I'm Banned for no Reason

[TheRoyalAu]

Care to explain? I see it as illegal.

[greg503]

Just use the appeal feature at posting.php?mode=post&f=6

[TheRoyalAu]

I did, I'm awaiting an explanation.

[greg503]

Well it probably won't be on this thread

[TheRoyalAu]

I have breached none of these rules:

https://www.duelingbook.com/rules

[Genexwrecker]

I have breached none of these rules:

https://www.duelingbook.com/rules

You did that is why you were frozen.

[TheRoyalAu]

I have breached none of these rules:

https://www.duelingbook.com/rules

You did that is why you were frozen.

Pardon me? I'm lost... :/

[TheRoyalAu]

You cannot ban anyone for abiding by the rules. And from the rules I have read, I still have not found that explanation that states I have done something wrong.

[Renji Asuka]

Keep in mind any company can ban you for any reason at their sole discretion.

Also you're lying about not breaking any rules. The judges here don't typically abuse their power. (I haven't seen a case of it happening at least on the forums.)

[greg503]

Have you by chance been using a VPN or other network used by a lot of people?

[Genexwrecker]

Have you by chance been using a VPN or other network used by a lot of people?

They did not

[Genexwrecker]

Keep in mind any company can ban you for any reason at their sole discretion.

Also you're lying about not breaking any rules. The judges here don't typically abuse their power. (I haven't seen a case of it happening at least on the forums.)

In 4 years iv only seen 3 judges abuse their power and they were immediately terminated in less than 24 hours of each incident. I also wouldnt call it lying. A lot of people are in the mindset that their childish behavior isnt punishable or is not punishable if not explicitly states on the rules page.

[Sound4]

What exactly were you frozen for? What did the judge say what you were frozen for?

[Sound4]

Keep in mind any company can ban you for any reason at their sole discretion.

Also you're lying about not breaking any rules. The judges here don't typically abuse their power. (I haven't seen a case of it happening at least on the forums.)

In 4 years iv only seen 3 judges abuse their power and they were immediately terminated in less than 24 hours of each incident. I also wouldnt call it lying. A lot of people are in the mindset that their childish behavior isnt punishable or is not punishable if not explicitly states on the rules page.

It isn't about just abusing power judges can make poor decisions. Then the judge doesn't want to listen to anything the player is saying. There are literally replays that judges don't want to to either take into consideration what the player is saying or just intentionally ignores them without giving an explanation. Another thing is ban/freeze appeals are definitely not answered abuse reports are but not appeals. You can go a month without even a reply.

[greg503]

Then the judge doesn't want to listen to anything the player is saying. There are literally replays that judges don't want to to either take into consideration what the player is saying or just intentionally ignores them without giving an explanation.

Have you considered that sometimes actions speak louder than words? That some players would make excuses that don't work?

[Sound4]

Then the judge doesn't want to listen to anything the player is saying. There are literally replays that judges don't want to to either take into consideration what the player is saying or just intentionally ignores them without giving an explanation.

Have you considered that sometimes actions speak louder than words? That some players would make excuses that don't work?

That is why it is important for the judge to listen to the player on why the player took that action. Some players do make excuses but this must be proved with evidence not assumptions.

[Genexwrecker]

Then the judge doesn't want to listen to anything the player is saying. There are literally replays that judges don't want to to either take into consideration what the player is saying or just intentionally ignores them without giving an explanation.

Have you considered that sometimes actions speak louder than words? That some players would make excuses that don't work?

That is why it is important for the judge to listen to the player on why the player took that action. Some players do make excuses but this must be proved with evidence not assumptions.

We dont always need solid evidence of x behavior if a player keeps walking a line we can make that kudgement call to issue a penalty.

[Sound4]

Have you considered that sometimes actions speak louder than words? That some players would make excuses that don't work?

That is why it is important for the judge to listen to the player on why the player took that action. Some players do make excuses but this must be proved with evidence not assumptions.

We dont always need solid evidence of x behavior if a player keeps walking a line we can make that kudgement call to issue a penalty.

What do you mean by walking a line? Also yes it is important to have evidence or else it seems like you are giving punishments just for the fun of it.

[greg503]

That is why it is important for the judge to listen to the player on why the player took that action. Some players do make excuses but this must be proved with evidence not assumptions.

We dont always need solid evidence of x behavior if a player keeps walking a line we can make that kudgement call to issue a penalty.

What do you mean by walking a line? Also yes it is important to have evidence or else it seems like you are giving punishments just for the fun of it.

The evidence IS that the player is acting suspicious, such as only communicating certain actions as if they intend to shark.

[Genexwrecker]

That is why it is important for the judge to listen to the player on why the player took that action. Some players do make excuses but this must be proved with evidence not assumptions.

We dont always need solid evidence of x behavior if a player keeps walking a line we can make that kudgement call to issue a penalty.

What do you mean by walking a line? Also yes it is important to have evidence or else it seems like you are giving punishments just for the fun of it.

A lot of cases will not have 100% evidence. That is when our opinions and evaluations are what are used to determine if penalties are needed for x behavior