Being "Right" Vs Being Correct.
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2022 11:25 pm
it seems most of you are more focused on being "right" then being factually correct, rather, you are more interested in being "the least wrong" an example of this would be:
Player A: "If my opponent destroys my set artifact with Cosmic cyclone, do i still get to special summon it?"
Player B: "No, it is banished, not destroyed"
Player C: "UHM ACTUALLY monsters cant be put in the Spell and trap zone in the first place according to the rulebook, except pendulums"
Notice how player C ignored the question entirely and tried to correct the already correct answer.
That seems to be how a majority of you argue, Ive seen a lot of this type of argumentum ad infinitum, trying to prove who is the "least wrong" without proving either side correct.
this is a symptom of a bad faith argument, if you or someone you see does this, just acknowlage they dont even believe the nonsense theyre arguing.
Player A: "If my opponent destroys my set artifact with Cosmic cyclone, do i still get to special summon it?"
Player B: "No, it is banished, not destroyed"
Player C: "UHM ACTUALLY monsters cant be put in the Spell and trap zone in the first place according to the rulebook, except pendulums"
Notice how player C ignored the question entirely and tried to correct the already correct answer.
That seems to be how a majority of you argue, Ive seen a lot of this type of argumentum ad infinitum, trying to prove who is the "least wrong" without proving either side correct.
this is a symptom of a bad faith argument, if you or someone you see does this, just acknowlage they dont even believe the nonsense theyre arguing.