DarkPhenix wrote:Player1 can you please lock this thread
Honestly I dont think he will. This is the part of the forum where we "Spam" and blocking this thread does nothing really it just moves the problem elsewhere.
DarkPhenix wrote:Player1 can you please lock this thread
d1234 wrote:Christen57 wrote:d1234 wrote:I heard your opinion, and still disagree.
You all seem to be forgetting what punishment is for; to stop them from doing it again.
It is clear that Dark Cyborg will not let his friend boost, so there is no need for a permanent punishment.
The permanent punishment is what ensures that this boosting won't be done again.
A red-named judge already explained this. https://forum.duelingbook.com/viewtopic.php?p=51608#p51608
Also, a purple-named judge said they would have been forgiven for this behavior if they acted better, but they blew that chance by continuing to whine about this. https://forum.duelingbook.com/viewtopic.php?p=49769#p49769
https://forum.duelingbook.com/viewtopic.php?p=50072#p50072
The moral of this story is simple. Do not let anyone else access duelingbook using your account or network. If someone has to access duelingbook using your network, either you or them should use a proxy or Virtual Private Network (VPN) so at least you aren't tied to the same Internet Protocol (IP) Address, and that any rule-breaking they engage in can't be linked back to you.
I do not recommend that you attempt to continue these discussions, as the other thread was already locked by said red-named judge. Trying to revive these discussions after the thread was already locked can be interpreted as spamming, which is against rule 4.
Logic can ensure that boosting won’t happen, so a punishment is not needed.
And what your moral implies is, don’t trust anyone, and don’t let your friend play Dueling book at your house
Christen57 wrote:d1234 wrote:Christen57 wrote:
The permanent punishment is what ensures that this boosting won't be done again.
A red-named judge already explained this. https://forum.duelingbook.com/viewtopic.php?p=51608#p51608
Also, a purple-named judge said they would have been forgiven for this behavior if they acted better, but they blew that chance by continuing to whine about this. https://forum.duelingbook.com/viewtopic.php?p=49769#p49769
https://forum.duelingbook.com/viewtopic.php?p=50072#p50072
The moral of this story is simple. Do not let anyone else access duelingbook using your account or network. If someone has to access duelingbook using your network, either you or them should use a proxy or Virtual Private Network (VPN) so at least you aren't tied to the same Internet Protocol (IP) Address, and that any rule-breaking they engage in can't be linked back to you.
I do not recommend that you attempt to continue these discussions, as the other thread was already locked by said red-named judge. Trying to revive these discussions after the thread was already locked can be interpreted as spamming, which is against rule 4.
Logic can ensure that boosting won’t happen, so a punishment is not needed.
And what your moral implies is, don’t trust anyone, and don’t let your friend play Dueling book at your house
That's my moral because as we've seen, Dark Cyborg allowed a "friend" of his to play dueling book on his network, and said friend broke the rules on it.
A permanent punishment probably woudn't have been needed had Dark Cyborg did what the purple-named judge said and acted better and shown that he deserves a second chance, but like said purple-named judge said, Dark Cyborg blew it.
d1234 wrote:Also on the someone else using your internet note, what if you live in a apartment where everyone uses the same internet.
d1234 wrote:Christen57 wrote:d1234 wrote:Logic can ensure that boosting won’t happen, so a punishment is not needed.
And what your moral implies is, don’t trust anyone, and don’t let your friend play Dueling book at your house
That's my moral because as we've seen, Dark Cyborg allowed a "friend" of his to play dueling book on his network, and said friend broke the rules on it.
A permanent punishment probably woudn't have been needed had Dark Cyborg did what the purple-named judge said and acted better and shown that he deserves a second chance, but like said purple-named judge said, Dark Cyborg blew it.
The second chance the purple judge meant was the ability to play in unrated.
d1234 wrote:Also on the someone else using your internet note, what if you live in a apartment where everyone uses the same internet.
Amr Khalid wrote:I wouldn't say there's nothing darkcyborg could do.
He had the chance to behave at one point multiple times and he didn't take it.
Plus, "what if" games are actually important so you don't miss the timing
d1234 wrote:Also on the someone else using your internet note, what if you live in a apartment where everyone uses the same internet.
DarkPhenix wrote:Player1 can you please lock this thread
Renji Asuka wrote:d1234 wrote:Also on the someone else using your internet note, what if you live in a apartment where everyone uses the same internet.
Stop playing the what if games. In the end you aren't changing jack shit, your posts are useless. There is literally NOTHING you can do regarding this matter.
Amr Khalid wrote:I wouldn't say there's nothing darkcyborg could do.
He had the chance to behave at one point multiple times and he didn't take it.
Plus, "what if" games are actually important so you don't miss the timing
d1234 wrote:Renji Asuka wrote:d1234 wrote:Also on the someone else using your internet note, what if you live in a apartment where everyone uses the same internet.
Stop playing the what if games. In the end you aren't changing jack shit, your posts are useless. There is literally NOTHING you can do regarding this matter.
After I put my grand plan into action you will disagree.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 313 guests