Support » Suggestions

This card must be fixed.
1st. doesnt have the green button when it's in the hand for apply 1st eff.
2nd. isnt possible ban fd 3 cards from extra for apply 2nd eff. when it's on the field the green button apply erronealy the cost for the 1st eff instead of ban fd 3 from extra.

ban fd is always dangerous coz has a bad fixing.
i think is better to eliminate the gren button of this card when it's on the field.

Or just don't click the green section. But hey let's remove Banish from field when nothing can banish it also, just because you got misclick issues.

TL DR I disagree with changing, because it's only being done for YOUR convenience, not others.

Of course, you're free to accept or reject all suggest.
But ban 3 fd from extra until yesterday isn't possible and this is a problem.
I mean that 3 banned cards aren't public knowledge.
Also I mean the actual green button must be visible in hand and in gy, not elsewhere.

[quote="M112x":2g6ww0ms]Of course, you're free to accept or reject all suggest.
But ban 3 fd from extra until yesterday isn't possible and this is a problem.
I mean that 3 banned cards aren't public knowledge.[/quote:2g6ww0ms]
So you got the function yesterday...
What's the problem specifically? I am having issues understanding what you are suggesting you believe to be an issue.

[quote="M112x":2g6ww0ms]Also I mean the actual green button must be visible in hand and in gy, not elsewhere.[/quote:2g6ww0ms]

This I can agree with, as well as some coding that could be applied for "Auto Apply Functions" and have it able to be disabled. Such as as soon as Pot of Desires were to be played, it automatically Banishes the Top 10 Cards.
User Functions can be edited per profile to allow this for themselves personally, would not impact their opponent, and would add speed to the duels, and speed to the Admin Calls that would result even if slightly faster than the normal it would be a great addition for the site's software and user interest from my perspective. Thoughts of that?

Coz until 14/8 i didnt play in db

ty for implementation of 2nd point