Game Related Question

[greg503]

Discarding to hand size happens during your End Phase

[Cromat]

Question #7:

Portion 1:
I am activated "De-Fusion" by targetting "Destiny HERO - Destroyer Phoenix Enforcer" which is under control of my opponent; they activated that Fusion's effect for destroy I just activated Spell (and also itself).

Portion 2:
I am activating "Raigeki" while opponent has "Destiny HERO - Destroyer Phoenix Enforcer" as face-up; they activating its effect for destroy my Spell (and also itself).

Portion 3:
Those are destroying my Spells, really; or this game is reached to being sucks as far as it can?

[greg503]

Question #7:

Portion 1:
I am activated "De-Fusion" by targetting "Destiny HERO - Destroyer Phoenix Enforcer" which is under control of my opponent; they activated that Fusion's effect for destroy I just activated Spell (and also itself).

Portion 2:
I am activating "Raigeki" while opponent has "Destiny HERO - Destroyer Phoenix Enforcer" as face-up; they activating its effect for destroy my Spell (and also itself).

Portion 3:
Those are destroying my Spells, really; or this game is reached to being sucks as far as it can?

Yes, they can chain DPE to destroy spells you activate, since the two you mentioned aren't continuous they will then resolve. De-Fusion (I forget whether the real version lets you target your opponents cards but I will assume it does) resolves without effect since the target left the field, while Raigeki will destroy their other monsters, then in a new chain, the can activate DPE's other effect.

[Cromat]

Question #7:

Portion 1:
I am activated "De-Fusion" by targetting "Destiny HERO - Destroyer Phoenix Enforcer" which is under control of my opponent; they activated that Fusion's effect for destroy I just activated Spell (and also itself).

Portion 2:
I am activating "Raigeki" while opponent has "Destiny HERO - Destroyer Phoenix Enforcer" as face-up; they activating its effect for destroy my Spell (and also itself).

Portion 3:
Those are destroying my Spells, really; or this game is reached to being sucks as far as it can?

Yes, they can chain DPE to destroy spells you activate, since the two you mentioned aren't continuous they will then resolve. De-Fusion (I forget whether the real version lets you target your opponents cards but I will assume it does) resolves without effect since the target left the field, while Raigeki will destroy their other monsters, then in a new chain, the can activate DPE's other effect.

So, you are saying that when I activate De-Fusion, Raigeki, Lightning Storm and/or Dark Hole while no card on the field at that moment but Destiny HERO - Destroyer Phoenix Enforcer, that Fusion Monster can destroy itself and I just activated Spell, thus it can make my card trash? Have I understood clear?

[Lil Oldman]

Yes.

[Cromat]

Yes.

Well, tell them then that don't call Judges when they activated Dark Hole, Lightning Storm and/or Harpie's Feather Duster and I responded with Mystical Space Typhoon. Because I will destroy their Spells too.

[Lil Oldman]

Yes.

Well, tell them then that don't call Judges when they activated Dark Hole, Lightning Storm and/or Harpie's Feather Duster and I responded with Mystical Space Typhoon. Because I will destroy their Spells too.

I don't get what you mean. The scenarios you are describing are different.

[Cromat]

Question #8

(a)
While ATK of "Gren Maju Da Eiza" was 6400, "Number 61: Volcasaurus" is destroyed that Effect Monster by using its effect. Opponent will take 6400 damage or taken no damage?

(b)
While ATK of "Eater of Millions" was 1600, "Red-Eyes Dark Dragoon" used its effect for destroy "Eater of Millions", opponent will take 1600 damage or not?

[Christen57]

Question #8

(a)
While ATK of "Gren Maju Da Eiza" was 6400, "Number 61: Volcasaurus" is destroyed that Effect Monster by using its effect. Opponent will take 6400 damage or taken no damage?

(b)
While ATK of "Eater of Millions" was 1600, "Red-Eyes Dark Dragoon" used its effect for destroy "Eater of Millions", opponent will take 1600 damage or not?

https://yugipedia.com/wiki/Card_Rulings:Number_61:_Volcasaurus

Monster whose original ATK is 0 or ?: The targeted monster is destroyed, but the opponent takes no damage.

[Cromat]

Question #9:

● Chain Link 1: Opponent activating effect of their "Accesscode Talker" by banishing 1 Link Monster from their graveyard.
● Chain Link 2: I am chaining my Trap card; the "Ice Dragon's Prison" by targeting opponent's Link Monster that in graveyard of my opponent. (Opponent has only 1 Link Monster to banish in their graveyard that moment.)
● Chain Link 3: Opponent chaining effect of "Borreload Savage Dragon" which is on opponent's field as face-up, that for negate my activated Trap.
● Chain Link 4: Last link of the chain is: Activated by me the "Paleozoic Dinomischus" by targeting opponent's Synchro Monster (the Borreload Savage Dragon).

