Banned from rated

Say your goodbyes to the forum here
Lil Oldman
User avatar
Posts: 1734
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2018 11:23 pm
Reputation: 178
Location: Toontown
Mood:

Re: Banned from rated

Post #61 by Lil Oldman » Tue Nov 10, 2020 2:23 am

I have to side on d1234 on this, the rules state only positive boosting is punished. Not the other way around.
"Complacency? How rude. I live the stifling life of a high school student in our problematic modern society."
Help I cannot remove this music from my head
https://youtu.be/ZuXI7qcNsHQ
Will try reviewing custom cards if they look interesting.

d1234
Posts: 267
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2020 9:29 pm
Reputation: 16

Post #62 by d1234 » Tue Nov 10, 2020 2:33 am

Genexwrecker wrote:
d1234 wrote:My opinion on the matter is that you should unban him, and give him another chance, and if something happens again make the penalty worse and put it back on.

We are giving him a chance he isnt banned from the site the accounts are just set to beginner. that is a second chance if i ever saw one and he is currently blowing it.


The dictionary definition of second chance is opportunity after the first one. This is a fairly vague term and I think he should have a second chance to play rated
Remove Dark Cyborg from beginner.

Renji Asuka
User avatar
Posts: 2682
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2018 4:37 am
Reputation: 242

Post #63 by Renji Asuka » Tue Nov 10, 2020 2:34 am

Lil Oldman wrote:I have to side on d1234 on this, the rules state only positive boosting is punished. Not the other way around.

Does not matter, it still affects players in a negative way.
Image
Showing people that I'm The King of Games since September 30, 1996.

Dark Cyborg
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:34 pm
Reputation: 6

Post #64 by Dark Cyborg » Tue Nov 10, 2020 2:36 am

Renji Asuka wrote:
Lil Oldman wrote:I have to side on d1234 on this, the rules state only positive boosting is punished. Not the other way around.

Does not matter, it still affects players in a negative way.


Literally, no player but me is being affected in a negative way.

d1234
Posts: 267
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2020 9:29 pm
Reputation: 16

Post #65 by d1234 » Tue Nov 10, 2020 2:53 am

d1234 wrote:My opinion on the matter is that you should unban him, and give him another chance, and if something happens again make the penalty worse and put it back on.
Remove Dark Cyborg from beginner.

d1234
Posts: 267
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2020 9:29 pm
Reputation: 16

Post #66 by d1234 » Tue Nov 10, 2020 2:54 am

When he said he liked this that implies that he has no intention of doing it again.
Remove Dark Cyborg from beginner.

Renji Asuka
User avatar
Posts: 2682
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2018 4:37 am
Reputation: 242

Post #67 by Renji Asuka » Tue Nov 10, 2020 3:02 am

Dark Cyborg wrote:
Renji Asuka wrote:
Lil Oldman wrote:I have to side on d1234 on this, the rules state only positive boosting is punished. Not the other way around.

Does not matter, it still affects players in a negative way.


Literally, no player but me is being affected in a negative way.

By de ranking you literally put yourself against worse players, which then you can beat them with ease. So stop lying. You're banned from rated, and you're going to stay being banned.
Image
Showing people that I'm The King of Games since September 30, 1996.

Dark Cyborg
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:34 pm
Reputation: 6

Post #68 by Dark Cyborg » Tue Nov 10, 2020 3:05 am

Renji Asuka wrote:
Dark Cyborg wrote:
Renji Asuka wrote:Does not matter, it still affects players in a negative way.


Literally, no player but me is being affected in a negative way.

By de ranking you literally put yourself against worse players, which then you can beat them with ease. So stop lying. You're banned from rated, and you're going to stay being banned.



I did not beat a single soul though lol. Duelist records prove this.

d1234
Posts: 267
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2020 9:29 pm
Reputation: 16

Post #69 by d1234 » Tue Nov 10, 2020 3:09 am

Renji Asuka wrote:
Dark Cyborg wrote:
Renji Asuka wrote:Does not matter, it still affects players in a negative way.


Literally, no player but me is being affected in a negative way.

By de ranking you literally put yourself against worse players, which then you can beat them with ease. So stop lying. You're banned from rated, and you're going to stay being banned.


You have nothing to ban him for. Read the rules.
As said by Fulton J Sheen,” The big print giveth the fine print taketh away,” I plan to use the fine print to take away the ban.
Remove Dark Cyborg from beginner.

