Decided to make some Infernoid Support

Post your custom made cards in this forum
Anarking
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat May 27, 2017 7:15 pm
Reputation: 0

Decided to make some Infernoid Support

Post #1 by Anarking » Wed Apr 26, 2023 7:18 am

I wanted to try my hand at making Infernoid support since i enjoy the deck a lot and konami most likely will never support them. I tried to make the cards as balanced as possible but I may have gone overboard lol. Feel free to comment on how i can make them better or if theyre balanced enough.

P.S. was too lazy to add photos to the cards right now but may do it later. Also might make more support in the future.

https://www.duelingbook.com/card?id=3923747
Their new Fusion monster

https://www.duelingbook.com/card?id=3923745
An archetypal Fusion spell

https://www.duelingbook.com/card?id=3923744
I way to help them hit the board easier and recycle cards

Christen57
User avatar
Posts: 2033
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 10:37 pm
Reputation: 182
Location: New York, United States of America

Post #2 by Christen57 » Mon Aug 28, 2023 10:32 pm

Gotta be careful when letting such a fusion monster dump massive amounts of cards. Void Imagination dumping 6 Infernoids from the deck to summon this monster, and then this monster milling 6 more cards from the deck makes this possibly broken.

Also, banished pile isn't an offical term. The correct wording is: Special Summon a number of your "Infernoid" monsters that are banished and/or in your GY up to the number of monsters your opponent controls, ignoring their Summoning conditions.

Also, you use a colon after activation conditions, not a semi-colon, so it should be:
leaves the field by an opponent's card:
instead of:
leaves the field by an opponent's card;

Void Fusion's effect can be shortened from:
Fusion summon one Fiend-Type Fusion Monster from your extra deck, using monsters you control or in your hand as fusion materials. If Summoning an "Infernoid" Fusion Monster this way, you can also banish "Infernoid" monsters in your GY as fusion materials.
to:
Fusion Summon 1 Fiend monster from your Extra Deck, using monsters from your hand or field. If Summoning an "Infernoid" monster this way, you can also banish "Infernoid" monsters from your GY as material.

  • You don't use the word one in effects when you can use the number 1
  • You no longer need to include -Type when referencing monster types anymore unless you're directly influencing types of individual monsters, such as with Dragoncaller Magician's effect that changes types to Dragon-Type
  • You no longer need to specify in the first sentence of a fusion summon that the monster has to specifically be a fusion monster. You can just say "Fusion Summon 1 monster" instead of "Fusion Summon 1 Fusion Monster" where you write "Fusion" twice, since any fusion summon is currently, by default, going to be that of a fusion monster and not a synchro, xyz, or link monster. See Dinomorphia Frenzy as an example, and how that card doesn't use "Fusion" twice in its fusion summoning sentence
  • When writing these fusion summoning effects, you can now end the sentence with "using monsters in your hand or field" period. No need to include "as fusion materials" anymore in such sentences
  • Similarly, you no longer need to say "If Fusion Summoning an Infernoid Fusion Monster this way, you can also banish Infernoid monsters in your GY as Fusion Materials" where you have the word "Fusion" three times in one sentence. Modern fusion summoning effects that let you perform additional actions to additional monsters as fusion material, such as banishing, don't use the word "Fusion" that much
  • Summon is always capitalized, including "Fusion Summon" and "Summoning"
  • Material no longer needs to be plural with an S at the end when using the phrase "as material"

Void Repentence's effect can be shortened from:
While this card is face-up on the field, the level of all "Infernoid" monsters you control become equal to the number of "Infernoid" monsters you control. If an "Infernoid" monster(s) is banished to summon an "Infernoid" monster, you can target one of those monsters; Special summon that monster ignoring its summoning conditions. You can only use this effect of "Void Repentence" twice per turn. Once per turn, during your End Phase; you can target one of your banished "Infernoid" monsters and either return it to the GY or your hand.
to:
The Levels of "Infernoid" monsters you control become the number of them. If an "Infernoid" monster(s) is banished by an "Infernoid" monster: You can target 1 of those banished monsters; Special Summon it ignoring its Summoning conditions. You can only use this effect of "Void Repentence" twice per turn. Once per turn, during your End Phase: Target 1 of your banished "Infernoid" monsters; return it to the hand or GY.

  • "While this card is face-up on the field, the level of all" can be shortened to simply "The Levels of". Continuous spells, by default, apply their effects only while face-up on the field anyways, so there's no need to specify that the spell has to be face-up on the field to apply
  • You can just use the word "them" as a reference to the number of Infernoid monsters you control instead of using "Infernoid monsters you control" twice in that same sentence
  • Banishing an Infernoid monster as part of another Infernoid monster's summoning requirement counts as banishing that banished monster by an Infernoid monster, just like how an opponent tributing your Archfiend's Awakening and sending it to the graveyard as a cost to summon a Kaiju counts as your Archfiend's Awakening being sent to the graveyard by the opponent's card. This means this spell's second effect's activation condition can be simplified to "banished by an Infernoid monster"
  • That last effect needs to include a semi-colon somewhere after doing any sort of targeting, and there's no need to include "either" in that effect or to specify that the target returns to "your" hand, as cards will return to their owners' hands by default when returning to hands
  • The last change I recommend isn't a grammar or problem-solving card text issue, but a recommendation that the last effect be mandatory instead of optional, allowing smart opponents to try to exploit it with spell card effect negation, promoting healthy interaction


Return to “Custom Cards”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 114 guests