Silence is Consent in Yugioh Just had Confirmation

[Renji Asuka]

What have I ignored?

Everything that has been told to you, you have dismissed and you still keep this thread going.

As expected saying everything is avoiding what you sau I have "ignored" you have yet to still mention anything that I have "ignored" which makes it seem like you are lying. Mention one thing I have ignored.

Literally EVERYONE TELLING YOU THAT SILENCE ISN'T CONSENT, BUT YOU DON'T FUCKING LISTEN.

Again, IT'S ALREADY BEEN TOLD TO YOU.

[greg503]

What have I ignored?

Everything that has been told to you, you have dismissed and you still keep this thread going.

As expected saying everything is avoiding what you sau I have "ignored" you have yet to still mention anything that I have "ignored" which makes it seem like you are lying. Mention one thing I have ignored.

Genexwrecker

[Lil Oldman]

Everything that has been told to you, you have dismissed and you still keep this thread going.

As expected saying everything is avoiding what you sau I have "ignored" you have yet to still mention anything that I have "ignored" which makes it seem like you are lying. Mention one thing I have ignored.

Genexwrecker

DB Head Judge thread

[Sound4]

As expected saying everything is avoiding what you sau I have "ignored" you have yet to still mention anything that I have "ignored" which makes it seem like you are lying. Mention one thing I have ignored.

Genexwrecker

DB Head Judge thread

I actually replied to Marshie about that and nothing was ignored.

[Sound4]

Everything that has been told to you, you have dismissed and you still keep this thread going.

As expected saying everything is avoiding what you sau I have "ignored" you have yet to still mention anything that I have "ignored" which makes it seem like you are lying. Mention one thing I have ignored.

Literally EVERYONE TELLING YOU THAT SILENCE ISN'T CONSENT, BUT YOU DON'T FUCKING LISTEN.

Again, IT'S ALREADY BEEN TOLD TO YOU.

Listening and ignoring aren't the same. Plus I have been reading your replies and the others but I I showed the logs on why that isn't the case.

[Sound4]

Everything that has been told to you, you have dismissed and you still keep this thread going.

As expected saying everything is avoiding what you sau I have "ignored" you have yet to still mention anything that I have "ignored" which makes it seem like you are lying. Mention one thing I have ignored.

Genexwrecker

What have I ignored anything Genexwrecker's part?

[Renji Asuka]

As expected saying everything is avoiding what you sau I have "ignored" you have yet to still mention anything that I have "ignored" which makes it seem like you are lying. Mention one thing I have ignored.

Literally EVERYONE TELLING YOU THAT SILENCE ISN'T CONSENT, BUT YOU DON'T FUCKING LISTEN.

Again, IT'S ALREADY BEEN TOLD TO YOU.

Listening and ignoring aren't the same. Plus I have been reading your replies and the others but I I showed the logs on why that isn't the case.

Actually they are, if you don't listen to what people tell you, you're ignoring them.

You were still told by multiple staff that Silence isn't consent, YET YOU STILL fucking push that silence is consent.

You're wrong end of story, take the fucking L. Stop bumping this thread.

[Lil Oldman]

Genexwrecker

DB Head Judge thread

I actually replied to Marshie about that and nothing was ignored.

Wrong answer. The DB head judge thread says:

Does This Mean Silence is Consent?

No. However, should you continue after waiting a reasonable amount of time, the likelihood that a Judge Call is ruled in your favor increases should there be a dispute.

So either you conveniently didn't read that section, or you simply decided to ignore it.

[greg503]

As expected saying everything is avoiding what you sau I have "ignored" you have yet to still mention anything that I have "ignored" which makes it seem like you are lying. Mention one thing I have ignored.

Genexwrecker

What have I ignored anything Genexwrecker's part?

Their official conclusion

[Sound4]

DB Head Judge thread

I actually replied to Marshie about that and nothing was ignored.

Wrong answer. The DB head judge thread says:

Does This Mean Silence is Consent?

No. However, should you continue after waiting a reasonable amount of time, the likelihood that a Judge Call is ruled in your favor increases should there be a dispute.

So either you conveniently didn't read that section, or you simply decided to ignore it.

