Duelingbook Forum

CrystalMusic wrote:

LightCaster wrote:

CrystalMusic wrote:
pathetic deck. only bad decks use an easy to aquire win condition
there is only 2 alt victories i use:
Exodia
Final Countdown

now considering i dont allow new support, its obvious that im running exodia as a backdoor. not purely to win.

You play a Hoarkthy deck. So yours is just as pathetic

ok i forgot about her. so make that 3. so i stand corrected!

Hoarkthy is a guy though....

Renji Asuka wrote:

CrystalMusic wrote:

LightCaster wrote:
You play a Hoarkthy deck. So yours is just as pathetic

ok i forgot about her. so make that 3. so i stand corrected!

Hoarkthy is a guy though....

https://yugioh.fandom.com/wiki/Holactie ... (character)
Gender: Female

Back to the Replays! said @KTeknis
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=21598896
This is why CrystalMusic hates cards like these
@CrystalMusic, Next time how bout you turn off the Watcher or a password like "qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcbnm" like you promise!

james123 wrote:Back to the Replays! said @KTeknis
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=21598896
This is why CrystalMusic hates cards like these
@CrystalMusic, Next time how bout you turn off the Watcher or a password like "qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcbnm" like you promise!

looking at the replay its a 7 star, they didnt have enough monsters to tribute for it. they cheated!

CrystalMusic wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:

CrystalMusic wrote:
ok i forgot about her. so make that 3. so i stand corrected!

Hoarkthy is a guy though....

https://yugioh.fandom.com/wiki/Holactie ... (character)
Gender: Female

Still male, considering its Atem's father.

Renji Asuka wrote:

CrystalMusic wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:Hoarkthy is a guy though....

https://yugioh.fandom.com/wiki/Holactie ... (character)
Gender: Female

Still male, considering its Atem's father.

Plenty of deities have been portrayed as men and women before. This is irrelevant and petty. Relax.

greg503 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:

CrystalMusic wrote:
https://yugioh.fandom.com/wiki/Holactie ... (character)
Gender: Female

Still male, considering its Atem's father.

Plenty of deities have been portrayed as men and women before. This is irrelevant and petty. Relax.

Its a lore thing.

CrystalMusic wrote:

LightCaster wrote:

CrystalMusic wrote:
pathetic deck. only bad decks use an easy to aquire win condition
there is only 2 alt victories i use:
Exodia
Final Countdown

now considering i dont allow new support, its obvious that im running exodia as a backdoor. not purely to win.

You play a Hoarkthy deck. So yours is just as pathetic

ok i forgot about her. so make that 3. so i stand corrected!

I mean your rules say: "No alternate win conditions." So I'm not surprised in the least that you'd break your own rule.

I made my Opponent laugh and shut down his broken cards!
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=90641-21686757

LightCaster wrote:

CrystalMusic wrote:

LightCaster wrote:
You play a Hoarkthy deck. So yours is just as pathetic

ok i forgot about her. so make that 3. so i stand corrected!

I mean your rules say: "No alternate win conditions." So I'm not surprised in the least that you'd break your own rule.

my rules dont say that. not the ones in my profile at least.
i have never minded exodia as long as its aquired 1 of 2 ways:
1: normally drawing it WITHOUT draw effects.
2: NOT using support that specifically lists "Forbidden One" in its effect

As for Horakhty? As long as ur not using any card that lists "The Winged Dragon of Ra" or "Obelisk The Tormentor" or "Slifer The Sky Dragon" in its effect, IDC

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-21738348 they tired using battle fusion from their hand during my turn. also, in order to use battle fusion, they must have been the one who declared the attack, not me. so they cant even activate it!

CrystalMusic wrote:

LightCaster wrote:

CrystalMusic wrote:
ok i forgot about her. so make that 3. so i stand corrected!

I mean your rules say: "No alternate win conditions." So I'm not surprised in the least that you'd break your own rule.

my rules dont say that. not the ones in my profile at least.
i have never minded exodia as long as its aquired 1 of 2 ways:
1: normally drawing it WITHOUT draw effects.
2: NOT using support that specifically lists "Forbidden One" in its effect

As for Horakhty? As long as ur not using any card that lists "The Winged Dragon of Ra" or "Obelisk The Tormentor" or "Slifer The Sky Dragon" in its effect, IDC

Wait, there's only ONE card that lists Obelisk's or Slifer's name: Ra's Disciple, a terrible card for being both a Garnet (aside from the first copy you draw) and for locking you out of special summons. Dedicated Egyptian God decks and Horakthy actually get hindered by running that monster. On the other hand, "The Winged Dragon of Ra" does have more a bit more direct support, but the general goal there is making it a viable beatstick, since Ra is the worst of the trio.

But more importantly, doesn't that mean that you would care if the opponent used Horakthy, since it has all those three cards' names in its effect?

CrystalMusic wrote:https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-21738348 they tired using battle fusion from their hand during my turn. also, in order to use battle fusion, they must have been the one who declared the attack, not me. so they cant even activate it!

