Duelingbook Forum

This morning, I was attempting to copy (via ctrl + c) the name of a card to paste it in the chat (via ctrl + v, enter.) The copy command did not work for me, and I ended up pasting the last thing I had copied on my computer before entering DuelingBook: a link to a gay porn video. I was immediately shocked and apologized within seconds.

Even though this was an accident, the judges froze me. Not only that, but they also froze me beyond the 1-7 days range listed in the Rules (for 12 days.)

How is that "judging" and taking context into account? You are freezing your player base for honest accidents? What message is that sending? Or rather, what did I do wrong here that I deserve to be punished for?

This targeting is starting to feel like blatant homophobia and discrimination from the judges team towards me.

I literally told you we were discussing it in the judge chat. you didnt even wait for the outcome. I got the okay to remove the freeze so ur good to go.

Overreacting by just a little

Why do I have the feeling that GayNProud didn't do it by accident, but did it as a troll.

Renji Asuka wrote:Why do I have the feeling that GayNProud didn't do it by accident, but did it as a troll.

I assure you, they talked that possibility over

greg503 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:Why do I have the feeling that GayNProud didn't do it by accident, but did it as a troll.

I assure you, they talked that possibility over

Oh I'm sure they have.

Suprised the judge wannabes didnt rush to defend this judge who very clearly (and admitted) to wrongdoing.

Excellion wrote:Suprised the judge wannabes didnt rush to defend this judge who very clearly (and admitted) to wrongdoing.

the freeze was 100% legitimate and warranted as there is no excuse to ever post porn on the site even if by "accident". We just decided we didnt think it was needed to be kept to prevent future issues.

https://www.duelingbook.com/rules

Linking to adult material or other inappropriate content in a public chat, or in private message to a user not expecting it:
- Linking to a screamer.
- Linking to adult content. <-
- Posting spoilers for new movies for the sole intention of ruining it for others.

Excellion wrote:Suprised the judge wannabes didnt rush to defend this judge who very clearly (and admitted) to wrongdoing.

Not quite, but also, I would trust someone who can admit to and reflect on mistakes, eh Mr. "Somewhat responsible for 5+ locked threads"

greg503 wrote:

Excellion wrote:Suprised the judge wannabes didnt rush to defend this judge who very clearly (and admitted) to wrongdoing.

Not quite, but also, I would trust someone who can admit to and reflect on mistakes, eh Mr. "Somewhat responsible for 5+ locked threads"

weird how in none of those threads did i resort to namecalling, telling the other person to "shut the f*ck up" or willingly spread misinformation, i think even saying "somewhat responsible" is giving me too much credit.

Why is it always that any of you guys says a thing, y'all inmediately start talking shit to each other.

Excellion wrote:

greg503 wrote:

Excellion wrote:Suprised the judge wannabes didnt rush to defend this judge who very clearly (and admitted) to wrongdoing.

Not quite, but also, I would trust someone who can admit to and reflect on mistakes, eh Mr. "Somewhat responsible for 5+ locked threads"

weird how in none of those threads did i resort to namecalling, telling the other person to "shut the f*ck up" or willingly spread misinformation, i think even saying "somewhat responsible" is giving me too much credit.

I mean, you clearly would call judges homophobic...

Renji Asuka wrote:

Excellion wrote:

greg503 wrote:Not quite, but also, I would trust someone who can admit to and reflect on mistakes, eh Mr. "Somewhat responsible for 5+ locked threads"

weird how in none of those threads did i resort to namecalling, telling the other person to "shut the f*ck up" or willingly spread misinformation, i think even saying "somewhat responsible" is giving me too much credit.

I mean, you clearly would call judges homophobic...

Yes, stating that saying lgbtq people deserve less rights... is homophobic, thats not name calling, its just an accurate observation, which has already been covered.

Excellion wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:

Excellion wrote:weird how in none of those threads did i resort to namecalling, telling the other person to "shut the f*ck up" or willingly spread misinformation, i think even saying "somewhat responsible" is giving me too much credit.

I mean, you clearly would call judges homophobic...

Yes, stating that saying lgbtq people deserve less rights... is homophobic, thats not name calling, its just an accurate observation, which has already been covered.

saying they don't deserve a right that others don't have isn't homophobic it just points out there's an inequality that shouldn't be there.
so you are stating something false about judges which would be under name calling

Excellion wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:

Excellion wrote:weird how in none of those threads did i resort to namecalling, telling the other person to "shut the f*ck up" or willingly spread misinformation, i think even saying "somewhat responsible" is giving me too much credit.

I mean, you clearly would call judges homophobic...

Yes, stating that saying lgbtq people deserve less rights... is homophobic, thats not name calling, its just an accurate observation, which has already been covered.

You also been told the context and you still scream "homophobic". So yes, it is name calling.

Excellion wrote:

greg503 wrote:

Excellion wrote:Suprised the judge wannabes didnt rush to defend this judge who very clearly (and admitted) to wrongdoing.

Not quite, but also, I would trust someone who can admit to and reflect on mistakes, eh Mr. "Somewhat responsible for 5+ locked threads"

weird how in none of those threads did i resort to namecalling, telling the other person to "shut the f*ck up" or willingly spread misinformation, i think even saying "somewhat responsible" is giving me too much credit.

You're right, you're fully responsible

greg503 wrote:

Excellion wrote:

greg503 wrote:Not quite, but also, I would trust someone who can admit to and reflect on mistakes, eh Mr. "Somewhat responsible for 5+ locked threads"

weird how in none of those threads did i resort to namecalling, telling the other person to "shut the f*ck up" or willingly spread misinformation, i think even saying "somewhat responsible" is giving me too much credit.

You're right, you're fully responsible

I guarantee you, it's not just him.

If anything, all Excelion is doing is bringing out the absolute worst of certain people to the point where I can no longer take them seriously either.

troglyte wrote:

greg503 wrote:

Excellion wrote:weird how in none of those threads did i resort to namecalling, telling the other person to "shut the f*ck up" or willingly spread misinformation, i think even saying "somewhat responsible" is giving me too much credit.

You're right, you're fully responsible

I guarantee you, it's not just him.

If anything, all Excelion is doing is bringing out the absolute worst of certain people to the point where I can no longer take them seriously either.

I would argue he doesn't even do that.

He's just needs a waaaaaahmbulance

Everytime I make a thread, y'all just find a way to fight with each other. Smh.

GayNProud wrote:Everytime I make a thread, y'all just find a way to fight with each other. Smh.

grab some popcorn I guess cause this show ain't stopping anytime soon