I will use this thread for saving and sharing replays with others

Here you can discuss just about whatever you want
greg503
User avatar
Posts: 2373
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2017 3:43 pm
Reputation: 208
Location: Flundereeze

Re: I will use this thread for saving and sharing replays with others

Post #1701 by greg503 » Sun Oct 31, 2021 1:46 pm

AnimeMasterDub wrote:
Christen57 wrote:
Futuregamer wrote:https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=76788-33311075
What a piece of garbage. And of course the admin enables him.


[16:39] Futuregamer: "maybe you should seriously consider killing yourself"
[16:43] FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF: "oh"
[16:44] Futuregamer: "it will make your family happier"
[16:45] FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF: "so now"
[16:54] FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF: "im gonna call judge for harrassment"

[16:59] Futuregamer: "of course you are"
[17:02] Futuregamer: "you're a mystic mine player"

[17:02] FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF: "your words hurt my feelings"
[17:07] FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF: Called a judge for Cheating

[17:19] itsmetristan: "Hi. What's the issue?"
[17:19] FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF: "opponent told me to kill myself"
[17:28] FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF: "so"

[17:39] itsmetristan: "Futuregamer Care to explain?"
[17:45] Futuregamer: "He plays Mystic Mine?"
[17:51] Futuregamer: "obviously?"

[18:05] FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF: "didnt know certain cards allow for that"
[18:09] itsmetristan: "And you think that that's enough reason to tell them to kill themself?"
[18:24] Futuregamer: "Honestly I'm confused about why you don't think so too."
[18:32] Futuregamer: "And I didn't order it, I just made the suggestion."
[18:41] Futuregamer: "In my honest opinion, it would make his family happier."

[18:49] FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF: "jesus "
[18:52] itsmetristan: "I will be freezing your account for Severe Harassment"
[19:03] Futuregamer: "Sure, while you're at it, try growing some balls./"

You've gotta stop breaking duelingbook's rules just because of a specific profile pic or a card your opponent played. I hate Mystic Mine too, and I'm sure that judge does as well, but you can't keep saying stuff that would clearly get you frozen and then get mad at the judge for applying the appropriate penalty for such behavior. A judge's job is to enforce the rules, not to grow "balls".

You hate Mystic Mine that much, quit and find another opponent. NO card an opponent plays is worth another freeze to your account. Not Mystic Mine. Not Ojama Green. Nothing. You can't keep thinking that you should be allowed to get away with breaking rules if your opponent plays a card you dislike.

It hurts me seeing you get frozen once again, but if you're really "confused" about why that judge didn't "think so too" it's because if judges allowed you get away with that, it would set a dangerous precedent where breaking any rule is now perfectly okay as long as the opponent had a profile pic you didn't like or played a card you didn't like. You start getting away with breaking rules just because your opponent played Mystic Mine or wore Ojama Green, you'll have others doing the same to you and also getting away with it because they disliked the Eldlich cards you played or your Megalith Bethor pic.

"You play X card? Well you're subhuman now and I'm gonna doxx you and your loved ones and send you child porn and make death threats to you and your family because you played X card in X duel and you deserve it for playing such a card, and if you get offended, try growing some balls!"

"You have X image as your profile pic? Well I'm just gonna maliciously stall for the next hour or so since you now DeSeRvE to have your time wasted, and the admins aren't gonna do a thing about it because you cLeArLy deserve it for having such a profile pic, and if you don't like it, well, you just need to try growing some balls!"

That is what duelingbook would turn into. That is the dangerous precedent the admins would be setting if they stopped punishing rule-breakers just because their opponents played disliked cards and had disliked profile pics. That is why the admins need to enforce rules fairly no matter who played what card or had what profile pic.

While your statement may hold truth something needs to be done before too many people end up using mystic mine Konami did not bother to ban it when they made the October TCG Banlist and OCG is pretty much dead. No Matter how you put it the issue remains.

