battle, Kaijus might make the cut. That's the beauty of deck building, at least in my opinion.

[quote="Lil Oldman":h5zscpu7][quote="AnimeMasterDub":h5zscpu7]I tried making a deck but it is probably terrible
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10497059[/quote:h5zscpu7]
So, why do you run so many 1 offs? Is it spelled like that? Specifically Splashmammoth, Gongato, Light Phoenix and Unicorn.
Most cards that you dont play 3, are cards that don't contribute to mayor plays, so might as well replace those with more useful cards.
Regardless, your first, second, or third deck isn't going to be great. You should always look for what cards do the most for you and what cards do the least. How many scenarios does running Silver Claw help you in contrast with running Lightning Storm or a Gamma. Do you really need 2 Odd-eyes Fusion, 1 Dissolver and 1 Splashmammoth? These mental exercises are a way to get better at deck building.
Another big factor is too recognize your deck's weaknesses and look for ways to reduce them. Example, as a Krawler player, I suffer from backrow removal, and since TT, Lightning Storm and HFD are popular backrow removal options, so to counter these popular staples, I run Starlight Road. Any backrow protection works for me, but since Krawlers, from my experience, don't require a lot of their extra deck slots, I can run a single Stardust Dragon. Was it a good decision? Maybe, I'll have to look how much of a difference it makes running it. Maybe I can run a more versatile card like Solemn Judgement, Maybe I can run Waking the Dragon to make destruction more punishing, but I will just have to wait and see how the new additions perform. If you can't deal with handtraps, maybe run called or Gamma, if you can't deal with Backrow, maybe Lightning Storm can help you, you can't beat big monsters by battle, Kaijus might make the cut. That's the beauty of deck building, at least in my opinion.[/quote:h5zscpu7]
I was focusing on the options in case one would fail plus do you see all the fusions in the extra deck some of the one offs are fillers that are compatible with the other cards

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":2uzwhabv][quote="Lil Oldman":2uzwhabv][quote="AnimeMasterDub":2uzwhabv]I tried making a deck but it is probably terrible
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10497059[/quote:2uzwhabv]
So, why do you run so many 1 offs? Is it spelled like that? Specifically Splashmammoth, Gongato, Light Phoenix and Unicorn.
Most cards that you dont play 3, are cards that don't contribute to mayor plays, so might as well replace those with more useful cards.
Regardless, your first, second, or third deck isn't going to be great. You should always look for what cards do the most for you and what cards do the least. How many scenarios does running Silver Claw help you in contrast with running Lightning Storm or a Gamma. Do you really need 2 Odd-eyes Fusion, 1 Dissolver and 1 Splashmammoth? These mental exercises are a way to get better at deck building.
Another big factor is too recognize your deck's weaknesses and look for ways to reduce them. Example, as a Krawler player, I suffer from backrow removal, and since TT, Lightning Storm and HFD are popular backrow removal options, so to counter these popular staples, I run Starlight Road. Any backrow protection works for me, but since Krawlers, from my experience, don't require a lot of their extra deck slots, I can run a single Stardust Dragon. Was it a good decision? Maybe, I'll have to look how much of a difference it makes running it. Maybe I can run a more versatile card like Solemn Judgement, Maybe I can run Waking the Dragon to make destruction more punishing, but I will just have to wait and see how the new additions perform. If you can't deal with handtraps, maybe run called or Gamma, if you can't deal with Backrow, maybe Lightning Storm can help you, you can't beat big monsters by battle, Kaijus might make the cut. That's the beauty of deck building, at least in my opinion.[/quote:2uzwhabv]
I was focusing on the options in case one would fail plus do you see all the fusions in the extra deck some of the one offs are fillers that are compatible with the other cards[/quote:2uzwhabv]
I did see the extra deck, but in what kind of duel are you expecting to play so long as to fusion summon 4 different times. Also, what are you planning to summon of the effect of Masquerena? BLS? Wouldn't you get more from running Knightmare Unicorn?

