Duelingbook Forum

Dreams Equals Memes wrote: The dude didn't even bring evidence for his claim you idiot

Why so hostile towards that guy?

d1234? He has like 3+ months arguing about "Unjust" punishments

Stop the necroposting, please and thanks

DarkPhenix wrote:Stop the necroposting, please and thanks

The issue has not been resolved.

Lil Oldman wrote:d1234? He has like 3+ months arguing about "Unjust" punishments

Those quotations should not be there...

!!! (AQ) Blinkill wrote:

Dreams Equals Memes wrote:

d1234 wrote:
May I bring this to your attention

The dude didn't even bring evidence for his claim you idiot

Take it easy "idiot", here's your evidence.
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=411875-10006794

Had to contact the guy in a yugioh Discord server because he doesn't play on Dueling Book anymore.

Refusing to continue to play when the judge tells you to gets you game lossed. Who knew. Not like there isn't literally a section on the rules for this or anything. Judge waited for over a minute and a half, even though the rules states 30 seconds is sufficient, so bonus points for getting a full minute of lenience to boot. And they still managed to pull off getting game lossed not just once, but twice. When will people learn to stop breaking the rules, lol.

d1234 wrote:

Lil Oldman wrote:d1234? He has like 3+ months arguing about "Unjust" punishments

Those quotations should not be there...

Oh, so it should be written like this?

Lil Oldman wrote:d1234? He has like 3+ months arguing about punishments

Why punish rulebreakers, after all? Or I guess it could be...

Lil Oldman wrote:d1234? He has like 3+ months arguing

Since let's be honest, we all know your posts are just garbage tier nonsense anyways. Maybe you're just arguing to argue. Not that you are very good at it. Don't worry, it's not like we read your posts for their validity anyways. We know better than that. We just read it for the comedy now.

d1234 wrote:

Lil Oldman wrote:d1234? He has like 3+ months arguing about "Unjust" punishments

Those quotations should not be there...

Sure, whatever, Dark Cyborg's alt.

Wek wrote:

d1234 wrote:

Lil Oldman wrote:d1234? He has like 3+ months arguing about "Unjust" punishments

Those quotations should not be there...

Oh, so it should be written like this?

Lil Oldman wrote:d1234? He has like 3+ months arguing about punishments

Why punish rulebreakers, after all? Or I guess it could be...

Lil Oldman wrote:d1234? He has like 3+ months arguing

Since let's be honest, we all know your posts are just garbage tier nonsense anyways. Maybe you're just arguing to argue. Not that you are very good at it. Don't worry, it's not like we read your posts for their validity anyways. We know better than that. We just read it for the comedy now.

I wonder if you will be saying that when your turn to be falsely accused comes

troglyte wrote:

d1234 wrote:

Lil Oldman wrote:d1234? He has like 3+ months arguing about "Unjust" punishments

Those quotations should not be there...

Sure, whatever, Dark Cyborg's alt.

I told you I the alt is for d123

And on this day, nothing of value was lost.

d1234 wrote:

Wek wrote:

d1234 wrote:Those quotations should not be there...

Oh, so it should be written like this?

Lil Oldman wrote:d1234? He has like 3+ months arguing about punishments

Why punish rulebreakers, after all? Or I guess it could be...

Lil Oldman wrote:d1234? He has like 3+ months arguing

Since let's be honest, we all know your posts are just garbage tier nonsense anyways. Maybe you're just arguing to argue. Not that you are very good at it. Don't worry, it's not like we read your posts for their validity anyways. We know better than that. We just read it for the comedy now.

I wonder if you will be saying that when your turn to be falsely accused comes

IF it happened you wouldn't be reading about it because I would be talking with the judges instead of posting about it

greg503 wrote:

d1234 wrote:

Wek wrote:
Oh, so it should be written like this?



Why punish rulebreakers, after all? Or I guess it could be...



Since let's be honest, we all know your posts are just garbage tier nonsense anyways. Maybe you're just arguing to argue. Not that you are very good at it. Don't worry, it's not like we read your posts for their validity anyways. We know better than that. We just read it for the comedy now.

I wonder if you will be saying that when your turn to be falsely accused comes

IF it happened you wouldn't be reading about it because I would be talking with the judges instead of posting about it

Everyone’s time will come

d1234 wrote:

greg503 wrote:

d1234 wrote:I wonder if you will be saying that when your turn to be falsely accused comes

IF it happened you wouldn't be reading about it because I would be talking with the judges instead of posting about it

Everyone’s time will come

Unlikely. It's pretty difficult to get punished on DB without doing something pretty stupid. If something did happen that was wrong, it's easy enough to overturn via an appeal. And like Greg said, no reason to be whining in public about. The morons who try to make their DB punishments public just end up embarrassing themselves by showing how the DB judges had to apply penalties in spite of how lenient they are.