Yu-Gi-Oh! » Custom Cards

Oh look, more improper PSCT and a busted effect from CrystalMusic.

[quote="Renji Asuka":2l09319n]Oh look, more improper PSCT and a busted effect from CrystalMusic.[/quote:2l09319n]

oh look, more "i cant comment nicely on CM's posts" comments from Renji!

and you know, instead of criticizing the card, why dont you actually comment how "YOU" would "FIX" it?

[quote="CrystalMusic":3elnp3dx][quote="Renji Asuka":3elnp3dx]Oh look, more improper PSCT and a busted effect from CrystalMusic.[/quote:3elnp3dx]

oh look, more "i cant comment nicely on CM's posts" comments from Renji!

and you know, instead of criticizing the card, why dont you actually comment how "YOU" would "FIX" it?[/quote:3elnp3dx]
Oh look, more "Wah! I can't take criticism for shit so I'm gonna lash out out the one who criticized my card!"

Also, seeing that anyone can easily Kaiju or beat over it, it's really not that good.

[quote="Darkraiclone":1tzqi2bn][quote="CrystalMusic":1tzqi2bn][quote="Renji Asuka":1tzqi2bn]Oh look, more improper PSCT and a busted effect from CrystalMusic.[/quote:1tzqi2bn]

oh look, more "i cant comment nicely on CM's posts" comments from Renji!

and you know, instead of criticizing the card, why dont you actually comment how "YOU" would "FIX" it?[/quote:1tzqi2bn]
Oh look, more "Wah! I can't take criticism for shit so I'm gonna lash out out the one who criticized my card!"

Also, seeing that anyone can easily Kaiju or beat over it, it's really not that good.[/quote:1tzqi2bn]

seeing as im only going to have 1 rule when i use this u cant even kaiju it: rarely used 1st gen character decks.

[quote="CrystalMusic":36ojtu88][quote="Darkraiclone":36ojtu88][quote="CrystalMusic":36ojtu88]

oh look, more "i cant comment nicely on CM's posts" comments from Renji!

and you know, instead of criticizing the card, why dont you actually comment how "YOU" would "FIX" it?[/quote:36ojtu88]
Oh look, more "Wah! I can't take criticism for shit so I'm gonna lash out out the one who criticized my card!"

Also, seeing that anyone can easily Kaiju or beat over it, it's really not that good.[/quote:36ojtu88]

seeing as im only going to have 1 rule when i use this u cant even kaiju it: rarely used 1st gen character decks.[/quote:36ojtu88]
Okay, then how about Santa Claws or Lava Golem?

[quote="Darkraiclone":1ygwujjm][quote="CrystalMusic":1ygwujjm][quote="Darkraiclone":1ygwujjm]
Oh look, more "Wah! I can't take criticism for shit so I'm gonna lash out out the one who criticized my card!"

Also, seeing that anyone can easily Kaiju or beat over it, it's really not that good.[/quote:1ygwujjm]

seeing as im only going to have 1 rule when i use this u cant even kaiju it: rarely used 1st gen character decks.[/quote:1ygwujjm]
Okay, then how about Santa Claws or Lava Golem?[/quote:1ygwujjm]

1st off Santa Claws isnt 1st gen. 2nd Lava Golem was only used by one character: Marik and i dont allow his deck! so lava golem is outta the question. there are 3 characters i NEVER allow: Marik and the schroeder brothers: Ziegfried and Leon

[quote="CrystalMusic":17k0n6t8][quote="Darkraiclone":17k0n6t8][quote="CrystalMusic":17k0n6t8]

seeing as im only going to have 1 rule when i use this u cant even kaiju it: rarely used 1st gen character decks.[/quote:17k0n6t8]
Okay, then how about Santa Claws or Lava Golem?[/quote:17k0n6t8]

1st off Santa Claws isnt 1st gen. 2nd Lava Golem was only used by one character: Marik and i dont allow his deck! so lava golem is outta the question.[/quote:17k0n6t8]
I see, and seeing that you don't like Harpies according to the Duel Recording I watched prior, you will only allow people to use Character decks that can't beat yours then?