[quote="Lil Oldman":3tdusyy8][quote="AnimeMasterDub":3tdusyy8][quote="Lil Oldman":3tdusyy8]
So, why do you run so many 1 offs? Is it spelled like that? Specifically Splashmammoth, Gongato, Light Phoenix and Unicorn.
Most cards that you dont play 3, are cards that don't contribute to mayor plays, so might as well replace those with more useful cards.
Regardless, your first, second, or third deck isn't going to be great. You should always look for what cards do the most for you and what cards do the least. How many scenarios does running Silver Claw help you in contrast with running Lightning Storm or a Gamma. Do you really need 2 Odd-eyes Fusion, 1 Dissolver and 1 Splashmammoth? These mental exercises are a way to get better at deck building.
Another big factor is too recognize your deck's weaknesses and look for ways to reduce them. Example, as a Krawler player, I suffer from backrow removal, and since TT, Lightning Storm and HFD are popular backrow removal options, so to counter these popular staples, I run Starlight Road. Any backrow protection works for me, but since Krawlers, from my experience, don't require a lot of their extra deck slots, I can run a single Stardust Dragon. Was it a good decision? Maybe, I'll have to look how much of a difference it makes running it. Maybe I can run a more versatile card like Solemn Judgement, Maybe I can run Waking the Dragon to make destruction more punishing, but I will just have to wait and see how the new additions perform. If you can't deal with handtraps, maybe run called or Gamma, if you can't deal with Backrow, maybe Lightning Storm can help you, you can't beat big monsters by battle, Kaijus might make the cut. That's the beauty of deck building, at least in my opinion.[/quote:3tdusyy8]
I was focusing on the options in case one would fail plus do you see all the fusions in the extra deck some of the one offs are fillers that are compatible with the other cards[/quote:3tdusyy8]
I did see the extra deck, but in what kind of duel are you expecting to play so long as to fusion summon 4 different times. Also, what are you planning to summon of the effect of Masquerena? BLS? Wouldn't you get more from running Knightmare Unicorn?[/quote:3tdusyy8]
knightmare unicorn only has 1 link arrow point to a monster zone

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":26jxvcrz][quote="Lil Oldman":26jxvcrz][quote="AnimeMasterDub":26jxvcrz]
I was focusing on the options in case one would fail plus do you see all the fusions in the extra deck some of the one offs are fillers that are compatible with the other cards[/quote:26jxvcrz]
I did see the extra deck, but in what kind of duel are you expecting to play so long as to fusion summon 4 different times. Also, what are you planning to summon of the effect of Masquerena? BLS? Wouldn't you get more from running Knightmare Unicorn?[/quote:26jxvcrz]
knightmare unicorn only has 1 link arrow point to a monster zone[/quote:26jxvcrz]
If what you worry about is having Link Zones readily available, then I guess using masquerena isn't being used to it's fullest potential, since you can't pendulum summon during your opponent's turn and BLS can't disrupt your opponent. Might aswell run something that can be abused more easily like Halqifibrax Damn you localization team to turbo out Synchron.

[quote="Lil Oldman":21u98ok5][quote="AnimeMasterDub":21u98ok5][quote="Lil Oldman":21u98ok5]
I did see the extra deck, but in what kind of duel are you expecting to play so long as to fusion summon 4 different times. Also, what are you planning to summon of the effect of Masquerena? BLS? Wouldn't you get more from running Knightmare Unicorn?[/quote:21u98ok5]
knightmare unicorn only has 1 link arrow point to a monster zone[/quote:21u98ok5]
If what you worry about is having Link Zones readily available, then I guess using masquerena isn't being used to it's fullest potential, since you can't pendulum summon during your opponent's turn and BLS can't disrupt your opponent. Might aswell run something that can be abused more easily like Halqifibrax Damn you localization team to turbo out Synchron.[/quote:21u98ok5]
there is only one tuner in the deck

