CrystalMusic wrote:Debt wrote:The point still stands, he wasn't playing a good deck nor did he play well. He had the tools to break your set up but didn't use them. Tempest isn't a good card no matter how to slice it. It's a card that only looks decent if you're going up against a bad player, a bad deck or a player who's choosing not to beat it, that's not the signs of a good card. Those are the hallmarks of a bad card.
so a card is bad not because of its effect but because the opponent chose not to try and beat it? WTF kind of logic is that?!? the way your brain works is confusing.
Tempest takes so much investment to make things indestructible BY BATTLE, it already has 2800 ATK, making it difficult to attack over, rendering its "protection" almost useless, if they had just destroyed it instantly, you would have quit, they are either trash, which you "don't duel," or a jobber making your "combo" look good in comparison, you narc. It's bad and your opponent played bad to make it look better.