Judge not working their job properly

[Sound4]

3rd Reply from the bottom on Page 1.

Their words exactly "I dont trust anyone that tells me something."

Now, do you want to stop being stupid? Or are you going to smarten up and keep your mouth shut so you don't make more of a fool of yourself?

"I asked judge nicely, no judge refused to send me anything. If he did that, i would say thank you and im sorry. "
I recommend paying attention more when you are reading. Also that quote refers to a statement with nothing to back it up. Again you either clearly did not read properly or misunderstood.

Ah yes, the whole "Maybe you should pay attention while I selectively read" argument.

Thank you for confirming that you are wrong. Have a nice day.

[Sound4]

3rd Reply from the bottom on Page 1.

Their words exactly "I dont trust anyone that tells me something."

Now, do you want to stop being stupid? Or are you going to smarten up and keep your mouth shut so you don't make more of a fool of yourself?

"I asked judge nicely, no judge refused to send me anything. If he did that, i would say thank you and im sorry. "
I recommend paying attention more when you are reading. Also that quote refers to a statement with nothing to back it up. Again you either clearly did not read properly or misunderstood.

The whole point of (head) judges is that they know the rules, so if they say something is against the rules then they ARE the source

Judges aren't perfect and has been criticised many times of judges making ruling mistakes.

[Sound4]

This is drama, not a serious discussion bruh...

The nosense never ending story...

Don't bother reading then in the first place.

[greg503]

"I asked judge nicely, no judge refused to send me anything. If he did that, i would say thank you and im sorry. "
I recommend paying attention more when you are reading. Also that quote refers to a statement with nothing to back it up. Again you either clearly did not read properly or misunderstood.

The whole point of (head) judges is that they know the rules, so if they say something is against the rules then they ARE the source

Judges aren't perfect and has been criticised many times of judges making ruling mistakes.

Of which this is unanimously NOT one of them

[Renji Asuka]

"I asked judge nicely, no judge refused to send me anything. If he did that, i would say thank you and im sorry. "
I recommend paying attention more when you are reading. Also that quote refers to a statement with nothing to back it up. Again you either clearly did not read properly or misunderstood.

Ah yes, the whole "Maybe you should pay attention while I selectively read" argument.

Thank you for confirming that you are wrong. Have a nice day.

Ah yes, the guy who makes himself to be a hypocrite without realizing, then proceeds he is in the right.

But hey, I didn't know you advocated for blatant cheating.

[Sound4]

Ah yes, the whole "Maybe you should pay attention while I selectively read" argument.

Thank you for confirming that you are wrong. Have a nice day.

Ah yes, the guy who makes himself to be a hypocrite without realizing, then proceeds he is in the right.

But hey, I didn't know you advocated for blatant cheating.

Elaborate on the "hypocrite" part. I said that you are a hypocrite since you said about me that you it is important to show sources to what what I am saying instead of saying "type x thing". You proceed to do the same thing by the saying "look on master duel". It is incredibly hypocritical. Also don't jump to conclusions who said I am advocating cheating? You completely missed the point. Pay attention. What I said that you are a hypocrite based on what you said on what this topic is about. Also you intentionally misinterpreting quotes and once you saw that I proved you wrong. You gave a weak argument. Don't jump to conclusions before reading properly. Have a nice day.

[Sound4]

The whole point of (head) judges is that they know the rules, so if they say something is against the rules then they ARE the source

Judges aren't perfect and has been criticised many times of judges making ruling mistakes.

Of which this is unanimously NOT one of them

Of course the point is that the person wanted a source on why the judge thought that.

[greg503]

Judges aren't perfect and has been criticised many times of judges making ruling mistakes.

Of which this is unanimously NOT one of them

Of course the point is that the person wanted a source on why the judge thought that.

Which is where they misunderstand that the judge does not need to give a source, end of story

[Renji Asuka]

Thank you for confirming that you are wrong. Have a nice day.

Ah yes, the guy who makes himself to be a hypocrite without realizing, then proceeds he is in the right.

But hey, I didn't know you advocated for blatant cheating.

Elaborate on the "hypocrite" part. I said that you are a hypocrite since you said about me that you it is important to show sources to what what I am saying instead of saying "type x thing". You proceed to do the same thing by the saying "look on master duel". It is incredibly hypocritical. Also don't jump to conclusions who said I am advocating cheating? You completely missed the point. Pay attention. What I said that you are a hypocrite based on what you said on what this topic is about. Also you intentionally misinterpreting quotes and once you saw that I proved you wrong. You gave a weak argument. Don't jump to conclusions before reading properly. Have a nice day.

I don't need to elaborate on anything since you're incapable of reading.

[Sound4]

Ah yes, the guy who makes himself to be a hypocrite without realizing, then proceeds he is in the right.

But hey, I didn't know you advocated for blatant cheating.

Elaborate on the "hypocrite" part. I said that you are a hypocrite since you said about me that you it is important to show sources to what what I am saying instead of saying "type x thing". You proceed to do the same thing by the saying "look on master duel". It is incredibly hypocritical. Also don't jump to conclusions who said I am advocating cheating? You completely missed the point. Pay attention. What I said that you are a hypocrite based on what you said on what this topic is about. Also you intentionally misinterpreting quotes and once you saw that I proved you wrong. You gave a weak argument. Don't jump to conclusions before reading properly. Have a nice day.

