Off Topic ยป Spam Paradise

ill be impressed if someone can accomplish this:
CrystalMusic
#1
play a deck that:
- is not any thing that was meta from april 11, 2011 to what is currently meta
- does not use pends
- does not use links
- does not use an alternate victory
- does not use any new support (cards that came out after its era - example: E hero solid soldier, e hero voltic, e hero liquid solider, e hero shadow mist, etc (you get the point)
- does not use an extra deck
- does not use any effect that inflicts damage (aka burn)
- does not use monsters that have the ability to attack directly (toons, etc)
and does not use: Monster Reborn, Ash Blossom & Joyus Spring, Ghost Ogre & Snow Rabbit, Effect Veiler, Pot of Extarvagance, Mystic Mine, Twin Twisters, Mystical Space Typhoon, Raigeki, Dark Hole, Card of Demise, Pot of Duality, Eater of Millions, Evenly Matched, Cosmic Cyclone, Firewall Dragon, Ghost Reaper & Winter Cherries, Soulmn Strike, Droll & Lock Bird, Terraforming, "Monarch" cards.

if any person can complete this challenge, i will be impressed.
LightCaster
#2
You can't even accomplish that, why expect someone else to?
james123
#3
I cannot but this can!
https://www.duelingbook.com/card?id=1393624
https://www.duelingbook.com/card?id=251355
NiwatoriFTW
#4
A challenge just to impress someone is already bad by itself. And nobody earns anything from this. You just wanted to spam more topics, didn't you?
Slitina
#5
The real question is can crystalmusic do it without raging wait who am I kidding of course he will because he is a stuck up boomer
Neo_Fire_Sonic
#6
I'll be impressed if you can play yugioh like a normal person.
CrystalMusic
#7
[quote="Neo_Fire_Sonic":tg9fz1l6]I'll be impressed if you can play yugioh like a normal person.[/quote:tg9fz1l6]

1: there is no such thing as normal
2: yugioh died, for me, when zexal became a thing
LightCaster
#8
[quote="CrystalMusic":28a5g0jt][quote="Neo_Fire_Sonic":28a5g0jt]I'll be impressed if you can play yugioh like a normal person.[/quote:28a5g0jt]

1: there is no such thing as normal
2: yugioh died, for me, when zexal became a thing[/quote:28a5g0jt]

And yugioh died for me when you started playing. Your point?
CrystalMusic
#9
[quote="LightCaster":1owtridg][quote="CrystalMusic":1owtridg][quote="Neo_Fire_Sonic":1owtridg]I'll be impressed if you can play yugioh like a normal person.[/quote:1owtridg]

1: there is no such thing as normal
2: yugioh died, for me, when zexal became a thing[/quote:1owtridg]

And yugioh died for me when you started playing. Your point?[/quote:1owtridg]
then yugioh would have died for you in the LOB set back in 2002, in which case why are u even playing the game anymore???
LightCaster
#10
[quote="CrystalMusic":2aiit1x5][quote="LightCaster":2aiit1x5][quote="CrystalMusic":2aiit1x5]

1: there is no such thing as normal
2: yugioh died, for me, when zexal became a thing[/quote:2aiit1x5]

And yugioh died for me when you started playing. Your point?[/quote:2aiit1x5]
then yugioh would have died for you in the LOB set back in 2002, in which case why are u even playing the game anymore???[/quote:2aiit1x5]

Because I like coming up with bullshit to see if you're stupid enough to believe me, which you are. It also gives me a glimpse into your intelligence because you think I'm stupid enough to believe anything you say or have said. The game hasn't died for me when you started playing. The game got more frustrating knowing that people like you exist. Stupid, hypocritical and egocentric.
Renji Asuka
#11
CrystalMusic, you can't even stay in a normal duel for an entire game when you lose and someone beats you at your own game.
Debt
#12
[quote="CrystalMusic":l0vo3mop]play a deck that:
- is not any thing that was meta from april 11, 2011 to what is currently meta
- does not use pends
- does not use links
- does not use an alternate victory
- does not use any new support (cards that came out after its era - example: E hero solid soldier, e hero voltic, e hero liquid solider, e hero shadow mist, etc (you get the point)
- does not use an extra deck
- does not use any effect that inflicts damage (aka burn)
- does not use monsters that have the ability to attack directly (toons, etc)
and does not use: Monster Reborn, Ash Blossom & Joyus Spring, Ghost Ogre & Snow Rabbit, Effect Veiler, Pot of Extarvagance, Mystic Mine, Twin Twisters, Mystical Space Typhoon, Raigeki, Dark Hole, Card of Demise, Pot of Duality, Eater of Millions, Evenly Matched, Cosmic Cyclone, Firewall Dragon, Ghost Reaper & Winter Cherries, Soulmn Strike, Droll & Lock Bird, Terraforming, "Monarch" cards.

if any person can complete this challenge, i will be impressed.[/quote:l0vo3mop]
You've never explained in any logical or coherent fashion as to why any of these shouldn't be used other than "I don't like them because I refuse to learn how to counter them". And people have done all of the above and you still rage quit because you'll make up new rules so you can rage quit. I've seen you play an actual deck with an actual strategy behind it (that wasn't unga bunga stall until big attack points) so I don't know why you even need these horseshit rules other than to frustrate yourself when people don't want to play one dimensional garbage.
LightCaster
#13
[quote="Debt":2pdulv6a][quote="CrystalMusic":2pdulv6a]play a deck that:
- is not any thing that was meta from april 11, 2011 to what is currently meta
- does not use pends
- does not use links
- does not use an alternate victory
- does not use any new support (cards that came out after its era - example: E hero solid soldier, e hero voltic, e hero liquid solider, e hero shadow mist, etc (you get the point)
- does not use an extra deck
- does not use any effect that inflicts damage (aka burn)
- does not use monsters that have the ability to attack directly (toons, etc)
and does not use: Monster Reborn, Ash Blossom & Joyus Spring, Ghost Ogre & Snow Rabbit, Effect Veiler, Pot of Extarvagance, Mystic Mine, Twin Twisters, Mystical Space Typhoon, Raigeki, Dark Hole, Card of Demise, Pot of Duality, Eater of Millions, Evenly Matched, Cosmic Cyclone, Firewall Dragon, Ghost Reaper & Winter Cherries, Soulmn Strike, Droll & Lock Bird, Terraforming, "Monarch" cards.