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":ieppa26x][quote="Lil Oldman":ieppa26x][quote="AnimeMasterDub":ieppa26x]
knightmare unicorn only has 1 link arrow point to a monster zone[/quote:ieppa26x]
If what you worry about is having Link Zones readily available, then I guess using masquerena isn't being used to it's fullest potential, since you can't pendulum summon during your opponent's turn and BLS can't disrupt your opponent. Might aswell run something that can be abused more easily like Halqifibrax Damn you localization team to turbo out Synchron.[/quote:ieppa26x]
there is only one tuner in the deck[/quote:ieppa26x]
Ok, but that's the point of deck building, explore for options, Masquerena might be doing fine, but maybe there's another link that does her job and a little more. Maybe run Beyond the Pendulum or Proxy F Magician. Is the 1 zone Unicorn gives worth the it's disruption? Is there a better link that you can go into using Unicorn afterwards like Avramax or Unchained Abomination?
I cannot know how consistent or incosistent your deck is, but experimenting around with options will help in the long run in identifing issues within the deck.

[quote="Lil Oldman":8dleuonh][quote="AnimeMasterDub":8dleuonh][quote="Lil Oldman":8dleuonh]
If what you worry about is having Link Zones readily available, then I guess using masquerena isn't being used to it's fullest potential, since you can't pendulum summon during your opponent's turn and BLS can't disrupt your opponent. Might aswell run something that can be abused more easily like Halqifibrax Damn you localization team to turbo out Synchron.[/quote:8dleuonh]
there is only one tuner in the deck[/quote:8dleuonh]
Ok, but that's the point of deck building, explore for options, Masquerena might be doing fine, but maybe there's another link that does her job and a little more. Maybe run Beyond the Pendulum or Proxy F Magician. Is the 1 zone Unicorn gives worth the it's disruption? Is there a better link that you can go into using Unicorn afterwards like Avramax or Unchained Abomination?
I cannot know how consistent or incosistent your deck is, but experimenting around with options will help in the long run in identifing issues within the deck.[/quote:8dleuonh]
after careful consideration I can see how unchained abomination would be useful as a berserker card so I rearranged the extra deck

I also made a dark magician deck https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10499694

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":1itpl5xx][quote="Lil Oldman":1itpl5xx][quote="AnimeMasterDub":1itpl5xx]
there is only one tuner in the deck[/quote:1itpl5xx]
Ok, but that's the point of deck building, explore for options, Masquerena might be doing fine, but maybe there's another link that does her job and a little more. Maybe run Beyond the Pendulum or Proxy F Magician. Is the 1 zone Unicorn gives worth the it's disruption? Is there a better link that you can go into using Unicorn afterwards like Avramax or Unchained Abomination?
I cannot know how consistent or incosistent your deck is, but experimenting around with options will help in the long run in identifing issues within the deck.[/quote:1itpl5xx]
after careful consideration I can see how unchained abomination would be useful as a berserker card so I rearranged the extra deck[/quote:1itpl5xx]
The Unchained archetype is a Link engine

[quote="DarwisBellium92":2azzhn2r][quote="AnimeMasterDub":2azzhn2r][quote="Lil Oldman":2azzhn2r]
Ok, but that's the point of deck building, explore for options, Masquerena might be doing fine, but maybe there's another link that does her job and a little more. Maybe run Beyond the Pendulum or Proxy F Magician. Is the 1 zone Unicorn gives worth the it's disruption? Is there a better link that you can go into using Unicorn afterwards like Avramax or Unchained Abomination?
I cannot know how consistent or incosistent your deck is, but experimenting around with options will help in the long run in identifing issues within the deck.[/quote:2azzhn2r]
after careful consideration I can see how unchained abomination would be useful as a berserker card so I rearranged the extra deck[/quote:2azzhn2r]
The Unchained archetype is a Link engine[/quote:2azzhn2r]
did you even look at the deck?

