Duelingbook Forum

d1234 wrote:

troglyte wrote:My balls are clenched.

Also, hello Dark Cyborg. Yes, we ALL know this is your alt.

Actually, this is not an alt of Dark Cyborg’s

Okay Dark Cyborg.

Renji Asuka wrote:

d1234 wrote:

troglyte wrote:My balls are clenched.

Also, hello Dark Cyborg. Yes, we ALL know this is your alt.

Actually, this is not an alt of Dark Cyborg’s

Okay Dark Cyborg.

Dude, he's not, Dark cyborg joined 2017, d1234 joined march 2020 and banned from rated was created on November 2020. The story just doesn't add up. But that does not delete the fact that he's spewing pure nonsense, he has a clear https://www.duelingbook.com/card?id=2057491

Uhh, dude, usually when a person is punished on the site, is when the alt accounts are created. The fact they were created 3 years later takes nothing away from the fact he is most likely an alt.

d1234 joined before this even happened. If you check the now locked "Banned from rated", you can see that it was created in November 2020, he joined on march on 2020, about 7-8 months prior to the incident.

That does not mean he is not an alt.

DarkPhenix wrote:That does not mean he is not an alt.

Indeed, that name is very alt like, but not necessarily Dark Cyborg's alt

d1234 wrote:

greg503 wrote:If the admins were the oppressive tyrants you want to paint them as, wouldn't they attempt to suppress your posts?

Does the originalthread being locked men any thing to you.

No, because a sequel thread was made, you posted on it, and you have made this thread, they could have completely kept you from further posting, or deleted posts and threads that complain.

To Darkphenix.
How? Really like, will Dark Cyborg just make an Stan Account just to TRY getting his account unbanned? Even, Dark Cyborg and d1234 have a way different way to talk and it doesn't make sense, was he banned during march, then made the account but decided not to do a post about it, but 7-8 months later decided to make it anyway?

I really dont care

bruh momento

greg503 wrote:

DarkPhenix wrote:That does not mean he is not an alt.

Indeed, that name is very alt like, but not necessarily Dark Cyborg's alt

Correct. I made this alt for testing pirposes

Lil Oldman wrote:

d1234 wrote:

Lil Oldman wrote:1- You are dark Cyborg, so you have been punished
1.1- Your signature
1.2- Dark Cyborg hardly ever posts (or never)
1.3- Dark Cyborg has only seen your profile, even though I initially side by his side.
2,3,4- Retroactiveness isnt just about the past problems, but to adapt, hence the use of it upon Dark Cyvorg.
5- If someone gets everyone banned in a network, it is everyone's fault on not preventing it.

Now if you allow me, lol

1- I am not Dark Cyborg
2,3,4- Put that in the rules then
5- this is false

2,3,4 they are.
5 prove it.

2,3,4- no
5- Do you not think it is wrong to punish someone for something they didn’t do?

d1234 wrote:

Lil Oldman wrote:

d1234 wrote:1- I am not Dark Cyborg
2,3,4- Put that in the rules then
5- this is false

2,3,4 they are.
5 prove it.

2,3,4- no
5- Do you not think it is wrong to punish someone for something they didn’t do?

2,3,4- Rules state

Offenses are not limited to examples given in italics.

5- Rules state and no, I do not think it is wrong.

You are responsible for all activity performed on your account and/or network, even if other individuals break the rules using them.

these points have already been addressed.

you guys are just arguing in circles.

Lil Oldman wrote:

d1234 wrote:

Lil Oldman wrote:
2,3,4 they are.
5 prove it.

2,3,4- no
5- Do you not think it is wrong to punish someone for something they didn’t do?

2,3,4- Rules state

Offenses are not limited to examples given in italics.

5- Rules state and no, I do not think it is wrong.

You are responsible for all activity performed on your account and/or network, even if other individuals break the rules using them.

2,3,4- They, them are limited by the green
5- I think this rule is a problem, as I have stated because it is biased against poor and elderly people, not saving it doesn’t exist

me atm: https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=166&v=0SWSgdAENcs (like just those 3 seconds)
Anyway, what's the point now? They are not going to change it. You may not like it but I will just quote Youtuber Tom Scott

I am not saying that's how it should be, I am saying how it is.

Point being, they thought it would be ythe best for everyone or the great majority, so bam, punish and lots of places can ban a network for evading a punishment, mostly videogames or media like wikipedia. (it blocked all associated IP's with the church of scientology)

However the 6th problem on DB that is way worse than the Other 5 are the "True Trolls" like CrystalMusic, thecanadian/co/mrade, etc. Because these True Trolls are harder to Report for Abuse because they don't play Rated.

james123 wrote:However the 6th problem on DB that is way worse than the Other 5 are the "True Trolls" like CrystalMusic, thecanadian/co/mrade, etc. Because these True Trolls are harder to Report for Abuse because they don't play Rated.

Not that hard to report it’s just harder to take action but if all a user does is make every player they come across have a miserable experience on the site then they don’t need to be here.

i mean i know this dude aint an alt and every time someone complains darkpheonix is with the "blah blah blah" bull instead of addressing the problem he says blah blah blah its an alt this is all he says plus nothing in the rules that states if someone does something another account linked to the computer is gonna be punished as well I mean the first account boosted everyone knows that but there's 0 proof that he was on the account that did the deed accept its just on his computer at least put it in the rules before enforcing it and the judge mistrust problem is real I personally only trust 3755 and most of the judges within the hundreds and other users don't trust them as well and I have seen cases of over punishing or what can be called it by most instead of going oh alt shut up either help understand and fix the problem or debunk it with real evidence not hey darkcyborg or shut up that's what I have to say

Genexwrecker wrote:

james123 wrote:However the 6th problem on DB that is way worse than the Other 5 are the "True Trolls" like CrystalMusic, thecanadian/co/mrade, etc. Because these True Trolls are harder to Report for Abuse because they don't play Rated.

Not that hard to report it’s just harder to take action but if all a user does is make every player they come across have a miserable experience on the site then they don’t need to be here.

Oh come on! These guys are in Unrated and takes a lot of attempts to get them Frozen or Banned