[quote="Darkraiclone":36x1h6sf][quote="CrystalMusic":36x1h6sf][quote="Darkraiclone":36x1h6sf]
Okay, then how about Santa Claws or Lava Golem?[/quote:36x1h6sf]

1st off Santa Claws isnt 1st gen. 2nd Lava Golem was only used by one character: Marik and i dont allow his deck! so lava golem is outta the question.[/quote:36x1h6sf]
I see, and seeing that you don't like Harpies according to the Duel Recording I watched prior, you will only allow people to use Character decks that can't beat yours then?[/quote:36x1h6sf]

i never said that. i want to see characters like weevil, rex, bonz (without skull servants!) bandit keith, rapheal, rebecca, solomon, alister and valon.

[quote="CrystalMusic":2cu6nsaa][quote="Darkraiclone":2cu6nsaa][quote="CrystalMusic":2cu6nsaa]

1st off Santa Claws isnt 1st gen. 2nd Lava Golem was only used by one character: Marik and i dont allow his deck! so lava golem is outta the question.[/quote:2cu6nsaa]
I see, and seeing that you don't like Harpies according to the Duel Recording I watched prior, you will only allow people to use Character decks that can't beat yours then?[/quote:2cu6nsaa]

i never said that. i want to see characters like weevil, rex, bonz (without skull servants!) bandit keith, rapheal, rebecca, solomon, alister and valon.[/quote:2cu6nsaa]
And as I said in the other topic, you will more than likely get butthurt over them beating you with those decks that you'll not want people to use them. Because let's face it, you don't care about having a fun duel or not, you just want to win.

It's only a busted card in relation to GOAT and other such formats, it still gets shredded by the current meta.
Also Guardians are still a trash archetype, even if they could be summoned normally.

[quote="CrystalMusic":znzv9e9c][quote="Renji Asuka":znzv9e9c]Oh look, more improper PSCT and a busted effect from CrystalMusic.[/quote:znzv9e9c]

oh look, more "i cant comment nicely on CM's posts" comments from Renji!

and you know, instead of criticizing the card, why dont you actually comment how "YOU" would "FIX" it?[/quote:znzv9e9c]
Why would I comment nicely on a post from you when you post a card knowing damn well you won't even try to fix the issues with it?

[quote="CrystalMusic":39a2a08r]https://www.duelingbook.com/card?id=1854713[/quote:39a2a08r]

Oh look. Yet another busted card with improper PSCT and a million immunities.

[quote="LightCaster":1vpmgk5m][quote="CrystalMusic":1vpmgk5m]https://www.duelingbook.com/card?id=1854713[/quote:1vpmgk5m]

Oh look. Yet another busted card with improper PSCT and a million immunities.[/quote:1vpmgk5m]
But only if you open it and OG Eatos which is pretty bad in current format, it's no Red-Eyes Dark Dragoon

[quote="greg503":2144xbt0][quote="LightCaster":2144xbt0][quote="CrystalMusic":2144xbt0]https://www.duelingbook.com/card?id=1854713[/quote:2144xbt0]

Oh look. Yet another busted card with improper PSCT and a million immunities.[/quote:2144xbt0]
But only if you open it and OG Eatos which is pretty bad in current format, it's no Red-Eyes Dark Dragoon[/quote:2144xbt0]
You're talking about customs, CrystalMusic can easily make this card consistent.

[quote="Renji Asuka":2ztpzabh][quote="greg503":2ztpzabh][quote="LightCaster":2ztpzabh]

Oh look. Yet another busted card with improper PSCT and a million immunities.[/quote:2ztpzabh]
But only if you open it and OG Eatos which is pretty bad in current format, it's no Red-Eyes Dark Dragoon[/quote:2ztpzabh]
You're talking about customs, CrystalMusic can easily make this card consistent.[/quote:2ztpzabh]
By itself, this is a fine card, hardly "slightly better" since it has protection from a lot of things, but not game breaking in our 2020 meta

[quote="greg503":wlheseul][quote="Renji Asuka":wlheseul][quote="greg503":wlheseul]
But only if you open it and OG Eatos which is pretty bad in current format, it's no Red-Eyes Dark Dragoon[/quote:wlheseul]
You're talking about customs, CrystalMusic can easily make this card consistent.[/quote:wlheseul]
By itself, this is a fine card, hardly "slightly better" since it has protection from a lot of things, but not game breaking in our 2020 meta[/quote:wlheseul]
You do not compare the TCG/OCG to Customs.....you just don't...

