Sound4 wrote:Renji Asuka wrote:Sound4 wrote:Yet you fail to explain how my evidence works against me. You clearly have no more arguments.
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=815175-40439894
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=815175-40407305
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=815175-40344564
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=815175-40344266
https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=815175-40322082
5 straight wins with Unchained vs literally tier 1 and above decks yet unchained is suppost to be "trash".
Which again, ANY DECK CAN BEAT ANY DECK. This argument explains why you win any games. This was already told to you multiple times.
Also if you were a good player, then why isn't your rating in the 1000+? Oh wait, it isn't.
In singles, you have a 28% win rate.
In Match, you have a 42% win rate.
Now tell me exactly how you are good let alone unchained?
Stats don't lie, you have a below 50% win rate.
If unchained WAS good, you'd have an above 50% win rate.
Your own evidence is anecdotal and cannot be considered.
So basically when you have no argument you say "any deck can beat any deck" in am attempt to discredit how good unchained is as you are in denial for no reason. Plus you lack context in terms ofy win rate. First do you seriously think that every single one if those game with unchained? Be seious here as now I think you are trolling. Also a lot of those duels I had to quit and leave because there was no judges online which I can't do anything about.
Math is my argument, and mathematically any deck can beat any deck every once in awhile. Math also discredits your argument of you being a good player let alone unchained being "good". How you lost is irrelevant. If you were a good player, you'd have a higher win rate. That is a fact.