You could have stopped halfway there and the post would completely hold water. It turns out Battle Fusion can be activated whether you or the opponent attacked, it only matters if there was an attack declaration involving your Fusion Monster and the opponent's monster. Sure, they were in the wrong, but, had they known the rules a bit more, it would have been a nice comeback.

Also, you shouldn't shame people for not knowing how Quick-Play Spell Cards works: https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-20304389

[0:00] CrystalMusic: CrystalMusic hosted Single (with siding) in Goat Format (Unrated) with duel note "No Discard, Mill, Wave Cannon"
...
[2:09] Horus Dragon Tamer: Normal Summoned "D.D. Warrior Lady" from hand (6/6) to M-3
[2:10] Horus Dragon Tamer: Entered Battle Phase
[2:11] Horus Dragon Tamer: Attacked Set card in M-3 with "D.D. Warrior Lady" in M-3
[2:12] CrystalMusic: Activated Set "Bottomless Trap Hole" in S-3
[2:19] Horus Dragon Tamer: Activated "My Body as a Shield" from hand (5/5)
[2:21] Horus Dragon Tamer: Lost 1500 LP
[2:22] CrystalMusic: "u cant"
[2:32] CrystalMusic: "u can only use then im chain of they were set"
[2:38] CrystalMusic: "leanr how quick plays work noob"
[2:41] CrystalMusic: Left duel

How can situations like this not become a lesson in humility?

CrystalMusic wrote:

LightCaster wrote:

CrystalMusic wrote:
ok i forgot about her. so make that 3. so i stand corrected!

I mean your rules say: "No alternate win conditions." So I'm not surprised in the least that you'd break your own rule.

my rules dont say that. not the ones in my profile at least.
i have never minded exodia as long as its aquired 1 of 2 ways:
1: normally drawing it WITHOUT draw effects.
2: NOT using support that specifically lists "Forbidden One" in its effect

As for Horakhty? As long as ur not using any card that lists "The Winged Dragon of Ra" or "Obelisk The Tormentor" or "Slifer The Sky Dragon" in its effect, IDC

So you can't have your rule be "No alternative win conditions" if you're okay with literally two of the ways of winning.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=21756783

This guy apparently thinks Masked HERO Dark Law negates whatever it banishes, so not 1 but 2 judges have to come and explain to him that this isn't true. He gets defensive and says that someone from his locals or something told him that it is. The judges tell him that this person, whoever they are, is wrong, and he refuses to believe them, even going as far as to get offended over being reminded of the rules. They give him a game loss for arguing and not cooperating.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=58994-21773263

This player tries to fusion summon a link monster, then gets salty when I tell him you can't do that.

Christen57 wrote:https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=58994-21773263

This player tries to fusion summon a link monster, then gets salty when I tell him you can't do that.

Not to mention he special summoned Indigo Eclipse twice using its once per turn summon effect.

Christen57 wrote:https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=21756783

This guy apparently thinks Masked HERO Dark Law negates whatever it banishes, so not 1 but 2 judges have to come and explain to him that this isn't true. He gets defensive and says that someone from his locals or something told him that it is. The judges tell him that this person, whoever they are, is wrong, and he refuses to believe them, even going as far as to get offended over being reminded of the rules. They give him a game loss for arguing and not cooperating.

Oh yeah He Also mocked the Great DistantCoder AKA the Holy God of Resource Judges
Also, Rez (The Dreamcast game) in Duel Form! AKA @Ignisters (Cyberspace) vs Melodious (Rhythm)
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=90641-21012313

Plus, did you know, that me and DJ professor K Duel'd 2 users with Very broken Decks (1 with a 9999 ATK Normal Gemini more broken than these 2 cards (https://www.duelingbook.com/card?id=1407381, https://www.duelingbook.com/card?id=705021) and 1 Hitman Deck with a Dirty Card that is Private at least (no pun intended) with no PSCT and more Broken Effects)
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=90641-21777443

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=21774883

Guy calls a judge over having his feelings hurt, then calls a judge a second time because the opponent acts like they know everything but said opponent gets a ruling wrong.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=21774918

Here a dinosaur player resolves Agnimazud's activated effect to destroy 2 fire monsters in his hand and special summon it, but then his opponent tries to use Solemn Judgment to negate it, even though that's an illegal play since you can't use Solemn Judgment to negate activated monster effects that special summon. The Agnimazud player apparently doesn't know this and thinks the illegal play was correct, thus overlooking it. Then said Agnimazud player tries to use Ash Blossom on the opponent's Shard of Greed, but the opponent says it's "too late". A judge comes and says it isn't, then gives him a game loss for not letting said Agnimazud player chain and resolve the Ash Blossom.

I guess someone didn't like Dora and/or watched "Dora gets Grounded"....
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=90641-21785987

Christen57 wrote:Another replay of CrystalMusic lashing out at someone for no good reason and insulting them: https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=17162913

And another replay of CrystalMusic getting mad at the opponent for playing a level 4 with 2000 ATK even though level 4's with 2000 ATK like Alexandrite Dragon already exist. https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=17162465

Alexandrite Dragon: NORMAL MONSTER
Their card: EFFECT MONSTER
THAT CHANGES THE WHOLE ASPECT!!!!