Why not? Good custom cards are balanced around not outshining TCG/OCG archetypes and creating another Tier 0 card like Astrograph

[quote="greg503":1i9p977y]Why not? Good custom cards are balanced around not outshining TCG/OCG archetypes and creating another Tier 0 card like Astrograph[/quote:1i9p977y]
They are separate games for 1, for 2, everyone plays shit that is far more busted than the TCG/OCG.

[quote="Renji Asuka":1i0a5zdn][quote="greg503":1i0a5zdn]Why not? Good custom cards are balanced around not outshining TCG/OCG archetypes and creating another Tier 0 card like Astrograph[/quote:1i0a5zdn]
They are separate games for 1, for 2, everyone plays shit that is far more busted than the TCG/OCG.[/quote:1i0a5zdn]
Regardless of whether it's a custom card or not, the fact still remains is that at least it still dies to Kaiju and monsters with similar summon conditions.

[quote="Darkraiclone":3t445o0j][quote="Renji Asuka":3t445o0j][quote="greg503":3t445o0j]Why not? Good custom cards are balanced around not outshining TCG/OCG archetypes and creating another Tier 0 card like Astrograph[/quote:3t445o0j]
They are separate games for 1, for 2, everyone plays shit that is far more busted than the TCG/OCG.[/quote:3t445o0j]
Regardless of whether it's a custom card or not, the fact still remains is that at least it still dies to Kaiju and monsters with similar summon conditions.[/quote:3t445o0j]
You forget, its CrystalMusic, they won't let you do that.

[quote="Renji Asuka":3rk36y5w][quote="greg503":3rk36y5w]Why not? Good custom cards are balanced around not outshining TCG/OCG archetypes and creating another Tier 0 card like Astrograph[/quote:3rk36y5w]
They are separate games for 1, for 2, everyone plays shit that is far more busted than the TCG/OCG.[/quote:3rk36y5w]
Then that sounds like a "them" problem that doesn't matter, the point is that this is not, in my opinion, a bad custom card, don't blame the card because that card's creator is a bad actor in our community.

[quote="greg503":1dj9fjvk][quote="Renji Asuka":1dj9fjvk][quote="greg503":1dj9fjvk]Why not? Good custom cards are balanced around not outshining TCG/OCG archetypes and creating another Tier 0 card like Astrograph[/quote:1dj9fjvk]
They are separate games for 1, for 2, everyone plays shit that is far more busted than the TCG/OCG.[/quote:1dj9fjvk]
Then that sounds like a "them" problem that doesn't matter, the point is that this is not, in my opinion, a bad custom card, don't blame the card because that card's creator is a bad actor in our community.[/quote:1dj9fjvk]
But its the fact that it is poorly designed in a way where the user in this case CrystalMusic won't allow counter play or allow there to be any outs.

[quote="CrystalMusic":151p2vae][quote="Renji Asuka":151p2vae]Oh look, more improper PSCT and a busted effect from CrystalMusic.[/quote:151p2vae]

oh look, more "i cant comment nicely on CM's posts" comments from Renji!

and you know, instead of criticizing the card, why dont you actually comment how "YOU" would "FIX" it?[/quote:151p2vae]

(This card's name is always treated as "Guardian Eatos".)
Cannot be Normal Summoned/Set. Must be Special Summoned (from your hand) by tributing 1 "Guardian Eatos". When this card is Special Summoned: You can equip 1 "Celestial Sword - Eatos" from your hand, deck or GY to this card. Cannot be targeted or destroyed by card effects except for "Celestial Sword - Eatos".
While this card is on the field "Celestial Sword - Eatos" gains the following effects. 
● Cannot be targeted or destroyed by card effects. 
● The equipped monsters effects cannot be negated.
If this card battles an opponent's monster, banish that opponent's monster after damage calculation, and if you do, negate its effects.
You can reveal this card from your hand: "Guardian" monsters except for "Guardian Dreadscythe" and this card, in your hand can be Normal or Special Summoned from your hand, ignoring the summoning conditions.

Use proper psct.

[quote="Renji Asuka":1upyqmxy][quote="Darkraiclone":1upyqmxy][quote="Renji Asuka":1upyqmxy]
They are separate games for 1, for 2, everyone plays shit that is far more busted than the TCG/OCG.[/quote:1upyqmxy]
Regardless of whether it's a custom card or not, the fact still remains is that at least it still dies to Kaiju and monsters with similar summon conditions.[/quote:1upyqmxy]
You forget, its CrystalMusic, they won't let you do that.[/quote:1upyqmxy]
Ah yeah I completely forgot, and here I am trying to apply logic towards a card made by somebody who makes logic and reasoning their bitch. How silly of me.

