Duelingbook Forum

Cromat wrote:Question #38:

Opponent send to GY of "Black Dragon Collapserpent" for Link Summoning of "Striker Dragon", then declare that Link Monster's effect, I am sending to GY of my "Effect Veiler". Then opponent declares effect of "Black Dragon Collapserpent" by saying "That is chain link so your "Effect Veiler" can do nothing." Is it true, if so: When I activated "Trickstar Reincarnation" and "Present Card" opponent can't try use "Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring" to stop my "Trickstar Reincarnation" because I activated "Present Card" lastly.

Cromat wrote:Question #38:

Opponent send to GY of "Black Dragon Collapserpent" for Link Summoning of "Striker Dragon", then declare that Link Monster's effect, I am sending to GY of my "Effect Veiler". Then opponent declares effect of "Black Dragon Collapserpent" by saying "That is chain link so your "Effect Veiler" can do nothing." Is it true, if so: When I activated "Trickstar Reincarnation" and "Present Card" opponent can't try use "Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring" to stop my "Trickstar Reincarnation" because I activated "Present Card" lastly.

Cromat wrote:Question #39:

During my opponent's Main Phase 1: They placed as face-up to field of "Fateful Adventure" by else card's effect while I have a face-up "Macro Cosmos";

● Can they use that Spell's effect [During your Main Phase: You can add 1 monster that mentions "Adventurer Token" from your Deck to your hand, then send 1 card from your hand to the GY.]?

greg503 wrote:

Cromat wrote:Question #39:

During my opponent's Main Phase 1: They placed as face-up to field of "Fateful Adventure" by else card's effect while I have a face-up "Macro Cosmos";

● Can they use that Spell's effect [During your Main Phase: You can add 1 monster that mentions "Adventurer Token" from your Deck to your hand, then send 1 card from your hand to the GY.]?

Yes, because it doesn't send for cost

Cromat wrote:

greg503 wrote:

Cromat wrote:Question #39:

During my opponent's Main Phase 1: They placed as face-up to field of "Fateful Adventure" by else card's effect while I have a face-up "Macro Cosmos";

● Can they use that Spell's effect [During your Main Phase: You can add 1 monster that mentions "Adventurer Token" from your Deck to your hand, then send 1 card from your hand to the GY.]?

Yes, because it doesn't send for cost

What does this have to do with cost? I'm not sure your answer is very clear and precise.

Cromat wrote:

greg503 wrote:

Cromat wrote:Question #39:

During my opponent's Main Phase 1: They placed as face-up to field of "Fateful Adventure" by else card's effect while I have a face-up "Macro Cosmos";

● Can they use that Spell's effect [During your Main Phase: You can add 1 monster that mentions "Adventurer Token" from your Deck to your hand, then send 1 card from your hand to the GY.]?

Yes, because it doesn't send for cost

What does this have to do with cost? I'm not sure your answer is very clear and precise.

Cromat wrote:Question #40:

● What happen if I control a "Dimensional Fissure" as face-up and activate "Crackdown" to take control of a monster of my opponent and; after that, activate "Self-Mummification"?

● What would happen if opponent's monster declares an attack to me with while my opponent has only 1 card in their hand (for this scenario, let's assume that the card in their hand is a monster), and has a monster in Attack Position; while I control a face-up "Dimensional Fissure" and a face-up "Toll Hike"?

Cromat wrote:Question #40.1:

Can your opponent use that effect of "Mirrorjade the Iceblade Dragon" [Once per turn (Quick Effect): You can send 1 Fusion Monster from your Extra Deck to the GY that mentions "Fallen of Albaz" as material; banish 1 monster on the field, also this card cannot use this effect next turn.] while you have a face-up "Dimensional Fissure" and a face-up "Guardian Chimera" in Defense Position?



Question #41:

While I control no monster; I am activating "Crackdown" to take control of my opponent's "Guardian Chimera". (My opponent has no "Polymerization" in their GY by the way.) Then, my opponent is Special Summoned "Starving Venom Fusion Dragon" during their Main Phase. Can my opponent activate this effect of "Starving Venom Fusion Dragon" [If this card is Fusion Summoned: You can make this card gain ATK equal to 1 opponent's Special Summoned monster, until the end of this turn.]? I mean; can it gain equal ATK of "Guardian Chimera", because that "Guardian Chimera" isn't my Special Summoned monster. That is my opponent's Special Summoned monster, still that effect can be used?

