Duelingbook Forum

troglyte wrote:Whether you judge or duel, you absolutely need to have a basic knowledge of the game. A great source for this basic knowledge is the rulebook.

But the rulebook doesn't answer every question. This is where judges come in. It's their duty to understand the more complex aspects of the game in order settle ruling disputes.

Duelists can play without knowing every complex ruling, but there is no good reason to not learn them.

This was never the point I was making read all my replies to Genexwrecker. It seems like you just read Renji Asuka replies then just made this post. Read properly please.

Renji Asuka wrote:

greg503 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:All you have done is dismiss what is being told to you because it was an inconvenience to what you want to claim. If you didn't read the rulebook, you don't know how to play, period.

*don't know how to judge

A person shouldn't be a judge if they don't know how to play the game, and if you don't read the rulebook of any game you shouldn't be playing said game.

Well Genexwrecker judges and he/she has claimed he/she doesn't know how to play the game.

Renji Asuka wrote:

greg503 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:All you have done is dismiss what is being told to you because it was an inconvenience to what you want to claim. If you didn't read the rulebook, you don't know how to play, period.

*don't know how to judge

A person shouldn't be a judge if they don't know how to play the game, and if you don't read the rulebook of any game you shouldn't be playing said game.

Did you know about the Beginner's Guide

Sound4 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:

Sound4 wrote:Read my replies to Genexwrecker and TheRoyalAU I have alread answered this. Read properly please.

All you have done is dismiss what is being told to you because it was an inconvenience to what you want to claim. If you didn't read the rulebook, you don't know how to play, period.

I have not dismissed anything I have replied to everything that you and the other are saying. You didn't get the point of this conversation if you did then you would have known that I said in the of Genexwrecker but you didn't read.

You have though, you kept creating excuses on why the rulebook shouldn't be read.

Sound4 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:

greg503 wrote:*don't know how to judge

A person shouldn't be a judge if they don't know how to play the game, and if you don't read the rulebook of any game you shouldn't be playing said game.

Well Genexwrecker judges and he/she has claimed he/she doesn't know how to play the game.

And GenexWrecker read the rulebook, so they do know how to play the game.

When they said "I don't know how to play the game", they're actually referring to how decks operate.

Sound4 wrote:

troglyte wrote:Whether you judge or duel, you absolutely need to have a basic knowledge of the game. A great source for this basic knowledge is the rulebook.

But the rulebook doesn't answer every question. This is where judges come in. It's their duty to understand the more complex aspects of the game in order settle ruling disputes.

Duelists can play without knowing every complex ruling, but there is no good reason to not learn them.

This was never the point I was making read all my replies to Genexwrecker. It seems like you just read Renji Asuka replies then just made this post. Read properly please.

No, you should read MY post again. Where exactly did I quote or reference YOU in any way? You're incredibly vain if you think my post on the subject had anything to do with you.

Ive noticed a trend... the people "demanding" new judges have no experience being a judge, have no qualifications to be a judge, likely didnt pass the judge test themselves and think the judges we have OWE us their time. since you seem to be parroting the same arguments, ill do the same
Judges are volunteers, wed have more judges if more players were qualified, more judges doesnt necessarily mean well have one on at all times because all judges have their own lives outside of DB

ominous wrote:Ive noticed a trend... the people "demanding" new judges have no experience being a judge, have no qualifications to be a judge, likely didnt pass the judge test themselves and think the judges we have OWE us their time. since you seem to be parroting the same arguments, ill do the same
Judges are volunteers, wed have more judges if more players were qualified, more judges doesnt necessarily mean well have one on at all times because all judges have their own lives outside of DB

I have not even taken the judge exam yet. It is still unacceptable to have 1200 users online and have 1 maybe 2 judges online.

Renji Asuka wrote:

Sound4 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:A person shouldn't be a judge if they don't know how to play the game, and if you don't read the rulebook of any game you shouldn't be playing said game.

Well Genexwrecker judges and he/she has claimed he/she doesn't know how to play the game.

And GenexWrecker read the rulebook, so they do know how to play the game.

When they said "I don't know how to play the game", they're actually referring to how decks operate.

Just because you read the rulebook doesn't mean you know how to play the game. You still need experience.
If you would like to join my tournament and settle this you may duel me next.
https://www.duelingbook.com/tourney?id=10262445 link

troglyte wrote:

Sound4 wrote:

troglyte wrote:Whether you judge or duel, you absolutely need to have a basic knowledge of the game. A great source for this basic knowledge is the rulebook.

But the rulebook doesn't answer every question. This is where judges come in. It's their duty to understand the more complex aspects of the game in order settle ruling disputes.

Duelists can play without knowing every complex ruling, but there is no good reason to not learn them.

This was never the point I was making read all my replies to Genexwrecker. It seems like you just read Renji Asuka replies then just made this post. Read properly please.

No, you should read MY post again. Where exactly did I quote or reference YOU in any way? You're incredibly vain if you think my post on the subject had anything to do with you.

