Sound4 wrote:greg503 wrote:Sound4 wrote:Read what I said. You clearly didn't.
No u
You missed the point.
And you're huffing more copium than people who thought they would hit the Adventurer package this list
Sound4 wrote:greg503 wrote:Sound4 wrote:Read what I said. You clearly didn't.
No u
You missed the point.
Sound4 wrote:greg503 wrote:Sound4 wrote:Read what I said. You clearly didn't.
No u
You missed the point.
Sound4 wrote:Christen57 wrote:Sound4 wrote:When did I say Unchained bricks? If you are referring to the "better Shuffling System" thread thatk wasn't Unchained being an inconsistent deck but just the shuffling system in DB being bad. Read properly.
Read what I said to Renji Asuka. If you aren't playing enough going 2nd cards then you are going to lose going 2nd. I already explained why the board breaking cards aren't as good as you think.
Plus this is my deck list.
https://www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=6962272
You didn't say Unchained bricks. You said Unchained has bricks such as Unchained Soul of Disaster, the card you run, while I talked about the rest of Unchained's -1s in card advantage.
https://imgur.com/nwmkYAE
Replace 2 of the Ghost Belles (and probably 1 of the Ash Blossoms as well) with D.D. Crow, and replace (another) 1 of the Ash Blossoms with either a Ghost Ogre or Ghost Mourner.
You basically ignored what I said. You said that a good amount Unchained cards are bricks. I was asking fir you which cards are bricks and you failed to do so.
Sound4 wrote:Renji Asuka wrote:Sound4 wrote:You missed the point I am saying that just because a deck does not have good representation doesn't mean it is bad.
No, you missed the point. You compared a META deck to Unchained as an argument to why Unchained is good because you felt like Virtual World is underrepresented.
Unchained isn't good which is why it doesn't have a lot of people playing the deck. If it was good, it'd had topped a regionals at the very least, it hasn't.
The point was that just because a deck doesn't have good representation doesn't mean it is bad. Plus VW isn't meta because Desires was limited but now it is at 2 so it might become a tier 1 deck soon. Plus here is a person topping with unchained at a tournament.
https://youtu.be/TFytbHzbC8I
Renji Asuka wrote:Sound4 wrote:Renji Asuka wrote:No, you missed the point. You compared a META deck to Unchained as an argument to why Unchained is good because you felt like Virtual World is underrepresented.
Unchained isn't good which is why it doesn't have a lot of people playing the deck. If it was good, it'd had topped a regionals at the very least, it hasn't.
The point was that just because a deck doesn't have good representation doesn't mean it is bad. Plus VW isn't meta because Desires was limited but now it is at 2 so it might become a tier 1 deck soon. Plus here is a person topping with unchained at a tournament.
https://youtu.be/TFytbHzbC8I
I never said VW was T1, what the actual fuck are you smoking? You still compared a deck that WAS META to your shitty Unchained deck that NEVER seen competitive play, let alone top ANY MAJOR EVENT.
greg503 wrote:Renji Asuka wrote:Sound4 wrote:The point was that just because a deck doesn't have good representation doesn't mean it is bad. Plus VW isn't meta because Desires was limited but now it is at 2 so it might become a tier 1 deck soon. Plus here is a person topping with unchained at a tournament.
https://youtu.be/TFytbHzbC8I
I never said VW was T1, what the actual fuck are you smoking? You still compared a deck that WAS META to your shitty Unchained deck that NEVER seen competitive play, let alone top ANY MAJOR EVENT.
*Multiple major events with high representation. Remote Duels count, but 1 top 16 is a fluke
Renji Asuka wrote:Sound4 wrote:Renji Asuka wrote:No, you missed the point. You compared a META deck to Unchained as an argument to why Unchained is good because you felt like Virtual World is underrepresented.
Unchained isn't good which is why it doesn't have a lot of people playing the deck. If it was good, it'd had topped a regionals at the very least, it hasn't.
The point was that just because a deck doesn't have good representation doesn't mean it is bad. Plus VW isn't meta because Desires was limited but now it is at 2 so it might become a tier 1 deck soon. Plus here is a person topping with unchained at a tournament.
https://youtu.be/TFytbHzbC8I
I never said VW was T1, what the actual fuck are you smoking? You still compared a deck that WAS META to your shitty Unchained deck that NEVER seen competitive play, let alone top ANY MAJOR EVENT.
greg503 wrote:Renji Asuka wrote:Sound4 wrote:The point was that just because a deck doesn't have good representation doesn't mean it is bad. Plus VW isn't meta because Desires was limited but now it is at 2 so it might become a tier 1 deck soon. Plus here is a person topping with unchained at a tournament.
https://youtu.be/TFytbHzbC8I
I never said VW was T1, what the actual fuck are you smoking? You still compared a deck that WAS META to your shitty Unchained deck that NEVER seen competitive play, let alone top ANY MAJOR EVENT.