Cromat wrote:Question #42:

My opponent has a "Lady Labrynth of the Silver Castle" on their field in Attack Position. I control a "Skill Drain" and have a Set card on my field it's "Runick Freezing Curses". When opponent entered their Battle Phase and declared an attack; I am activating my Quick-Play Spell. Could you explain to me (with source) about the status of that Quick-Play Spell, opponent said that you cannot negate it because your Trap is already negated it.

Cromat wrote:Question #43:

You control a face-up "Necrovalley" and a face-up "Inspector Boarder" and your opponent has a Set card on their Spell/Trap Zone. You are declaring an attack, and they activates their Set card the "Dogmatika Punishment", with it they send "Elder Entity N'tss" to their GY. Effect of "Dogmatika Punishment" and "Elder Entity N'tss" don't resolve simultaneously? I mean; you have an "Inspector Boarder"; how "Elder Entity N'tss" can try to destroy your "Necrovalley"?

Cromat wrote:Question #44:

I have a "Solemn Judgment" as Set on the field and opponent has a Set "Metaverse" on the field and has a "Lady Labrynth of the Silver Castle" on their hand. They activates "Metaverse" and declare effect of "Lady Labrynth of the Silver Castle", and saying to me you can't chain your "Solemn Judgment" to my "Metaverse". Because I activated "Lady Labrynth of the Silver Castle" effect, ~ what you do think about that?

(Related issue's replay: https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=168328-47466898 )

Lil Oldman wrote:

Cromat wrote:Question #44:

I have a "Solemn Judgment" as Set on the field and opponent has a Set "Metaverse" on the field and has a "Lady Labrynth of the Silver Castle" on their hand. They activates "Metaverse" and declare effect of "Lady Labrynth of the Silver Castle", and saying to me you can't chain your "Solemn Judgment" to my "Metaverse". Because I activated "Lady Labrynth of the Silver Castle" effect, ~ what you do think about that?

(Related issue's replay: https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=168328-47466898 )

Lady Labrynth's relevant effect is a Quick Effect in this case, which means it must go on top of the chain, instead of triggering on resolution on a new chain. This also means that when the condition is meet, in this case activating a trap, the opponent has the opportunity to respond with a Spell Speed 2 or higher effect. At this point, since the Judgement it is a Counter, it can no longer be chained. Considering there were only 2 seconds from Metaverse to Lady Labrynth, I would consider this not a reasonable amount of time.
I do wonder if the card wasnt a counter, would Lady Labrynth still be able to activate? Not sure on that part.

Cromat wrote:Question #44:

I have a "Solemn Judgment" as Set on the field and opponent has a Set "Metaverse" on the field and has a "Lady Labrynth of the Silver Castle" on their hand. They activates "Metaverse" and declare effect of "Lady Labrynth of the Silver Castle", and saying to me you can't chain your "Solemn Judgment" to my "Metaverse". Because I activated "Lady Labrynth of the Silver Castle" effect [If a "Labrynth" card or effect or a Normal Trap Card was activated this turn, except "Lady Labrynth of the Silver Castle" (Quick Effect): You can Special Summon this card from your hand in Defense Position.] , ~ what you do think about that?

(Related issue's replay: https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=168328-47466898 )

Fredblade wrote:

Cromat wrote:Question #44:

I have a "Solemn Judgment" as Set on the field and opponent has a Set "Metaverse" on the field and has a "Lady Labrynth of the Silver Castle" on their hand. They activates "Metaverse" and declare effect of "Lady Labrynth of the Silver Castle", and saying to me you can't chain your "Solemn Judgment" to my "Metaverse". Because I activated "Lady Labrynth of the Silver Castle" effect [If a "Labrynth" card or effect or a Normal Trap Card was activated this turn, except "Lady Labrynth of the Silver Castle" (Quick Effect): You can Special Summon this card from your hand in Defense Position.] , ~ what you do think about that?

(Related issue's replay: https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=168328-47466898 )

First of All, your opponent cannot activate Metaverse then immediately chain Lady Labrynth of the Silver Castle without asking you for a response to Metaverse first.
Second, I've seen people not understanding how Lady Labrynth works, she's similar to Multifaker in the sense that you have to wait for the chain to resolve then in a new chain after a previous one where a Trap was activated resolves, so he would have to first activate metaverse, wait for it to resolve, THEN they're allowed to activate Lady Labrynth's quick effect from that point onward. The Labrynth player would be allowed to chain Lady Labrynth to the metaverse if there was a normal trap card activated in a point prior that turn, but because I assume Metaverse was the first normal trap activated in that turn, chaining Lady Labrynth in that scenario is an illegal move.