> Chain Link will be resolved normally as "Borreload Savage Dragon" will negate of "Ice Dragon's Prison" or it will not do it because of "Paleozoic Dinomischus"; that means it banished that Synchro Monster thus that won't be able to negate of that Trap (the "Ice Dragon's Prison") and I can Summon opponent's graveyard to that Link Monster before they banished it which is attempted to banish for effect of "Borreload Savage Dragon"? <



(I was really tired while typing that question.)

[Lil Oldman]

Question #9:

● Chain Link 1: Opponent activating effect of their "Accesscode Talker" by banishing 1 Link Monster from their graveyard.
● Chain Link 2: I am chaining my Trap card; the "Ice Dragon's Prison" by targeting opponent's Link Monster that in graveyard of my opponent. (Opponent has only 1 Link Monster to banish in their graveyard that moment.)
● Chain Link 3: Opponent chaining effect of "Borreload Savage Dragon" which is on opponent's field as face-up, that for negate my activated Trap.
● Chain Link 4: Last link of the chain is: Activated by me the "Paleozoic Dinomischus" by targeting opponent's Synchro Monster (the Borreload Savage Dragon).

> Chain Link will be resolved normally as "Borreload Savage Dragon" will negate of "Ice Dragon's Prison" or it will not do it because of "Paleozoic Dinomischus"; that means it banished that Synchro Monster thus that won't be able to negate of that Trap (the "Ice Dragon's Prison") and I can Summon opponent's graveyard to that Link Monster before they banished it which is attempted to banish for effect of "Borreload Savage Dragon"? <



(I was really tired while typing that question.)

A) Acesscode banishing is cost, so you cannot activate nothing until the thing banishes.
B) Savege, to my understanding, doesn't need to be on the field to activate, only needs to remove the counter. (As cost too.)
C)Dinomischus doesn't negate, so Borreload leaving the field does nothing on the chain.

[greg503]

Question #9:

● Chain Link 1: Opponent activating effect of their "Accesscode Talker" by banishing 1 Link Monster from their graveyard.
● Chain Link 2: I am chaining my Trap card; the "Ice Dragon's Prison" by targeting opponent's Link Monster that in graveyard of my opponent. (Opponent has only 1 Link Monster to banish in their graveyard that moment.)
● Chain Link 3: Opponent chaining effect of "Borreload Savage Dragon" which is on opponent's field as face-up, that for negate my activated Trap.
● Chain Link 4: Last link of the chain is: Activated by me the "Paleozoic Dinomischus" by targeting opponent's Synchro Monster (the Borreload Savage Dragon).

> Chain Link will be resolved normally as "Borreload Savage Dragon" will negate of "Ice Dragon's Prison" or it will not do it because of "Paleozoic Dinomischus"; that means it banished that Synchro Monster thus that won't be able to negate of that Trap (the "Ice Dragon's Prison") and I can Summon opponent's graveyard to that Link Monster before they banished it which is attempted to banish for effect of "Borreload Savage Dragon"? <



(I was really tired while typing that question.)

You can't chain to Accesscode lmao

[Slitina]

All this work with chaining with an effect that can’t be responded to. Accesscode Talker: Your opponent cannot activate cards or effects in response to this card's effect activations.

[Danobious17]

How does a deck check work if you've started a tournament on DB?

[Christen57]

How does a deck check work if you've started a tournament on DB?

The system automatically checks your deck and lets you know if it's compatible with the banlist and everything. There's no need for a third party to verify your deck.

[greg503]

How does a deck check work if you've started a tournament on DB?

The system automatically checks your deck and lets you know if it's compatible with the banlist and everything. There's no need for a third party to verify your deck.

Unless of course, you're not playing a format that DB supports

[Christen57]

How does a deck check work if you've started a tournament on DB?

The system automatically checks your deck and lets you know if it's compatible with the banlist and everything. There's no need for a third party to verify your deck.

Unless of course, you're not playing a format that DB supports

He was asking about tournaments — a format that duelingbook does support.

[greg503]

The system automatically checks your deck and lets you know if it's compatible with the banlist and everything. There's no need for a third party to verify your deck.

Unless of course, you're not playing a format that DB supports

He was asking about tournaments — a format that duelingbook does support.

Tournaments are not a format in and of themselves, if I wanted to host an Edison tournament I would need to make sure they were using decks of that format

[Christen57]

Unless of course, you're not playing a format that DB supports

He was asking about tournaments — a format that duelingbook does support.

Tournaments are not a format in and of themselves, if I wanted to host an Edison tournament I would need to make sure they were using decks of that format

I thought he meant regular advanced format tournaments.

[greg503]

He was asking about tournaments — a format that duelingbook does support.

Tournaments are not a format in and of themselves, if I wanted to host an Edison tournament I would need to make sure they were using decks of that format

I thought he meant regular advanced format tournaments.

I know, and it's fine if that is, which is why I mentioned other formats