The greatest dueling simulator on earth
https://forum.duelingbook.com/
Lil Oldman wrote:Not that the deck is good, but why not run Gearbreed if you are so adamant on playing Equip Spells
AnimeMasterDub wrote:Lil Oldman wrote:Not that the deck is good, but why not run Gearbreed if you are so adamant on playing Equip Spells
because there aren't that many fire/gemini monsters in the deck
Lil Oldman wrote:AnimeMasterDub wrote:Lil Oldman wrote:Not that the deck is good, but why not run Gearbreed if you are so adamant on playing Equip Spells
because there aren't that many fire/gemini monsters in the deck
So, you are willing to play a monster that destroys the cards you equip to it, and NOTHING else, but not the card that searches the darn equip spells.
Lil Oldman wrote:AnimeMasterDub wrote:Lil Oldman wrote:Not that the deck is good, but why not run Gearbreed if you are so adamant on playing Equip Spells
because there aren't that many fire/gemini monsters in the deck
So, you are willing to play a monster that destroys the cards you equip to it, and NOTHING else, but not the card that searches the darn equip spells.
greg503 wrote:Lil Oldman wrote:AnimeMasterDub wrote:because there aren't that many fire/gemini monsters in the deck
So, you are willing to play a monster that destroys the cards you equip to it, and NOTHING else, but not the card that searches the darn equip spells.
"Searches" by replacing your draw, which isn't the best given that you would both want a monster capable of using the Equip Spell to search one, and that you might draw an Equip for turn anyways
AnimeMasterDub wrote:These decks I made from scratch. Any constructive criticism would be helpful
Note: SAYING SCRAP THE DECK AND MAKE a "Insert name of deck that I don't like" ISN'T CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10499694 Dark Magician
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10497059 Odd-eyes
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10508395 D/D/D (shelved due to too many risks and complications)
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10512024 Blue-Eyes
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10514286 Blackwing (shelved due to people saying blackwing synchro monsters are outdated)
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10516978 Melodious
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10517048 Red-Eyes ( Do not suggest Dragoon)
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10519816 SuperHeavy Samurai
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10519010 Harpie
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10521523 Abyss Actors (hard work in progress)
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10536847 Elemental (Do not suggest mask cards)
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10536953 Kuriboh (Honestly not my best work)
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10539439 BLS
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10542384 Evil Rock
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10556940 Galaxy-Eyes
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10557533 Toon
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10557603 Amazon
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10557668 Summoned Skull
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10566375 Ancient Gear
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10608524 Cyber Dragon
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10608569 CyberDark
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10658211 Gearfried
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10675630 Goyo
ominous wrote:AnimeMasterDub wrote:These decks I made from scratch. Any constructive criticism would be helpful
Note: SAYING SCRAP THE DECK AND MAKE a "Insert name of deck that I don't like" ISN'T CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10499694 Dark Magician
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10497059 Odd-eyes
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10508395 D/D/D (shelved due to too many risks and complications)
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10512024 Blue-Eyes
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10514286 Blackwing (shelved due to people saying blackwing synchro monsters are outdated)
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10516978 Melodious
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10517048 Red-Eyes ( Do not suggest Dragoon)
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10519816 SuperHeavy Samurai
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10519010 Harpie
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10521523 Abyss Actors (hard work in progress)
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10536847 Elemental (Do not suggest mask cards)
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10536953 Kuriboh (Honestly not my best work)
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10539439 BLS
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10542384 Evil Rock
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10556940 Galaxy-Eyes
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10557533 Toon
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10557603 Amazon
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10557668 Summoned Skull
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10566375 Ancient Gear
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10608524 Cyber Dragon
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10608569 CyberDark
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10658211 Gearfried
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10675630 Goyo
your decks are bad, and you should try referencing other peoples builds, you dont gain anything by playing bad decks "you made yourself"
AnimeMasterDub wrote:greg503 wrote:Lil Oldman wrote:So, you are willing to play a monster that destroys the cards you equip to it, and NOTHING else, but not the card that searches the darn equip spells.
