Judge Apologists need to STFU

Here you can have intellectually stimulating conversations.
apocralyph
Posts: 66
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 1:45 am
Reputation: 2

Re: Judge Apologists need to STFU

Post #61 by apocralyph » Thu Jul 14, 2022 9:45 pm

Christen57 wrote:
apocralyph wrote:
Christen57 wrote:
"Narrow scope" meaning?



Where did she give such confirmation?



Well whether she previously did or didn't know, she knows now. The reason for your shadowban was narrowed down to those 2 possibilities: You, or the other user who was on your VPN, posting rule-breaking stuff on the main menu.

No, they dont :) and you cant prove otherwise.


She just said it. That's the proof.

So youre claiming youre a judge? still not proof, just speculation, you dont know how to prove an argument, sherlock :)

Lil Oldman
User avatar
Posts: 1733
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2018 11:23 pm
Reputation: 178
Location: Toontown
Mood:

Post #62 by Lil Oldman » Thu Jul 14, 2022 9:47 pm

Christen57 wrote:
Lil Oldman wrote:
Christen57 wrote:
I apologize for quoting the wrong person, but my point regarding your actions still stands, Apocralyph: The reason for your shadowban was narrowed down to 2 possibilities, both of which are correct: You posted rule-breaking stuff on the main menu, and you used a VPN which gave someone else the opportunity to get himself along with you shadowbanned.



What do you need to prove that for? If you're male, you choose the Male option. If you're female, you choose the Female option. If you choose the incorrect option, the worst that ends up happening is you getting mistakenly addressed as one gender when you're the other gender.

Again, why do we have that feature if it is so insignificant. It barely matters if you are a man or a woman, so it is obvious it is for personalization purposes, so why limit it to a considerably narrow scope.


"Narrow scope" meaning?

This might be a shocker, but you aren't Yuma Tsukumo, and I am not a man with a briefcase head. Why can we represent ourselves with such liberty, but can't say that I am not into guys/girls by default?
It has a narrow scope in that way. The feature is purely aesthetic, so it makes no sense for it to be restricted in just 2 options that don't represent a part of the community.
"Complacency? How rude. I live the stifling life of a high school student in our problematic modern society."
Help I cannot remove this music from my head
https://youtu.be/ZuXI7qcNsHQ
Will try reviewing custom cards if they look interesting.

Christen57
User avatar
Posts: 2033
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 10:37 pm
Reputation: 182
Location: New York, United States of America

Post #63 by Christen57 » Thu Jul 14, 2022 9:48 pm

apocralyph wrote:
Christen57 wrote:
apocralyph wrote:No, they dont :) and you cant prove otherwise.


She just said it. That's the proof.

So youre claiming youre a judge?


No, but she's a judge. I'm going off of what she said, off of what you posted and admitted to doing, and off of the sole purpose of shadowbans.

Chrisfen57
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2022 9:50 pm
Reputation: 1

Post #64 by Chrisfen57 » Thu Jul 14, 2022 9:52 pm

Genexwrecker wrote:I remember people who calmly provide good points in an argument. The people posting arent sucking up to me and their posts dont change how I think of them. I just remember good points made so i can apply it to improvement of the site. Thanks for your concern.

Please mommy i told all the bad dumb people who disagreed with you theyre wrong and bad and dumb on the internet please mommy please let me see those toes, lemme get a sniff im mommies good boy please

Christen57
User avatar
Posts: 2033
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 10:37 pm
Reputation: 182
Location: New York, United States of America

Post #65 by Christen57 » Thu Jul 14, 2022 9:54 pm

Chrisfen57 wrote:
Genexwrecker wrote:I remember people who calmly provide good points in an argument. The people posting arent sucking up to me and their posts dont change how I think of them. I just remember good points made so i can apply it to improvement of the site. Thanks for your concern.