if any person can complete this challenge, i will be impressed.[/quote:2pdulv6a]
You've never explained in any logical or coherent fashion as to why any of these shouldn't be used other than "I don't like them because I refuse to learn how to counter them". And people have done all of the above and you still rage quit because you'll make up new rules so you can rage quit. I've seen you play an actual deck with an actual strategy behind it (that wasn't unga bunga stall until big attack points) so I don't know why you even need these horseshit rules other than to frustrate yourself when people don't want to play one dimensional garbage.[/quote:2pdulv6a]


Even then it's not even a good strategy. "Stall until I get an alternate victory" That's the only strategy he knows.
Debt
#14
[quote="LightCaster":3u0drrhl]

Even then it's not even a good strategy. "Stall until I get an alternate victory" That's the only strategy he knows.[/quote:3u0drrhl]
I've actually seen crystal play a somewhat proactive deck that utilized monster removal even tributing his opponent's cards.
LightCaster
#15
[quote="Debt":2bkhhk8o][quote="LightCaster":2bkhhk8o]

Even then it's not even a good strategy. "Stall until I get an alternate victory" That's the only strategy he knows.[/quote:2bkhhk8o]
I've actually seen crystal play a somewhat proactive deck that utilized monster removal even tributing his opponent's cards.[/quote:2bkhhk8o]

Wow. A deck with an actual strategy. A pity he only does that once in a blue moon and if he loses, he goes back to custom cards to boost that fragile ego
Neo_Fire_Sonic
#16
[quote="CrystalMusic":271fq516][quote="Neo_Fire_Sonic":271fq516]I'll be impressed if you can play yugioh like a normal person.[/quote:271fq516]

1: there is no such thing as normal
2: yugioh died, for me, when zexal became a thing[/quote:271fq516]

There is such thing as playing yugioh "normally". It means you don't cheat for no reason like you usually do, use all cards, don't complain because someone has a similar themed deck as you, and don't ragequit because your random set card was destroyed.
But also you saying anything about "Zexal", thats a lie right there, since you think [url:271fq516]https://yugipedia.com/wiki/Arcana_Force_0_-_The_Fool[/url:271fq516] came out in zexal so yugioh is still alive and kicking for you.
Debt
#17
[quote="LightCaster":mdd1hy8h]

Wow. A deck with an actual strategy. A pity he only does that once in a blue moon and if he loses, he goes back to custom cards to boost that fragile ego[/quote:mdd1hy8h]
Don't get me wrong, it was still a terrible jank deck. And it had a lot of built in stall. It was using spirit barrier + reptilliene naga to safely hit monsters and turn their atk to 0 so he could tribute them for Vaskii with a bunch of burn cards in his deck. It was just that his opponent's deck was absolutely terrible and Crystal being unable to attack because he's completely risk adverse and won't opt into attacking when backrow is present unless he can attack safely.
CrystalMusic
#18
[quote="Debt":176hjwrf][quote="LightCaster":176hjwrf]

Wow. A deck with an actual strategy. A pity he only does that once in a blue moon and if he loses, he goes back to custom cards to boost that fragile ego[/quote:176hjwrf]
Don't get me wrong, it was still a terrible jank deck. And it had a lot of built in stall. It was using spirit barrier + reptilliene naga to safely hit monsters and turn their atk to 0 so he could tribute them for Vaskii with a bunch of burn cards in his deck. It was just that his opponent's deck was absolutely terrible and Crystal being unable to attack because he's completely risk adverse and won't opt into attacking when backrow is present unless he can attack safely.[/quote:176hjwrf]

this deck? https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=5416634
Debt
#19
[quote="CrystalMusic":z4m8cer9]

this deck? https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=5416634[/quote:z4m8cer9]
Looks about right. Still a bad deck but it's infinitely more interesting and has more potential to be proactive than the other one dimensional decks you play.
CrystalMusic
#20
[quote="Debt":c4xd7yp0][quote="CrystalMusic":c4xd7yp0]

this deck? https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=5416634[/quote:c4xd7yp0]
Looks about right. Still a bad deck but it's infinitely more interesting and has more potential to be proactive than the other one dimensional decks you play.[/quote:c4xd7yp0]

well i just improved it by adding 1 card
Debt
#21
[quote="CrystalMusic":yxx5hk5j]

well i just improved it by adding 1 card[/quote:yxx5hk5j]
It's sort of funny, that deck is like a bad and jank version of Cubics. I think you'd actually enjoy playing Cubics. But you would never allow yourself to enjoy them for arbitrary reasons.
LightCaster
#22
I play Cubics and they're loads of fun but brick too much. But obviously Crystal's high horse won't allow him to play anything that's actually good. He'll just come up with bullshit and claim it's good if he beats bad opponents.
Debt
#23
[quote="LightCaster":3sb9fhjn]I play Cubics and they're loads of fun but brick too much. But obviously Crystal's high horse won't allow him to play anything that's actually good. He'll just come up with bullshit and claim it's good if he beats bad opponents.[/quote:3sb9fhjn]
It's a hell of a lot less bricky than anything crystal makes
Post Reply: