Duelingbook Forum

greg503 wrote:

TheRoyalAu wrote:

greg503 wrote:Not quite, because they DO own a part of Yu-Gi-Oh, the anime.

It doesn't matter, Fair Use 1971 grant's the use of any copyrighted content for education, criticism, judgement, etc.

It allows for all communication types mentioned under the Fair Use ACT 1971.

But was DN fair use?

Yup, copyright trolls come in all shapes and sizes mate, even in corporate form.

DN used fair use, but they still lost, even though they altered the look of some of the cards and avatar's.

TheRoyalAu wrote:

greg503 wrote:

TheRoyalAu wrote:
It doesn't matter, Fair Use 1971 grant's the use of any copyrighted content for education, criticism, judgement, etc.

It allows for all communication types mentioned under the Fair Use ACT 1971.

But was DN fair use?

Yup, copyright trolls come in all shapes and sizes mate, even in corporate form.

DN used fair use, but they still lost, even though they altered the look of some of the cards and avatar's.

Japan copyright =/= US copyright, but also lol US judicial system

greg503 wrote:

TheRoyalAu wrote:

greg503 wrote:But was DN fair use?

Yup, copyright trolls come in all shapes and sizes mate, even in corporate form.

DN used fair use, but they still lost, even though they altered the look of some of the cards and avatar's.

Japan copyright =/= US copyright, but also lol US judicial system

Did you know that due to the automated copyrighted content ID claim system on YouTube, I have won a total of 53 copyright claims by Square Enix?

TheRoyalAu wrote:

greg503 wrote:

TheRoyalAu wrote:
Yup, copyright trolls come in all shapes and sizes mate, even in corporate form.

DN used fair use, but they still lost, even though they altered the look of some of the cards and avatar's.

Japan copyright =/= US copyright, but also lol US judicial system

Did you know that due to the automated copyrighted content ID claim system on YouTube, I have won a total of 53 copyright claims by Square Enix?

Nice

greg503 wrote:

TheRoyalAu wrote:

greg503 wrote:Japan copyright =/= US copyright, but also lol US judicial system

Did you know that due to the automated copyrighted content ID claim system on YouTube, I have won a total of 53 copyright claims by Square Enix?

Nice

Yup, really f***ing annoying bulls*** by YouTube if you ask me.

To clarify, I didn't say delete the site because of the fair use violations, it's because right now, the game itself is unbalanced and unplayable.

Dark Priscilla wrote:To clarify, I didn't say delete the site because of the fair use violations, it's because right now, the game itself is unbalanced and unplayable.

Yes, but that's just like, your opinion man

Dark Priscilla wrote:To clarify, I didn't say delete the site because of the fair use violations, it's because right now, the game itself is unbalanced and unplayable.

Ahhh you changed idea now?
Mah... i not have words for your childish drama/flame, literally

Dark Priscilla wrote:To clarify, I didn't say delete the site because of the fair use violations, it's because right now, the game itself is unbalanced and unplayable.

LOL, nice backpedal right there.

No you want the site deleted because of toxic users, and ironically you're one of said users.

Also didn't you say you left DB?

So why are you back?

Renji Asuka wrote:

Dark Priscilla wrote:To clarify, I didn't say delete the site because of the fair use violations, it's because right now, the game itself is unbalanced and unplayable.

LOL, nice backpedal right there.

No you want the site deleted because of toxic users, and ironically you're one of said users.

Also didn't you say you left DB?

So why are you back?

ARE they backpedaling their opinion on toxicity though?

greg503 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:

Dark Priscilla wrote:To clarify, I didn't say delete the site because of the fair use violations, it's because right now, the game itself is unbalanced and unplayable.

LOL, nice backpedal right there.

No you want the site deleted because of toxic users, and ironically you're one of said users.

Also didn't you say you left DB?

So why are you back?

ARE they backpedaling their opinion on toxicity though?

Nope, they're just a hypocrite on that matter. There was a screenshot posted of them on the Main Menu being toxic.

Renji Asuka wrote:

greg503 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:LOL, nice backpedal right there.

No you want the site deleted because of toxic users, and ironically you're one of said users.

Also didn't you say you left DB?

So why are you back?

ARE they backpedaling their opinion on toxicity though?

Nope, they're just a hypocrite on that matter. There was a screenshot posted of them on the Main Menu being toxic.

Are you saying that they can't complain about a problem while also being a part of it?

greg503 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:

greg503 wrote:ARE they backpedaling their opinion on toxicity though?

Nope, they're just a hypocrite on that matter. There was a screenshot posted of them on the Main Menu being toxic.

Are you saying that they can't complain about a problem while also being a part of it?

Exactly, its hypocrisy.

Renji Asuka wrote:

greg503 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:Nope, they're just a hypocrite on that matter. There was a screenshot posted of them on the Main Menu being toxic.

Are you saying that they can't complain about a problem while also being a part of it?

Exactly, its hypocrisy.

So are they bad for backpedaling or for being hypocritical?

greg503 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:

greg503 wrote:Are you saying that they can't complain about a problem while also being a part of it?

Exactly, its hypocrisy.

So are they bad for backpedaling or for being hypocritical?

Both.

Renji Asuka wrote:

greg503 wrote:

Renji Asuka wrote:Exactly, its hypocrisy.

So are they bad for backpedaling or for being hypocritical?

Both.

No, either

Reminder, it was not Konami that shut down DuelingNetwork, didn't even bother.

It was Nihon Ad Systems (NAS) sent the C&D to BLS, and the latter didn't want to deal with fighting a major corporation's legal team.

Any interested, full story here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kj-RCr8-W2M

greg503 wrote:

TheRoyalAu wrote:

greg503 wrote:Not quite, because they DO own a part of Yu-Gi-Oh, the anime.

It doesn't matter, Fair Use 1971 grant's the use of any copyrighted content for education, criticism, judgement, etc.

It allows for all communication types mentioned under the Fair Use ACT 1971.

But was DN fair use?

Yup, and the corporate trolls that NAS TV were shut them down.

I mean, I'm not wrong.

Dark Priscilla wrote:I mean, I'm not wrong.

No, you are wrong.