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":f55ldrlj][quote="DarwisBellium92":f55ldrlj][quote="AnimeMasterDub":f55ldrlj]
after careful consideration I can see how unchained abomination would be useful as a berserker card so I rearranged the extra deck[/quote:f55ldrlj]
The Unchained archetype is a Link engine[/quote:f55ldrlj]
did you even look at the deck?[/quote:f55ldrlj]
Yep
I know the archetype in general.

[quote="DarwisBellium92":zij3zuh0][quote="AnimeMasterDub":zij3zuh0][quote="DarwisBellium92":zij3zuh0]
The Unchained archetype is a Link engine[/quote:zij3zuh0]
did you even look at the deck?[/quote:zij3zuh0]
Yep
I know the archetype in general.[/quote:zij3zuh0]
I can't tell if you are bad mouthing the deck or giving me constructive criticism

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":18zcemly][quote="DarwisBellium92":18zcemly][quote="AnimeMasterDub":18zcemly]
did you even look at the deck?[/quote:18zcemly]
Yep
I know the archetype in general.[/quote:18zcemly]
I can't tell if you are bad mouthing the deck or giving me constructive criticism[/quote:18zcemly]
Dude, try you Albaz Shaddoll, is very strong

[quote="DarwisBellium92":18by6a3o][quote="AnimeMasterDub":18by6a3o][quote="DarwisBellium92":18by6a3o]
Yep
I know the archetype in general.[/quote:18by6a3o]
I can't tell if you are bad mouthing the deck or giving me constructive criticism[/quote:18by6a3o]
Dude, try you Albaz Shaddoll, is very strong[/quote:18by6a3o]
no I am sticking with odd-eyes besides I don't like albaz or shaddoll

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":17mf685i][quote="DarwisBellium92":17mf685i][quote="AnimeMasterDub":17mf685i]
I can't tell if you are bad mouthing the deck or giving me constructive criticism[/quote:17mf685i]
Dude, try you Albaz Shaddoll, is very strong[/quote:17mf685i]
no I am sticking with odd-eyes besides I don't like albaz or shaddoll[/quote:17mf685i]
Too bad :v

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":26e85zv0]Title explains it all reasons I may or may not mention in the original posts. Original posts may be updated over time.

SkyStrikers (too much spamming)
Altergeist ( way too much spamming)[/quote:26e85zv0]
No, we shouldnt be lowering ourselves to your sub-par standards, you should try elevating yourself to par.

[quote="ominous":4b9o8bx8][quote="AnimeMasterDub":4b9o8bx8]Title explains it all reasons I may or may not mention in the original posts. Original posts may be updated over time.

SkyStrikers (too much spamming)
Altergeist ( way too much spamming)[/quote:4b9o8bx8]
No, we shouldnt be lowering ourselves to your sub-par standards, you should try elevating yourself to par.[/quote:4b9o8bx8]
What do you mean?

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":1jghl2t6][quote="ominous":1jghl2t6][quote="AnimeMasterDub":1jghl2t6]Title explains it all reasons I may or may not mention in the original posts. Original posts may be updated over time.

SkyStrikers (too much spamming)
Altergeist ( way too much spamming)[/quote:1jghl2t6]
No, we shouldnt be lowering ourselves to your sub-par standards, you should try elevating yourself to par.[/quote:1jghl2t6]
What do you mean?[/quote:1jghl2t6]
I think he means play a better deck (or play in such a way that you can beat these decks, instead of saying they're too strong, only meta decks can be called too strong, though there are "cheap" strategies like Timelords and Mine that require you to play counters)

[quote="greg503":3iq8fhe3][quote="AnimeMasterDub":3iq8fhe3][quote="ominous":3iq8fhe3]
No, we shouldnt be lowering ourselves to your sub-par standards, you should try elevating yourself to par.[/quote:3iq8fhe3]
What do you mean?[/quote:3iq8fhe3]
I think he means play a better deck (or play in such a way that you can beat these decks, instead of saying they're too strong, only meta decks can be called too strong, though there are "cheap" strategies like Timelords and Mine that require you to play counters)[/quote:3iq8fhe3]
from my experience there are 2 difficulties in the game getting a powerful monster onto the field and keeping it on the field and so far there is one solution

