Banned from rated

Say your goodbyes to the forum here
PENMASTER
User avatar
Posts: 613
Joined: Wed May 06, 2020 9:08 pm
Reputation: 58

Re: Banned from rated

Post #221 by PENMASTER » Sun Dec 06, 2020 6:54 am

now that you have a better explanation have a good day
love2hate

OrcustPlaya
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon May 25, 2020 6:43 pm
Reputation: 0

Post #222 by OrcustPlaya » Sun Dec 06, 2020 12:02 pm

Yo im banned completely lol

Christen57
User avatar
Posts: 2033
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 10:37 pm
Reputation: 182
Location: New York, United States of America

Post #223 by Christen57 » Sun Dec 06, 2020 9:11 pm

d1234 wrote:
Christen57 wrote:
d1234 wrote:It is ,ent to be a question. Let’s say that they get lucky, and guess right quickly. In theory, would you be punished?


You still don't seem to understand how extremely unlikely anything like that happening would be. Allow me to break it down for you.

In order for someone to first "break into" my home, they must first figure out exactly where my home it. Currently, there are at least a billion homes on this planet, so a guy looking to brute-force his way into my network would have to first check each and every one of these billions of homes on this planet to figure out which one I am in.

Once he manages to do that... somehow... he needs to get past my house's alarm system. This alarm system requires a 4-digit numerical code to deactivate. The possible digits are 0 through 9, which makes a total of 10 numbers. This means that a system that requires a 4-digit code with each digit being 1 of 10 possible numbers has a total of 10,000 different possible combinations. You get this number by multiplying 10 to the 4th power.

After this man goes through all 10,000 of the possible combinations, which is almost impossible since the alarm goes off if you enter the wrong code after about 4 or 5 times, he then needs to figure out the password to my wi-fi.

There are 26 lowercase letters in the alphabet along with 26 uppercase letters in the alphabet, plus 10 one-digit numbers — zero through nine — along with at least 20 additional special characters such as !@#$ and so on. That makes at least 82 possible characters a password 1 character long could be, so if you tried to guess a 1-character password correctly on your first try, you would have at most a 1/82 chance of doing so.

My wi-fi password happens to be at least 15 characters long. To calculate the odds of guessing a 15-character password correctly on your first try, we simply multiply 82 to the fifteenth power — 82^15 — and the result is 50,957,461,585,642,714,263,997,677,568.

In other words, you have literally a 1 in 50,957,461,585,642,714,263,997,677,568 chance of guessing my password correctly on your first try.

Your chances of guessing a 15-digit password correctly "quickly" is literally less than 0.000000000000000000000000002%. That is a zero, followed by a dot, followed by 26 more zeroes, followed by the number 2, followed by the percent symbol.

That's over 50 octillion different possible passwords you would have to go through to guess my wi-fi password.

You know how much an octillion is, right?

This is a million: 1,000,000.

This is a billion: 1,000,000,000.

This is a trillion: 1,000,000,000,000.

This is a quadrillion: 1,000,000,000,000,000.

This is a quintillion: 1,000,000,000,000,000,000.

This is a sextillion: 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.

This is a septillion: 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.

And this is an octillion: 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.

That's how much an octillion is.

But wait! There's more!

You also have to factor in the possibility of this bad guy getting caught breaking into my home and the police catching and arresting him.

Do you really think a guy would go through billions of homes on this planet to figure out which one I'm in, go through thousands of different possible alarm passcodes to figure out which one deactivates my alarm, then go through octillions of different possible passwords to figure out which one the correct one, all at the risk of getting caught by police and sentenced to years in prison, just to break some rules of a children's card game? I know I don't.

You do realize that all of that would literally take decades to accomplish, if not centuries, assuming you guess 10 passwords a second? Do you realize that you have a far better chance of winning the multi-billion dollar lottery at least 4 times in a row? Why on earth would someone waste their time trying to break into a random family's wi-fi to get someone banned from a children's card game and risk jail time when they are more likely to win the powerball jackpot of over 500 million dollars and the mega million jackpot of over 400 million dollars 4 times in a row?