Mystic Mine is not meta enough anymore, it is not the problem deck, just play Cosmic Cyclone/Eldlich/Floowandereeze Stormforth
Buy Floowandereeze

Christen57
User avatar
Posts: 2065
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 10:37 pm
Reputation: 189
Location: New York, United States of America

Post #1702 by Christen57 » Sun Oct 31, 2021 5:01 pm

Futuregamer wrote:Personally I'm 100% for harassment, it's a matter of freedom of speech. If it gets annoying you can just ignore it or block the users, it's not something that actually impedes the game. In all my years in DB I have never once reported harassment to admins, and I receive it by the bucket daily. The only reason the admins punish it is to protect the feelings of oversensitive morons.


Freedom of speech isn't binary. It exists on a spectrum. You can have no freedom of speech, a little bit of freedom of speech, a lot of freedom of speech, or nearly infinite freedom of speech.

The admins don't punish severe harassment to "protect the feelings" of anyone. If that were the case, most of us including myself would've been banned from duelingbook by this point since we've all hurt someone else's feelings at some point. The admins punish severe harassment mainly because they rely on google ads to help keep the site running and the bills paid, and google ads has certain rules websites using it must follow if they want to be able to keep utilizing google ads.

When you visit duelingbook without any kind of ad blocker, you'll see some random ad, and when you click on it's little blue arrow, you'll see that it's a google ad.

Image

The way these basically work is that duelingbook displays these google ads on it's site to advertise products/services, and in return, google gives duelingbook a share of money to help keep duelingbook running.

However, google has a minimum set of rules that need to be followed or else it will stop giving shares of money to websites that break those rules. https://support.google.com/adsense/answer/10502938

The first thing it says is that "When you monetize your content with Google ad code you are required to adhere to the following policies."

Then it says basically that websites accepting money through google ads can't have:


Content advocating suicide, anorexia, or other self-harm; threatening someone with real-life harm or calling for the attack of another person; promoting, glorifying, or condoning violence against others; content made by or in support of terrorist groups or transnational drug trafficking organizations, or content that promotes terrorist acts, including recruitment, or that celebrates attacks by transnational drug trafficking or terrorist organizations.


This means duelingbook must have penalties in place for users who encourage suicide or commit other forms of severe harassment. Without such penalties, duelingbook will be stripped of it's main source of income — google ads — and then at that point, duelingbook will be much harder, if not impossible, to keep running.

You do not tell someone to "try growing some balls" when you're heavily dependent on them for your income.

Christen57
User avatar
Posts: 2065
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 10:37 pm
Reputation: 189
Location: New York, United States of America

Post #1703 by Christen57 » Sun Oct 31, 2021 5:04 pm

KTeknis wrote:"Never meet your heroes" Now I understands why...


Understand what? Who's the hero here?

AnimeMasterDub wrote:
Christen57 wrote:
Futuregamer wrote:https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=76788-33311075
What a piece of garbage. And of course the admin enables him.


[16:39] Futuregamer: "maybe you should seriously consider killing yourself"
[16:43] FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF: "oh"
[16:44] Futuregamer: "it will make your family happier"
[16:45] FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF: "so now"
[16:54] FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF: "im gonna call judge for harrassment"

[16:59] Futuregamer: "of course you are"
[17:02] Futuregamer: "you're a mystic mine player"

[17:02] FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF: "your words hurt my feelings"
[17:07] FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF: Called a judge for Cheating

[17:19] itsmetristan: "Hi. What's the issue?"
[17:19] FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF: "opponent told me to kill myself"
[17:28] FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF: "so"

[17:39] itsmetristan: "Futuregamer Care to explain?"
[17:45] Futuregamer: "He plays Mystic Mine?"
[17:51] Futuregamer: "obviously?"

[18:05] FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF: "didnt know certain cards allow for that"
[18:09] itsmetristan: "And you think that that's enough reason to tell them to kill themself?"
[18:24] Futuregamer: "Honestly I'm confused about why you don't think so too."
[18:32] Futuregamer: "And I didn't order it, I just made the suggestion."
[18:41] Futuregamer: "In my honest opinion, it would make his family happier."