Please mommy i told all the bad dumb people who disagreed with you theyre wrong and bad and dumb on the internet please mommy please let me see those toes, lemme get a sniff im mommies good boy please


Image

Genexwrecker
User avatar
Posts: 2665
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 10:52 pm
Reputation: 396

Post #66 by Genexwrecker » Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:08 pm

Fucking lmao XD
Official Duelingbook Support staff
Official Duelingbook Resource Judge
Official Duelingbook Tournament Admin.(Other tournament Admin is Runzy)

greg503
User avatar
Posts: 2333
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2017 3:43 pm
Reputation: 199
Location: Flundereeze

Post #67 by greg503 » Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:14 pm

If I had a nickel for every time I saw someone be impersonated on these forums, I'd have two nickels. Which isn't a lot, but it's weird that it happened twice.
Buy Floowandereeze

greg503
User avatar
Posts: 2333
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2017 3:43 pm
Reputation: 199
Location: Flundereeze

Post #68 by greg503 » Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:16 pm

Anyways, it's probably time for Marshie to tell people to stop posting in circles
Buy Floowandereeze

Wek
Posts: 260
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2018 6:34 pm
Reputation: 42

Post #69 by Wek » Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:55 pm

Lil Oldman wrote:I am not a man with a briefcase head.


You mean this whole time you've been lying about your gender? :o You're a woman with a briefcase head?

Wek
Posts: 260
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2018 6:34 pm
Reputation: 42

Post #70 by Wek » Thu Jul 14, 2022 10:55 pm

greg503 wrote:If I had a nickel for every time I saw someone be impersonated on these forums, I'd have two nickels. Which isn't a lot, but it's weird that it happened twice.


DOOM!

Renji Asuka
User avatar
Posts: 2680
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2018 4:37 am
Reputation: 242

Post #71 by Renji Asuka » Fri Jul 15, 2022 12:16 am

I Only Play Water Decks wrote:
Plum Blossom wrote:Defending judges is sad dude.



All jokes aside I haven't seen other judges saying anything homophobic. Plus it's just impossible to have someone online all the time, we have work, school etc.


The homophobic thing is mostly from Genex from their replies on a forum post for someone asking for an NB option.
https://imgur.com/a/AFe9Al6

What exactly is "homophobic" to you?

Cause all I see is facts.

If facts are homophobic, then that says more about you than it does about the facts.
Image
Showing people that I'm The King of Games since September 30, 1996.

troglyte
User avatar
Posts: 474
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2017 9:23 pm
Reputation: 93
Mood:

Post #72 by troglyte » Fri Jul 15, 2022 2:36 am

Renji Asuka wrote:
I Only Play Water Decks wrote:
Plum Blossom wrote:Defending judges is sad dude.



All jokes aside I haven't seen other judges saying anything homophobic. Plus it's just impossible to have someone online all the time, we have work, school etc.


The homophobic thing is mostly from Genex from their replies on a forum post for someone asking for an NB option.
https://imgur.com/a/AFe9Al6

What exactly is "homophobic" to you?

Cause all I see is facts.

If facts are homophobic, then that says more about you than it does about the facts.

Saying that an opinion is a fact does not automatically make it fact. That's not how facts work.
Crab Turtle respects your pronouns.
he/him
Sign the Crab Turtle petition here! http://chng.it/J4rvHFFfZG

Christen57
User avatar
Posts: 2033
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 10:37 pm
Reputation: 182
Location: New York, United States of America

Post #73 by Christen57 » Fri Jul 15, 2022 2:40 am

troglyte wrote:
Renji Asuka wrote:
I Only Play Water Decks wrote:
The homophobic thing is mostly from Genex from their replies on a forum post for someone asking for an NB option.
https://imgur.com/a/AFe9Al6

What exactly is "homophobic" to you?

Cause all I see is facts.

If facts are homophobic, then that says more about you than it does about the facts.

Saying that an opinion is a fact does not automatically make it fact. That's not how facts work.


What "opinion" did he claim was a fact?

Renji Asuka
User avatar
Posts: 2680
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2018 4:37 am
Reputation: 242

Post #74 by Renji Asuka » Fri Jul 15, 2022 2:52 am

troglyte wrote:
Renji Asuka wrote:
I Only Play Water Decks wrote:
The homophobic thing is mostly from Genex from their replies on a forum post for someone asking for an NB option.
https://imgur.com/a/AFe9Al6

What exactly is "homophobic" to you?