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":1p2xa8v4][quote="Sound4":1p2xa8v4][quote="AnimeMasterDub":1p2xa8v4]
not from my experience the majority of people on db don't have the time for a best 2 out of 3 plus even if that wasn't the case a side deck doesn't work for me because from my experience when I tried using a side deck it turns out the card I switched out I needed in addition to the card I switched in to put it simply the cards that I already have in the deck need to stay in the deck and the card that I need needs to be put into the deck[/quote:1p2xa8v4]
If your odd eyes deck is struggling against Altergeist then I recommend switching to a better Pendulum deck. Sky Strikers I some what understand but instead if saying that they need a downgrade read the cards and take advantage of certain weaknesses they have.[/quote:1p2xa8v4]
out of the question it has to be odd-eyes[/quote:1p2xa8v4]
Then stop complaining about decks like Altergeist which are rogue at best. Some archetypes aren't the best equipped to play against other certain archetypes.

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":1uylx82w][quote="greg503":1uylx82w][quote="AnimeMasterDub":1uylx82w]
What do you mean?[/quote:1uylx82w]
I think he means play a better deck (or play in such a way that you can beat these decks, instead of saying they're too strong, only meta decks can be called too strong, though there are "cheap" strategies like Timelords and Mine that require you to play counters)[/quote:1uylx82w]
from my experience there are 2 difficulties in the game getting a powerful monster onto the field and keeping it on the field and so far there is one solution[/quote:1uylx82w]
Wow, no wonder you lose if these are the "only difficulties in the game"

[quote="ominous":c0me2ssy][quote="AnimeMasterDub":c0me2ssy][quote="greg503":c0me2ssy]
I think he means play a better deck (or play in such a way that you can beat these decks, instead of saying they're too strong, only meta decks can be called too strong, though there are "cheap" strategies like Timelords and Mine that require you to play counters)[/quote:c0me2ssy]
from my experience there are 2 difficulties in the game getting a powerful monster onto the field and keeping it on the field and so far there is one solution[/quote:c0me2ssy]
Wow, no wonder you lose if these are the "only difficulties in the game"[/quote:c0me2ssy]
what are you implying?

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":1l6z3la1][quote="ominous":1l6z3la1][quote="AnimeMasterDub":1l6z3la1]
from my experience there are 2 difficulties in the game getting a powerful monster onto the field and keeping it on the field and so far there is one solution[/quote:1l6z3la1]
Wow, no wonder you lose if these are the "only difficulties in the game"[/quote:1l6z3la1]
what are you implying?[/quote:1l6z3la1]
its pretty clear what is implied.

[quote="ominous":2fe45b5b][quote="AnimeMasterDub":2fe45b5b][quote="ominous":2fe45b5b]
Wow, no wonder you lose if these are the "only difficulties in the game"[/quote:2fe45b5b]
what are you implying?[/quote:2fe45b5b]
its pretty clear what is implied.[/quote:2fe45b5b]
answer the question anyway

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":1qddmlhj][quote="ominous":1qddmlhj][quote="AnimeMasterDub":1qddmlhj]
what are you implying?[/quote:1qddmlhj]
its pretty clear what is implied.[/quote:1qddmlhj]
answer the question anyway[/quote:1qddmlhj]
You lose because you dont understand the basics of the game.