I actually read that part and how the entire thread just proves my point even further.

[Sound4]

Literally EVERYONE TELLING YOU THAT SILENCE ISN'T CONSENT, BUT YOU DON'T FUCKING LISTEN.

Again, IT'S ALREADY BEEN TOLD TO YOU.

Listening and ignoring aren't the same. Plus I have been reading your replies and the others but I I showed the logs on why that isn't the case.

Actually they are, if you don't listen to what people tell you, you're ignoring them.

You were still told by multiple staff that Silence isn't consent, YET YOU STILL fucking push that silence is consent.

You're wrong end of story, take the fucking L. Stop bumping this thread.

I have read everything that you and the others have said and provided logs and links on why that isn't the case. Plus you have still not said anything on what I have "ignored" which says to me that you have no evidence proving that and I actually did not ignore anything.

[Sound4]

Genexwrecker

What have I ignored anything Genexwrecker's part?

Their official conclusion

Which conclusion?

[Renji Asuka]

Listening and ignoring aren't the same. Plus I have been reading your replies and the others but I I showed the logs on why that isn't the case.

Actually they are, if you don't listen to what people tell you, you're ignoring them.

You were still told by multiple staff that Silence isn't consent, YET YOU STILL fucking push that silence is consent.

You're wrong end of story, take the fucking L. Stop bumping this thread.

I have read everything that you and the others have said and provided logs and links on why that isn't the case. Plus you have still not said anything on what I have "ignored" which says to me that you have no evidence proving that and I actually did not ignore anything.

Your reasons of why are irrelevant. Staff are absolute in most cases, you're still wrong.

[greg503]

What have I ignored anything Genexwrecker's part?

Their official conclusion

Which conclusion?

That you are wrong

[Lil Oldman]

I actually replied to Marshie about that and nothing was ignored.

Wrong answer. The DB head judge thread says:

Does This Mean Silence is Consent?

No. However, should you continue after waiting a reasonable amount of time, the likelihood that a Judge Call is ruled in your favor increases should there be a dispute.

So either you conveniently didn't read that section, or you simply decided to ignore it.

I actually read that part and how the entire thread just proves my point even further.

It literally says "no".

[MarshieDemon]

I was linked back to this topic by one of my Senior Administrators letting me know that there is still a dispute about this subject.

The purpose of the Q&A article was meant to specifically settle the communication debate once and for all, one that Judges have had to address on an individual-basis for years. It is not intended to be interpreted in any way other than exactly as it is written. This article was also the combined effort of every Head Administrator on the platform.

If there is any ambiguity in that article, I will be more than happy to address it. Otherwise, I am confused how this is still an issue to be debated.

[Renji Asuka]

I was linked back to this topic by one of my Senior Administrators letting me know that there is still a dispute about this subject.

The purpose of the Q&A article was meant to specifically settle the communication debate once and for all, one that Judges have had to address on an individual-basis for years. It is not intended to be interpreted in any way other than exactly as it is written. This article was also the combined effort of every Head Administrator on the platform.

If there is any ambiguity in that article, I will be more than happy to address it. Otherwise, I am confused how this is still an issue to be debated.

Here's why, it's because for some reason, Sound4 won't accept anything that is being told to him. He'll claim there is "flaws" where there is none and continue to play stupid.

There's a reason why this thread should be locked.

[MarshieDemon]

I'd rather not lock the topic if I can avoid it, since I do think there is some value in open, thought-provoking discussion about communication if somebody wanted to provide specific examples from the article that may be ambiguous or require further clarification.

However, if I find that this topic provides no value whatsoever other than people continuing to hurl pointless insults at each other, I may have to consider it.

[Renji Asuka]

I'd rather not lock the topic if I can avoid it, since I do think there is some value in open, thought-provoking discussion about communication if somebody wanted to provide specific examples from the article that may be ambiguous or require further clarification.

However, if I find that this topic provides no value whatsoever other than people continuing to hurl pointless insults at each other, I may have to consider it.

Despite the thread not providing value past page 1? Since there was already a hard stance that silence isn't consent?

[Lil Oldman]

Reading popcorn for "Ace Attorney dB: The Movie"