[18:49] FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF: "jesus "
[18:52] itsmetristan: "I will be freezing your account for Severe Harassment"
[19:03] Futuregamer: "Sure, while you're at it, try growing some balls./"

You've gotta stop breaking duelingbook's rules just because of a specific profile pic or a card your opponent played. I hate Mystic Mine too, and I'm sure that judge does as well, but you can't keep saying stuff that would clearly get you frozen and then get mad at the judge for applying the appropriate penalty for such behavior. A judge's job is to enforce the rules, not to grow "balls".

You hate Mystic Mine that much, quit and find another opponent. NO card an opponent plays is worth another freeze to your account. Not Mystic Mine. Not Ojama Green. Nothing. You can't keep thinking that you should be allowed to get away with breaking rules if your opponent plays a card you dislike.

It hurts me seeing you get frozen once again, but if you're really "confused" about why that judge didn't "think so too" it's because if judges allowed you get away with that, it would set a dangerous precedent where breaking any rule is now perfectly okay as long as the opponent had a profile pic you didn't like or played a card you didn't like. You start getting away with breaking rules just because your opponent played Mystic Mine or wore Ojama Green, you'll have others doing the same to you and also getting away with it because they disliked the Eldlich cards you played or your Megalith Bethor pic.

"You play X card? Well you're subhuman now and I'm gonna doxx you and your loved ones and send you child porn and make death threats to you and your family because you played X card in X duel and you deserve it for playing such a card, and if you get offended, try growing some balls!"

"You have X image as your profile pic? Well I'm just gonna maliciously stall for the next hour or so since you now DeSeRvE to have your time wasted, and the admins aren't gonna do a thing about it because you cLeArLy deserve it for having such a profile pic, and if you don't like it, well, you just need to try growing some balls!"

That is what duelingbook would turn into. That is the dangerous precedent the admins would be setting if they stopped punishing rule-breakers just because their opponents played disliked cards and had disliked profile pics. That is why the admins need to enforce rules fairly no matter who played what card or had what profile pic.

While your statement may hold truth something needs to be done before too many people end up using mystic mine Konami did not bother to ban it when they made the October TCG Banlist and OCG is pretty much dead. No Matter how you put it the issue remains.


How is the OCG dead when they banned Mystic Mine?

AnimeMasterDub
User avatar
Posts: 2858
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 4:39 pm
Reputation: 23
Location: In the Anime Dimension

Post #1704 by AnimeMasterDub » Sun Oct 31, 2021 5:06 pm

Christen57 wrote:
KTeknis wrote:"Never meet your heroes" Now I understands why...


Understand what? Who's the hero here?

AnimeMasterDub wrote:
Christen57 wrote:
[16:39] Futuregamer: "maybe you should seriously consider killing yourself"
[16:43] FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF: "oh"
[16:44] Futuregamer: "it will make your family happier"
[16:45] FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF: "so now"
[16:54] FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF: "im gonna call judge for harrassment"

[16:59] Futuregamer: "of course you are"
[17:02] Futuregamer: "you're a mystic mine player"

[17:02] FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF: "your words hurt my feelings"
[17:07] FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF: Called a judge for Cheating

[17:19] itsmetristan: "Hi. What's the issue?"
[17:19] FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF: "opponent told me to kill myself"
[17:28] FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF: "so"

[17:39] itsmetristan: "Futuregamer Care to explain?"
[17:45] Futuregamer: "He plays Mystic Mine?"
[17:51] Futuregamer: "obviously?"

[18:05] FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF: "didnt know certain cards allow for that"
[18:09] itsmetristan: "And you think that that's enough reason to tell them to kill themself?"
[18:24] Futuregamer: "Honestly I'm confused about why you don't think so too."
[18:32] Futuregamer: "And I didn't order it, I just made the suggestion."
[18:41] Futuregamer: "In my honest opinion, it would make his family happier."

