Duelingbook Forum

PENMASTER wrote:i swear him trying to to defend "on eff" isnt a responce is soo fucking funny like the fuck did you expect for him to do when you said that

Sound4 wrote:

PENMASTER wrote:i swear him trying to to defend "on eff" isnt a responce is soo fucking funny like the fuck did you expect for him to do when you said that

I expected him to say something that make sense. Like "resp" which is even shorter. I even waited for a response.

Renji Asuka wrote:

Sound4 wrote:

PENMASTER wrote:i swear him trying to to defend "on eff" isnt a responce is soo fucking funny like the fuck did you expect for him to do when you said that

I expected him to say something that make sense. Like "resp" which is even shorter. I even waited for a response.

You didn't though, you rushed into your plays, and even ignored the chat.

Sound4 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:

Sound4 wrote:I expected him to say something that make sense. Like "resp" which is even shorter. I even waited for a response.

You didn't though, you rushed into your plays, and even ignored the chat.

From 4:07 to 4:14 I waited and extra seven seconds and communicated well to make what is happening. There is no reason why the opponent took that long to respond

Sound4 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:

Sound4 wrote:I expected him to say something that make sense. Like "resp" which is even shorter. I even waited for a response.

You didn't though, you rushed into your plays, and even ignored the chat.

From 4:07 to 4:14 I waited and extra seven seconds and communicated well to make what is happening. There is no reason why the opponent took that long to respond

Sound4 wrote:

Genexwrecker wrote:This is not the place to continue this your report was handled case closed.

I know it was handled. Yet you were making false claims and other people which I had to reply.

Genexwrecker wrote:

Sound4 wrote:

Genexwrecker wrote:This is not the place to continue this your report was handled case closed.

I know it was handled. Yet you were making false claims and other people which I had to reply.

What have I said in this thread that is incorrect?

Renji Asuka wrote:

Sound4 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:You didn't though, you rushed into your plays, and even ignored the chat.

From 4:07 to 4:14 I waited and extra seven seconds and communicated well to make what is happening. There is no reason why the opponent took that long to respond

Does not matter, YOU CHOSE to keep playing when you CLEARLY WEREN'T GIVEN THE OKAY. Stop JUSTIFYING YOUR SHITTY BEHAVIOR.

Lil Oldman wrote:

Sound4 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:You didn't though, you rushed into your plays, and even ignored the chat.

From 4:07 to 4:14 I waited and extra seven seconds and communicated well to make what is happening. There is no reason why the opponent took that long to respond

Lord forgive that you give actual response time to your opponent. he at the seven second mark responded and instead of you actually listening to him you continued playing like nothing happened.
Also, quite odd for you to say that 7 seconds is way to much time, but most of your "reading" was intentional stalling. Even at the end, when the plays didn't even matter.
Quoting your opponent
"i said hold on because you just rushed and took cyber dragon, you didnt even let me", you rushed your plays, disallowing the interaction between you two.

Sound4 wrote::arrow:

Lil Oldman wrote:

Sound4 wrote:From 4:07 to 4:14 I waited and extra seven seconds and communicated well to make what is happening. There is no reason why the opponent took that long to respond

Lord forgive that you give actual response time to your opponent. he at the seven second mark responded and instead of you actually listening to him you continued playing like nothing happened.
Also, quite odd for you to say that 7 seconds is way to much time, but most of your "reading" was intentional stalling. Even at the end, when the plays didn't even matter.
Quoting your opponent
"i said hold on because you just rushed and took cyber dragon, you didnt even let me", you rushed your plays, disallowing the interaction between you two.

This is from the official rule book

"If your opponent does not respond, you may activate a second effect and create a Chain to your own card's activation." This even stated in the official rulebook."
I was never rushing. My opponent was making plays but I was focused on the chat so after that I was reading my opponent cards. N3sh didn't care though pretty much nobody can read and type at the same time. I literally said read multiple times.

Sound4 wrote::arrow:

Lil Oldman wrote:

Sound4 wrote:From 4:07 to 4:14 I waited and extra seven seconds and communicated well to make what is happening. There is no reason why the opponent took that long to respond

Lord forgive that you give actual response time to your opponent. he at the seven second mark responded and instead of you actually listening to him you continued playing like nothing happened.
Also, quite odd for you to say that 7 seconds is way to much time, but most of your "reading" was intentional stalling. Even at the end, when the plays didn't even matter.
Quoting your opponent
"i said hold on because you just rushed and took cyber dragon, you didnt even let me", you rushed your plays, disallowing the interaction between you two.

This is from the official rule book

"If your opponent does not respond, you may activate a second effect and create a Chain to your own card's activation." This even stated in the official rulebook."
I was never rushing. My opponent was making plays but I was focused on the chat so after that I was reading my opponent cards. N3sh didn't care though pretty much nobody can read and type at the same time. I literally said read multiple times.

Sound4 wrote::arrow:

Lil Oldman wrote:

Sound4 wrote:From 4:07 to 4:14 I waited and extra seven seconds and communicated well to make what is happening. There is no reason why the opponent took that long to respond

Lord forgive that you give actual response time to your opponent. he at the seven second mark responded and instead of you actually listening to him you continued playing like nothing happened.
Also, quite odd for you to say that 7 seconds is way to much time, but most of your "reading" was intentional stalling. Even at the end, when the plays didn't even matter.
Quoting your opponent
"i said hold on because you just rushed and took cyber dragon, you didnt even let me", you rushed your plays, disallowing the interaction between you two.

