Duelingbook Forum

LightCaster wrote:

Christen57 wrote:

LightCaster wrote:
On an alternate account, I had customs that were made by someone else, that had art that Aromagirl deemed inappropriate but either had next to no naughty bits showing or convenient censoring by the background.

You admitted to using nsfw artworks. Were they like the artworks spidermanbaconman used for his "Lewd warrior" cards in this replay that was shared earlier? https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=106567-37498269

If so, then that would clearly be inappropriate for duelingbook, as covering a girl's butt with just micro thongs, and their boobs with just a micro bikini, isn't usually enough to properly censor them to make them appropriate. Micro thongs and micro bikinis barely cover the woman's private parts, so relying on just those to properly censor custom card female artworks could still cause them to be in violation of the rules.

Another ineffective censoring method I see some people use is using a little boob tape, or just putting a few jewels or a diamond or something, over each of the woman's tits and thinking that that'll be enough to keep it properly censored, even though the rest of the boobs are clearly showing from top to bottom. Like the micro thong/bikini stuff, these things also often barely cover enough to make the artwork appropriate.

You have to be conservative when it comes to female artworks to avoid getting penalized for an inappropriate artwork. In other words, if your want your female character to appear "sexy" or "attractive" while still being appropriate for duelingbook, don't think "what is the most amount of boobs and butt I can show while keeping my artwork within the rules" (which is pretty much what spidermanbaconman did). Instead, think "are my character's private parts well-covered, and if so, how much more skin can I cover to make the character more age-appropriate while still keeping her looking at least somewhat sexy/attractive?"
Alternatively, you can take into consideration whether or not your female character showing more skin than, say, Ib the World Chalice Justiciar?"
At least that's how I think when choosing female artworks for my customs, and editing certain artworks to be more appropriate for the site.

Aromagirl called it 100% NSFW on the principle of cleavage showing on female characters who had hilariously disproportionate figures that favored the bust or because female characters where in skin-tight outfights but didn't show any naughty bits.

Lil Oldman wrote:I did NOT need to see that today.

Christen57 wrote:

LightCaster wrote:

Christen57 wrote:
You admitted to using nsfw artworks. Were they like the artworks spidermanbaconman used for his "Lewd warrior" cards in this replay that was shared earlier? https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=106567-37498269

If so, then that would clearly be inappropriate for duelingbook, as covering a girl's butt with just micro thongs, and their boobs with just a micro bikini, isn't usually enough to properly censor them to make them appropriate. Micro thongs and micro bikinis barely cover the woman's private parts, so relying on just those to properly censor custom card female artworks could still cause them to be in violation of the rules.

Another ineffective censoring method I see some people use is using a little boob tape, or just putting a few jewels or a diamond or something, over each of the woman's tits and thinking that that'll be enough to keep it properly censored, even though the rest of the boobs are clearly showing from top to bottom. Like the micro thong/bikini stuff, these things also often barely cover enough to make the artwork appropriate.

You have to be conservative when it comes to female artworks to avoid getting penalized for an inappropriate artwork. In other words, if your want your female character to appear "sexy" or "attractive" while still being appropriate for duelingbook, don't think "what is the most amount of boobs and butt I can show while keeping my artwork within the rules" (which is pretty much what spidermanbaconman did). Instead, think "are my character's private parts well-covered, and if so, how much more skin can I cover to make the character more age-appropriate while still keeping her looking at least somewhat sexy/attractive?"
Alternatively, you can take into consideration whether or not your female character showing more skin than, say, Ib the World Chalice Justiciar?"
At least that's how I think when choosing female artworks for my customs, and editing certain artworks to be more appropriate for the site.

Aromagirl called it 100% NSFW on the principle of cleavage showing on female characters who had hilariously disproportionate figures that favored the bust or because female characters where in skin-tight outfights but didn't show any naughty bits.

You mean something like this?

Christen57 wrote:You mean something like this?

LightCaster wrote:You hit the nail right on the head

KTeknis wrote:

Christen57 wrote:You mean something like this?

