Duelingbook Forum

Renji Asuka wrote:

Sound4 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:3rd Reply from the bottom on Page 1.

Their words exactly "I dont trust anyone that tells me something."

Now, do you want to stop being stupid? Or are you going to smarten up and keep your mouth shut so you don't make more of a fool of yourself?

"I asked judge nicely, no judge refused to send me anything. If he did that, i would say thank you and im sorry. "
I recommend paying attention more when you are reading. Also that quote refers to a statement with nothing to back it up. Again you either clearly did not read properly or misunderstood.

Ah yes, the whole "Maybe you should pay attention while I selectively read" argument.

Thank you for confirming that you are wrong. Have a nice day.

greg503 wrote:

Sound4 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:3rd Reply from the bottom on Page 1.

Their words exactly "I dont trust anyone that tells me something."

Now, do you want to stop being stupid? Or are you going to smarten up and keep your mouth shut so you don't make more of a fool of yourself?

"I asked judge nicely, no judge refused to send me anything. If he did that, i would say thank you and im sorry. "
I recommend paying attention more when you are reading. Also that quote refers to a statement with nothing to back it up. Again you either clearly did not read properly or misunderstood.

The whole point of (head) judges is that they know the rules, so if they say something is against the rules then they ARE the source

Judges aren't perfect and has been criticised many times of judges making ruling mistakes.

DarwisBellium92 wrote:This is drama, not a serious discussion bruh...

The nosense never ending story...

Don't bother reading then in the first place.

Sound4 wrote:

greg503 wrote:

Sound4 wrote:"I asked judge nicely, no judge refused to send me anything. If he did that, i would say thank you and im sorry. "
I recommend paying attention more when you are reading. Also that quote refers to a statement with nothing to back it up. Again you either clearly did not read properly or misunderstood.

The whole point of (head) judges is that they know the rules, so if they say something is against the rules then they ARE the source

Judges aren't perfect and has been criticised many times of judges making ruling mistakes.

Of which this is unanimously NOT one of them

Sound4 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:

Sound4 wrote:"I asked judge nicely, no judge refused to send me anything. If he did that, i would say thank you and im sorry. "
I recommend paying attention more when you are reading. Also that quote refers to a statement with nothing to back it up. Again you either clearly did not read properly or misunderstood.

Ah yes, the whole "Maybe you should pay attention while I selectively read" argument.

Thank you for confirming that you are wrong. Have a nice day.

Ah yes, the guy who makes himself to be a hypocrite without realizing, then proceeds he is in the right.

But hey, I didn't know you advocated for blatant cheating.

Renji Asuka wrote:

Sound4 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:Ah yes, the whole "Maybe you should pay attention while I selectively read" argument.

Thank you for confirming that you are wrong. Have a nice day.

Ah yes, the guy who makes himself to be a hypocrite without realizing, then proceeds he is in the right.

But hey, I didn't know you advocated for blatant cheating.

Elaborate on the "hypocrite" part. I said that you are a hypocrite since you said about me that you it is important to show sources to what what I am saying instead of saying "type x thing". You proceed to do the same thing by the saying "look on master duel". It is incredibly hypocritical. Also don't jump to conclusions who said I am advocating cheating? You completely missed the point. Pay attention. What I said that you are a hypocrite based on what you said on what this topic is about. Also you intentionally misinterpreting quotes and once you saw that I proved you wrong. You gave a weak argument. Don't jump to conclusions before reading properly. Have a nice day.

greg503 wrote:

Sound4 wrote:

greg503 wrote:The whole point of (head) judges is that they know the rules, so if they say something is against the rules then they ARE the source

Judges aren't perfect and has been criticised many times of judges making ruling mistakes.

Of which this is unanimously NOT one of them

Of course the point is that the person wanted a source on why the judge thought that.

Sound4 wrote:

greg503 wrote:

Sound4 wrote:Judges aren't perfect and has been criticised many times of judges making ruling mistakes.

Of which this is unanimously NOT one of them

Of course the point is that the person wanted a source on why the judge thought that.

Which is where they misunderstand that the judge does not need to give a source, end of story

Sound4 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:

Sound4 wrote:Thank you for confirming that you are wrong. Have a nice day.

Ah yes, the guy who makes himself to be a hypocrite without realizing, then proceeds he is in the right.

But hey, I didn't know you advocated for blatant cheating.

Elaborate on the "hypocrite" part. I said that you are a hypocrite since you said about me that you it is important to show sources to what what I am saying instead of saying "type x thing". You proceed to do the same thing by the saying "look on master duel". It is incredibly hypocritical. Also don't jump to conclusions who said I am advocating cheating? You completely missed the point. Pay attention. What I said that you are a hypocrite based on what you said on what this topic is about. Also you intentionally misinterpreting quotes and once you saw that I proved you wrong. You gave a weak argument. Don't jump to conclusions before reading properly. Have a nice day.

I don't need to elaborate on anything since you're incapable of reading.

Renji Asuka wrote:

Sound4 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:Ah yes, the guy who makes himself to be a hypocrite without realizing, then proceeds he is in the right.

But hey, I didn't know you advocated for blatant cheating.

Elaborate on the "hypocrite" part. I said that you are a hypocrite since you said about me that you it is important to show sources to what what I am saying instead of saying "type x thing". You proceed to do the same thing by the saying "look on master duel". It is incredibly hypocritical. Also don't jump to conclusions who said I am advocating cheating? You completely missed the point. Pay attention. What I said that you are a hypocrite based on what you said on what this topic is about. Also you intentionally misinterpreting quotes and once you saw that I proved you wrong. You gave a weak argument. Don't jump to conclusions before reading properly. Have a nice day.