[quote="Renji Asuka":176sh4ib]
But its the fact that it is poorly designed in a way where the user in this case CrystalMusic won't allow counter play or allow there to be any outs.[/quote:176sh4ib]
No, that's being unsportsmanlike, that has nothing to do with the quality of the card.

[quote="greg503":2yctnazx][quote="Renji Asuka":2yctnazx]
But its the fact that it is poorly designed in a way where the user in this case CrystalMusic won't allow counter play or allow there to be any outs.[/quote:2yctnazx]
No, that's being unsportsmanlike, that has nothing to do with the quality of the card.[/quote:2yctnazx]
Its literally designed as "You can't stop this monster", especially with CrystalMusic's bullshit rules.

[quote="Renji Asuka":yxrcjomc][quote="greg503":yxrcjomc][quote="Renji Asuka":yxrcjomc]
But its the fact that it is poorly designed in a way where the user in this case CrystalMusic won't allow counter play or allow there to be any outs.[/quote:yxrcjomc]
No, that's being unsportsmanlike, that has nothing to do with the quality of the card.[/quote:yxrcjomc]
Its literally designed as "You can't stop this monster", especially with CrystalMusic's bullshit rules.[/quote:yxrcjomc]
It's a slightly worse and less protected Ultimate Falcon, and again, just because the creator wants it to be unstoppable is a reflection of them, unless he made it invincible while I wasn't looking, then this is just par for the course.
I do not believe that the custom card I read was "busted." Though since CM plays nonexistent formats I can see why you would get angry at his disregard for the importance of effect removal.

[quote="CrystalMusic":2wjb701y]https://www.duelingbook.com/card?id=1854713[/quote:2wjb701y]
BTW, you know that the clause "This cards name is always treated as "Guardian Eatos"" means that you can only use 3 of it and OG Eatos in your deck COMBINED (i.e. You can play 2 OG and 1 of these but not 2 of each).

[quote="greg503":200krqie][quote="Renji Asuka":200krqie][quote="greg503":200krqie]
No, that's being unsportsmanlike, that has nothing to do with the quality of the card.[/quote:200krqie]
Its literally designed as "You can't stop this monster", especially with CrystalMusic's bullshit rules.[/quote:200krqie]
It's a slightly worse and less protected Ultimate Falcon, and again, just because the creator wants it to be unstoppable is a reflection of them, unless he made it invincible while I wasn't looking, then this is just par for the course.
I do not believe that the custom card I read was "busted." Though since CM plays nonexistent formats I can see why you would get angry at his disregard for the importance of effect removal.[/quote:200krqie]
Has 0 counter play, is literally designed in a way where CrystalMusic won't let you beat it, yes its busted.

[quote="Renji Asuka":l52amq0p][quote="greg503":l52amq0p][quote="Renji Asuka":l52amq0p]
Its literally designed as "You can't stop this monster", especially with CrystalMusic's bullshit rules.[/quote:l52amq0p]
It's a slightly worse and less protected Ultimate Falcon, and again, just because the creator wants it to be unstoppable is a reflection of them, unless he made it invincible while I wasn't looking, then this is just par for the course.
I do not believe that the custom card I read was "busted." Though since CM plays nonexistent formats I can see why you would get angry at his disregard for the importance of effect removal.[/quote:l52amq0p]
Has 0 counter play, is literally designed in a way where CrystalMusic won't let you beat it, yes its busted.[/quote:l52amq0p]
What do you mean, I see a 3500 ATK beater that prevents floating and is immune to 3 things: targeting, effect negation, and destruction effects. It loses to Dingirisu, it loses to Borrelsword, it loses to Utopia Double/Lightning, it loses to Tiaramisu, it can't be summoned if you negate the summon of/destroy the original Eatos during the period where it is on the field, but before this is summoned, AND it loses to the Monarchs Stormforth. 0 counter play only applies to this troll, the card wouldn't even be played in the TCG if it were released right now.