[18:49] FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF: "jesus "
[18:52] itsmetristan: "I will be freezing your account for Severe Harassment"
[19:03] Futuregamer: "Sure, while you're at it, try growing some balls./"

You've gotta stop breaking duelingbook's rules just because of a specific profile pic or a card your opponent played. I hate Mystic Mine too, and I'm sure that judge does as well, but you can't keep saying stuff that would clearly get you frozen and then get mad at the judge for applying the appropriate penalty for such behavior. A judge's job is to enforce the rules, not to grow "balls".

You hate Mystic Mine that much, quit and find another opponent. NO card an opponent plays is worth another freeze to your account. Not Mystic Mine. Not Ojama Green. Nothing. You can't keep thinking that you should be allowed to get away with breaking rules if your opponent plays a card you dislike.

It hurts me seeing you get frozen once again, but if you're really "confused" about why that judge didn't "think so too" it's because if judges allowed you get away with that, it would set a dangerous precedent where breaking any rule is now perfectly okay as long as the opponent had a profile pic you didn't like or played a card you didn't like. You start getting away with breaking rules just because your opponent played Mystic Mine or wore Ojama Green, you'll have others doing the same to you and also getting away with it because they disliked the Eldlich cards you played or your Megalith Bethor pic.

"You play X card? Well you're subhuman now and I'm gonna doxx you and your loved ones and send you child porn and make death threats to you and your family because you played X card in X duel and you deserve it for playing such a card, and if you get offended, try growing some balls!"

"You have X image as your profile pic? Well I'm just gonna maliciously stall for the next hour or so since you now DeSeRvE to have your time wasted, and the admins aren't gonna do a thing about it because you cLeArLy deserve it for having such a profile pic, and if you don't like it, well, you just need to try growing some balls!"

That is what duelingbook would turn into. That is the dangerous precedent the admins would be setting if they stopped punishing rule-breakers just because their opponents played disliked cards and had disliked profile pics. That is why the admins need to enforce rules fairly no matter who played what card or had what profile pic.

While your statement may hold truth something needs to be done before too many people end up using mystic mine Konami did not bother to ban it when they made the October TCG Banlist and OCG is pretty much dead. No Matter how you put it the issue remains.


How is the OCG dead when they banned Mystic Mine?

because no one in rated does ocg i tried
Image
Image
Image

Futuregamer
Posts: 127
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 9:44 am
Reputation: 13

Post #1705 by Futuregamer » Sun Oct 31, 2021 5:31 pm

Christen57 wrote:You do not tell someone to "try growing some balls" when you're heavily dependent on them for your income.[/size]

Heh... I never realised DB uses ads because I use an ad-blocker, I always thought they had just contacted cardmarket or the troll&toad directly, like they had with Dueling Network.
Alright, if that's the case I admit I was being unfair to the judge (I do still support the MM player killing themselves though, just like all MM players should).

...Honestly if using DB supports Google I might stop using it entirely. I have switched to DuckduckGo for about two years for that same reason.

greg503
User avatar
Posts: 2373
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2017 3:43 pm
Reputation: 208
Location: Flundereeze

Post #1706 by greg503 » Sun Oct 31, 2021 5:52 pm

Christen57 wrote:How is the OCG dead when they banned Mystic Mine?

Maxx "C", Chicken Game, Vanities Emptiness, Kaiser Colosseum lmao
Buy Floowandereeze

Christen57
User avatar
Posts: 2065
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 10:37 pm
Reputation: 189
Location: New York, United States of America

Post #1707 by Christen57 » Sun Oct 31, 2021 10:42 pm

Futuregamer wrote:
Christen57 wrote:You do not tell someone to "try growing some balls" when you're heavily dependent on them for your income.[/size]

Heh... I never realised DB uses ads because I use an ad-blocker, I always thought they had just contacted cardmarket or the troll&toad directly, like they had with Dueling Network.
Alright, if that's the case I admit I was being unfair to the judge (I do still support the MM player killing themselves though, just like all MM players should).

...Honestly if using DB supports Google I might stop using it entirely. I have switched to DuckduckGo for about two years for that same reason.