Cause all I see is facts.

If facts are homophobic, then that says more about you than it does about the facts.

Saying that an opinion is a fact does not automatically make it fact. That's not how facts work.

Genetics back up what Genexwrecker claims.

Science backs up what Genexwrecker claims.

Men cannot get pregnant.

Women can never become a man.

Men can never become a woman.

Gender Dysphoria is classified as a mental illness.

Denying these things doesn't make it true.
Image
Showing people that I'm The King of Games since September 30, 1996.

troglyte
User avatar
Posts: 474
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2017 9:23 pm
Reputation: 93
Mood:

Post #75 by troglyte » Fri Jul 15, 2022 3:01 am

Renji Asuka wrote:
troglyte wrote:
Renji Asuka wrote:What exactly is "homophobic" to you?

Cause all I see is facts.

If facts are homophobic, then that says more about you than it does about the facts.

Saying that an opinion is a fact does not automatically make it fact. That's not how facts work.

Genetics back up what Genexwrecker claims.

Science backs up what Genexwrecker claims.

Women can never become a man.

Gender Dysphoria is classified as a mental illness.

Denying these things doesn't make it true.


Enough with the tribalistic chanting. Did you copypaste that?

Science did support that claim at one point. But then science changed. There's several fields of science studying gender, sex, and their relationship with each other.

Science may be 'set in stone' but guess what? Stone can be carved.

If these threads have taught me anything, it's that yugioh players are not qualified to be discussing gender politics of any kind. That includes you too, Genex.
Crab Turtle respects your pronouns.
he/him
Sign the Crab Turtle petition here! http://chng.it/J4rvHFFfZG

Renji Asuka
User avatar
Posts: 2680
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2018 4:37 am
Reputation: 242

Post #76 by Renji Asuka » Fri Jul 15, 2022 3:12 am

troglyte wrote:
Renji Asuka wrote:
troglyte wrote:Saying that an opinion is a fact does not automatically make it fact. That's not how facts work.

Genetics back up what Genexwrecker claims.

Science backs up what Genexwrecker claims.

Women can never become a man.

Gender Dysphoria is classified as a mental illness.

Denying these things doesn't make it true.


Enough with the tribalistic chanting. Did you copypaste that?

Science did support that claim at one point. But then science changed. There's several fields of science studying gender, sex, and their relationship with each other.

Science may be 'set in stone' but guess what? Stone can be carved.

If these threads have taught me anything, it's that yugioh players are not qualified to be discussing gender politics of any kind. That includes you too, Genex.

History, science.

All this proves what I have stated is a fact.

Name 1 person from 1732 that was a man who gave birth.

Name 1 person in 1507 that was a man who gave birth.

Name 1 person in 1232 that was a woman that changed into a man.

Name 1 person in 1100 AD that was a woman that changed into a man.

Name 1 person in 1843 where a woman impregnated a man.

Odds are, you can't.

There are universal truths and this is one of them.
Image
Showing people that I'm The King of Games since September 30, 1996.

troglyte
User avatar
Posts: 474
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2017 9:23 pm
Reputation: 93
Mood:

Post #77 by troglyte » Fri Jul 15, 2022 3:47 am

Renji Asuka wrote:
troglyte wrote:
Renji Asuka wrote:Genetics back up what Genexwrecker claims.

Science backs up what Genexwrecker claims.

Women can never become a man.

Gender Dysphoria is classified as a mental illness.

Denying these things doesn't make it true.


Enough with the tribalistic chanting. Did you copypaste that?

Science did support that claim at one point. But then science changed. There's several fields of science studying gender, sex, and their relationship with each other.

Science may be 'set in stone' but guess what? Stone can be carved.

If these threads have taught me anything, it's that yugioh players are not qualified to be discussing gender politics of any kind. That includes you too, Genex.

History, science.

All this proves what I have stated is a fact.

Name 1 person from 1732 that was a man who gave birth.