I don't need to elaborate on anything since you're incapable of reading.

Very weak and vague argument. Is it that you have realised that you misinterpreted what the user said? or are you in denial? Either way you have been proven wrong with facts and evidence which you have no answer for. Have a nice day.

[Sound4]

Of which this is unanimously NOT one of them

Of course the point is that the person wanted a source on why the judge thought that.

Which is where they misunderstand that the judge does not need to give a source, end of story

The point is that the user didn't see much of a reason why the judge thought that and wanted a source. A judge in well within their rights to provide a source which I I have seen been done.

[greg503]

Of course the point is that the person wanted a source on why the judge thought that.

Which is where they misunderstand that the judge does not need to give a source, end of story

The point is that the user didn't see much of a reason why the judge thought that and wanted a source. A judge in well within their rights to provide a source which I I have seen been done.

They are also well within their rights to not in a scenario as obvious as this.

[Renji Asuka]

Elaborate on the "hypocrite" part. I said that you are a hypocrite since you said about me that you it is important to show sources to what what I am saying instead of saying "type x thing". You proceed to do the same thing by the saying "look on master duel". It is incredibly hypocritical. Also don't jump to conclusions who said I am advocating cheating? You completely missed the point. Pay attention. What I said that you are a hypocrite based on what you said on what this topic is about. Also you intentionally misinterpreting quotes and once you saw that I proved you wrong. You gave a weak argument. Don't jump to conclusions before reading properly. Have a nice day.

I don't need to elaborate on anything since you're incapable of reading.

Very weak and vague argument. Is it that you have realised that you misinterpreted what the user said? or are you in denial? Either way you have been proven wrong with facts and evidence which you have no answer for. Have a nice day.

It isn't weak or vague, you just refuse to read. There's a difference.

If you actually cared to have a conversation, you wouldn't be intellectually dishonest.

And yes, nearly every thread you get into, you're always intellectually dishonest.

[DarwisBellium92]

The endless and useless words battle...

[Sound4]

I don't need to elaborate on anything since you're incapable of reading.

Very weak and vague argument. Is it that you have realised that you misinterpreted what the user said? or are you in denial? Either way you have been proven wrong with facts and evidence which you have no answer for. Have a nice day.

It isn't weak or vague, you just refuse to read. There's a difference.

If you actually cared to have a conversation, you wouldn't be intellectually dishonest.

And yes, nearly every thread you get into, you're always intellectually dishonest.

Incorrect you realised that you misinterpreted what the user said and refuse to admit. You have been proven wrong with facts and evidence which you have no answer. That is the truth. This isn't my opinion this is purely facts supported with evidence. You know it just accept it. Have a nice day.

[Sound4]

Which is where they misunderstand that the judge does not need to give a source, end of story

The point is that the user didn't see much of a reason why the judge thought that and wanted a source. A judge in well within their rights to provide a source which I I have seen been done.

They are also well within their rights to not in a scenario as obvious as this.

The user did which is what they are complaining about.

[greg503]

The point is that the user didn't see much of a reason why the judge thought that and wanted a source. A judge in well within their rights to provide a source which I I have seen been done.

They are also well within their rights to not in a scenario as obvious as this.

The user did which is what they are complaining about.

And they can complain, but it doesn't change anything

[Renji Asuka]

Very weak and vague argument. Is it that you have realised that you misinterpreted what the user said? or are you in denial? Either way you have been proven wrong with facts and evidence which you have no answer for. Have a nice day.

It isn't weak or vague, you just refuse to read. There's a difference.

If you actually cared to have a conversation, you wouldn't be intellectually dishonest.

And yes, nearly every thread you get into, you're always intellectually dishonest.

Incorrect you realised that you misinterpreted what the user said and refuse to admit. You have been proven wrong with facts and evidence which you have no answer. That is the truth. This isn't my opinion this is purely facts supported with evidence. You know it just accept it. Have a nice day.

once again you're showing how you're intellectually dishonest.

[Sound4]

It isn't weak or vague, you just refuse to read. There's a difference.

If you actually cared to have a conversation, you wouldn't be intellectually dishonest.

And yes, nearly every thread you get into, you're always intellectually dishonest.

Incorrect you realised that you misinterpreted what the user said and refuse to admit. You have been proven wrong with facts and evidence which you have no answer. That is the truth. This isn't my opinion this is purely facts supported with evidence. You know it just accept it. Have a nice day.

once again you're showing how you're intellectually dishonest.

Explain. Oh sorry you can't. You know why? It is because you have been proven wrong with facts and evidence.

[Renji Asuka]

Incorrect you realised that you misinterpreted what the user said and refuse to admit. You have been proven wrong with facts and evidence which you have no answer. That is the truth. This isn't my opinion this is purely facts supported with evidence. You know it just accept it. Have a nice day.

once again you're showing how you're intellectually dishonest.

Explain. Oh sorry you can't. You know why? It is because you have been proven wrong with facts and evidence.

You claim I can't, yet I already have, which is more proof you don't read and all you do is just worry about what your next response is going to be.