Using duelingbook doesn't support google. Using duelingbook supports duelingbook. Google just assists in making that possible.

greg503 wrote:
Christen57 wrote:How is the OCG dead when they banned Mystic Mine?

Maxx "C", Chicken Game, Vanities Emptiness, Kaiser Colosseum lmao


https://roadoftheking.com/ocg-2021-10-metagame-report-0/

The OCG hardly plays Chicken Game or Kaiser Colosseum, most of them do play Maxx "C", but very few of them main deck or even side deck Vanity's Emptiness.

greg503
User avatar
Posts: 2373
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2017 3:43 pm
Reputation: 208
Location: Flundereeze

Post #1708 by greg503 » Mon Nov 01, 2021 2:37 am

Christen57 wrote:
greg503 wrote:
Christen57 wrote:How is the OCG dead when they banned Mystic Mine?

Maxx "C", Chicken Game, Vanities Emptiness, Kaiser Colosseum lmao


https://roadoftheking.com/ocg-2021-10-metagame-report-0/

The OCG hardly plays Chicken Game or Kaiser Colosseum, most of them do play Maxx "C", but very few of them main deck or even side deck Vanity's Emptiness.

It's almost like OCG players have a different mindset about abusing broken effects
Buy Floowandereeze

KTeknis
User avatar
Posts: 727
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 12:32 pm
Reputation: 77

Post #1709 by KTeknis » Mon Nov 01, 2021 5:26 am

Christen57 wrote:Understand what? Who's the hero here?

Well let's just say... I overidealized someone...
I have interest in badly designed custom cards.
You saw these cards as terrible, I saw them as ideas.

Christen57
User avatar
Posts: 2065
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 10:37 pm
Reputation: 189
Location: New York, United States of America

Post #1710 by Christen57 » Mon Nov 01, 2021 3:29 pm

KTeknis wrote:
Christen57 wrote:Understand what? Who's the hero here?

Well let's just say... I overidealized someone...


Who?

Futuregamer
Posts: 127
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 9:44 am
Reputation: 13

Post #1711 by Futuregamer » Mon Nov 01, 2021 8:51 pm

Christen57 wrote:
KTeknis wrote:
Christen57 wrote:Understand what? Who's the hero here?

Well let's just say... I overidealized someone...


Who?

Oh, come on, who do you think?

Christen57
User avatar
Posts: 2065
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 10:37 pm
Reputation: 189
Location: New York, United States of America

Post #1712 by Christen57 » Tue Nov 02, 2021 3:13 pm

Futuregamer wrote:
Christen57 wrote:
KTeknis wrote:Well let's just say... I overidealized someone...


Who?

Oh, come on, who do you think?


Either one of us maybe?

Zack223
User avatar
Posts: 103
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2021 3:31 pm
Reputation: 6
Mood:

Post #1713 by Zack223 » Tue Nov 02, 2021 3:45 pm

Look at this Degenerate Combo and it's Degenerate End Board https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=731601-33393627 Please watch
Image

Zacian best Pokemon he is fucking cool

Zack223
User avatar
Posts: 103
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2021 3:31 pm
Reputation: 6
Mood:

Post #1714 by Zack223 » Tue Nov 02, 2021 5:20 pm

OH LOOK! another Degenerate Combo? https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=731601-33396311 UwU
Image

Zacian best Pokemon he is fucking cool

Futuregamer
Posts: 127
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 9:44 am
Reputation: 13

Post #1715 by Futuregamer » Tue Nov 02, 2021 11:19 pm

Zack223 wrote:OH LOOK! another Degenerate Combo? https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=731601-33396311 UwU

The first one took you 6 reshuffles, so I stopped watching, the second one is a vanguard deck, so I stopped watching. & noone's interested in solo mode.

Renji Asuka
User avatar
Posts: 2708
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2018 4:37 am
Reputation: 246

Post #1716 by Renji Asuka » Wed Nov 03, 2021 8:16 am

Futuregamer wrote:https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=76788-33311075
What a piece of garbage. And of course the admin enables him.