How about instead we say the see a wifi password on your fridge through a kitchen window, press up against the side of your house and use you wifi. (I know this might not apply directly to you but it is not extremely uncommon either)


How about you don't put your wifi password in an area where strangers can see it that easily like that to begin with?

d1234 wrote:
DarkPhenix wrote:Its funny how you guys seem to always focus on the wrong topic. These rules are guidelines to general misconduct etc. What you guys dont seem to get is that Admins have discretion to apply punishments that are either harsher or less harsher depending the infraction and the HISTORY of the user. When people come here to complain they have been banned, HISTORY is never brought up as a topic. Additionally, administrators are chosen because of their ability to make the right calls. Now stop shitposting and abusing admins. They already get enough of that. Everyone knows that purposely losing again and again is not healthy for the rated pool. Additionally, everyone knows its called negative boosting. Get over it. Thanks!

I believe the judge exam only covers yugioh rules. Also, I have looked back at other complaints of people being banned, and I think the judges are wrong then too most of the time. Also, the admins are the ones ABUSING their authority. AND if you look at Dark Cyborg’s history, this is the only bad thing that has happened.


I once took dueling network's judge exam myself back when that was still around. It covers far more than just yugioh rules/rulings. It also covers certain scenarios that are likely to come up such as "What would you do if Player1 make this error? How would you fix this? Should Player1 recieve a warning for this or a game loss?" or "Player2 says his screen is glitched and shows you a screenshot claiming it proves it, but you aren't sure if it proves that they are glitched. Should you trust Player2 and cancel the match, or require more proof?"

Also, what "other complaints of people being banned" do you have a problem with, and how can we see Dark Cyborg's history and know for certain that he never attempted anything like this before?

DarkPhenix
User avatar
Posts: 426
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2020 2:12 pm
Reputation: 78
Location: The Jungle

Post #224 by DarkPhenix » Sun Dec 06, 2020 11:42 pm

That is not for you to see. This topic has been exploited far pass anything sensical. Lets end this pointless thread that is just wasting people's time including my own.
RC-1, PC-1 Konami® Certified Judge

d1234
Posts: 267
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2020 9:29 pm
Reputation: 16

Post #225 by d1234 » Tue Dec 08, 2020 10:28 pm

DarkPhenix wrote:That is not for you to see. This topic has been exploited far pass anything sensical. Lets end this pointless thread that is just wasting people's time including my own.

I’m not stopping
Remove Dark Cyborg from beginner.

Genexwrecker
User avatar
Posts: 2666
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 10:52 pm
Reputation: 396

Post #226 by Genexwrecker » Tue Dec 08, 2020 10:55 pm

There is no conversation to be had here anymore.
Official Duelingbook Support staff
Official Duelingbook Resource Judge
Official Duelingbook Tournament Admin.(Other tournament Admin is Runzy)

greg503
User avatar
Posts: 2333
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2017 3:43 pm
Reputation: 199
Location: Flundereeze

Post #227 by greg503 » Tue Dec 08, 2020 11:54 pm

Can't threads be locked?
Buy Floowandereeze

d1234
Posts: 267
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2020 9:29 pm
Reputation: 16

Post #228 by d1234 » Wed Dec 09, 2020 1:58 am

There is conversation to be had
Remove Dark Cyborg from beginner.

Renji Asuka
User avatar
Posts: 2680
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2018 4:37 am
Reputation: 242

Post #229 by Renji Asuka » Wed Dec 09, 2020 2:05 am

d1234 wrote:There is conversation to be had

No there isn't.
Image
Showing people that I'm The King of Games since September 30, 1996.

Player1
User avatar
Posts: 970
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 5:12 am
Reputation: 16

Post #230 by Player1 » Wed Dec 09, 2020 11:13 am

As multiple judges have explained (along with myself, a month ago), quitting the duel repeatedly to intentionally lower your rating to 69 is a form of boosting, regardless of whether it's to gain exp or simply lower rating.

You're boosting losses, and giving others illegitimate wins. You're ruining the integrity of the rated pool. This is the consequence.

And what the rules do clearly state is that ALL activity on your network or account fall under your responsibility, regardless of whether or not it was another individual like your "friend" who performed those actions.


Return to “Farewells”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 70 guests