Duelingbook Forum

greg503 wrote:The unchained guy topped off of the back of Ice Dragon's Prison and D Shifter, Floowandereeze can just do that better now

Floowandereeze don't play ice dragon's prison.

Sound4 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:

Sound4 wrote:"A" the person topping was beating multiple top tier decks with unchained consistently not just one but multiple.

Did I stutter?

What do you mean?

That that top proves nothing

Sound4 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:

Sound4 wrote:"A" the person topping was beating multiple top tier decks with unchained consistently not just one but multiple.

Did I stutter?

What do you mean?

It's a non argument as I already covered that, which you seem to ignore. I'm not going to repeat my arguments to you.

Renji Asuka wrote:

Sound4 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:Did I stutter?

What do you mean?

It's a non argument as I already covered that, which you seem to ignore. I'm not going to repeat my arguments to you.

You said "a" as in he beat one top tier deck but he was beating multiple top tier decks. Your post does not answer my point.

greg503 wrote:

Sound4 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:Did I stutter?

What do you mean?

That that top proves nothing

How? Explain

Okay, so the crux of your argument Sound has been "a good pilot can bring the most outta a deck". No shit, Sherlock. This applies to ANY deck in the game.

Also, yes Coder is a good Unchained pilot but 1 event top does not prove its status as a meta or more than a rogue deck. Anyone can have a good run at a tournament, the meta and top decks are defined by how consistenrly they top.

I want to see Unchained play against Splight

Sound4 wrote:

greg503 wrote:

Sound4 wrote:What do you mean?

That that top proves nothing

How? Explain

"A broken clock is right twice a day"
Meaning:
The phrase even a broken clock is right twice a day means that occasionally, even [thing] considered unreliable can [do what it should/what's correct].

Note: This phrase is also said as ‘even a stopped clock is right twice a day.’ (The word ‘broken’ is sometimes substituted for the word ‘stopped.’)

Origin Of ‘Even a Broken Clock Is Right Twice a Day’
A broken clock is obviously going to be unreliable, as it cannot properly tell you the time. So whenever you look at it, the time it shows will be wrong. Well, mostly, because even a busted clock that has its minute and hour hands stuck in place will still be right twice a day, hence the clock is correct on occasion. This is comparable to a person who, like a broken clock (in that they often give wrong or unreliable information about things), even they can still be correct at times.
This phrase goes back to at least the early 18th century. It was used in a magazine called The Spectator, by Joseph Addison and Richard Steele, from the year 1711:

“If instead of running after the mode, they would continue fixed in one certain habit, the mode would come time or other overtake them, as a clock that stands still is sure to point right once in twelve hours.”

Sound4 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:

Sound4 wrote:What do you mean?

It's a non argument as I already covered that, which you seem to ignore. I'm not going to repeat my arguments to you.

You said "a" as in he beat one top tier deck but he was beating multiple top tier decks. Your post does not answer my point.

Did I stutter?

Renji Asuka wrote:

Sound4 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:It's a non argument as I already covered that, which you seem to ignore. I'm not going to repeat my arguments to you.

You said "a" as in he beat one top tier deck but he was beating multiple top tier decks. Your post does not answer my point.

Did I stutter?

Nice way to avoid an argument. So I assuming that you have no response.

ScottyAdams wrote:Okay, so the crux of your argument Sound has been "a good pilot can bring the most outta a deck". No shit, Sherlock. This applies to ANY deck in the game.

Also, yes Coder is a good Unchained pilot but 1 event top does not prove its status as a meta or more than a rogue deck. Anyone can have a good run at a tournament, the meta and top decks are defined by how consistenrly they top.

The Deck just doesn't have good representation. Also yes the top does mean something especially when Christen57, Greg503 and Renji Asuka were all saying unchained was bad and can't top outside of a locals. Once I showed the proof they had no response.

Lil Oldman wrote:I want to see Unchained play against Splight

That is in the OCG

Sound4 wrote:

Lil Oldman wrote:I want to see Unchained play against Splight

That is in the OCG

Splight will come in the TCG soon enough.

Sound4 wrote:

Lil Oldman wrote:I want to see Unchained play against Splight

That is in the OCG

Nice argument avoidance.

Sound4 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:

Sound4 wrote:You said "a" as in he beat one top tier deck but he was beating multiple top tier decks. Your post does not answer my point.

Did I stutter?

Nice way to avoid an argument. So I assuming that you have no response.

To avoid an argument, you first have to actually make one

Sound4 wrote:

ScottyAdams wrote:Okay, so the crux of your argument Sound has been "a good pilot can bring the most outta a deck". No shit, Sherlock. This applies to ANY deck in the game.

Also, yes Coder is a good Unchained pilot but 1 event top does not prove its status as a meta or more than a rogue deck. Anyone can have a good run at a tournament, the meta and top decks are defined by how consistenrly they top.

The Deck just doesn't have good representation. Also yes the top does mean something especially when Christen57, Greg503 and Renji Asuka were all saying unchained was bad and can't top outside of a locals. Once I showed the proof they had no response.

Repeat after me: Meta game rule 1: The more something is used in competitive play, especially without budget/supply/time restrictions, the more likely it is to be actually good. When something sees almost little to no representation in competitive play, it is bad.
Thus, Unchained is bad until multiple players top with it, or many players enter multiple reputable tourneys with it, which won't happen with the way the archtype is now

Sound4 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:

Sound4 wrote:You said "a" as in he beat one top tier deck but he was beating multiple top tier decks. Your post does not answer my point.

Did I stutter?

Nice way to avoid an argument. So I assuming that you have no response.

You keep bringing up arguments that were already covered and tried to again.

So shut your bitch ass up.

Guys, you know he's just going to continue ignoring every argument you make, and then pretend like you haven't said anything, right

troglyte wrote:Guys, you know he's just going to continue ignoring every argument you make, and then project his own illiteracy onto you, right?

True, but I'd rather deal with this drama rather than another politically heavy debate

troglyte wrote:Guys, you know he's just going to continue ignoring every argument you make, and then pretend like you haven't said anything, right

I'm just sick of the notifications tbh.