Imagine telling or suggesting people to off themselves because of a card that is legal to play in the TCG/OCG.

Imagine lying about the situation....bruh...
Image
Showing people that I'm The King of Games since September 30, 1996.

Futuregamer
Posts: 127
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 9:44 am
Reputation: 13

Post #1717 by Futuregamer » Thu Nov 04, 2021 3:19 am

Renji Asuka wrote:
Futuregamer wrote:https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=76788-33311075
What a piece of garbage. And of course the admin enables him.

Imagine telling or suggesting people to off themselves because of a card that is legal to play in the TCG/OCG.

Imagine lying about the situation....bruh...

How am I lying? I posted the replay right there, it has all the proof.

Renji Asuka
User avatar
Posts: 2708
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2018 4:37 am
Reputation: 246

Post #1718 by Renji Asuka » Thu Nov 04, 2021 3:39 am

Futuregamer wrote:
Renji Asuka wrote:
Futuregamer wrote:https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=76788-33311075
What a piece of garbage. And of course the admin enables him.

Imagine telling or suggesting people to off themselves because of a card that is legal to play in the TCG/OCG.

Imagine lying about the situation....bruh...

How am I lying? I posted the replay right there, it has all the proof.

The lie is "admin enables him" no, the admin did not.

There is 0 excuse you can make that makes it fine to tell people to off themselves (suggesting or otherwise).

That is not appropriate behavior. Don't be a shitty person.
Image
Showing people that I'm The King of Games since September 30, 1996.

Futuregamer
Posts: 127
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 9:44 am
Reputation: 13

Post #1719 by Futuregamer » Thu Nov 04, 2021 3:45 am

Renji Asuka wrote:
Futuregamer wrote:
Renji Asuka wrote:Imagine telling or suggesting people to off themselves because of a card that is legal to play in the TCG/OCG.

Imagine lying about the situation....bruh...

How am I lying? I posted the replay right there, it has all the proof.

The lie is "admin enables him" no, the admin did not.

There is 0 excuse you can make that makes it fine to tell people to off themselves (suggesting or otherwise).

That is not appropriate behavior. Don't be a shitty person.

The admin acted exclusively to protect the feefies of the Mystic Mine player, how is that not enabling?
(edit: And obviously the MM player was looking for excuses from the start, look at how he phrased it before the admin call "your words hurt my feelings". These people need to have their teeth broken in) There is no harm that these people don't deserve.

Renji Asuka
User avatar
Posts: 2708
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2018 4:37 am
Reputation: 246

Post #1720 by Renji Asuka » Thu Nov 04, 2021 8:16 am

Futuregamer wrote:
Renji Asuka wrote:
Futuregamer wrote:How am I lying? I posted the replay right there, it has all the proof.

The lie is "admin enables him" no, the admin did not.

There is 0 excuse you can make that makes it fine to tell people to off themselves (suggesting or otherwise).

That is not appropriate behavior. Don't be a shitty person.

The admin acted exclusively to protect the feefies of the Mystic Mine player, how is that not enabling?
(edit: And obviously the MM player was looking for excuses from the start, look at how he phrased it before the admin call "your words hurt my feelings". These people need to have their teeth broken in) There is no harm that these people don't deserve.

No, it's the admin enforcing the rules.

Harassment Severe
Threatening, physical, violent, or overly abusive conduct:
- Telling another member you want them to die, without being provoked.
- Telling another member you are going to kill them or physically harm them.
- Threatening another member's family, household, well-being, etc. by saying that they or their property will be personally harmed.

Also no, they didn't "ask for it".

There is 0 reason to ever suggest to a person or even tell another person to off themselves over a card game. There is 0 reason for YOU to take out whatever bullshit is going on with you on another person who has nothing to do with it. Don't be a shitty person. It's not hard.
Image
Showing people that I'm The King of Games since September 30, 1996.


Return to “Spam Paradise”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 91 guests