Renji Asuka wrote:Sound4 wrote:Renji Asuka wrote:YOU made assumptions, so yes, it is imaginary bullshit and why should I care about having the deck be top tier? I been playing Dark Worlds SINCE Elemental Energy. It's a long time staple deck for me so any support for it makes me excited. End of story.
And your video is meaningless to me.
Also ending on a link 2 with some backrow is still bad. If you're not not stopping your opponent's plays, you're not doing anything.
If you would lose because of any board wipe, your field is bad. End of story. If Unchained were good, we'd see them in events. But we don't. At most it's a locals level deck. Which tells us that the deck can't even be considered rogue tier.
You also claim to be a good pilot, but with your track record, it's unlikely. As you can't even read what is being told to you while also lacking critical thinking skills.
I said that you should not get your hopes up since this probably won't put Dark world into top tier contention. There is no reason to play this deck at the moment.
You clearly have not understood anything on how Unchained works and my reply. The backrow is disruption and again Unchained is a control deck not a combo deck. Plus the link 2 Unchained rage allows you to link with another monster on the opponent's side. Since a pit if people start with the rite of aramesir to summon a token and get fateful to their side of the field. You can you Unchained rage to link with itself and the token making the whole Adventure Token package at that point useless as the token us very important. Since wandering gryphon can't negate without an adventure token.
Your last paragraph makes no sense. The replay actually shows a lot on how if played by a good pilot unchained can be really good. Here is a replay with me destroying swordsoul woth unchained 2-0. Swordsoul another top deck currently.
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=815175-38251953
No, you moved the goal post. You made the claim that "I was acting as if Dark Worlds would be top tier" when you're the one who brought up competitive viability. . That is VERY different than what you're attempting to claim. Now stfu and sit the fuck down and think before you even respond so you can at least BE consistent.
You then claim I don't know how unchained works, then proceed to repeat what I already said about their links? Are you just responding while not reading what is being told to you or are you just stupid?
You then proceed to claim that my last paragraph doesn't make sense, yet you choose to ignore how you constantly tried to cheat in ranked Ingeneiro so you can win. You end up stalling or even LYING to the opponent when you would lose. That tells me enough about your skills as a player.
Also if Unchained was rogue, we'd see them in regionals AT LEAST. But wait, we don't...so it isn't a "rogue" deck.
I was saying that the support would most likely not put Dark world into top tier contention especially as they already don't really have any interactions with the current meta.
I was explaining how unchained works as you clearly don't. Your 2nd to last paragraph has nothing to do with the current topic.
Plus you don't consider representation there are many decks that are tier /rogue bit don't have enough representation to get played more in big events. For example, a deck like Virtual World is currently tier 2 but don't have good representation so don't get played much. Does that mean it is a bad deck? No it just does not have enough representation.