Duelingbook Forum

Cromat wrote:Question #7:

Portion 1:
I am activated "De-Fusion" by targetting "Destiny HERO - Destroyer Phoenix Enforcer" which is under control of my opponent; they activated that Fusion's effect for destroy I just activated Spell (and also itself).

Portion 2:
I am activating "Raigeki" while opponent has "Destiny HERO - Destroyer Phoenix Enforcer" as face-up; they activating its effect for destroy my Spell (and also itself).

Portion 3:
Those are destroying my Spells, really; or this game is reached to being sucks as far as it can?

greg503 wrote:

Cromat wrote:Question #7:

Portion 1:
I am activated "De-Fusion" by targetting "Destiny HERO - Destroyer Phoenix Enforcer" which is under control of my opponent; they activated that Fusion's effect for destroy I just activated Spell (and also itself).

Portion 2:
I am activating "Raigeki" while opponent has "Destiny HERO - Destroyer Phoenix Enforcer" as face-up; they activating its effect for destroy my Spell (and also itself).

Portion 3:
Those are destroying my Spells, really; or this game is reached to being sucks as far as it can?

Yes, they can chain DPE to destroy spells you activate, since the two you mentioned aren't continuous they will then resolve. De-Fusion (I forget whether the real version lets you target your opponents cards but I will assume it does) resolves without effect since the target left the field, while Raigeki will destroy their other monsters, then in a new chain, the can activate DPE's other effect.

Lil Oldman wrote:Yes.

Cromat wrote:

Lil Oldman wrote:Yes.

Well, tell them then that don't call Judges when they activated Dark Hole, Lightning Storm and/or Harpie's Feather Duster and I responded with Mystical Space Typhoon. Because I will destroy their Spells too.

Cromat wrote:
Question #8

(a)
While ATK of "Gren Maju Da Eiza" was 6400, "Number 61: Volcasaurus" is destroyed that Effect Monster by using its effect. Opponent will take 6400 damage or taken no damage?

(b)
While ATK of "Eater of Millions" was 1600, "Red-Eyes Dark Dragoon" used its effect for destroy "Eater of Millions", opponent will take 1600 damage or not?

Cromat wrote:Question #9:

● Chain Link 1: Opponent activating effect of their "Accesscode Talker" by banishing 1 Link Monster from their graveyard.
● Chain Link 2: I am chaining my Trap card; the "Ice Dragon's Prison" by targeting opponent's Link Monster that in graveyard of my opponent. (Opponent has only 1 Link Monster to banish in their graveyard that moment.)
● Chain Link 3: Opponent chaining effect of "Borreload Savage Dragon" which is on opponent's field as face-up, that for negate my activated Trap.
● Chain Link 4: Last link of the chain is: Activated by me the "Paleozoic Dinomischus" by targeting opponent's Synchro Monster (the Borreload Savage Dragon).

> Chain Link will be resolved normally as "Borreload Savage Dragon" will negate of "Ice Dragon's Prison" or it will not do it because of "Paleozoic Dinomischus"; that means it banished that Synchro Monster thus that won't be able to negate of that Trap (the "Ice Dragon's Prison") and I can Summon opponent's graveyard to that Link Monster before they banished it which is attempted to banish for effect of "Borreload Savage Dragon"? <



(I was really tired while typing that question.)

Cromat wrote:Question #9:

● Chain Link 1: Opponent activating effect of their "Accesscode Talker" by banishing 1 Link Monster from their graveyard.
● Chain Link 2: I am chaining my Trap card; the "Ice Dragon's Prison" by targeting opponent's Link Monster that in graveyard of my opponent. (Opponent has only 1 Link Monster to banish in their graveyard that moment.)
● Chain Link 3: Opponent chaining effect of "Borreload Savage Dragon" which is on opponent's field as face-up, that for negate my activated Trap.
● Chain Link 4: Last link of the chain is: Activated by me the "Paleozoic Dinomischus" by targeting opponent's Synchro Monster (the Borreload Savage Dragon).

> Chain Link will be resolved normally as "Borreload Savage Dragon" will negate of "Ice Dragon's Prison" or it will not do it because of "Paleozoic Dinomischus"; that means it banished that Synchro Monster thus that won't be able to negate of that Trap (the "Ice Dragon's Prison") and I can Summon opponent's graveyard to that Link Monster before they banished it which is attempted to banish for effect of "Borreload Savage Dragon"? <



(I was really tired while typing that question.)

Danobious17 wrote:How does a deck check work if you've started a tournament on DB?

Christen57 wrote:

Danobious17 wrote:How does a deck check work if you've started a tournament on DB?

The system automatically checks your deck and lets you know if it's compatible with the banlist and everything. There's no need for a third party to verify your deck.

greg503 wrote:

Christen57 wrote:

Danobious17 wrote:How does a deck check work if you've started a tournament on DB?

The system automatically checks your deck and lets you know if it's compatible with the banlist and everything. There's no need for a third party to verify your deck.

Unless of course, you're not playing a format that DB supports

Christen57 wrote:

greg503 wrote:

Christen57 wrote:
The system automatically checks your deck and lets you know if it's compatible with the banlist and everything. There's no need for a third party to verify your deck.

Unless of course, you're not playing a format that DB supports

He was asking about tournaments — a format that duelingbook does support.

greg503 wrote:

Christen57 wrote:

greg503 wrote:Unless of course, you're not playing a format that DB supports

He was asking about tournaments — a format that duelingbook does support.

Tournaments are not a format in and of themselves, if I wanted to host an Edison tournament I would need to make sure they were using decks of that format

Christen57 wrote:

greg503 wrote:

Christen57 wrote:
He was asking about tournaments — a format that duelingbook does support.

Tournaments are not a format in and of themselves, if I wanted to host an Edison tournament I would need to make sure they were using decks of that format

I thought he meant regular advanced format tournaments.