Duelingbook Forum

CrystalMusic wrote:

Darkraiclone wrote:

NiwatoriFTW wrote:Well, I already shared the points of why Extravagance is at 3 instead of being limited or banned.

I just can't help it but see how you want some upper authority intervention to make the game meet your expectations, instead of just adapting to the changes that happened in the course of over a decade and half and proving your skills against different situations you are put against.

I believe the answer to that question is quite obvious, he either can't prove his skill at the game or he simply won't. And given the fact of how he is willing to change his own rules on the fly to claim his opponent broke the rules, it's clear that all CrystalMusic cares about is winning, not having a fun or fair game, just to win. Which leads to the question, of why doesn't he just build a tier 1 meta deck and get as many wins till his heart's content instead of making things harder on himself by making up all these rules?

maybe you forgot but, i dont like meta, unless six sams are meta. then six sams are my go to.

CrystalMusic wrote:that was when i made a deck to give ppl a taste of their own un-unique medicine.

CrystalMusic wrote:

Darkraiclone wrote:

NiwatoriFTW wrote:Well, I already shared the points of why Extravagance is at 3 instead of being limited or banned.

I just can't help it but see how you want some upper authority intervention to make the game meet your expectations, instead of just adapting to the changes that happened in the course of over a decade and half and proving your skills against different situations you are put against.

I believe the answer to that question is quite obvious, he either can't prove his skill at the game or he simply won't. And given the fact of how he is willing to change his own rules on the fly to claim his opponent broke the rules, it's clear that all CrystalMusic cares about is winning, not having a fun or fair game, just to win. Which leads to the question, of why doesn't he just build a tier 1 meta deck and get as many wins till his heart's content instead of making things harder on himself by making up all these rules?

maybe you forgot but, i dont like meta, unless six sams are meta. then six sams are my go to.

Darkraiclone wrote:

CrystalMusic wrote:

Darkraiclone wrote:I believe the answer to that question is quite obvious, he either can't prove his skill at the game or he simply won't. And given the fact of how he is willing to change his own rules on the fly to claim his opponent broke the rules, it's clear that all CrystalMusic cares about is winning, not having a fun or fair game, just to win. Which leads to the question, of why doesn't he just build a tier 1 meta deck and get as many wins till his heart's content instead of making things harder on himself by making up all these rules?

maybe you forgot but, i dont like meta, unless six sams are meta. then six sams are my go to.

If built and ran properly, they can outplay most top tier decks, even Superheavy Samurais can outplay the meta, and they strictly play monsters.

Renji Asuka wrote:

CrystalMusic wrote:

Darkraiclone wrote:I believe the answer to that question is quite obvious, he either can't prove his skill at the game or he simply won't. And given the fact of how he is willing to change his own rules on the fly to claim his opponent broke the rules, it's clear that all CrystalMusic cares about is winning, not having a fun or fair game, just to win. Which leads to the question, of why doesn't he just build a tier 1 meta deck and get as many wins till his heart's content instead of making things harder on himself by making up all these rules?

maybe you forgot but, i dont like meta, unless six sams are meta. then six sams are my go to.

Six Sams are a "Spam Deck" which is against your rules, so glad to know you break your own rules.

CrystalMusic wrote:why?
1: its easily abusable (all u need is some pointless cards in your extradeck to use it)
2: because of #1 its a FREE draw 2
3: because of 1 & 2 its basically a PoG (which may i remind you IS banned) replacement

edit: IMO it should have an errata that says: You can only activate 1 "Pot of Extravagance" per duel.
edit 2: i did not make this post because i hate the card, despite it being annoying, its because people only use it to abuse it!
edit 3: despite i CAN counter this with D.D Dynamite which would inflict anywhere from 900 - 1800 damage a pop after one uses Pot of Extravagance, its still a nuisance

CrystalMusic wrote:why?
1: its easily abusable (all u need is some pointless cards in your extradeck to use it)
2: because of #1 its a FREE draw 2
3: because of 1 & 2 its basically a PoG (which may i remind you IS banned) replacement

edit: IMO it should have an errata that says: You can only activate 1 "Pot of Extravagance" per duel.
edit 2: i did not make this post because i hate the card, despite it being annoying, its because people only use it to abuse it!
edit 3: despite i CAN counter this with D.D Dynamite which would inflict anywhere from 900 - 1800 damage a pop after one uses Pot of Extravagance, its still a nuisance

CrystalMusic wrote: forgot but, i dont like meta, unless six sams are meta. then six sams are my go to.

KTeknis wrote:

CrystalMusic wrote: forgot but, i dont like meta, unless six sams are meta. then six sams are my go to.

Ah, you remind me of my young self when i was In dueling network in Xyz era. My deck there is Six Sams, but i was a fool in deckbuilding there that i kept losing a lot.
I think i might try a Six Sams deck again, considering how many supports there are now, also Shi En synchro is now at 3.