Dark Cyborg
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:34 pm
Reputation: 6

Post #70 by Dark Cyborg » Tue Nov 10, 2020 3:14 am

Thank you so much!!

Renji Asuka
User avatar
Posts: 2682
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2018 4:37 am
Reputation: 242

Post #71 by Renji Asuka » Tue Nov 10, 2020 3:19 am

Dark Cyborg wrote:
Renji Asuka wrote:
Dark Cyborg wrote:
Literally, no player but me is being affected in a negative way.

By de ranking you literally put yourself against worse players, which then you can beat them with ease. So stop lying. You're banned from rated, and you're going to stay being banned.



I did not beat a single soul though lol. Duelist records prove this.

You missed the point, by deranking on purpose you are lowering your rank, which then puts you against lower ranked players in which case you can take advantage of them. There is NO reason to do what you did if that wasn't your goal. Get out of here with your bullshit.
Image
Showing people that I'm The King of Games since September 30, 1996.

Dark Cyborg
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:34 pm
Reputation: 6

Post #72 by Dark Cyborg » Tue Nov 10, 2020 3:28 am

I did not take advantage of any lower-ranked players as well lol. And it isn't bullshit when I'm providing straight up facts.

KTeknis
User avatar
Posts: 724
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:32 pm
Reputation: 76

Post #73 by KTeknis » Tue Nov 10, 2020 3:37 am

Deranking on purpose to duel low-ranked.... That sound like smurfing?
I have interest in badly designed custom cards.
You saw these cards as terrible, I saw them as ideas.

Dark Cyborg
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:34 pm
Reputation: 6

Post #74 by Dark Cyborg » Tue Nov 10, 2020 3:41 am

KTeknis wrote:Deranking on purpose to duel low-ranked.... That sound like smurfing?


I did not do that.

Renji Asuka
User avatar
Posts: 2682
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2018 4:37 am
Reputation: 242

Post #75 by Renji Asuka » Tue Nov 10, 2020 3:51 am

Dark Cyborg wrote:
KTeknis wrote:Deranking on purpose to duel low-ranked.... That sound like smurfing?


I did not do that.

You were working towards it.
Image
Showing people that I'm The King of Games since September 30, 1996.

Dark Cyborg
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:34 pm
Reputation: 6

Post #76 by Dark Cyborg » Tue Nov 10, 2020 3:58 am

I did not work towards that, you are now falsely accusing me.

kijani
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2017 11:27 am
Reputation: 0

Post #77 by kijani » Tue Nov 10, 2020 4:27 am

I think the fact he's getting punished isn't necessarily the issue to be honest. If someone is breaking the rules non-maliciously surely there should be some leeway in stead of giving him the second worst punishment on the website. Looking at real life as an example manslaughter and murder are both actions that result in the death of someone but the manslaughter charge has the smaller punishment. Why? Because it was non-intentional and surely the same thing should apply in his case. I'm not a judge obviously but surely a temporary freeze on the account would be a better alternative than banning his account from reasonable play till the end of time.

Renji Asuka
User avatar
Posts: 2682
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2018 4:37 am
Reputation: 242

Post #78 by Renji Asuka » Tue Nov 10, 2020 4:51 am

Dark Cyborg wrote:I did not work towards that, you are now falsely accusing me.

It was intentional, you wouldn't be doing it otherwise.
Image
Showing people that I'm The King of Games since September 30, 1996.

Dark Cyborg
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:34 pm
Reputation: 6

Post #79 by Dark Cyborg » Tue Nov 10, 2020 4:55 am

Renji Asuka wrote:
Dark Cyborg wrote:I did not work towards that, you are now falsely accusing me.

It was intentional, you wouldn't be doing it otherwise.


What was intentional? Also, I thought you said my supposed goals and intentions don't matter lmao.

Renji Asuka
User avatar
Posts: 2682
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2018 4:37 am
Reputation: 242

Post #80 by Renji Asuka » Tue Nov 10, 2020 5:26 am

Dark Cyborg wrote:
Renji Asuka wrote:
Dark Cyborg wrote:I did not work towards that, you are now falsely accusing me.

It was intentional, you wouldn't be doing it otherwise.


What was intentional? Also, I thought you said my supposed goals and intentions don't matter lmao.

Yeah it doesn't matter why you did it, its the fact you did and you'll still be punished for it. But you can't convince anyone you were innocent.
Image
Showing people that I'm The King of Games since September 30, 1996.


Return to “Farewells”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests