Card List: https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=6072829
Deck excample: https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=6072594
The green babes work off 2 themes:
1)Discarding cards as costs to use some of their effects.
2)Triggering effects when they survive battles that the opponent took no damage from.
They're one of the decks I use most often in tags. Nothing mindblowing, but pretty effective/old-school overall.
Orcesses
-
Futuregamer
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 9:44 am
- Reputation: 13
Orcesses
Last edited by Futuregamer on Sat Dec 19, 2020 11:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
What a gimmick. The deck doesn't plan to win fast (or at all). It like control, but on no damage battles involving them. I think this is the weakest deck you post so far.
-
Futuregamer
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 9:44 am
- Reputation: 13
Rocket2 wrote:What a gimmick. The deck doesn't plan to win fast (or at all). It like control, but on no damage battles involving them. I think this is the weakest deck you post so far.
The deck actually has a pretty impressive win record in both singles and tags. It doesn't win fast, but it burns through the opponent's resources at a steady rate without ever commiting too much. Also next major deck I post is probably gonna be the "Vurko" and I imagine I will get a lot of delightful comments about that, so I'm trying to release some of the small stuff first.
greg503 wrote:It's okay for a deck to be weak, like Dream Mirrors
If you had check my previous comment on Futuregamers' "Balleroid" Deck where I said "So long as I see a new consistent mechanic & not broken/troll/bad design custom decks, I'm good." I still meant it as they can be play casually. However, that doesn't mean I won't point out they are weak or gimmicky. Heck, even Futuregamer admit they are weak at his blog.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 184 guests