Name 1 person in 1507 that was a man who gave birth.

Name 1 person in 1232 that was a woman that changed into a man.

Name 1 person in 1100 AD that was a woman that changed into a man.

Name 1 person in 1843 where a woman impregnated a man.

Odds are, you can't.

There are universal truths and this is one of them.


First of all, those are just random dates which I'm guessing you pulled out of a number generator, so I'm just going to ignore that. Gee, it's almost like I'm not talking to a real person.

You missed the point of what I was saying. Back then society (and as a result, scientists as well) didn't understand gender expression and sexuality as well as today. Historians wouldn't understand nor know what to do with that information when it happened back then.

Also, STOP TALKING ABOUT PREGNANT MEN. You're literally the only one here talking about that, and it's creeping me out.
Crab Turtle respects your pronouns.
he/him
Sign the Crab Turtle petition here! http://chng.it/J4rvHFFfZG

Genexwrecker
User avatar
Posts: 2665
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 10:52 pm
Reputation: 396

Post #78 by Genexwrecker » Fri Jul 15, 2022 3:55 am

oh boy you would hate Seahorses XD
Official Duelingbook Support staff
Official Duelingbook Resource Judge
Official Duelingbook Tournament Admin.(Other tournament Admin is Runzy)

Renji Asuka
User avatar
Posts: 2680
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2018 4:37 am
Reputation: 242

Post #79 by Renji Asuka » Fri Jul 15, 2022 5:11 am

troglyte wrote:
Renji Asuka wrote:
troglyte wrote:
Enough with the tribalistic chanting. Did you copypaste that?

Science did support that claim at one point. But then science changed. There's several fields of science studying gender, sex, and their relationship with each other.

Science may be 'set in stone' but guess what? Stone can be carved.

If these threads have taught me anything, it's that yugioh players are not qualified to be discussing gender politics of any kind. That includes you too, Genex.

History, science.

All this proves what I have stated is a fact.

Name 1 person from 1732 that was a man who gave birth.

Name 1 person in 1507 that was a man who gave birth.

Name 1 person in 1232 that was a woman that changed into a man.

Name 1 person in 1100 AD that was a woman that changed into a man.

Name 1 person in 1843 where a woman impregnated a man.

Odds are, you can't.

There are universal truths and this is one of them.


First of all, those are just random dates which I'm guessing you pulled out of a number generator, so I'm just going to ignore that. Gee, it's almost like I'm not talking to a real person.

You missed the point of what I was saying. Back then society (and as a result, scientists as well) didn't understand gender expression and sexuality as well as today. Historians wouldn't understand nor know what to do with that information when it happened back then.

Also, STOP TALKING ABOUT PREGNANT MEN. You're literally the only one here talking about that, and it's creeping me out.


So your argument amounts to nothing more than "lalalala I can't hear you! Lalalalalalala"

You also tell me to stop talking about pregnant men. But aren't you arguing the idea that a woman can become a man and vice versa? And thus a man can be pregnant? Or are you backing out of that argument because you know how foolish it is?

@Genexwrecker, good thing I'm talking about humans. Otherwise we can talk about clownfish :P
Image
Showing people that I'm The King of Games since September 30, 1996.

Excellion
Posts: 228
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2020 9:25 pm
Reputation: 4

Post #80 by Excellion » Fri Jul 15, 2022 5:25 am

Renji Asuka wrote:
I Only Play Water Decks wrote:
Plum Blossom wrote:Defending judges is sad dude.



All jokes aside I haven't seen other judges saying anything homophobic. Plus it's just impossible to have someone online all the time, we have work, school etc.


The homophobic thing is mostly from Genex from their replies on a forum post for someone asking for an NB option.
https://imgur.com/a/AFe9Al6

What exactly is "homophobic" to you?

Cause all I see is facts.

If facts are homophobic, then that says more about you than it does about the facts.

"lgbtq people have too many rights" isnt homophobic? but when the genexwrecker impersonator posted the same phrase, replacing "lgbtq" with "black" we all agreed its racist.


Return to “Serious Discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 73 guests