Duelingbook Forum

Renji Asuka wrote:

itsmetristan wrote:

eyal282 wrote:This is time consuming. I made fixes to this feature by banishing, and right clicking the banish pile returns them to bottom deck

It's as easy as using /banish[x] (x is the number of cards you need to excavate) or /mill[x] and then returning them to the deck or whichever location they need to go. It takes 15-20 seconds to do if you're dealing with a significant number of cards. We're not going add a nonexistent zone that will confuse players just so some can save a few seconds when excavating. Playing on DB isn't a speedrun, not everything needs to be optimized to be as fast as possible.

If I recall, we can only /mill or /banish up to 9 at a time. It'd be nice to go to a higher limit if possible.

Genexwrecker wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:

itsmetristan wrote:It's as easy as using /banish[x] (x is the number of cards you need to excavate) or /mill[x] and then returning them to the deck or whichever location they need to go. It takes 15-20 seconds to do if you're dealing with a significant number of cards. We're not going add a nonexistent zone that will confuse players just so some can save a few seconds when excavating. Playing on DB isn't a speedrun, not everything needs to be optimized to be as fast as possible.

If I recall, we can only /mill or /banish up to 9 at a time. It'd be nice to go to a higher limit if possible.

I will see about an increase

eyal282 wrote:

Genexwrecker wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:If I recall, we can only /mill or /banish up to 9 at a time. It'd be nice to go to a higher limit if possible.

I will see about an increase

This may cause mistypes where people will mill 22 instead of 2.

Renji Asuka wrote:

eyal282 wrote:

Genexwrecker wrote:I will see about an increase

This may cause mistypes where people will mill 22 instead of 2.

Not an argument to prevent the increase for the limit. People can proofread what they typed.

eyal282 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:

eyal282 wrote:
This may cause mistypes where people will mill 22 instead of 2.

Not an argument to prevent the increase for the limit. People can proofread what they typed.

Sounds disastrous.

Renji Asuka wrote:

eyal282 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:Not an argument to prevent the increase for the limit. People can proofread what they typed.

Sounds disastrous.

It isn't. You just have no real argument.

eyal282 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:

eyal282 wrote:
Sounds disastrous.

It isn't. You just have no real argument.

Sure, be prepared to have more judge calls for that argument I don't have.

eyal282 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:

eyal282 wrote:
Sounds disastrous.

It isn't. You just have no real argument.

Sure, be prepared to have more judge calls for that argument I don't have.

eyal282 wrote:Thoughts on adding Master Duel as a format?

I understand the dislike of adding old formats like Edison, but master duel will surely be an interesting add.


Card Pool of MD.txt

Code to extract the cards from master duel meta:

Code.js

Example of how to use the code:

This is an example to turn the client-sided array "Cards" into a list of Master Duel Cards

Edit: I mean of course, unranked. Master Duel ranked is a bit not feasable unless DB booms in popularity.

Genexwrecker wrote:

eyal282 wrote:Thoughts on adding Master Duel as a format?

I understand the dislike of adding old formats like Edison, but master duel will surely be an interesting add.


Card Pool of MD.txt

Code to extract the cards from master duel meta:

Code.js

Example of how to use the code:

This is an example to turn the client-sided array "Cards" into a list of Master Duel Cards

Edit: I mean of course, unranked. Master Duel ranked is a bit not feasable unless DB booms in popularity.

Master duel is not a format it is a videogame ip. We will not infringe that.

eyal282 wrote:Ability to like & dislike custom cards, eventually able to view ranks on customs based on the feedback & sorting by likes when searching for custom cards for an archetype.

LimpBizkit4real wrote:So you guys did add stat changing