Duelingbook Forum

Genexwrecker wrote:well here is my original post viewtopic.php?p=82804#p82804

here is what the terminated account posted https://prnt.sc/MS-ULzSIxK3R
so no you were not terminated for quoting me.

why were they terminated?

https://www.duelingbook.com/replay?id=39685797 This player said " show me the mine and ill scoop " in this duel, meaning he's promising to admit defeat upon seeing the Mystic Mine his opponent was running. However, when that opponent later indeed displayed Mystic Mine, his excuse for not ...

Lil Oldman wrote:

Excellion wrote:Bringing up locked threads? and im allowed to post about it on the main site, i dont have to keep to your echo chamber people on db deserve to know about whats happening here.

I really don't care, I just found it funny. Am I not allowed to post the funy?

No one said you cant

Bringing up locked threads? and im allowed to post about it on the main site, i dont have to keep to your echo chamber people on db deserve to know about whats happening here.

It's almost like you don't know English very well or you don't know how to comprehend what you read. its almost like you dont know how rules are enforced, prove i did something wrong, then the judges will handle it, there is no evidence the alts are mine which is why i havent been banned. Looks lik...

It's almost like you don't know English very well or you don't know how to comprehend what you read. its almost like you dont know how rules are enforced, prove i did something wrong, then the judges will handle it, there is no evidence the alts are mine which is why i havent been banned. Looks lik...

Did I stutter? Or are you just stupid? If. They. Were. Mine. I. Would. not. Be. Here. Also, thanks for adding to the extensive list of evidence for the harrassemtn report, following me into multple threads, telling me to "shut the fuck up" unproked and now outright insulting. i cant wait ...

for all the (baseless) accusations you all have been making, i wonder if you know the rules in the first place? because im curtain youve all violated more rules than i have at this point.

As I told you yesterday, they're still likely investigating the situation. But in this case I'd like to change it up, they're still deciding an appropriate punishment for the member involved. If they were mine, genexwrecker would have said they were mine. He didnt, so we can therefore assume they a...

I mean we know the alts are yours cause I doubt some rando that hasn't said anything would spam the forums. we cant trust anything you say so I wonder why anyone is even asking at this point why you haven't been muted or banned yet could just be debating within the judge team or an outside factor b...

You mean outside of spamming your alts? Still lacking reading comprehension? No if they were my alts and/or those alts broke the rules i would have, therefore, been muted or warned, which i havent. Which means they werent mine. As I told you yesterday, they're still likely investigating the situati...

You mean outside of spamming your alts? Still lacking reading comprehension? No if they were my alts and/or those alts broke the rules i would have, therefore, been muted or warned, which i havent. Which means they werent mine. I mean we know the alts are yours cause I doubt some rando that hasn't ...

Then you must've been let off with a warning at least. Nope no warnings, cause like i said i did nothing wrong i broke no rules. You mean outside of spamming your alts? Still lacking reading comprehension? No if they were my alts and/or those alts broke the rules i would have, therefore, been muted...

Christen57 wrote:

Excellion wrote:

Christen57 wrote:And I assume Excellion's been dealt with as well?

Nope because i have not broken any rules

Then you must've been let off with a warning at least.

Nope no warnings, cause like i said i did nothing wrong i broke no rules.

greg503 wrote:

Excellion wrote:

Christen57 wrote:And I assume Excellion's been dealt with as well?

Nope because i have not broken any rules

I would hope that you wouldn't get salty enough over the arguments to break the forum's rules

Nope

Christen57 wrote:And I assume Excellion's been dealt with as well?

Nope because i have not broken any rules

You've already been told no. How many threads do you have to infiltrate to get it through your thick skull? 1. They dont get to unilaterally decide what does and does not get seen and considered by staff and 2. The reason given is based on "wokeness" which is predicated on bias, as ive be...

What I've gathered is that Nazis didn't have anything to do with the state of the world in 1940. This comparison is implying homophobes have eberything to do with gender politics Nazi: homophobes; state of the world in1940: gender politics. You really should work on your reading comprehension. You ...

Remove the gender select option Pros: less creepy harrasment (you admitted it happens), prevents future "wokeness" (people wont be asking for a "Attack helicopter") people who still want to display their gender on their profile for some reason can do so in their profile notes if...

Can't be projecting when you're bringing stuff back up that was already addressed as if it wasn't. Because it wasnt you still havent pointed to a single example of what yiure accusing me of, you claimed "except the homophobic ones" did, it didnt because the word "homophobic" has...