Excellion wrote:Christen57 wrote:So your source is saying a few people are estimated to have "an intersex trait". Does it say what chromosome combinations these people were born with?
Yes, it does and xxy chromsomes even have a name, its called "Klinefelter syndrome" [url]https://medlineplus.gov/genetics/condition/klinefelter-syndrome/
[/url]
"
Klinefelter syndrome is a chromosomal condition in boys and men that can affect physical and intellectual development." - your medlineplus.gov source
This would mean you having XXY chromosomes still makes you male.
people see "memeglish" as their primary language on their account and thats fine
Then why would it matter what they put as their gender?
Because there are still only 2 genders. Male and female.
but youre really gonna be offended if someone puts "attack helicopter' as their gender?
No. I'm gonna think that person's trolling or trying to be funny like how I find it funny people are listing Memeglish as their language.
Right... then why shouldnt gender be any different?
Because there's no need to allow any additional genders to be added besides the 2 already displayed: Male and Female.
"Lost third gender of japan" covers it.
Could you link to it?
This source confirms that some males can be born with certain physical genitalia which appear to be female-looking, and vice versa, but it still confirms what Genexwrecker and myself have been telling you: That regardless of what these things are you're born with, you're still ultimately male if you have XY chromosomes and female if you have XX chromosomes.
Not genetically... which was the point youre bith trying to make, if its a binary system then there are only xy or xx, if its xxy or xyy or yy, it is not, by your definition, a male or female, thats the point.
If it's XXY or XYY, either of those would still make you male as you still have at least 1 Y chromosome, and YY hasn't existed as a chromosome pair in anyone so far.
Then no one should have to participate in the "delusion" of a binary system either, which is why it should be removed.
But in order for living beings to reproduce, it has to be clear to both genders who's male and who's female, which is why you don't see a male and another male (or a female and another female) attempting to reproduce. That's not a delusion. That's basic biology. In reproduction, the male is responsible for fertilizing the woman's egg. If a female thinks she is male, she will expect to be able to fertilize another woman's egg, and if a male thinks he is female, he's expect to be fertilized by another man. Humanity can't reproduce if people think like this.
Yes, they can artifical incemination can be done between 2 females using bone marrow to inceminate an egg
Even if you extract sperm and put it in the woman to impregnate her, the sperm still requires a male to produce and donate to begin with, no?
"Just because old cultures did it doesnt make it right"
But i thought you said its a "new fad" also
New in North America. Old in those Roman, Greek, and Japanese locations you listed.
First off who decides what is considered "new" and "old" and who said north america sets the standards for social norms?
"New" meaning, compared to the Roman, Greek, and Japanese locations you listed (which you
said had this for hundreds of thousands of years or so), it hasn't been widely done before in America.
Social norms can vary somewhat from country to country and can also overlap somewhat. It can be the "social norm" in one country to make up and accept additional genders besides male and female but not in another country.