[quote="greg503":2zshmm5s][quote="Renji Asuka":2zshmm5s][quote="greg503":2zshmm5s]
It's a slightly worse and less protected Ultimate Falcon, and again, just because the creator wants it to be unstoppable is a reflection of them, unless he made it invincible while I wasn't looking, then this is just par for the course.
I do not believe that the custom card I read was "busted." Though since CM plays nonexistent formats I can see why you would get angry at his disregard for the importance of effect removal.[/quote:2zshmm5s]
Has 0 counter play, is literally designed in a way where CrystalMusic won't let you beat it, yes its busted.[/quote:2zshmm5s]
What do you mean, I see a 3500 ATK beater that prevents floating and is immune to 3 things: targeting, effect negation, and destruction effects. It loses to Dingirisu, it loses to Borrelsword, it loses to Utopia Double/Lightning, it loses to Tiaramisu, it can't be summoned if you negate the summon of/destroy the original Eatos during the period where it is on the field, but before this is summoned, AND it loses to the Monarchs Stormforth. 0 counter play only applies to this troll, the card wouldn't even be played in the TCG if it were released right now.[/quote:2zshmm5s]
Exactly. I think it would be better to apply your efforts on making an old archetype more consistent than just creating busted new cards and restricting your opponent through "rules". You would prove your skills in custom card design and have a great time making your favorite deck being on par to whatever your opponent is using.

The way you're doing only perpetuates a denial cycle and, more often than not, results in situations like this:
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-22059936

[0:00] CrystalMusic: CrystalMusic hosted Single (with siding) in Custom Cards (Unrated) with duel note "rarely used 1st gen character decks"
..
[4:46] CrystalMusic: Entered Draw Phase
[4:46] CrystalMusic: Drew "Guardian Tryce"
[4:50] CrystalMusic: Activated "Guarded Treasure" from hand (2/7)
[4:56] CrystalMusic: Sent "Dark Bribe" from hand (2/6) to GY
[4:56] killerthesun: "OH GOD"
[4:57] CrystalMusic: Sent "Reaper Scythe - Dreadscythe" from hand (1/5) to GY
[4:58] CrystalMusic: Sent "Soul Release" from hand (2/4) to GY
[5:00] CrystalMusic: Sent "Dark Bribe" from hand (2/3) to GY
[5:03] CrystalMusic: Sent "Guardian Tryce" from hand (2/2) to GY
[5:08] CrystalMusic: Drew "Seven Tools of the Bandit"
[5:09] CrystalMusic: Drew "Gravity Axe - Grarl"
[5:15] CrystalMusic: Ended turn
--------------------------------------------
[5:18] killerthesun: Entered Draw Phase
[5:18] killerthesun: Drew "Ordeal of a Traveler"
[5:22] killerthesun: Entered Main Phase 1
[5:28] killerthesun: Set "Wandering Mummy" from hand (4/5) to M-2
[5:30] killerthesun: Entered Battle Phase
[5:32] killerthesun: Attacked Set card in M-4 with "Ancient Giant" in M-4
[5:34] CrystalMusic: Flipped Set "Guardian Baou" in M-4
[5:35] CrystalMusic: Sent "Guardian Baou" from M-4 to GY
[5:38] killerthesun: Ended turn
--------------------------------------------
[5:40] CrystalMusic: Entered Draw Phase
[5:40] CrystalMusic: Drew "Seven Tools of the Bandit"
[5:46] CrystalMusic: Declared effect of "Guarded Treasure" in S-3
[5:47] CrystalMusic: Drew "Twin Swords of Flashing Light - Tryce"
[6:07] CrystalMusic: "this is why guardians are really hard to summon"
[6:18] killerthesun: "I mean, you can equip too opponenets monsters"
[6:19] killerthesun: "which can help"
[6:23] CrystalMusic: "hence why i remade my favorite to be kinda powerful"
[6:34] killerthesun: "I wish guardians got some"
[6:36] killerthesun: "legacy support"
[6:36] CrystalMusic: Ended turn
--------------------------------------------
[6:38] killerthesun: Entered Draw Phase
[6:38] killerthesun: Drew "Ancient Key"
[6:40] killerthesun: Entered Main Phase 1
[6:46] killerthesun: Activated "Ancient Key" from hand (5/5)
[6:49] killerthesun: "LETS GOOO"
[6:53] killerthesun: Viewed deck
[6:56] killerthesun: Special Summoned "Stone Giant" from Deck to M-5 (DEF)
[6:58] killerthesun: Special Summoned "Stone Giant" from Deck to M-1 (DEF)
[6:59] killerthesun: Stopped viewing Deck
[6:59] killerthesun: Shuffled deck
[7:01] killerthesun: Changed "Stone Giant" in M-5 to ATK
[7:02] killerthesun: Changed "Stone Giant" in M-1 to ATK
[7:05] killerthesun: Sent "Ancient Key" from S-5 to GY
[7:07] killerthesun: Entered Battle Phase
[7:09] killerthesun: Attacked Set card in M-3 with "Ancient Giant" in M-4
[7:09] CrystalMusic: "bye"
[7:11] CrystalMusic: "ur not being fair"
[7:16] CrystalMusic: "ur not givne me a chance"
[7:18] killerthesun: "!!!"
[7:23] CrystalMusic: "ave me alone for a while so i can get something out"
[7:26] CrystalMusic: Left duel