I have read your post. Read my posts to Genexwrecker you will see how a lot of stuff you were saying was an answer to one of my posts to Genexwrecker you just didn't say my name.
If you would like to join my tournament and settle this you may duel me next.
https://www.duelingbook.com/tourney?id=10262445 link

Renji Asuka wrote:

Sound4 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:All you have done is dismiss what is being told to you because it was an inconvenience to what you want to claim. If you didn't read the rulebook, you don't know how to play, period.

I have not dismissed anything I have replied to everything that you and the other are saying. You didn't get the point of this conversation if you did then you would have known that I said in the of Genexwrecker but you didn't read.

You have though, you kept creating excuses on why the rulebook shouldn't be read.

You still don't get the point I never claimed either the rulebook shouldn't be read. You clearly have not read.

Sound4 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:

Sound4 wrote:Well Genexwrecker judges and he/she has claimed he/she doesn't know how to play the game.

And GenexWrecker read the rulebook, so they do know how to play the game.

When they said "I don't know how to play the game", they're actually referring to how decks operate.

Just because you read the rulebook doesn't mean you know how to play the game. You still need experience.
If you would like to join my tournament and settle this you may duel me next.
https://www.duelingbook.com/tourney?id=10262445 link

Actually, yes yes it does mean you know how to play the game if you read the rulebook.

Also no one is interested in your stupid tournament.

Sound4 wrote::(

Renji Asuka wrote:

Sound4 wrote:I have not dismissed anything I have replied to everything that you and the other are saying. You didn't get the point of this conversation if you did then you would have known that I said in the of Genexwrecker but you didn't read.

You have though, you kept creating excuses on why the rulebook shouldn't be read.

You still don't get the point I never claimed either the rulebook shouldn't be read. You clearly have not read.

No, you don't get it. You keep making excuses as to why reading the rulebook shouldn't be read.

Renji Asuka wrote:

Sound4 wrote::(

Renji Asuka wrote:You have though, you kept creating excuses on why the rulebook shouldn't be read.

You still don't get the point I never claimed either the rulebook shouldn't be read. You clearly have not read.

No, you don't get it. You keep making excuses as to why reading the rulebook shouldn't be read.

*isn't, which doesn't counter the point.

Sound4 wrote:

troglyte wrote:

Sound4 wrote:This was never the point I was making read all my replies to Genexwrecker. It seems like you just read Renji Asuka replies then just made this post. Read properly please.

No, you should read MY post again. Where exactly did I quote or reference YOU in any way? You're incredibly vain if you think my post on the subject had anything to do with you.

I have read your post. Read my posts to Genexwrecker you will see how a lot of stuff you were saying was an answer to one of my posts to Genexwrecker you just didn't say my name.
If you would like to join my tournament and settle this you may duel me next.
https://www.duelingbook.com/tourney?id=10262445 link

I know you don't understand what I said, because NOWHERE did I say that you had to read the rulebook to play the game.

This conversation is not about you. Stop pretending that it is.

troglyte wrote:

Sound4 wrote:

troglyte wrote:
No, you should read MY post again. Where exactly did I quote or reference YOU in any way? You're incredibly vain if you think my post on the subject had anything to do with you.

I have read your post. Read my posts to Genexwrecker you will see how a lot of stuff you were saying was an answer to one of my posts to Genexwrecker you just didn't say my name.
If you would like to join my tournament and settle this you y duel me next.
https://www.duelingbook.com/tourney?id=10262445 link

I know you don't understand what I said, because NOWHERE did I say that you had to read the rulebook to play the game.

This conversation is not about you. Stop pretending that it is.

I never said this conversation about me. What are you talking about? The stuff you were saying about you should absolutely read tge rulebook already suggests that you read renji Asuka replies not mine and more of a reply to me.

Renji Asuka wrote:

Sound4 wrote::(

Renji Asuka wrote:You have though, you kept creating excuses on why the rulebook shouldn't be read.

You still don't get the point I never claimed either the rulebook shouldn't be read. You clearly have not read.

No, you don't get it. You keep making excuses as to why reading the rulebook shouldn't be read.

You still don't get the point I never claimed either the rulebook shouldn't be read. You clearly have not read.

Sound4 wrote:

troglyte wrote:

Sound4 wrote:I have read your post. Read my posts to Genexwrecker you will see how a lot of stuff you were saying was an answer to one of my posts to Genexwrecker you just didn't say my name.
If you would like to join my tournament and settle this you y duel me next.
https://www.duelingbook.com/tourney?id=10262445 link

I know you don't understand what I said, because NOWHERE did I say that you had to read the rulebook to play the game.

This conversation is not about you. Stop pretending that it is.

I never said this conversation about me. What are you talking about? The stuff you were saying about you should absolutely read tge rulebook already suggests that you read renji Asuka replies not mine and more of a reply to me.

If it wasn't anything to deal with you, than don't quote it

I find it hilarious that Sound4 liked my comment instead of quoting it, then proceeded to unlike.

Don't think I didn't see that Sound4.

Renji Asuka wrote:I find it hilarious that Sound4 liked my comment instead of quoting it, then proceeded to unlike.

Don't think I didn't see that Sound4.

Misclicks