Off Topic » Spam Paradise

Their Shield & Sword woudlnt have worked anyways due to Imperial Order

[quote="CrystalMusic":izkf2h9l]Their Shield & Sword woudlnt have worked anyways due to Imperial Order[/quote:izkf2h9l]
Neither would your Ring of Magnetism. That could have been significant.

On a second thought, Copycat can only target an opponent's monster, so that's a mistake on their part as well.

This was messier than I thought and way less interesting. Why did you share this?

Well, isn't this ironic? You proudly using a burn deck in one game but condemning its usage in a later one: https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=13672038

That is, if you can even consider Ancient Gears a burn deck. But I suppose hypocrisy doesn't matter if you have to justify a rage quit, right?

ye it do be like that with him

[quote="Silvers Rayleigh":evrqoi7c]Well, isn't this ironic? You proudly using a burn deck in one game but condemning its usage in a later one: https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=13672038

That is, if you can even consider Ancient Gears a burn deck. But I suppose hypocrisy doesn't matter if you have to justify a rage quit, right?[/quote:evrqoi7c]

-_- well funny thing is Crowler's Ancient Gears are much more powerful than Rebeccas Fire Princess. So i think im justified here.

[quote="CrystalMusic":2sbntdcd]-_- well funny thing is Crowler's Ancient Gears are much more powerful than Rebeccas Fire Princess. So i think im justified here.[/quote:2sbntdcd]
Hypocrisy is hypocrisy. And piercing damage is a form of battle damage not effect damage. You just didn't want ancient gears to destroy you.

[quote="CrystalMusic":2of09pxg][quote="Silvers Rayleigh":2of09pxg]Well, isn't this ironic? You proudly using a burn deck in one game but condemning its usage in a later one: https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=13672038

That is, if you can even consider Ancient Gears a burn deck. But I suppose hypocrisy doesn't matter if you have to justify a rage quit, right?[/quote:2of09pxg]

-_- well funny thing is Crowler's Ancient Gears are much more powerful than Rebeccas Fire Princess. So i think im justified here.[/quote:2of09pxg]
This is some classic "avoiding the question" here, as well as some straw man fallacy: Saying that using Rebecca's burn deck is "justified" because it's less powerful than Crowler's Ancient Gear deck. Which it isn't, specially when comparing cards you used, like Gravity Bind and Imperial Order.

Anyway, you take pride on winning with a burn/stall deck, but claimed that Ancient Gears have a burn effect, that burn decks are for noobs, and then rage quitted. That's the hypocrisy, if it's needed to explicit that much.

That aside, one logical conclusion for your rage quit is that you bricked so hard that would be impossible to stand a chance against the most basic Ancient Gear deck. Of course, this is bound to happen when playing with a deck built with no focus or dedicated strategy, as we can see from that replay Horus LV4, 2 different Legendary Dragon cards and Exodia.

CrystalMusic just know that it's okay to suck at yugioh
it's a children's cardgame
: ) but also be made fun by me for sucking at yugioh while calling other people "noobs" and so on

Its his game, CrystalMusic isn't allowed to lose.