[quote="ominous":r0d2gfjn][quote="AnimeMasterDub":r0d2gfjn][quote="ominous":r0d2gfjn]
its pretty clear what is implied.[/quote:r0d2gfjn]
answer the question anyway[/quote:r0d2gfjn]
You lose because you dont understand the basics of the game.[/quote:r0d2gfjn]
I know the basics

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":1vjyokac][quote="ominous":1vjyokac][quote="AnimeMasterDub":1vjyokac]
answer the question anyway[/quote:1vjyokac]
You lose because you dont understand the basics of the game.[/quote:1vjyokac]
I know the basics[/quote:1vjyokac]
Well clearly, you don't

[quote="Lil Oldman":1s3ob2nd][quote="AnimeMasterDub":1s3ob2nd][quote="ominous":1s3ob2nd]
You lose because you dont understand the basics of the game.[/quote:1s3ob2nd]
I know the basics[/quote:1s3ob2nd]
Well clearly, you don't[/quote:1s3ob2nd]
basics are the knowing the categories of the the 3 types of cards (monsters, spells, and traps), the different summoning mechanics, and the general rules of the game

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":311z7j51][quote="Lil Oldman":311z7j51][quote="AnimeMasterDub":311z7j51]
I know the basics[/quote:311z7j51]
Well clearly, you don't[/quote:311z7j51]
basics are the knowing the categories of the the 3 types of cards (monsters, spells, and traps), the different summoning mechanics, and the general rules of the game[/quote:311z7j51]
nope, and thats why you lose, it has nothing to do with anyone or anything else, its your failure to understand the basic concepts that are required to be successful in the game.

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":33yslhi5][quote="Lil Oldman":33yslhi5][quote="AnimeMasterDub":33yslhi5]
the problem is the despite both having handicaps sky strikers still has the upper hand for some reason[/quote:33yslhi5]
Again, Skill Issue, Altergeist and Sky Striker ramp up their recourses, if you can stop the cards that do so (Kagari, Shizuhu, Hayate, Engage, Multirole) then the deck shouldn't suffer that much.[/quote:33yslhi5]
Is there an Odd-Eyes, performapal, or pendulum magician card that does that?[/quote:33yslhi5]

https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=9177212
This is my Pendulum Magician List from 2 months ago, but it should still give you a somewhat easy matchup against Strikers and decks of that same magnitude. It is also a very good demonstration of how certain out of archtype cards (in this case Scythe and DPE Engine) can work wonders for your Deck and don't necessarily create what you call an "imbalance". Have fun playing

[quote="Ir0n":1yj1mljr][quote="AnimeMasterDub":1yj1mljr][quote="Lil Oldman":1yj1mljr]
Again, Skill Issue, Altergeist and Sky Striker ramp up their recourses, if you can stop the cards that do so (Kagari, Shizuhu, Hayate, Engage, Multirole) then the deck shouldn't suffer that much.[/quote:1yj1mljr]
Is there an Odd-Eyes, performapal, or pendulum magician card that does that?[/quote:1yj1mljr]

https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=9177212
This is my Pendulum Magician List from 2 months ago, but it should still give you a somewhat easy matchup against Strikers and decks of that same magnitude. It is also a very good demonstration of how certain out of archtype cards (in this case Scythe and DPE Engine) can work wonders for your Deck and don't necessarily create what you call an "imbalance". Have fun playing [/quote:1yj1mljr]
your deck seems nice but I can't see myself using it mostly because there isn't an odd-eyes in the deck

[quote="AnimeMasterDub":3syb4cdc][quote="Ir0n":3syb4cdc][quote="AnimeMasterDub":3syb4cdc]
Is there an Odd-Eyes, performapal, or pendulum magician card that does that?[/quote:3syb4cdc]

https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=9177212
This is my Pendulum Magician List from 2 months ago, but it should still give you a somewhat easy matchup against Strikers and decks of that same magnitude. It is also a very good demonstration of how certain out of archtype cards (in this case Scythe and DPE Engine) can work wonders for your Deck and don't necessarily create what you call an "imbalance". Have fun playing [/quote:3syb4cdc]
your deck seems nice but I can't see myself using it mostly because there isn't an odd-eyes in the deck[/quote:3syb4cdc]
Well, the new banlist means it need to be altered again

Monkeyboard supremacy