This is from the official rule book

"If your opponent does not respond, you may activate a second effect and create a Chain to your own card's activation." This even stated in the official rulebook."
I was never rushing. My opponent was making plays but I was focused on the chat so after that I was reading my opponent cards. N3sh didn't care though pretty much nobody can read and type at the same time. I literally said read multiple times.

Genexwrecker wrote:

Sound4 wrote::arrow:

Lil Oldman wrote:Lord forgive that you give actual response time to your opponent. he at the seven second mark responded and instead of you actually listening to him you continued playing like nothing happened.
Also, quite odd for you to say that 7 seconds is way to much time, but most of your "reading" was intentional stalling. Even at the end, when the plays didn't even matter.
Quoting your opponent
"i said hold on because you just rushed and took cyber dragon, you didnt even let me", you rushed your plays, disallowing the interaction between you two.

This is from the official rule book

"If your opponent does not respond, you may activate a second effect and create a Chain to your own card's activation." This even stated in the official rulebook."
I was never rushing. My opponent was making plays but I was focused on the chat so after that I was reading my opponent cards. N3sh didn't care though pretty much nobody can read and type at the same time. I literally said read multiple times.

99% of the playerbase can read and communicate together. It is essential multitasking.

Lil Oldman wrote:

Sound4 wrote::arrow:

Lil Oldman wrote:Lord forgive that you give actual response time to your opponent. he at the seven second mark responded and instead of you actually listening to him you continued playing like nothing happened.
Also, quite odd for you to say that 7 seconds is way to much time, but most of your "reading" was intentional stalling. Even at the end, when the plays didn't even matter.
Quoting your opponent
"i said hold on because you just rushed and took cyber dragon, you didnt even let me", you rushed your plays, disallowing the interaction between you two.

This is from the official rule book

"If your opponent does not respond, you may activate a second effect and create a Chain to your own card's activation." This even stated in the official rulebook."
I was never rushing. My opponent was making plays but I was focused on the chat so after that I was reading my opponent cards. N3sh didn't care though pretty much nobody can read and type at the same time. I literally said read multiple times.

So what you are saying is that he didn't said he had a response?

Sound4 wrote:

Genexwrecker wrote:

Sound4 wrote::arrow:
This is from the official rule book

"If your opponent does not respond, you may activate a second effect and create a Chain to your own card's activation." This even stated in the official rulebook."
I was never rushing. My opponent was making plays but I was focused on the chat so after that I was reading my opponent cards. N3sh didn't care though pretty much nobody can read and type at the same time. I literally said read multiple times.

99% of the playerbase can read and communicate together. It is essential multitasking.

You didn't get what I said most players can only do one thing at a time in yugioh. Reading and typing at the same time is extremely which you will find nobody can do. You can be tasked with multiple things but only once at a time.

greg503 wrote:

Sound4 wrote::arrow:

Lil Oldman wrote:Lord forgive that you give actual response time to your opponent. he at the seven second mark responded and instead of you actually listening to him you continued playing like nothing happened.
Also, quite odd for you to say that 7 seconds is way to much time, but most of your "reading" was intentional stalling. Even at the end, when the plays didn't even matter.
Quoting your opponent
"i said hold on because you just rushed and took cyber dragon, you didnt even let me", you rushed your plays, disallowing the interaction between you two.

This is from the official rule book

"If your opponent does not respond, you may activate a second effect and create a Chain to your own card's activation." This even stated in the official rulebook."
I was never rushing. My opponent was making plays but I was focused on the chat so after that I was reading my opponent cards. N3sh didn't care though pretty much nobody can read and type at the same time. I literally said read multiple times.

CONTEXT, "respond" in that statement means gameplay responses, a fast effect to Chain.

Sound4 wrote:

Lil Oldman wrote:

Sound4 wrote::arrow:
This is from the official rule book

"If your opponent does not respond, you may activate a second effect and create a Chain to your own card's activation." This even stated in the official rulebook."
I was never rushing. My opponent was making plays but I was focused on the chat so after that I was reading my opponent cards. N3sh didn't care though pretty much nobody can read and type at the same time. I literally said read multiple times.

So what you are saying is that he didn't said he had a response?

My opponent never responded especially when I clearly communicated everything my nachster 2nd effect did. There is no reason why my opponent took so long to respond.

[4:17] "on eff"
[4:19] Special Summoned "Cyber Dragon" from GY to M-4 (ATK)
[4:19] "of summon"
[4:21] Stopped viewing GY
[4:24] "hold on"
[4:31] "send the cyber dragon back"

Lil Oldman wrote:

Sound4 wrote:

Lil Oldman wrote:So what you are saying is that he didn't said he had a response?

My opponent never responded especially when I clearly communicated everything my nachster 2nd effect did. There is no reason why my opponent took so long to respond.

So this is not a response?

[4:17] "on eff"
[4:19] Special Summoned "Cyber Dragon" from GY to M-4 (ATK)
[4:19] "of summon"
[4:21] Stopped viewing GY
[4:24] "hold on"
[4:31] "send the cyber dragon back"

Sound4 wrote:

Lil Oldman wrote:

Sound4 wrote:My opponent never responded especially when I clearly communicated everything my nachster 2nd effect did. There is no reason why my opponent took so long to respond.

So this is not a response?

[4:17] "on eff"
[4:19] Special Summoned "Cyber Dragon" from GY to M-4 (ATK)
[4:19] "of summon"
[4:21] Stopped viewing GY
[4:24] "hold on"
[4:31] "send the cyber dragon back"

A response that makes no sense and does not mean much. Plus I was already viewing GY giving the opponent plenty of time to respond.