| Hanverid | wrote:Destroyed.
More like Annihilated.
| Hanverid | wrote:Destroyed.
CrystalMusic wrote:This posts original topic never said anything negative to anyone and yet you ppl just HAD to start crap!
This just proves that no matter what i post here, you ppl tend to show you're nothing more than an jerk who has to spit their negative egotistical BS on a friendly post. And for what? to satisfy your little ego?
And you have the gall to condemn what I've done??? GTFOH!!!
CrystalMusic wrote:in other words i wont duel anyone here that has commented on my threads unless:
- they can come up with a deck that: only uses highly under used cards, uses cards from 1st gen, gx and 5ds (some exceptions on zexal, arc-v and vrains apply) and contains no extradeck
- win without any sort of direct attack effect, effect damage, alt victory, burn, equip spells.
- summon/set a monster only once a turn unless its by the effect of monster reborn, call of the haunted or premature burial
Runzy wrote:Fair and balanced cards are what matters. When making them consider if you would want to face what you are making and gauge how ridiculous it is. Either way the whole "lose by battle" is meh as what about burn effects?
CrystalMusic wrote:Runzy wrote:Fair and balanced cards are what matters. When making them consider if you would want to face what you are making and gauge how ridiculous it is. Either way the whole "lose by battle" is meh as what about burn effects?
u can still take damage from anything, but the LP meter must hit 0 by battle damage
CrystalMusic wrote:look like i said the reason behind this cad was to stop insta wins, i knew they were going to be made so i prepared ahead. also the "must reduce Lp to 0 by battle" is a good addition considering I have seen ppl make quick play spell cards that deal 8000 damage. now tell me how in any way is a quick play that does that much damage is considered fair or balanced? That last part of my cards effect was there long before these "insta win" cards ppl sometimes play. meaning my card was well prepared for the amount of BS Damage effects ppl might make in customs.
If you have an issue with my card which forces one to win by reducing LP by a direct attack or battle damage, i fail to see how thats MY problem!
CrystalMusic wrote:all it takes is for you to take a moment of your time to read the duel note and my profile. i dont get what is so hard about that!
Debt wrote:CrystalMusic wrote:all it takes is for you to take a moment of your time to read the duel note and my profile. i dont get what is so hard about that!
Keep pretending you don't use cards that are additional rules that your opponent never consented to playing with.
NiwatoriFTW wrote:Debt wrote:CrystalMusic wrote:all it takes is for you to take a moment of your time to read the duel note and my profile. i dont get what is so hard about that!
Keep pretending you don't use cards that are additional rules that your opponent never consented to playing with.
Not to mention the occasional cheating.
CrystalMusic wrote:
umm i dont cheat. when u dont obey my rules THAT is cheating.
CrystalMusic wrote:NiwatoriFTW wrote:Debt wrote:Keep pretending you don't use cards that are additional rules that your opponent never consented to playing with.
Not to mention the occasional cheating.
umm i dont cheat. when u dont obey my rules THAT is cheating.
CrystalMusic wrote:all it takes is for you to take a moment of your time to read the duel note and my profile. i dont get what is so hard about that!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 123 guests