My opponent insulted me as autistic and thus normalized an a neurodevelopmental condition as an insult. https://imgur.com/duelingbook-screenshot-tn1jub9
Hatespeech is attacking a group of people based on something they have in common. Hence attacking all autistic people by using it as an insult is clear hatespeech. This only lead to a slap on the wrist for my opponnet. The Assistant Head Judge Regulusmon refused to address how tolerable this kind of hatespeech is.: https://imgur.com/duelingbook-screenshot-IrZe1bh
Asking for a clarifcation on a card ef on the other hand is counted as stalling. This leads to the conclusion that you have to play based of guesses. It is unclear how such a scenario will be resolved. What if you guess wrong? Is the game rewinded. Do you play on with the wrong guess and any interaction you used based on that? Regulusmon refused to explained that as well: https://imgur.com/duelingbook-screenshot-IrZe1bh
What also needs to be explained is why Hatespeech gets a slap on the wrist and asking for a clarifcation on an effect which is dubiously counted as stalling gets you frozen without warning. Is Hatespeech really more tolerable to DB then supposed and far fetched "stalling"?
