master rule 34 discussion

Here you can have intellectually stimulating conversations.
ChosenUndead
User avatar
Posts: 344
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2017 6:43 pm
Reputation: 0
Location: Lordran
Mood:

master rule 34 discussion

Post #1 by ChosenUndead » Wed Aug 30, 2017 4:28 pm

Actually, it's not Link Monsters that are disliked by the community, it's Master Rule 4. It's Master Rule 4 that people dislike, not the Link Monsters. The Link Monsters themselves are fine, but many people dislike Master Rule 4 because of the Extra Deck limitation. The Extra Deck limitation is the reason why people are angry, not Link Monsters themselves. Master Rule 4 is the problem because it severely limits the Extra Deck, it's not Link Monsters by themselves. The problem people have is not Link Monsters in general, but Master Rule 4 and the changes it brings. Look at it (Master Rule 4 and Links) this way:
If it was just Link Monsters, people wouldn't have a problem. People don't really have a problem with Link Monsters. But the problem is in the fact that Master Rule 4 prevents you from using other Extra Deck monsters without Links.
Master Rule 4 is the actual issue. Without it, people wouldn't be angry. Master Rule 4 makes it so that you cannot use your Extra Deck like you did before without using Link Monsters, which is why people are angry.
That's kinda the whole deal in a nutshell, and the reason why people are angry at Master Rule 4, not the Link Monsters themselves. The proper way to handle this would be getting rid of Master Rule 4 (which restricts Extra Deck usage without Link monsters), but keeping Link Monsters, since they aren't a problem by themselves. I hope that clears things up, and shows the reason why people are angry (that being the inclusion of Master Rule 4, not exactly Link Monsters).
tiny
small
normal
large
huge

Return to “Serious Discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 75 guests