"Searches" by replacing your draw, which isn't the best given that you would both want a monster capable of using the Equip Spell to search one, and that you might draw an Equip for turn anyways
to put it simply a search at the cost of a normal draw isn't worth it in 99% of situations the only 1 exception is with malefic worlds search effect since you get a power malefic monster no matter what
Renji Asuka wrote:ominous wrote:AnimeMasterDub wrote:These decks I made from scratch. Any constructive criticism would be helpful
Note: SAYING SCRAP THE DECK AND MAKE a "Insert name of deck that I don't like" ISN'T CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10499694 Dark Magician
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10497059 Odd-eyes
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10508395 D/D/D (shelved due to too many risks and complications)
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10512024 Blue-Eyes
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10514286 Blackwing (shelved due to people saying blackwing synchro monsters are outdated)
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10516978 Melodious
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10517048 Red-Eyes ( Do not suggest Dragoon)
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10519816 SuperHeavy Samurai
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10519010 Harpie
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10521523 Abyss Actors (hard work in progress)
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10536847 Elemental (Do not suggest mask cards)
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10536953 Kuriboh (Honestly not my best work)
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10539439 BLS
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10542384 Evil Rock
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10556940 Galaxy-Eyes
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10557533 Toon
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10557603 Amazon
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10557668 Summoned Skull
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10566375 Ancient Gear
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10608524 Cyber Dragon
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10608569 CyberDark
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10658211 Gearfried
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=10675630 Goyo
your decks are bad, and you should try referencing other peoples builds, you dont gain anything by playing bad decks "you made yourself"
That isn't real feedback.
You need to tell him why they're bad.
ominous wrote:Renji Asuka wrote:ominous wrote:your decks are bad, and you should try referencing other peoples builds, you dont gain anything by playing bad decks "you made yourself"
That isn't real feedback.
You need to tell him why they're bad.
pretty sure just saying "theyre bad" is by definition feedback, and i did explain why they were bad, theyre bad because they chose to build the decks "by themselves" instead of referencing other builds of the same deck.
AnimeMasterDub wrote:ominous wrote:Renji Asuka wrote:That isn't real feedback.
You need to tell him why they're bad.
pretty sure just saying "theyre bad" is by definition feedback, and i did explain why they were bad, theyre bad because they chose to build the decks "by themselves" instead of referencing other builds of the same deck.
1) Renji is right saying that they're bad isn't real feedback
2) I was told that I should be making decks from scratch instead of copying other people's decks
Lil Oldman wrote:AnimeMasterDub wrote:ominous wrote:pretty sure just saying "theyre bad" is by definition feedback, and i did explain why they were bad, theyre bad because they chose to build the decks "by themselves" instead of referencing other builds of the same deck.
1) Renji is right saying that they're bad isn't real feedback
2) I was told that I should be making decks from scratch instead of copying other people's decks
Copying =/= referencing
AnimeMasterDub wrote:Lil Oldman wrote:AnimeMasterDub wrote:1) Renji is right saying that they're bad isn't real feedback
2) I was told that I should be making decks from scratch instead of copying other people's decks
Copying =/= referencing
even if that were the case the decks already made by someone else are perfect the way they are and don't need to be changed in any way so it would still be like copying their decks
ominous wrote:AnimeMasterDub wrote:Lil Oldman wrote:Copying =/= referencing
even if that were the case the decks already made by someone else are perfect the way they are and don't need to be changed in any way so it would still be like copying their decks
Wow, so in otherwords you lack the ability to innovate....?
AnimeMasterDub wrote:Lil Oldman wrote:AnimeMasterDub wrote:1) Renji is right saying that they're bad isn't real feedback
2) I was told that I should be making decks from scratch instead of copying other people's decks
Copying =/= referencing
even if that were the case the decks already made by someone else are perfect the way they are and don't need to be changed in any way so it would still be like copying their decks
AnimeMasterDub wrote:Lil Oldman wrote:AnimeMasterDub wrote:1) Renji is right saying that they're bad isn't real feedback
2) I was told that I should be making decks from scratch instead of copying other people's decks
Copying =/= referencing
even if that were the case the decks already made by someone else are perfect the way they are and don't need to be changed in any way so it would still be like copying their decks
Lil Oldman wrote:AnimeMasterDub wrote:Lil Oldman wrote:Copying =/= referencing
even if that were the case the decks already made by someone else are perfect the way they are and don't need to be changed in any way so it would still be like copying their decks
What are you insinuating? That everybody that has the spare time to upload aomething to deckshop pro is the equivalent of god? Nobody is perfect, I can say the same about you and your decks and the argument just falls apart.
AnimeMasterDub wrote:Lil Oldman wrote:AnimeMasterDub wrote:even if that were the case the decks already made by someone else are perfect the way they are and don't need to be changed in any way so it would still be like copying their decks
What are you insinuating? That everybody that has the spare time to upload aomething to deckshop pro is the equivalent of god? Nobody is perfect, I can say the same about you and your decks and the argument just falls apart.
I never claimed that the decks I made from scratch are perfect If I thought they were I wouldn't have made this thread and posted them on it.
I am insinuating the decks that are posted online on other websites besides the duelingbook are carefully made so they are at their most efficient in other works there is no way to improve those decks. If you think that is false then I'll test your theory by posting a deck that a copied from another's deck list and you can tell me how it can be improved.