Also, considering all the listed cards that could deal with that Eatos, Ordeal of a Traveler would have been awesome to see in action.

[quote="greg503":2d31ukkf][quote="Renji Asuka":2d31ukkf][quote="greg503":2d31ukkf]
It's a slightly worse and less protected Ultimate Falcon, and again, just because the creator wants it to be unstoppable is a reflection of them, unless he made it invincible while I wasn't looking, then this is just par for the course.
I do not believe that the custom card I read was "busted." Though since CM plays nonexistent formats I can see why you would get angry at his disregard for the importance of effect removal.[/quote:2d31ukkf]
Has 0 counter play, is literally designed in a way where CrystalMusic won't let you beat it, yes its busted.[/quote:2d31ukkf]
What do you mean, I see a 3500 ATK beater that prevents floating and is immune to 3 things: targeting, effect negation, and destruction effects. It loses to Dingirisu, it loses to Borrelsword, it loses to Utopia Double/Lightning, it loses to Tiaramisu, it can't be summoned if you negate the summon of/destroy the original Eatos during the period where it is on the field, but before this is summoned, AND it loses to the Monarchs Stormforth. 0 counter play only applies to this troll, the card wouldn't even be played in the TCG if it were released right now.[/quote:2d31ukkf]
You really think CrystalMusic would let you play any of those? No, no they won't.

[quote="Renji Asuka":2q5sif8z][quote="greg503":2q5sif8z]
What do you mean, I see a 3500 ATK beater that prevents floating and is immune to 3 things: targeting, effect negation, and destruction effects. It loses to Dingirisu, it loses to Borrelsword, it loses to Utopia Double/Lightning, it loses to Tiaramisu, it can't be summoned if you negate the summon of/destroy the original Eatos during the period where it is on the field, but before this is summoned, AND it loses to the Monarchs Stormforth. 0 counter play only applies to this troll, the card wouldn't even be played in the TCG if it were released right now.[/quote:2q5sif8z]
You really think CrystalMusic would let you play any of those? No, no they won't.[/quote:2q5sif8z]
C'mon, you act as if he is the only one who can play the card. The card is not the problem here.

[quote="greg503":1lfaza42][quote="Renji Asuka":1lfaza42][quote="greg503":1lfaza42]
What do you mean, I see a 3500 ATK beater that prevents floating and is immune to 3 things: targeting, effect negation, and destruction effects. It loses to Dingirisu, it loses to Borrelsword, it loses to Utopia Double/Lightning, it loses to Tiaramisu, it can't be summoned if you negate the summon of/destroy the original Eatos during the period where it is on the field, but before this is summoned, AND it loses to the Monarchs Stormforth. 0 counter play only applies to this troll, the card wouldn't even be played in the TCG if it were released right now.[/quote:1lfaza42]
You really think CrystalMusic would let you play any of those? No, no they won't.[/quote:1lfaza42]
C'mon, you act as if he is the only one who can play the card. The card is not the problem here.[/quote:1lfaza42]
Bro, CrystalMusic doesn't make his cards public, c'mon now.

[quote="Renji Asuka":1ukeiihc][quote="greg503":1ukeiihc][quote="Renji Asuka":1ukeiihc]
You really think CrystalMusic would let you play any of those? No, no they won't.[/quote:1ukeiihc]
C'mon, you act as if he is the only one who can play the card. The card is not the problem here.[/quote:1ukeiihc]
Bro, CrystalMusic doesn't make his cards public, c'mon now.[/quote:1ukeiihc]
He's made a few public, and this feels like one of those cards that should be public, unless he's afraid that people would be playing "his" Eatos, but he posted the link to the card on this forum so why wouldn't it be public CM?

