Can I get banned for spaming?

[greg503]

Even for a topic in Spam Paradise this is starting to get out of hand. Can an admin please lock this?

Yeah, why is every thread Sound4 appears in now a continuation of viewtopic.php?f=22&t=18273

[Wek]

Even for a topic in Spam Paradise this is starting to get out of hand. Can an admin please lock this?

Yeah, why is every thread Sound4 appears in now a continuation of viewtopic.php?f=22&t=18273

Well

Tbh in my opinion both parties are equally guilty of the thing not ending

Which parties?

Sound4, who keeps responding, and the people who won't let him have the last word (myself included)

There's this

[parhelia_0000]

Well, given the fact that his threads have escalated to a point where a thread lock does seem warranted, I don't think we need to allow him to have the last word. But I wonder what the admins would have to say about that.

[Sound4]

Your replies are irrelevant, read the first page of your thread. It was debunked and you should had left it at that.

I could literally say the exact same thing. Anyway everything on the first page was replied by me and explained by me. I saw flaws in what Genexwrecker was saying which I was questioning.

And you were wrong, still wrong, and will always be wrong. Everything was bunk by staff on page 1.

Not exactly I saw flaws in what Genexwrecker was saying and I was questioning them.

[Sound4]

Well, given the fact that his threads have escalated to a point where a thread lock does seem warranted, I don't think we need to allow him to have the last word. But I wonder what the admins would have to say about that.

What do you mean?

[greg503]

Well, given the fact that his threads have escalated to a point where a thread lock does seem warranted, I don't think we need to allow him to have the last word. But I wonder what the admins would have to say about that.

What do you mean?

He means that your thread with 600 posts deserves to be done

[Renji Asuka]

I could literally say the exact same thing. Anyway everything on the first page was replied by me and explained by me. I saw flaws in what Genexwrecker was saying which I was questioning.

And you were wrong, still wrong, and will always be wrong. Everything was bunk by staff on page 1.

Not exactly I saw flaws in what Genexwrecker was saying and I was questioning them.

The "flaws" you saw, are non existant. It's already been ruled that silence isn't consent and has been debunked by staff.