I don't need to elaborate on anything since you're incapable of reading.

Very weak and vague argument. Is it that you have realised that you misinterpreted what the user said? or are you in denial? Either way you have been proven wrong with facts and evidence which you have no answer for. Have a nice day.

greg503 wrote:

Sound4 wrote:

greg503 wrote:Of which this is unanimously NOT one of them

Of course the point is that the person wanted a source on why the judge thought that.

Which is where they misunderstand that the judge does not need to give a source, end of story

The point is that the user didn't see much of a reason why the judge thought that and wanted a source. A judge in well within their rights to provide a source which I I have seen been done.

Sound4 wrote:

greg503 wrote:

Sound4 wrote:Of course the point is that the person wanted a source on why the judge thought that.

Which is where they misunderstand that the judge does not need to give a source, end of story

The point is that the user didn't see much of a reason why the judge thought that and wanted a source. A judge in well within their rights to provide a source which I I have seen been done.

They are also well within their rights to not in a scenario as obvious as this.

Sound4 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:

Sound4 wrote:Elaborate on the "hypocrite" part. I said that you are a hypocrite since you said about me that you it is important to show sources to what what I am saying instead of saying "type x thing". You proceed to do the same thing by the saying "look on master duel". It is incredibly hypocritical. Also don't jump to conclusions who said I am advocating cheating? You completely missed the point. Pay attention. What I said that you are a hypocrite based on what you said on what this topic is about. Also you intentionally misinterpreting quotes and once you saw that I proved you wrong. You gave a weak argument. Don't jump to conclusions before reading properly. Have a nice day.

I don't need to elaborate on anything since you're incapable of reading.

Very weak and vague argument. Is it that you have realised that you misinterpreted what the user said? or are you in denial? Either way you have been proven wrong with facts and evidence which you have no answer for. Have a nice day.

It isn't weak or vague, you just refuse to read. There's a difference.

If you actually cared to have a conversation, you wouldn't be intellectually dishonest.

And yes, nearly every thread you get into, you're always intellectually dishonest.

The endless and useless words battle...

Renji Asuka wrote:

Sound4 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:I don't need to elaborate on anything since you're incapable of reading.

Very weak and vague argument. Is it that you have realised that you misinterpreted what the user said? or are you in denial? Either way you have been proven wrong with facts and evidence which you have no answer for. Have a nice day.

It isn't weak or vague, you just refuse to read. There's a difference.

If you actually cared to have a conversation, you wouldn't be intellectually dishonest.

And yes, nearly every thread you get into, you're always intellectually dishonest.

Incorrect you realised that you misinterpreted what the user said and refuse to admit. You have been proven wrong with facts and evidence which you have no answer. That is the truth. This isn't my opinion this is purely facts supported with evidence. You know it just accept it. Have a nice day.

greg503 wrote:

Sound4 wrote:

greg503 wrote:Which is where they misunderstand that the judge does not need to give a source, end of story

The point is that the user didn't see much of a reason why the judge thought that and wanted a source. A judge in well within their rights to provide a source which I I have seen been done.

They are also well within their rights to not in a scenario as obvious as this.

The user did which is what they are complaining about.

Sound4 wrote:

greg503 wrote:

Sound4 wrote:The point is that the user didn't see much of a reason why the judge thought that and wanted a source. A judge in well within their rights to provide a source which I I have seen been done.

They are also well within their rights to not in a scenario as obvious as this.

The user did which is what they are complaining about.

And they can complain, but it doesn't change anything

Sound4 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:

Sound4 wrote:Very weak and vague argument. Is it that you have realised that you misinterpreted what the user said? or are you in denial? Either way you have been proven wrong with facts and evidence which you have no answer for. Have a nice day.

It isn't weak or vague, you just refuse to read. There's a difference.

If you actually cared to have a conversation, you wouldn't be intellectually dishonest.

And yes, nearly every thread you get into, you're always intellectually dishonest.

Incorrect you realised that you misinterpreted what the user said and refuse to admit. You have been proven wrong with facts and evidence which you have no answer. That is the truth. This isn't my opinion this is purely facts supported with evidence. You know it just accept it. Have a nice day.

once again you're showing how you're intellectually dishonest.

Renji Asuka wrote:

Sound4 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:It isn't weak or vague, you just refuse to read. There's a difference.

If you actually cared to have a conversation, you wouldn't be intellectually dishonest.

And yes, nearly every thread you get into, you're always intellectually dishonest.

Incorrect you realised that you misinterpreted what the user said and refuse to admit. You have been proven wrong with facts and evidence which you have no answer. That is the truth. This isn't my opinion this is purely facts supported with evidence. You know it just accept it. Have a nice day.

once again you're showing how you're intellectually dishonest.

Explain. Oh sorry you can't. You know why? It is because you have been proven wrong with facts and evidence.

Sound4 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:

Sound4 wrote:Incorrect you realised that you misinterpreted what the user said and refuse to admit. You have been proven wrong with facts and evidence which you have no answer. That is the truth. This isn't my opinion this is purely facts supported with evidence. You know it just accept it. Have a nice day.

once again you're showing how you're intellectually dishonest.

Explain. Oh sorry you can't. You know why? It is because you have been proven wrong with facts and evidence.

You claim I can't, yet I already have, which is more proof you don't read and all you do is just worry about what your next response is going to be.