LightCaster wrote:You hit the nail right on the head

If that's really the kind of artwork you were using, I think Aromagirl do have a justification on calling it NFSW.
Although I'm still confused, why you're the one getting the punishment, rather than the card creator, you said that you're using other people's card right?

LightCaster wrote:

KTeknis wrote:

Christen57 wrote:You mean something like this?

LightCaster wrote:You hit the nail right on the head

If that's really the kind of artwork you were using, I think Aromagirl do have a justification on calling it NFSW.
Although I'm still confused, why you're the one getting the punishment, rather than the card creator, you said that you're using other people's card right?

I was using another person's card. If you look up the card yourself you can see that the original creator isn't me.

Fredblade wrote:

LightCaster wrote:

KTeknis wrote:

If that's really the kind of artwork you were using, I think Aromagirl do have a justification on calling it NFSW.
Although I'm still confused, why you're the one getting the punishment, rather than the card creator, you said that you're using other people's card right?

I was using another person's card. If you look up the card yourself you can see that the original creator isn't me.

I mean, it's fair if both the person that created it and the person that uses it get their respective punishment, the creator for being the one that uploaded the image and the other for being the one that is using it and therefore, other players see it, making them uncomfortable. It's like if for example, someone gave you explicit photos to you and then you go to some public place and start flashing them at other people.

Personally, I don't care about the art but how well designed the card is, and design wise it is already obscene on its own right.

DarwisBellium92 wrote:

Fredblade wrote:

LightCaster wrote:
I was using another person's card. If you look up the card yourself you can see that the original creator isn't me.

I mean, it's fair if both the person that created it and the person that uses it get their respective punishment, the creator for being the one that uploaded the image and the other for being the one that is using it and therefore, other players see it, making them uncomfortable. It's like if for example, someone gave you explicit photos to you and then you go to some public place and start flashing them at other people.

Personally, I don't care about the art but how well designed the card is, and design wise it is already obscene on its own right.

But wasn't NSFW custom card material prohibited under Duelingbook rules?

greg503 wrote:

DarwisBellium92 wrote:

Fredblade wrote:
I mean, it's fair if both the person that created it and the person that uses it get their respective punishment, the creator for being the one that uploaded the image and the other for being the one that is using it and therefore, other players see it, making them uncomfortable. It's like if for example, someone gave you explicit photos to you and then you go to some public place and start flashing them at other people.

Personally, I don't care about the art but how well designed the card is, and design wise it is already obscene on its own right.

But wasn't NSFW custom card material prohibited under Duelingbook rules?

Yes

Fredblade wrote:Another custom creator on the blacklist, this time is MRONETURNKILL

He starts by summoning a monster straight up from his extra deck with no material requirement or effects used, just slap a monster for free. God forbid you have to draw a maindeck monster and normal summoning it.

Also his support cards are horrible, they have tons of effect and basically consist of making his monsters indestructible, boosting them and making them able to OTK, or force the opponent into attacking it while also lowering their ATK and going + in cards so he can keep refilling his BS. And he dares to ask for a first turn draw *facepalm*

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=106567-37619698

DarwisBellium92 wrote:I don't understand the sense of this player's reaction and then I get stuck because according to him I was a new player, well.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=436556-37650020

greg503 wrote:

DarwisBellium92 wrote:I don't understand the sense of this player's reaction and then I get stuck because according to him I was a new player, well.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=436556-37650020

You made a 1 card FTK. Nobody respects players who play 1 card win conditions, especially consistent, searchable ones, which I know you made

LightCaster wrote:

KTeknis wrote:

Christen57 wrote:You mean something like this?

LightCaster wrote:You hit the nail right on the head

If that's really the kind of artwork you were using, I think Aromagirl do have a justification on calling it NFSW.
Although I'm still confused, why you're the one getting the punishment, rather than the card creator, you said that you're using other people's card right?

I was using another person's card. If you look up the card yourself you can see that the original creator isn't me.