[quote="greg503":2a93luzq][quote="Renji Asuka":2a93luzq][quote="greg503":2a93luzq]
C'mon, you act as if he is the only one who can play the card. The card is not the problem here.[/quote:2a93luzq]
Bro, CrystalMusic doesn't make his cards public, c'mon now.[/quote:2a93luzq]
He's made a few public, and this feels like one of those cards that should be public, unless he's afraid that people would be playing "his" Eatos, but he posted the link to the card on this forum so why wouldn't it be public CM?[/quote:2a93luzq]
He posted a lot of cards on the forum that weren't accessible lol

[quote="CrystalMusic":1jac76rv]https://www.duelingbook.com/card?id=1854713[/quote:1jac76rv]
TELL ME WHY THIS CARD ISN'T PUBLIC CM

[quote="greg503":1tvu1cmb][quote="CrystalMusic":1tvu1cmb]https://www.duelingbook.com/card?id=1854713[/quote:1tvu1cmb]
TELL ME WHY THIS CARD ISN'T PUBLIC CM[/quote:1tvu1cmb]

cas its still in the works.
Heres how i go about making cards public:
1: I test them against my opponents
2: gather the opinions from my opponents
3: fix as needed
4: decide: private or public.

I did this with the following:
- Crystal Beast Diamond Unicorn
- Crystal Beast Jade Wolf
- Elemental HERO Seraph - The Immortal
- Contract With The Lord of Striking Thunder
- Cyber Angel Dragon

these are some of my cards i made public

and if you mention my private cards: why do you think iv been asking for advice as of recent?

Well, in your format without fun, the card is too good. But it would be a fine card to just be made public as is because it is not good by itself in the context of it being a "Guardian" support card in the TCG.
The only other thing I can say is to consider how many effects a card should have (This one has 5 effects, a Summoning condition AND a name clause). Most TCG cards (that aren't pendulums) released recently have 3 effects at most, at least one of those being short and simple.

again guys, please list how YOU would change it. Ill consider it!

Make a custom Celestial Sword that has the effects you want your card to give the original ("This card cannot be targeted or destroyed. The equipped monsters effects cannot be negated.") The last effect feels like it should go on a field spell since it deals with the "Guardian" archtype as a whole when all the other effects of the card are "Celestial Sword - Eatos" synergy. Removing those 2 effects makes the card easier to read since it would be shorter.

[quote="greg503":3q1a8nar]Make a custom Celestial Sword that has the effects you want your card to give the original ("This card cannot be targeted or destroyed. The equipped monsters effects cannot be negated.") The last effect feels like it should go on a field spell since it deals with the "Guardian" archtype as a whole when all the other effects of the card are "Celestial Sword - Eatos" synergy. Removing those 2 effects makes the card easier to read since it would be shorter.[/quote:3q1a8nar]

hmm good idea

Hows this for an equip for Eatos? https://www.duelingbook.com/card?id=1863020

as for the last effect (since it might be hard to understand - and if it is, how would you word it) Simply put: lets say you use Mystical Space Typhoon to target & destroy "Ethereal Sword - Eatos" it wont be destroyed by it. Then lets say you attempt to use a 2nd Mystical Space Typhoon on "Ethereal Sword - Eatos" it wont work as you have already targeted "Ethereal Sword - Eatos" with Mystical Space Typhoon once earlier in the same turn you activated the 2nd Mystical Space Typhoon.

Also: Updated Eatos: https://www.duelingbook.com/card?id=1854713

It's fine, both cards are short and easy enough to read.
Also I would have the last effect be split into "Once per turn: if this card would be destroyed by a card effect, it is not destroyed" and "Once per turn, if this card is targeted by a card effect: you can negate the activation and effect of that card. This card cannot be targeted by cards with the same name as the negated card this turn."

It's fine. I mean, it doesn't really help guardians a whole lot and if I had to add/remove something it would be replacing the effect of just being able to summon normally guardins into just once each turn special summon a guardian. being the only way to summon him is by tributing a guardian eatos, I think is a bit lackluster. also it could instead run a negate. : D