Page 2 of 2

Re: The PSCT errata we deserve

Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2022 3:32 am
by eyal282
greg503 wrote:A thread for PSCT errata for old, poorly worded cards.
Here's my attempt to make Last Turn do what it should https://www.duelingbook.com/card?id=3393180

Why "the end of the phase"

Re: The PSCT errata we deserve

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 12:54 am
by greg503
eyal282 wrote:
greg503 wrote:A thread for PSCT errata for old, poorly worded cards.
Here's my attempt to make Last Turn do what it should https://www.duelingbook.com/card?id=3393180

Why "the end of the phase"

Because there shouldn't need to be another phase to check the wincon

Re: The PSCT errata we deserve

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2022 3:28 pm
by eyal282
greg503 wrote:
eyal282 wrote:
greg503 wrote:A thread for PSCT errata for old, poorly worded cards.
Here's my attempt to make Last Turn do what it should https://www.duelingbook.com/card?id=3393180

Why "the end of the phase"

Because there shouldn't need to be another phase to check the wincon


End Phase instead of "The end of the phase"

Wait, those are different.

This affects the card's effects too, as MP2 or Strike Ninja may need to come back.

Re: The PSCT errata we deserve

Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2022 8:46 pm
by eyal282
What I tried to say, is that Last Turn's effect is originally the End Phase.

The end of the phase, is the end of the Battle Phase.

Re: The PSCT errata we deserve

Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2022 9:03 pm
by eyal282
https://www.duelingbook.com/card?id=3569897

I came up with this. This is two lines shorter, also it utilizes "Must attack if able" and "Battle damage involving it becomes 0"