Page 1 of 1

hows this for logic?

Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2020 6:26 am
by CrystalMusic
Me: *is in a duel*
Other players: "Youre bad at yugioh!"
Me: "If im so 'bad' at yugioh why is it you cant beat me in a duel? huh? Answer that!"

Re: hows this for logic?

Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2020 6:29 am
by LightCaster
Because you only gravitate to customs and make literally broken cards but don't want to accept that because you can't hear logic from the mountain we call your ego.

Re: hows this for logic?

Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2020 6:47 am
by NiwatoriFTW
Maybe you are only considering a player "beating you in a duel" if you actually click in the "Admit Defeat" button. People win against you all the time because you rage quit over the smallest of reasons (if they ever were), as seen by many players.

This duel, for example: https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=200963-13906265

It is within your rights to leave any duel you want and all that, but resorting to call the opponent a noob for using MST and rage quitting over that? Sounds like a very bad defense or coping mechanism there.

Re: hows this for logic?

Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2020 7:02 am
by Debt
1. You lack fundamental knowledge on how this game works and refuse to address this deficiency.
2. Winning while restricting what your opponents can do is not proof of skill. I could probably beat LeBron James at basketball if he was blindfolded and only allowed to use his left hand, doesn't mean I'm better than LeBron or even good at the game.
3. Bad players can still win duels, especially against other bad players.
4. You create an environment where skill differentiation doesn't exist. You can't display skill in your duels because you've robbed both players of the tools to do so. So it's not better player wins but often just luckier player wins.
5. Customs will never be an environment for displaying skill

Re: hows this for logic?

Posted: Sat Jan 11, 2020 2:13 am
by CrystalMusic
LightCaster wrote:Because you only gravitate to customs and make literally broken cards but don't want to accept that because you can't hear logic from the mountain we call your ego.


I play Advanced Format from time to time. Just not against pends, links or meta. u cant claim to be good if u need to use meta to win your duels

Re: hows this for logic?

Posted: Sat Jan 11, 2020 3:47 am
by NiwatoriFTW
CrystalMusic wrote:
LightCaster wrote:Because you only gravitate to customs and make literally broken cards but don't want to accept that because you can't hear logic from the mountain we call your ego.


I play Advanced Format from time to time. Just not against pends, links or meta. u cant claim to be good if u need to use meta to win your duels

That's quite a bold, condescending and arbitrary statement there, not to mention hypocrite. If one's claims of being good in the game are invalid just for using meta decks, then the same must go for custom cards users, specially considering unbalanced cards that makes meta a joke, like the ones you create and use. The view must be great in that glass house of yours.

Also, why can't them claim to be good, anyway? People's skills aren't measured by their resources or playing style, but how well they perform against various opponents. We all show our true colours in adversities. On the other hand, you continue being picky about what you wanna face or not and blaming people for using things that are "overused" for unknown reasons.

Re: hows this for logic?

Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2020 7:49 am
by LightCaster
NiwatoriFTW wrote:
CrystalMusic wrote:
LightCaster wrote:Because you only gravitate to customs and make literally broken cards but don't want to accept that because you can't hear logic from the mountain we call your ego.


I play Advanced Format from time to time. Just not against pends, links or meta. u cant claim to be good if u need to use meta to win your duels

That's quite a bold, condescending and arbitrary statement there, not to mention hypocrite. If one's claims of being good in the game are invalid just for using meta decks, then the same must go for custom cards users, specially considering unbalanced cards that makes meta a joke, like the ones you create and use. The view must be great in that glass house of yours.

Also, why can't them claim to be good, anyway? People's skills aren't measured by their resources or playing style, but how well they perform against various opponents. We all show our true colours in adversities. On the other hand, you continue being picky about what you wanna face or not and blaming people for using things that are "overused" for unknown reasons.

He's right you know.

Re: hows this for logic?

Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 5:36 am
by Wek
CrystalMusic wrote:Me: *is in a duel*
Other players: "Youre bad at yugioh!"
Me: "If im so 'bad' at yugioh why is it you cant beat me in a duel? huh? Answer that!"


Because you are, they can, and it's barely worth the effort to stomp one of the weakest players on the site.

Re: hows this for logic?

Posted: Sun Jan 26, 2020 9:30 am
by Neo_Fire_Sonic
Image
"ur retarded"
Image
"ur retarded"
Image

hows this for logic?
I'm apparently retarded.

Re: hows this for logic?

Posted: Sun Jan 26, 2020 9:34 am
by Debt
He's blatantly cherrypicking. The 2012 release was for Duel Terminal. Worldwide TCG was 2008
Image
It's also insanely hypocritical for him to deny Arcana Force on the grounds of release date when he gladly accepts Eye of Timaeus and friends when they were released at a much later 2014 but being in the DM anime means their fine for play.

Re: hows this for logic?

Posted: Sun Jan 26, 2020 6:25 pm
by Neo_Fire_Sonic
oh no he didn't deny it, the problem was that he couldn't comprehend that the english North american date of Light of destruction was may 13, 2008, its like he was blatantly ignoring what it said, and acting like it wasn't released in north america in 2008.
And worldwide apparently means just ocg... even though why would it mean just ocg if its "worldwide"? that would mean both ocg and TCG
If it was only OCG it would say, just OCG and not have a TCG release date.