*Multiple major events with high representation. Remote Duels count, but 1 top 16 is a fluke
Sound4 wrote:Renji Asuka wrote:Sound4 wrote:The point was that just because a deck doesn't have good representation doesn't mean it is bad. Plus VW isn't meta because Desires was limited but now it is at 2 so it might become a tier 1 deck soon. Plus here is a person topping with unchained at a tournament.
https://youtu.be/TFytbHzbC8I
I never said VW was T1, what the actual fuck are you smoking? You still compared a deck that WAS META to your shitty Unchained deck that NEVER seen competitive play, let alone top ANY MAJOR EVENT.
I just showed a person topping with unchained. Yet you say no one tops with Unchained or plays it.
Christen57 wrote:Sound4 wrote:Christen57 wrote:
You didn't say Unchained bricks. You said Unchained has bricks such as Unchained Soul of Disaster, the card you run, while I talked about the rest of Unchained's -1s in card advantage.
https://imgur.com/nwmkYAE
Replace 2 of the Ghost Belles (and probably 1 of the Ash Blossoms as well) with D.D. Crow, and replace (another) 1 of the Ash Blossoms with either a Ghost Ogre or Ghost Mourner.
You basically ignored what I said. You said that a good amount Unchained cards are bricks. I was asking fir you which cards are bricks and you failed to do so.
Bricks OR -1s in card advantage, not JUST bricks.
Lil Oldman wrote:Sound4 wrote:greg503 wrote:No u
You missed the point.
No u
Christen57 wrote:Sound4 wrote:Christen57 wrote:
You didn't say Unchained bricks. You said Unchained has bricks such as Unchained Soul of Disaster, the card you run, while I talked about the rest of Unchained's -1s in card advantage.
https://imgur.com/nwmkYAE
Replace 2 of the Ghost Belles (and probably 1 of the Ash Blossoms as well) with D.D. Crow, and replace (another) 1 of the Ash Blossoms with either a Ghost Ogre or Ghost Mourner.
You basically ignored what I said. You said that a good amount Unchained cards are bricks. I was asking fir you which cards are bricks and you failed to do so.
Bricks OR -1s in card advantage, not JUST bricks.
Sound4 wrote:Lil Oldman wrote:Sound4 wrote:You missed the point.
No u
What point have I missed?
Sound4 wrote:Renji Asuka wrote:Sound4 wrote:The point was that just because a deck doesn't have good representation doesn't mean it is bad. Plus VW isn't meta because Desires was limited but now it is at 2 so it might become a tier 1 deck soon. Plus here is a person topping with unchained at a tournament.
https://youtu.be/TFytbHzbC8I
I never said VW was T1, what the actual fuck are you smoking? You still compared a deck that WAS META to your shitty Unchained deck that NEVER seen competitive play, let alone top ANY MAJOR EVENT.
I just showed a person topping with unchained. Yet you say no one tops with Unchained or plays it.
Renji Asuka wrote:Sound4 wrote:Renji Asuka wrote:I never said VW was T1, what the actual fuck are you smoking? You still compared a deck that WAS META to your shitty Unchained deck that NEVER seen competitive play, let alone top ANY MAJOR EVENT.
I just showed a person topping with unchained. Yet you say no one tops with Unchained or plays it.
Which circles back to the argument we already used.
ANY DECK CAN BEAT A TOP TIER DECK EVERY ONCE IN AWHILE.
Stop using anecdotes to support your claim.
greg503 wrote:Sound4 wrote:Lil Oldman wrote:No u
What point have I missed?
That your 21 card core relies exclusively on being destroyed to do things, and only puts up 2 in-archtype disruptions, one of which is neg
Sound4 wrote:Renji Asuka wrote:Sound4 wrote:I just showed a person topping with unchained. Yet you say no one tops with Unchained or plays it.
Which circles back to the argument we already used.
ANY DECK CAN BEAT A TOP TIER DECK EVERY ONCE IN AWHILE.
Stop using anecdotes to support your claim.
"A" the person topping was beating multiple top tier decks with unchained consistently not just one but multiple.
Renji Asuka wrote:Sound4 wrote:Renji Asuka wrote:Which circles back to the argument we already used.
ANY DECK CAN BEAT A TOP TIER DECK EVERY ONCE IN AWHILE.
Stop using anecdotes to support your claim.
"A" the person topping was beating multiple top tier decks with unchained consistently not just one but multiple.
Did I stutter?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 130 guests