Orcesses

[Futuregamer]

Card List: https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=6072829

Deck excample: https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=6072594

The green babes work off 2 themes:
1)Discarding cards as costs to use some of their effects.
2)Triggering effects when they survive battles that the opponent took no damage from.

They're one of the decks I use most often in tags. Nothing mindblowing, but pretty effective/old-school overall.

[Rocket2]

What a gimmick. The deck doesn't plan to win fast (or at all). It like control, but on no damage battles involving them. I think this is the weakest deck you post so far.

[greg503]

It's okay for a deck to be weak, like Dream Mirrors

[Futuregamer]

What a gimmick. The deck doesn't plan to win fast (or at all). It like control, but on no damage battles involving them. I think this is the weakest deck you post so far.

The deck actually has a pretty impressive win record in both singles and tags. It doesn't win fast, but it burns through the opponent's resources at a steady rate without ever commiting too much. Also next major deck I post is probably gonna be the "Vurko" and I imagine I will get a lot of delightful comments about that, so I'm trying to release some of the small stuff first.

[Rocket2]

It's okay for a deck to be weak, like Dream Mirrors

If you had check my previous comment on Futuregamers' "Balleroid" Deck where I said "So long as I see a new consistent mechanic & not broken/troll/bad design custom decks, I'm good." I still meant it as they can be play casually. However, that doesn't mean I won't point out they are weak or gimmicky. Heck, even Futuregamer admit they are weak at his blog.