Duelingbook Forum

CardGirlChick wrote:I'm the most respectful one here, I respect the facts and what has transpired.

The "harasssment" i've been accused of (Taken at its worst and at face value) is actually LESS than your choice of vocabulary.

I've been calm all week, all I've seen is a bunch of kids get angry when someone like me disagrees with their faulty view of the world.

Shame on you.

No you're not. this is seen by your behavior, if you think how you're acting is "respectful" then you need to re-evaluate your life choices.

Dogmatikardinal wrote:tried to report accidentally upvoted...

Lmao

CardGirlChick wrote:

Genexwrecker wrote:

CardGirlChick wrote:
I have reported them, but i'm still subject to judges like you speaking out of ignorance, including your failure to notice the 2 threads i mentioned.

Stop disrespecting my staff.

Providing constructive criticism after I myself have been disrespected far worse.

Totally justified to me.

Itsmetristan didn't disrespect you at all. He checked Dogmatikardinal's post history like I did and saw only random threads he posted, none of which match any of the threads you accused Dogmatikardinal of posting.

Also, an example of constructive criticism in this case would be asking itsmetristan to check if Dogmatikardinal was using those other accounts to impersonate and spam you. Constructive criticism is explaining what someone can do better without making it about them personally.
"speaking out of ignorance, including your failure to notice the 2 threads i mentioned" is not constructive criticism.

Disrespecting people is a part of life, I'm not suggesting it be a regular occurence, but when you're right and someone else is wrong, you get moral license.

You can be right, or wrong, without being disrespectful about it.

Nope, 2 are still visible, one is still in "introductions", one in Farewells.

No threads of Dogmatikardinal exist or ever existed in Introductions, there's just 1 thread of his that exists in Farewells https://forum.duelingbook.com/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=20665, and it neither mentions nor refers to you.

You're all wrong once again, I'll say it again; He and his ALT accounts all made those spam-threads.

CardGirlChick wrote:You're all wrong once again, I'll say it again; He and his ALT accounts all made those spam-threads.

no, I didnt. getting tired of being accused as well, so stop. ive shown my accounts, ive reported the people doing this, if you dont believe me, fine, but if you continue to accuse me without proof ill have to speak to a judge.

Dogmatikardinal wrote:tried to report accidentally upvoted...

You can click the thumbs again to remove it

CardGirlChick wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:

CardGirlChick wrote:

So telling a judge they responded out of ignorance, when even they admitted afterwards to being incorrect, is in any way a slight towards me? Look at the subject in question before you embarrass yourself by opposing me.

You still don't have the right to disrespect staff. You can still say "Hey, actually they still made these threads here and here." Instead of resorting to insults because you're mad.

Be a fucking adult.

You're walking over your own words by using the "F word", and excuse me if i dont sugar coat what I say because it might make supposed adults not 100% cheery afterwards.

Disrespecting people is a part of life, I'm not suggesting it be a regular occurence, but when you're right and someone else is wrong, you get moral license.

Calm down, fool.

You WERE right, but itsmetristan was NOT INCORRECT EITHER, he was looking based on user, not on the actual threads, so he didn't see them because those threads were not made by who you said they were. Don't disrespect people over a simple misunderstanding.

This same "repent" troll player is pulling the same stunt RIGHT NOW in a tag duel that he 100% concretely lost.

Him and his partner are in a pattern of continuous log-in/out to never time out.

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=128683-41190386

I expect an apology from all the CGC haters after you watch this.

CardGirlChick wrote:https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=128683-41190386

I expect an apology from all the CGC haters after you watch this.

If it were me, I would leave, announcing that we both know I won, because it's unrated, and no one has anything on the line. If they want to be toxic about it, just say no, their BS isn't worth your time

If i leave, the duel gets eternalized as a loss in the duel records. Which I refuse to let happen.

CardGirlChick wrote:If i leave, the duel gets eternalized as a loss in the duel records. Which I refuse to let happen.

Then why bring this up? It's unrated. People are allowed to stall in it because there are no stakes. No rewards, no EXP, no rating. If you're not going to leave the duel when this happens, that's on you.

CardGirlChick wrote:If i leave, the duel gets eternalized as a loss in the duel records. Which I refuse to let happen.

Take a bite of humble pie.

I say that because judges/admins/whoever keep thinking its ok for trolls to break rules simply because its unrated, and im explaining how that line of thinking is wrong. If there is a negative consequence/anything, then that is the motivation to not simply leave.

Has nothing to do with being humble, you just can't handle that im right and you have no valid response.

CardGirlChick wrote:I say that because judges/admins/whoever keep thinking its ok for trolls to break rules simply because its unrated, and im explaining how that line of thinking is wrong. If there is a negative consequence/anything, then that is the motivation to not simply leave.

Has nothing to do with being humble, you just can't handle that im right and you have no valid response.

Then go stay in rated.

I don't play rated, just unrated.

CardGirlChick wrote:I say that because judges/admins/whoever keep thinking its ok for trolls to break rules simply because its unrated, and im explaining how that line of thinking is wrong. If there is a negative consequence/anything, then that is the motivation to not simply leave.

Has nothing to do with being humble, you just can't handle that im right and you have no valid response.

No, you can still report that. And being toxic in unrated is still bad. But you also have the ability to just say "no" in unrated and not have to put up with a bad opponent.

You dont know if they are a "bad" opponent before a duel begins, your logic is flawed.

CardGirlChick wrote:You dont know if they are a "bad" opponent before a duel begins, your logic is flawed.

Unrated doesn't do points, so you don't need to stay when you find out

nerds